Intel Executives Make Decisions that Shareholders Take the Hit On? Looks like a RICO Pattern and History to ME. Massive Shareholder Liability Alert.

Funny Intel Shareholders don't even Know what CEO Paul Otellini is hiding from them and has been for many - MANY years on the Biggest Liability that Intel Corp. has ever seen.

Way before the Legal Issues with Advanced Micro Devices, and Billions in Fines .. there was and Still is the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Technologies Company and the Stolen Technology that has made Billions on top of Billions and still is for Intel Corp. and many others involved in this High Finance Liability that shareholders will one day soon be FORCED to looked at AND that will be a Very Jagged Pill to Swallow.

November 2009 Article - Charles A. Gilman Got Moxy and Charles Gilman is VERY right in this request, Intel Executives are not Playing fair and NOT disclosing KNOWN Liabilities to this Day.

It is NOT the Intel Shareholder's Fault, they were no part of the Decisions and SHOULD not take the Financial Hit for It.

"" Intel shareholder wants execs to pay $2.7B in fines

He doesn't want the company on the hook for antitrust fines, settlement
By Sharon Gaudin.

Computerworld -

An Intel Corp. investor, frustrated that the chip maker has been hit with $2.7 billion in fines and settlement payments, has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the company and its top executives.

Charles A. Gilman wants the court to force company executives, including Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini, to fork over money for the fines and payments so shareholders don't take a financial hit.

The lawsuit was filed the same week Intel reached a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to end all antitrust litigation between the two companies. As part of the deal, Intel agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25 billion.

That followed a ruling in May by the European Commission in which Intel was found guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it $1.44 billion.

Gilman, who refers to himself in court documents as a "long-time shareholder," doesn't think the company and its shareholders should suffer for Intel's actions.

In a document filed in court, Gilman's attorneys contend that shareholder attempts to influence Intel's board of directors have "proved fruitless. ...Indeed, shareholder demands have been met with outright hostility, which can only bespeak bad faith."

The document also contends that Intel's board refused to investigate the antitrust charges against the company or to appoint an independent committee to review the charges and take remedial action, if needed.

" The antagonism of Intel's Board of Directors to the shareholders' demand is readily explained by growing evidence that the antitrust scheme, which spanned three continents, and which has so far led to over $1 billion in fines, was personally directed by CEO Otellini and by Intel's former board chairman, Craig R. Barrett," the document alleges.

Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research, Inc., said he's not surprised by the suit. "Someone always sues," he said, adding that he's never heard of company executives being forced to pay for any fines or settlements.

One of Gilman's attorneys, Roy Jacobs, of the firm Law Offices of Roy Jacobs in Manhattan, declined to comment on the suit. So did another Gilman attorney, Robert Goldberg, who is with Biggs and Battaglia, a Delaware law firm.

For its part, Intel promised to fight the suit. "We disagree with the plaintiff in the matter and we are planning a vigorous defense," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman

In addition to Otellini, those named in the suit include: former CEO and ex-Chairman of the Board Barrett; directors James Plummer and Susan Decker; and former directors Carol Bartz, D. James Guzy Sr., David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, David Yoffie, Charlene Barshefsky, John Donahoe and Frank Yeary. ""


Source of Post and Article Link
http://www.computerworld.com/
s/article/9141168/Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines


Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

More on the Intel Liability with the Iviewit Technologies
Stolen Patent at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Also Check out www.CEOPaulOtellini.com and www.BruceSewell.com
for Intel Corp's Role in this Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Durward Bruce Sewell
Shareholder Activism, Advocate - Shareholder watch

CEO Paul Otellini is Guilty of SEC Fraud the Way I See it..

CEO Paul Otellini of Intel knew of a Trillion Dollar Liability and REFUSED to tell his Shareholders. Why ? And now as insider Trading News is going around about Intel and IBM, now Paul Otellini says It is news to us... Paul Otellini KEEPS shareholders in the Dark, Does not Honor Contracts with Inventors and STANDS on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass..

Is all this Not Fraud?

I Guess it is a Matter of Who Ya Know... Boy if I had Intel Stocks I would Sure Be MAD if the Boys in Charge and their Attorney ( Bruce Sewell ) Were .. Well aware of a Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent and were well aware of Contracts they Refused to Make Good on and ... D. Bruce Sewell ... Attorney and CEO Paul Otellini knowing of this HUGE Liability .. and Did they Tell their Shareholders... Is this a Crime? Is it an Ethics Violation? Does it Even Matter at All?

Did Bruce Sewell and CEO Paul Otellini Make any Attempt to Make Good on the Contracts they Assumed... or did they Just Ignore it.. and Now D. Bruce Sewell is at Apple where it Seems he is part of the Fight with Nokio and this Patent Infringment... anyway MUCH More on that Issue and Connected Parties Later...

http://www.iphonejd.com/iphone_jd/2009/09/apple-hires-bruce-sewell-as-new-general-counsel.html

You will NEVER confince me that CEO Paul Otellini is not GUILTY, that he had no INSIDE information on any of this.

Come on Paul Otellini, as we Well Know .. had Knowledge of a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft which affects Stocks NOT ONLY in CEO Paul Otellini's Company but in many SEC Regulated Companies... Trillions of Dollars and ( Silent Fraud ) CEO Paul Otellini Said NOTHING to Shareholders RIGHT? And doesn't this So Called Pillar of the Financial Community owe any Fiduciary Duty to Other Companies, to Shareholders, to Inventors?

CEO Paul Otellini would have us believe he is NOT involved in this Multi-Billion Dollar Scandal....?? Hmmm.. Well I Say CEO Paul Otellini is GUILTY... But hey that is Just My Opinion.

We all Need to Complain to the SEC ON this guy.

Oh Nevermind CEO Paul Otellini and Intel are Above the Law because of Politicians they Know, Political Favors Owed to Them, Billions of Dollars and Corruption Beyond the Comprehension of Folks who have Morals.

Does the ITC (International Trade Commission) Really Care about Patent Infringement and the True Rights of Inventors, My Guess is AGAIN it is a matter of Who your Connected to, How Much Money the Bad Guys Have and Who is Above the Law, Ethics and Morals of Any Kind.


Why are Lengthy Court Battles Needed in Fights Such as Iviewit Getting their Patent, or in Nokai Getting Their Rights Honored against APPLE?

I mean It should take a Week, may be a month to Read the Patents and to see if they have been used by APPLE and do the right thing.


However, Keeping Nokai, Iviewit and REAL patent owners such as them in Court for years well this keeps Stock Prices Stable as the Decision is Pending and Meanwhile Guys like CEO Paul Otellini, the Apple Owners, Intel Corporation, Warner, Sony, MPEGLA - well they can lie about all this so Shareholders won't panic.

Though the Proof is Right there, if the Courts can be bought off in some way or some how manipulated well then it can drag on for years, GET those Attorneys Plenty of Money and NOT create a Panic in the Stock Market with the TRUTH that there is Trillions in Liability that Have not Been Reported on the Books.


Related Documents and Links...


http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/intel_ceo_paul_otellini_on_galleon_group_091019/


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/intel-ibm-lockheed-sgi-in-trillion.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/federal-complaint-service-intel.html


http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/to-paul-s-otellini-president-and-chief.html

Insider Trading News Links ( Again Print or Copy to your Computer - as Links and Information Disappear once the BOUGHT Media see the Dots Being Connected by Obnoxious Bloggers.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10377395-64.html

http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2009/10/26/daily153.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/12/11/intel_insider_trader_fined/

More on What CEO Paul Otellini and D. Bruce Sewell ( Now a Liability at APPLE) - More on What they Knew and did not Disclose to Shareholders COMING SOON.... Oh and Don't Think that IBM and Intel Were NOT Talking on this Trillion DOLLAR Patent Theft that WOULD affect both their Stock Prices.


Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Crystal

Silicon Graphics NEVER been Served.. What.. Trillion Dollar Fraud - Does anyone Care?

Look on Page 2 of this Link.. Well just Read this Whole
Court Document.. Trillion Dollar Liablity.. oh Well..

Let's Pretend we Just did not Know...
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/SGI%20Bankruptcy/Ramirez%20Declaration.pdf
intel
Bankruptcy Court Fraud,

Dear D. Bruce Sewell, Esq of Intel Corporation - Intel Shareholders were Warned about this Trillion Dollar Liability Right?

"From: Eliot Bernstein
To: D. Bruce Sewell, Esq.
Senior Vice President - General Counsel
Intel Corporation

March 06, 2009

Regarding: Follow Up of March 3, 2009 Phone Discussion: Responsible Business Judgements; Financial Accounting Standards Board "FASB" Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies Reporting Requirements; Limited Time Offer.

As a Follow up from our telephone discussion .... I wish to make several observations as part of this 24 hour limited time offer to enter a sound and responsible business negotiations on behalf of the Intel Corporation.

As you will note further herin, there is definate and certain action to be taken at the conclusion of the 24 hour period commencing upon 3PM EST On Friday March 06 th, 2009 ... and ending on Monday, March 9th 2009. Thus, you may wish to pay particular attention herein...

As you will see, it is Respectfully requested and suggested that you, Mr. Sewell, Senior Vice President - General Counsel of the Intel Corporation, will be making a sound and proper business decision herein by taking this matter and limited time offer to negotiate to your Chairman and CEO within 24-Hours herein.

Please read below to see the definite and certain action that I will be taking in the event you do not properly bring this matter to the Chairman and CEO within 24 hours for their response which will be due 48 hours after the ending of such 24 hour period.

As the original Owner and Inventor of backbone "technologies" and a business person myself, I was alarmed and shocked at your hostile resistance to commence sound, responsible business discussions in this matter and further alarmed at the hostile reaction you exibited when I suggested speaking with the Chairman and the CEO of Intel Corporation in this Matter.

I respectfully suggest that you, Mr. D. Bruce Sewell, Esq. have admitted to failing and may be presently and currently failing in a variety of legal and ethical obligations under law and codes of conduct and as it relates to Intel and the rights of the shareholders and others in Intel and other interested parties who may incur liablilited.

This Failure centers around your admission that "Contingent" liability has not been booked and will not be booked on the records of Intel as it relates to my claims as Original Owner and Inventor of backbone technologies as set out further herein. "

Click Below and Read this Full Document as D. Bruce Sewell of Intel Corporation, Real 3D, Inc. , Tim Connolly, Lawrence Palle, Craig R. Barrett, Brian G. Utley and More are discussed...

Source of Post - Take a Good Look
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf
Intel Scams
More Links on the Evils of the Intel Corporation
as Connected to the Stolen Patent, Stolen Technology
of the Real Iviewit Inventors.
Otellini
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:niq0dTFqd9oJ:iviewit.tv/press/press4.pdf+%22Paul+S.+Otellini%22+iviewit&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Intel
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf
craig barrett