Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Daniel Cooperman Was Bought Out Because APPLE needed D. Bruce Sewell to fight NOKIA and Other Pressing Complaints.

What ever it Cost to buy out Daniel Cooperman you can be sure it was Worth It.

Obviously this is speculation on my part, however, Come on, What else Could it be

Mark My Words it was Not without a HUGE back Story on Why Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp, What Motivated his Leave, Who had to Sign off on him Leaving, Who had to pay of Daniel Cooperman To Give his Job to D. Bruce Sewell and Just What Bruce Sewell Was bringing to APPLE that they wanted so Bad.

D. Bruce Sewell Knows his Way AROUND Anti-Trust Laws - Durward Bruce Sewell Certainly knows how to shut up those Pesky Inventors and Keep them from having ANY rights or Revenue from What they invented, and who knows what other "Connections" - "Cover Ups" and "Perks" D. Bruce Sewell brings to APPLE.

Maybe it is FCC, SEC, or FTC Connections that D. Bruce Sewell Brings to the APPLE Table, Whatever it Is, I Hope it Was REALLY worth it to APPLE and their Reputation.


$$$$$$

" Intel's Sewell Replaces Cooperman as Apple GC
Zusha Elinson
The Recorder
September 16, 2009

Steve Jobs has shown great staying power.

The general counsel who have served him lately have not.

On Tuesday, Apple Inc. said that its top lawyer, Daniel Cooperman, is retiring after two years on the job. At the same time, the company announced that it's hired D. Bruce Sewell, who stepped down as Intel Corp. GC on Monday.

"We are thrilled to have Bruce Sewell join our executive team, and wish Dan a very happy retirement," said Jobs in a press release.

"With Bruce's extensive experience in litigation, securities and intellectual property, we expect this to be a seamless transition."

The timing of Cooperman's retirement, at the end of this month, is unusual. He is 58 and he is potentially leaving about $17.5 million worth of unvested restricted Apple stock on the table.

Cooperman was granted 133,000 shares of Apple restricted stock on Nov. 1, 2007, after he was personally recruited by Jobs to replace the short-tenured Donald Rosenberg as GC.

Cooperman's stock grant was scheduled to vest over four years and he got the first quarter last fall, worth about $5.8 million at the current $175-a-share value.

The next quarter of the grant was scheduled to
vest on Nov. 1, six weeks from now.

Last year, the company gave Cooperman 60,000 shares that would vest in 2012.

Neither Apple nor Cooperman would say if the company had agreed to give him the stock early.
In an e-mail, Cooperman said he is looking forward to his free time after spending 11 years as the GC of Oracle Corp. and two at Apple.

"It is not often that we get to pursue our dreams," Daniel Cooperman wrote. "After 13 consecutive years in the GC role at two major Valley companies, with virtually no time to myself, I am looking forward to pursuing some other interests: community service, board and advisory roles, consulting, teaching, maybe even taking up golf. But it will be at my own pace, and on my own time."

Cooperman's predecessor, Rosenberg, lasted just 10 months on the job.

An East Coast lawyer from IBM Corp., Rosenberg had been brought on to shine up Apple's image after a stock option backdating scandal landed then-general counsel Nancy Heinen in hot water with the government.

Heinen was charged by the SEC and ultimately settled for $2.2 million. She had lasted nearly 10 years as GC under Jobs.

When Daniel Cooperman was hired, he was seen as a Valley guy who could handle Jobs' strong-willed personality, since he'd previously worked under Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. And most thought he'd be a better fit than Rosenberg, a Silicon Valley outsider.

During his tenure, Daniel Cooperman shaped up Apple's legal department. He hired Charles Charnas from Hewlett-Packard Co. to head up the corporate department, a position that had not been filled for years. He also instituted a preferred provider program where the company whittled down the number of outside law firms it uses.

"I leave Apple with great pride in the talented men and women who staff the Apple Legal Department," Daniel Cooperman wrote. "They have been marvelous colleagues. And, of course, I wish Bruce Sewell the best of luck in his new role."

D. Bruce Sewell will have his hands full.

The company is currently under scrutiny for its public disclosures of Jobs' ailing health.

The company initially downplayed the CEO's health problems last winter, but soon after announced that Jobs would take a six-month leave of absence.

Jobs received a liver transplant. Because investors believe that Jobs is so important to the success of the company, the SEC has reportedly opened an informal investigation into the adequacy of Apple's disclosures.

Apple is also facing an FCC inquiry into why the company rejected a Google software application for the iPhone that allows users to make cheap calls over the Internet. The company also has the usual mix of litigation facing tech companies, like patent infringement and product liability lawsuits.

D. Bruce Sewell , 50, was general counsel at Intel for the past five years.

A litigator by trade, he joined Intel in 1995. He's an old hand with antitrust issues, as one of his primary tasks at the chip company was to fight accusations brought by competitor Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

The European Commission fined Intel a record $1.45 billion for unfairly squashing competition earlier this year.

Intel announced that Sewell was leaving Monday amid a management shakeup. Tuesday's announcement that he would be taking Apple's top spot and Cooperman would be retiring caught the San Francisco Bay Area legal community off guard.

"This is a surprise and we are not going to know the truth of this for a while," said Martha Africa, an in-house recruiter with Major, Lindsey & Africa who was not involved in the deal. "One can speculate why this musical chairs is going on. But what is clear again is that the Valley is again valuing Valley insiders."

Apple did not respond to questions sent via e-mail and Daniel Cooperman didn't respond to questions about the circumstances surrounding his decision to leave.

Links to Read Full Article Above and for More on This...
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202433833262
Daniel Cooperman, Bruce Sewell
So Google was going to Work With APPLE on the iPhone and Now Google has it's own Phone... hmmmm... Not Fair Play over there at Apple no Wonder they needed Bruce Sewell.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Bruce Sewell, the Pompass ASS, Double Talk - "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,”

From the Apple Press Room - Online Of Course.. We have the Double Standards, Flat out Lies and Serious Double Talk from One D. Bruce Sewell General Council to Apple.

I mean this Cannot Really Be CAN IT..?.. Shocking Statement by Now Infamous Double Talker and Patent Infringement Companies BEST BUDDY - Bruce Sewell ...

DurWOOD.. oh I mean DurWard - Bruce Sewell Says THIS...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. " "

OH Yes, there it in Lights. Never Forget this Now Famous Statement that Will End Bruce Sewell's Career as He Once Knew It. Bruce Sewill - the POT Calling the KETTLE Black - per say... as he Smacks down the REAL inventors NOW at his NEW Job at Apple just like he DID at Intel Corp... Now at Intel - CEO Paul Otellini KNEW - we Wonder WHO at APPLE knows the TRUTH about Bruce Sewell and if that is WHY he Was Hired as General Council...

Bruce Sewell knowing Full Well of the Trillion Dollar Patent Theft of the REAL Inventors of the Iviewit Technology - Having FULL knowledge that "other companies" the ONE he was Representing was USING this Stolen Patent and NOT honoring Contract Commitments with the Iviewit Technology Company, and having been Fully Informed of the Importance this Matter was to the Financial Future of the Intel Company and to their Shareholders.... Bruce Sewell withheld this information and Denied the Real Inventors THEIR RIGHTS.

D. Bruce Sewell did this Blatantly, he knew he was above the Law and would never be held accountable for this. For NO ONE would EVER know RIGHT?

Boy if I Was APPLE ... I would Want to Hire the Almighty Bruce Sewell as Well this Way, all those Smart Boys and Girls out there inventing that Really Neat Stuff will have no rights and Get nothing and when they squirm and Fight about it we will just sick Ol' Bruce on Em' - Cuz... Bruce Sewell has Connections in VERY high places, and Bruce Sewell Knows the Ropes when it Comes to SHUTTING up those Pesky inventors, those Patent Owners...

So Again This Statement...

"“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president. "

and Oh Believe Me this Will SOON be the Most Highlighted Statement of D. Bruce Sewell's Career... Anyway...

Iviewit Did Invent "their own Technolgy" - D. Bruce Sewell then of Intel as their "General Counsel" Well he was informed of this.

Bruce Sewell knew that the Technology Was STOLEN - and he stood by the Criminals and NOT with the Victims as he Denied the REAL inventors their rights.

And now when the Shoe is on the Other Foot, the Self Righteous Pompass Ass Bruce Sewell says that " "“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell " -

How in the Heck do you COMPETE with a General Counsel from a MAJOR Tech Company when He is Above the Law, knows the Names and Players, has inside information and Stands Seriously on the WRONG side of the MORAL Compass?

You can't win against Liars like Bruce Sewell. He Condones the Stealing of Patents when at Intel and Now is suggesting that Nokai is Falsley Accusing Apple and that Nokai is "stealing ours" - sounds like a School Yard Bully .... but This School Yard Bully Packs a Trillion Dollar Punch and YOU LOSE!!

Here is the Now Infamous APPLE Press Release...


" Apple Countersues Nokia

CUPERTINO, California—December 11, 2009—Responding to a lawsuit brought against the company by Nokia, Apple® today filed a countersuit claiming that Nokia is infringing 13 Apple patents.

“Other companies must compete with us by inventing their own technologies, not just by stealing ours,” said Bruce Sewell, Apple’s General Counsel and senior vice president.

Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications.

Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.

Press Contacts:
Steve Dowling
Apple
dowling@apple.com
(408) 974-1896

NOTE TO EDITORS:
For additional

Source:
Apples Own Press Room...
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/12/11countersue.html
Copy This, Print It Out... Frame It...

Words Durward... YEP thats his Name..
D. Bruce Sewell ..
Words He WILL never Forget Saying.
Bruce Sewell

CEO Paul Otellini is Guilty of SEC Fraud the Way I See it..

CEO Paul Otellini of Intel knew of a Trillion Dollar Liability and REFUSED to tell his Shareholders. Why ? And now as insider Trading News is going around about Intel and IBM, now Paul Otellini says It is news to us... Paul Otellini KEEPS shareholders in the Dark, Does not Honor Contracts with Inventors and STANDS on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass..

Is all this Not Fraud?


I Guess it is a Matter of Who Ya Know... Boy if I had Intel Stocks I would Sure Be MAD if the Boys in Charge and their Attorney ( Bruce Sewell ) Were .. Well aware of a Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent and were well aware of Contracts they Refused to Make Good on and ... D. Bruce Sewell ... Attorney and CEO Paul Otellini knowing of this HUGE Liability .. and Did they Tell their Shareholders... Is this a Crime? Is it an Ethics Violation? Does it Even Matter at All?

Did Bruce Sewell and CEO Paul Otellini Make any Attempt to Make Good on the Contracts they Assumed... or did they Just Ignore it.. and Now D. Bruce Sewell is at Apple where it Seems he is part of the Fight with Nokio and this Patent Infringment... anyway MUCH More on that Issue and Connected Parties Later...

http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2009/09/apple-hires-bruce-sewell-as-new-general-counsel.html

You will NEVER confince me that CEO Paul Otellini is not GUILTY, that he had no INSIDE information on any of this.

Come on Paul Otellini, as we Well Know .. had Knowledge of a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft which affects Stocks NOT ONLY in CEO Paul Otellini's Company but in many SEC Regulated Companies... Trillions of Dollars and ( Silent Fraud ) CEO Paul Otellini Said NOTHING to Shareholders RIGHT? And doesn't this So Called Pillar of the Financial Community owe any Fiduciary Duty to Other Companies, to Shareholders, to Inventors?

CEO Paul Otellini would have us believe he is NOT involved in this Multi-Billion Dollar Scandal....?? Hmmm.. Well I Say CEO Paul Otellini is GUILTY... But hey that is Just My Opinion.

We all Need to Complain to the SEC ON this guy.

Oh Nevermind CEO Paul Otellini and Intel are Above the Law because of Politicians they Know, Political Favors Owed to Them, Billions of Dollars and Corruption Beyond the Comprehension of Folks who have Morals.

Does the ITC (International Trade Commission) Really Care about Patent Infringement and the True Rights of Inventors, My Guess is AGAIN it is a matter of Who your Connected to, How Much Money the Bad Guys Have and Who is Above the Law, Ethics and Morals of Any Kind.


Why are Lengthy Court Battles Needed in Fights Such as Iviewit Getting their Patent, or in Nokai Getting Their Rights Honored against APPLE?

I mean It should take a Week, may be a month to Read the Patents and to see if they have been used by APPLE and do the right thing.


However, Keeping Nokai, Iviewit and REAL patent owners such as them in Court for years well this keeps Stock Prices Stable as the Decision is Pending and Meanwhile Guys like CEO Paul Otellini, the Apple Owners, Intel Corporation, Warner, Sony, MPEGLA - well they can lie about all this so Shareholders won't panic.

Though the Proof is Right there, if the Courts can be bought off in some way or some how manipulated well then it can drag on for years, GET those Attorneys Plenty of Money and NOT create a Panic in the Stock Market with the TRUTH that there is Trillions in Liability that Have not Been Reported on the Books.


Related Documents and Links...


http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/intel_ceo_paul_otellini_on_galleon_group_091019/


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/federal-complaint-service-intel.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/to-paul-s-otellini-president-and-chief.html



Insider Trading News Links ( Again Print or Copy to your Computer - as Links and Information Disappear once the BOUGHT Media see the Dots Being Connected by Obnoxious Bloggers.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10377395-64.html

http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/10/26/daily153.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/12/11/intel_insider_trader_fined/

More on What CEO Paul Otellini and D. Bruce Sewell ( Now a Liability at APPLE) - More on What they Knew and did not Disclose to Shareholders COMING SOON.... Oh and Don't Think that IBM and Intel Were NOT Talking on this Trillion DOLLAR Patent Theft that WOULD affect both their Stock Prices.


Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Crystal

Broadcom, Apple, Nokia - Heads Up Intel Shareholders

" By MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) --

Among the shares expected to see active trade in Wednesday's session are those of Broadcom Corp., Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp.

Broadcom has agreed to settle a pending class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its current and former officers and directors.

The lawsuit, which is related to the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, was brought on behalf of investors who bought Broadcom's common shares between July 2005 and July 2006.

Under the proposed agreement, the claims against Broadcom and its officers will be dismissed in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by the company. Broadcom will record the settlement amount as a one-time charge in the fourth quarter.

Nokia filed a complaint against Apple with the U.S. International Trade Commission over patent infringements in "virtually all" of its mobile devices, portable music players, and computers.

Nokia claims that Apple is using seven of its patents for key features in its products, including user interface and camera, antenna and power management technologies. "While our litigation in Delaware is about Apple's attempt to free-ride on the back of Nokia investment in wireless standards, the ITC case filed today is about Apple's practice of building its business on Nokia's proprietary innovation," said Paul Melin, general manager of patent licensing at Nokia. Read more about Nokia's complaint against Apple "


Source:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-in-focus-for-wednesday-2009-12-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp


Market Watch... Well Folks If you have STOCK in ANY companies on this BLOG - then don't Say you were NOT Given a Heads Up on the Lies your Company or your Stock Management Team is Feeding YOU... those in charge of your Portfolios, those in the Management and Corporate offices of these Companies - THEY know about a Trillion Dollar Liability and My Guess is NONE of them HAVE it on the BOOKS.

Bruce Sewill


Apple, Broadcom,