Christine C. Anderson - New York Whistleblower Speaking Out Against "Well Connected Attorneys" and "Preferential Treatment"

"John Lovett, the lawyer for the fired lawyer, Christine C. Anderson, told the six-member jury that his client had been fired in retaliation for exercising her First Amendment rights in complaining to court officials that well-connected attorneys received preferential treatment and that the committee had "whitewashed" certain cases. "

http://www.judicialaccountability.org/articles/lawyersuesforwhitewash.htm
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,

" Christine C. Anderson contended that her June 2007 firing was in retaliation for complaints she made to her superiors at the disciplinary committee that at least nine cases had been handled too leniently because the lawyers being investigated were politically connected or were represented by attorneys who had previously worked for the committee (NYLJ, Oct. 30, 2007)."
http://www.onbeingablacklawyer.com/?m=200904
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill,
Documents on Court Case
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents.html
Thomas J. Cahill

Anderson v. The State of New York
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080616%20Anderson%20Docket%20with%20Eliot%20as%20Plaintiff.pdf
Christine C. Anderson
"Former First Department Disciplinary Committee Attorney Christine Anderson's $10 Million Lawsuit Proceeds Against Corrupt Discipline CommitteeIn allowing Anderson to proceed with her retaliation claim, New York District Judge Shira Scheindlin found that her contention that the committee had "whitewashed" as many as nine cases touched upon a subject of public concern and was protected under the First Amendment. Can New York State residents now hope to see the start of an end to the NYS corrupt courts that harm, neglect, and harass the innocent?"
http://www.parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7560
Thomas J. Cahill
"A former staff attorney at the First Department Disciplinary Committee has filed a federal
lawsuit charging she was fired in June in retaliation for complaining that her superiors had
engaged in a "pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints against certain select attorneys."

Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10 million in damages, claiming retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and
discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and black."
http://www.legal-disclosure.com/documents/grievanceLawsuit.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Thomas J. Cahill

Patentgate - Department of Justice Inquiry - Thomas J. Cahill - USPTO - New York Judges

July 16 2007 DOJ Widens Patentgate Inquiry:

In a letter dated July 16, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI investigation that involves an almost surreal story of the theft of nearly 30 U.S. Patents, and other intellectual property, worth billions of dollars.

The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
The Fox and the Hen House
It was only recently exposed in July that the underlying “Patentgate” inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan’s top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Mr. Cahill’s “retirement” was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.

While no one can exactly figure out how inquiries under Mr. Cahill’s charge went so awry, one thing is certain. At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar increased their own investigation into the same matter implicating the same attorneys. (Note: Mr. Cahill’s replacement was recently decided, and an announcement is expected as early as next week by the Appellate Division, First Department Presiding Justice, Jonathan Lippman.)

Article @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
P
The Ethics watchdogs Like Steven Krane are the ones committing the Crimes, or at the very least looking the other way while guys like Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose Committ them.