Headlines are Simply going Crazy today, as if to get you excited about Your Intel Stock. Come on in the face of an Insider Trading Scandal as with Intel Capital and the SEC Complaints Against Intel Corp. Due to a Trillion Dollar Accounting Error that was not Disclosed by CEO Paul Otellini and then General Council D. Bruce Sewell, I would certainly be Leary of thinking those Stocks are going to Keep Rising... and Of Course not being a Stock Analyst of even someone who owns any Stocks, what Would I Know?
Then let's not forget, isn't the Excitement all about this New Fangled Chip ... well What about Nvidia, How will Intel Corp. Quiet the Noise they are Making with a Competing Chip, or have I got this story all wrong... Ok So... didn't CEO Paul Otellini brag to President Obama about the 7 Billion Intel was putting into the US Job Market - Recent News talks about All that "once a lifetime" investments that Intel (INTC) was making to create factories in Oregon ... and other US States... Right? You Remember all this? Ok .. Well now it seems not all those Factories will be US Based so.. more Intel Lies? Or is the Tech Room Mill just a Bunch of Hooey....?
Did Intel Corp. Get any Kind of Incentives or Deals with the US Promised Jobs that they are Not Following Through on ?
Now onto this Nightmare of Information that Will in My VERY UNeducated, and NON-professional Opinion will sent Intel (INTC) socks plummeting... Well Add to This... SEC Complaints of Insider Trading from Intel Capital, and Suppose that CEO Paul Otellini Really was "Surprised" as he is touting in the Media, well certainly this will affect the Reputation of Intel Corp. Right? Which will in turn affect their Stocks, Right? Or is Intel Corp. and CEO Paul Otellini so Connected and inter-Connected that they are Above all that.... Above the Law, Above Anti-Trust Violations and
Truly, How Long Can CEO Paul Otellini and the Intel Corporation Keep us this Charade to Fool Shareholders?
It seems to Me that the Iviewit Trillion Dollar Accounting LIE and Cover Up would be Enough to RUIN Intel ... but Add to it the Intel Capital Insider Trading Scandal, the Lies and Cover Ups of D. Bruce Sewell and the Nvidia Scandal and Well You certainly have a House of Cards in a Hurricane.
Now Nvidia is creating so much noise for a buy out right? I mean we can't have small companies like Nvidia in the Market with a Better Product making Super Duper Intel Corp. and their head Honcho CEO Paul Otellin Look Bad. So They will Buy Nvidia and the Stocks will Stabilize or Rise... Right? What? I Don't think So... Intel Lies are Falling Down... and there is No Stopping the SEC, the FTC, the Attorney General, the FBI, the Department of Justice FROM Holding Intel Corp. ACCOUNTABLE ... oh Wait... Intel Owns them Right? or Owns Attorneys? or has "People" - Something like that and Intel Will Continue with the Technology Stealing Monopoly and well YOU Lose..
To Read Stock Article Click Below
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=153698&cat=1
Intel (INTC), Intel Stocks, Intel Shareholders,
Below is a Lots of Good Stuff on the Names and Players
of the Galleon Management Insider Trading Scandal
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?s=%22aj+Rajaratnam&x=27&y=12
CEO Paul Otellini
Showing posts with label Nvidia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nvidia. Show all posts
Monday, January 4, 2010
Intel is No Stranger to Crossing the Line of "Fair Play". Intel is an Evil Monopolistic Bullying Company that is Above all Laws and Morals.
April 10th 2008 News Archive
"Nvidia CEO goes on Intel Rant
Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jen-Hsun Huang let rip with a diatribe against Intel at Nvidia's financial analyst day on Thursday. Huang cited frustration with recent Intel comments stating that discrete graphics cards will become "unnecessary."
Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang(Credit: Nvidia)
Because Intel, the world's largest chipmaker, includes integrated-graphics silicon in most of its chipsets the company has become the world's largest supplier of graphics chips.
Its upcoming Nehalem processors will move the graphics from the chipset onto the same piece of silicon as the main processor. A design that is expected to result in vastly better performance.
(Note: A contrarian take on the graphics market states that Nvidia remains the #1 graphics supplier because approximately 73 million Intel integrated graphics processors (IGP) are unused in systems due to "double-attach" with an Nvidia solution, according to Doug Freedman of American Technology Research. More here at ExtremeTech.)
This image of Intel as an unstoppable graphics juggernaut is what Huang takes issue with. What set him off initially was a comment from an Intel graphics and gaming technologist who said that consumers "probably won't need" discrete cards in the future. Nvidia's primary business is designing and supplying graphics chips for discrete graphics cards that go into PCs.
"We don't typically like to do this. It's just that we've been taking it and taking it and taking it. Every single frickin' day. Are you allowed to say that word? Every day all over the world. Enough is Enough."
Huang was especially upset about Intel's claims of boosting integrated graphics performance in the future, saying Intel's claims paled against what Nvidia will achieve by that time.
"Claim after claim after claim. They're just false. They cross the line of fair play," he said. "Here's another one. Nvidia's gonna be dead. Because we're (Intel) sticking the graphics in the CPU and (Nvidia) will have no place to stick it," he said.
Huang also attacked Intel's marketing machine. "Just because they have this enormous marketing budget. Just because they have platforms everywhere in the world. It doesn't make it right. To take on smaller companies. It's just not right."
Huang also mounted an aggressive defense of gaming on the PC--one of the main reasons many consumers opt for Nvidia graphics chips. He began by claiming that Intel graphics can't run games. "We're not the only ones saying this. This is Tim Sweeney.
One of the most important game developers in the entire world. 'Intel is incapable of running modern games. Intel's integrated graphics just don't work. I don't think they will ever work.'
This wasn't said in 1994. This was said on March 10, 2008," Huang said.
"(It's) one of the most important apps. I play games. A lot more people play games today than before. It's a big industry. We happen to think games are important. Game developers are important. Game players are important. Online games, important. Retail games, important. First person shooters, important. Simulation games, important. I'm a perfectly grown adult. I'm not ashamed of them."
Intel also has plans to bring out a graphics engine code-named Larrabee that uses "many cores" to take on high-end engineering and scientific applications. And presumably games too.
When asked to comment, Intel spokesman Dan Snyder said, "Are you surprised? Nvidia's CEO has been very vocal about their feelings for several months now, so I don't think any of this comes as a surprise." "
Source of Above Post
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9916414-64.html
How Many Companies has Intel, has CEO Paul Otellini been involved in Destroying?
How Many Lives have Been Ruined by CEO Paul Otellini and the Intel Corporation. Intel is an Evil Company as they Bully the Industry, Monopolize so that even if you Invent Something AMAZING they will find a way to ruin you, and put the run on you...
Stop Intel Corp.'s Reign of Terror on Smaller Businesses.
CEO Paul Otellini
"Nvidia CEO goes on Intel Rant
Nvidia CEO and co-founder Jen-Hsun Huang let rip with a diatribe against Intel at Nvidia's financial analyst day on Thursday. Huang cited frustration with recent Intel comments stating that discrete graphics cards will become "unnecessary."
Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang(Credit: Nvidia)
Because Intel, the world's largest chipmaker, includes integrated-graphics silicon in most of its chipsets the company has become the world's largest supplier of graphics chips.
Its upcoming Nehalem processors will move the graphics from the chipset onto the same piece of silicon as the main processor. A design that is expected to result in vastly better performance.
(Note: A contrarian take on the graphics market states that Nvidia remains the #1 graphics supplier because approximately 73 million Intel integrated graphics processors (IGP) are unused in systems due to "double-attach" with an Nvidia solution, according to Doug Freedman of American Technology Research. More here at ExtremeTech.)
This image of Intel as an unstoppable graphics juggernaut is what Huang takes issue with. What set him off initially was a comment from an Intel graphics and gaming technologist who said that consumers "probably won't need" discrete cards in the future. Nvidia's primary business is designing and supplying graphics chips for discrete graphics cards that go into PCs.
"We don't typically like to do this. It's just that we've been taking it and taking it and taking it. Every single frickin' day. Are you allowed to say that word? Every day all over the world. Enough is Enough."
Huang was especially upset about Intel's claims of boosting integrated graphics performance in the future, saying Intel's claims paled against what Nvidia will achieve by that time.
"Claim after claim after claim. They're just false. They cross the line of fair play," he said. "Here's another one. Nvidia's gonna be dead. Because we're (Intel) sticking the graphics in the CPU and (Nvidia) will have no place to stick it," he said.
Huang also attacked Intel's marketing machine. "Just because they have this enormous marketing budget. Just because they have platforms everywhere in the world. It doesn't make it right. To take on smaller companies. It's just not right."
Huang also mounted an aggressive defense of gaming on the PC--one of the main reasons many consumers opt for Nvidia graphics chips. He began by claiming that Intel graphics can't run games. "We're not the only ones saying this. This is Tim Sweeney.
One of the most important game developers in the entire world. 'Intel is incapable of running modern games. Intel's integrated graphics just don't work. I don't think they will ever work.'
This wasn't said in 1994. This was said on March 10, 2008," Huang said.
"(It's) one of the most important apps. I play games. A lot more people play games today than before. It's a big industry. We happen to think games are important. Game developers are important. Game players are important. Online games, important. Retail games, important. First person shooters, important. Simulation games, important. I'm a perfectly grown adult. I'm not ashamed of them."
Intel also has plans to bring out a graphics engine code-named Larrabee that uses "many cores" to take on high-end engineering and scientific applications. And presumably games too.
When asked to comment, Intel spokesman Dan Snyder said, "Are you surprised? Nvidia's CEO has been very vocal about their feelings for several months now, so I don't think any of this comes as a surprise." "
Source of Above Post
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9916414-64.html
How Many Companies has Intel, has CEO Paul Otellini been involved in Destroying?
How Many Lives have Been Ruined by CEO Paul Otellini and the Intel Corporation. Intel is an Evil Company as they Bully the Industry, Monopolize so that even if you Invent Something AMAZING they will find a way to ruin you, and put the run on you...
Stop Intel Corp.'s Reign of Terror on Smaller Businesses.
CEO Paul Otellini
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)