Public Office Corruption - Related to the Christine Anderson Whistleblower Case - Scheindlins' Failure to Report

Judge Scheindlin Finds "Systemic" Public Office Corruption in the Legally Related "Whistle Blower" Lawsuit - then Scheindlin Dismisses Eliot Bernsteins Complaints in a Seriously Flawed Dismissal and Failure to Remove and Report Misconduct and Conflict.

The Corruption in the New York Courts is Out of Control and there seems to Be No Way to STOP it - It is Time for We the People To Pay Attention to What is Going on.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf

Read this Document Pertaining to the Iviewit Stolen Patent and the Relationship to the Corruption in the New York Courts.

$$$$$$

April 2009 Decision and Order by Scheindlin, in the "Legally Related" lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin formally judicially declared the validity of the Anderson Lawsuit as a "Whistleblower". Judge Scheindlin advancing the case on allegations of "Systemic" Public Office Corruption within the New York Supreme Court involving agencies directly implicated in Plaintiff-Appellant's case herein and directly involving the conduct of several major law firms names as Defendents...

Public Office Corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department and the New York Court Appellate Division First Departmnet - Departmental Disciplinary Committee is center stage in Judge Scheindlin's Decision advancing the Anderson Lawsuit Trial...

Click on the Document in this Post and read all these connections.. and then in January Scheindlin Dismisses iviewit as their Issues being MOOT and not based in Fact... the Corruption in the New York Court System is Blatantly Obvious and No One Seems to Be Looking at it.
Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf
Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin
and Don't Forget to Check Out the January 2012 Smackdown - Dismissal - Talk about Double Standards - Conflicts of Interest - Corruption - Denying Due Process
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20100109%20US%20Court%20of%20Appeal%20Denial%20of%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20and%20Appeal.pdf

More on this Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Christine C. Anderson, Judge Shira Scheindlin

Expose Corruption - Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven Krane, Proskauer Rose, Time Warner Inc., Bruce Sewell, Intel Corp., Gerald Lewin, MPEGLA, and More.

Who is Allowing the Corruption To Continue?

When the Sleeping Giant Awakens the Corruption Will End.

You are the Sleeping Giant ~ Once you Awaken to the Truth, there is NOTHING they can do. When you all truly wake up - they are the Minority and Truth, Justice for ALL and Doing the Right Thing Once Again Becomes Simply Just the Way things Are.

We the People Do have a Voice in saying NO MORE to Corporate Greed, Enough is Enough to Court Corruption and Favortism to Big Legal Firms at the Expense of YOUR life... your livlihood and your very Life. We the People Need to stand Up and STOP all these Elite Super Powers from Being Above the Law, Immune to Human Rights and Seemingly having No Morals or Ethics of any Kind. They will NOT STOP until you NOTICE and say Enough.

We the People Can Begin to Do That by Standing Up for the Iviewit Inventors in this Blatant, Obvious Attorney Protection, Court Corruption, USTPO Fraud, Attempted Murder, and the US Justice System Boldly standing for the Criminal just because they are Billionaires and Have amazing connections and Political Power.

We intend to File in the Criminal Code in Each State and County, with the Department of Justice, within the State and Federal Courts against EVERY criminal In this Blog. All the Tech Companies, Attorneys, Judges ... who have thus far been above the law - they NOW answer to We the People. Time For Accountability at Every Level.

To do this you Do not have to be Part of a Lawsuit, you simply have to be someone that knows the facts. All these guys who have Legally side stepped the Legal System and have controlled the State Bar Associations in Multiple States, these Patent Attorneys Committing Fraud, the Head of the Patent Office, the Intel Boys, all the Attorneys who Lied and Committed Fraud, the Politicians Involved, the Cheneys, Lockhead, MPEGLA, and All the Companies and Individual People, Judges, Attorneys On this Website.

We, in Mass will complain to State Boards everywhere they are licensed, file Legal Complaints that when the "Cleaners" and the Clerks of Court throw them in the ROUND FILE, we then file again For Obstruction of Justice.

In the United States, All Due Process has been Stripped from the Iviewit Inventors. Their Patent was Stolen by their Patent Attorney. The Department of Justice, Supreme Court, Patent Office, SEC, and State Bar Associations involved are doing Nothing About it. They seem to be ignoring this Blatant Crime and Some Courts have even simply dismissed it for no good reason at all. This Attack on Citizens Rights of the United States is nothing NEW, what Can Be NEW is that WE THE PEOPLE make a Stand and Demand Justice, Demand Accountability.

Those who brag about protecting Intellectual property rights, they are No Where to Be Found. You See they only protect the rights of patents they don't want and protect the patent thieves to Legally Get Away with Patenting Other Peoples inventions for their gain.

I understand wanting to Silence, Rob, Kill, and Keep these inventors down... and well Reasons to Ignore the Iviewit Shareholders... you see when the Cheneys, Lockheed Martin, IBM, Intel, Proskauer Rose, and the Biggest and the Richest are involved.. Shutting Up, bankrupting and Quieting the Voice of the Real Inventors, well this is the only way to Stay in Power....

So why not honor contracts, and why not set this right?

Well now they have to "Save Face" and NEVER admit that this really happened, so they will keep Iviewit in Court and Make them jump hoop after hoop, .. Trillions OFF Dollars they have to use in Fighting against the now penniless inventors... well you do the math... Add to it Death Threats, Car Bombings and Economic Terror and well the Power Elite Wins.

We the People Cannot ALLOW this.

Real The Documents on this Site, ( www.DeniedPatent.com ) Read the Iviewit Site and Blog and if you have time the THOUSANDS of documents at www.Iviewit.TV and you SEE the TRUTH is blatantly being ignored by the United States Justice System in Order to Protect the Power Elite.

Folks These Criminals, these True Evil Doers, these Economic Terrorists and attempted murders.. they answer to YOU.

If you sit Silent they keep doing this to People Over and Over.

We the People must say NO, and one way to do this is Talk about this Story and to Name Names. Reprint anything from this site, please link to www.DeniedPatent.com and to www.Iviewit.TV And Share this Story of a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist - These Patent Theives, these Corrupt Judges - Corrupt Attorneys and the Supreme Courts that Deny Due Process they NEED to Be Exposed.

Please Share the Iviewit Story on ALL your Blogs and Websites. Post links to documents and Get ALL Eyes on all this Big Corporations for What they have Done.

Expose the New York and Florida Supreme Court and State Attorney Bar for the blatant ignoring of Viable Proven Crimes and Ethics Violations by Attorneys Licensed in their State.

Expose the USPTO, the United States Patent and Trademark Office for their part in Denying these Inventors their Rights. Expose Companies Such as Time Warner Inc. , AOL, Sony, for Contracts they Denied and for VIOLATING Confidentiality Agreements.

Expose Major Tech Companies for Signing Non-Disclosure agreements and for Using Stolen technology with No Compensation for Inventors Rights. IBM, Intel, Sony, and all the Big Players on this Blog - Time to Tell On them. Post These Stories on Your Blogs and Websites and Link Back to Us.

Help Us Expose Corporate Greed, Corrupt Courts, Corrupti Judges, Attorney Favortism and the Power Elite Ruining Lives and Even Killing Inventors to Keep - Use and Profit from their Inventions.

Expose Major Law Firms that have side deals, connections, conflicts of interests and big money to make sure that Real Justice and the TRUTH or the Real Facts of a Case Do not actually even get into court. Stop Favortism among high profile attorneys with Total disregard for the Truth.

Stand With Eliot Bernstein and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology and be a Part of Changing The World. We the People have the Power.

Make videos and talk about any of the names and players in this blog. Tell us anything you know anything about any of the Companies, Judges, Courts, Attorneys on this BLOG, send me a Link - Crystal@CrystalCox.com Or Email your "Tip" - the Truth is No longer Taboo, the Truth is what we crave and the TRUTH is what We Seek.

Is this ALL about Money for the Inventors ?

Yes Iviewit Inventors deserve the Patent and The Royalties that Criminals IBM, Intel, MPEGLA and more are reeping the REWARDS from, however it is bigger then that.

If we let them get away with this then which one of you is next?

If your not in the "Club" not one of THE Rich - Powerful - Elite and you invent something GREAT... something life changing .. something they themselves call the Holy Grail... well you are Powerless.. without Money - BILLIONS and Connections Globally - You Never get the Rights to What you Really Invented, and the Shareholders never get what is owed to them for their courage in investing in an Unknown Group of Inventors.

Now with Years upon Year of Proof.. .. business plans .. .bank statements .. letters, emails, court documents... Thousands of Documents proving that all the courts, attorneys, judges involved seemed to just MAKE IT GO AWAY... and so here we are Case Proven COURTS refusing TRUTH - Refusing Due Process and the Rights of the Citizens.

And EVEN with Contracts in Place with Intel, Sony, Warner Bros. and way more that they are denying exist.. still The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, and all those who govern intellection property.. and the FBI.. how can they all Do NOTHING when the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors and Shareholders have been violated to such an Extreme?

My guess is the Courts are afraid of IBM's Money, afraid of Cheney and Lockheed, afraid of Proskauer Rose.. and the Courts - the Highest law of the land in every state involved and The United States Justices System as Well as Congress and Our New President.. well they are Afraid of these Super Powers.

And therefore Contracts with inventors - this does not matter, the Rights of Shareholders Does not matter, the Quality of Life of the Inventors themselves certainly Does not matter for THEY fear the Power Elite more then Some Guy that they Can Easily Bankrupt, Silence, Put on the Run and Ruin his life so much that Surely he Will Just Shut Up and Slink Away.

Please Post On your Blog, your Website, your Forum and STOP the Power Elite, Stop the Bilderber Cronies, Stop the Above the Law Proskauer Rose. POST their Secrets on your Site and Start a Revolution... one that Says We the People HOLD you Accountable for What you Have Done. We are Watching you, Everyone one YOU involved in this Trillion Dollar Heist and RUINING families, Stealing Lives, and Standing Firm in the Kind of Corruption that Denies Us All Quality of Life, Freedom of Opportunity and Real Justice and Liberty For All.

Take Back Your Country.

Start Now with Standing Firm against the Elitist Tyranny of IBM, Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Intel Corp., Sony, Warner Bros., and all the Tyrants on this Blog ( www.DeniedPatent.com )

Demand Accountablity from The Department of Justice, the US Patent Office, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Bar Association, the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar Association, the SEC, the FBI and All those your Tax Dollars Pay to Let this Happen to Guys Like YOU...

Eliot Bernstein is just a Guy, he has a Wife and Kids.. a family.. he works toward making this world a better place for all of us and even in the Face of Car Bombs, Economic Terror and 8 years of being put on the run by these Super Powers.

You can still find him on Forums, on Chats, Commenting on News articles and Speaking up to Protect the Iviewit Inventors, To Fight for the Original Iviewit Shareholder Rights, to Fight for his families right for a Real Life again and he Stands Penniless, Tattered, Silenced again and Again... and this is a Stand for All of us in hopes that the Dark Does not Win.

Those who are part of this Trillion Dollar Patent theft, they are Secret Society People, Bullies, Connected to Bilderbergs, Politicians, Connected To Congress, Control the US Patent Office, they are Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Bar Association that look the other way when Injustice is Served up to those Out of "the Attorney Fraternity". These "Bad Guys" are ruining the Peaceful way of Life that we All Want.

When we make this stand for Iviewit, For Eliot Bernstein - for the Inventors of the Iview Technology and for the Iviewit Shareholders, WE The People Stand and We Say ENOUGH is ENOUGH.

We do NOT stand with the Criminal.
We the People stand with the Victim.

Corrruption in the Courts, Corruption in the US Patent Office, Corrupt Supreme Court Judges, Mega-Rich Technology Companies, Favored Attorneys, and All those allowing this Corruption at every Level - Expose them - Write about them, Tell US What you Know about them, Blog about them ... it is Time for Accountability - Time to Tell the Truth.


They DO NOT Win.
WE the People WIN.


We the People Say No to the Stealing of the Iviewit Patents by the Patent Attorney and his Cronies and we VOW to Fight all those involved.

Fight for Boycotts of ALL Companies, Fight the US Patent Office, Fight that State Courts, the Federal Courts and all who WILL NOT look at this.

For if we do not, then each one of us can be next in line for Set ups, Car Bombs, Jailing, Beating, Theft, and Severe Life Altering Economic Terror.


Read Through www.DeniedPatent.com
Iviewit
And Check out www.Iviewit.TV

We will be adding more Soon, We will Teach you how to Play by Play File Criminal Complaints against each person and we will Expose each top level Person Responsible for the People under them that Committed this Heinous Crime.

Your Voice is Important.

court corruption

You Can Make a Difference.

Expose the TRUTH on any Player in the Game of Treason, this High Finance Crime Game Seemingly LEGAL in the United States of America. Email me your blog on these people, politicians, courts, patent office or email me your story on These Judges, USPTO Kappos, IBM, Steven Krane, Intel, Bruce Sewell, Brian Utley, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Roy Reardon, Florida Bar and Court System, New York Bar and Court System, Silicon Graphics, MPEGLA and all those on the www.DeniedPatent.com that have been involved in this Theft and are STILL actively participating in Sweeping it Under the Rug of Silence ... of Corruption...


Speak Up Folks Join the Iviewit Revolution To STOP those in Power from Keeping us Down, Keeping us Silent, Telling Us to Sit Down and Shut Up, Keeping Us in Court til' we Give up on the Truth or Starve to death .. taking our children with us.

Speak Up and lend your Voice
to STOP this From GOING on ONE Day Longer.


Read the document on this Site and Join as we become Millions Strong of We the People ... Legal Minds ... Bloggers .. People Who Know the Court System .. People who Know How to Make Noise in Congress ... People who Know the Secret of Why this Happen...


We Will be Filing Complaints and EXPOSING All the Companies on this Blog that Let this Happen... So Are Ya In? Post our Stories, Steal my Content - Give us a Link and EXPOSE this Crime at Every Level.
Stop Corruption

Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Stop Court Corruption

Bring Back A Government For ALL The People...Not Just A Select Few - Make Officials Accountable - It is YOUR Watch.

""Make Our Officials Accountable...

IS ABOUT PEOPLE - ALL PEOPLE
REGARDLESS OF RACE, RELIGION,
AGE, EDUCATION, ETC. UNITING AS
CITIZENS FOR A COMMON GOAL.

IT IS ABOUT TAKING BACK OUR NATION
ONE CASE, ONE ISSUE AT A TIME, TO GIVE
US ALL A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE.

IT'S NO SECRET THAT OUR GOVERNMENT
HAS FAILED US. THEY KEEP US SO BUSY
FIGHTING EACH OTHER THAT WE HAVE NO
TIME TO FIGHT THEM. THEY KEEP US SO
BUSY TRYING TO SURVIVE,
WE HAVE NO
TIME TO REALLY LIVE.
we the people
They have cut funding for Our Children, Our Seniors, Our Arts...all the while giving
themselves perks and raises.

They allow the outrageous gasoline prices when they have the technology to build renewable fuels in our own Country, that would eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. They are trying to take away OUR right to bear arms while they are the most guarded people in America.
They blatantly commit crimes because they made themselves immune from prosecution. The only time they prosecute one of their own, is when that one got too greedy.

We are considered "The Greatest Nation in the World." We give Billions of Dollars to help other Countries, yet our own people are starving, homeless, uneducated, working two and three jobs to survive, and are either without health insurance or going into debt paying for health insurance.

www.MakeOurOfficialsAccountable.com

Make no mistake...that's the way the Government wants to keep us, because then, we are under their control.

Don't fall into their trap of playing the race card that they love to promote.

That's how they divide the people into fighting amongst themselves, instead of uniting against the Officials for a common goal to better OUR quality of life.

The Officials certainly have a better quality of life...they're well protected, they're well paid, they have full benefits, and the tab is on us, the taxpayers. Can you really afford to pay for their benefits...when you can't even afford to pay for your own?

Our Officials are out of control, and it's long beyond the time WE THE PEOPLE let them know that their free ride is over.

PEOPLE PACK POWER!

It's time to stop sitting back and letting "The other guy" take care of things...because to him, YOU are the "other guy."

This website is about all of us, taking just 5 to 10 minutes a week out of our busy lives, to come together as Citizens, and demand the better quality of life we are entitled to.

It will be updated and you are encouraged to write if you know of injustices, solutions, if you want to be a contact or research person for your area, or if you can think of anything else to positively contribute.

UPDATE: Please use the form below to contact us as "an unnamed, "FOR NOW", source STOLE our e-mail link and is sending bogus e-mails to people in our name. DO NOT OPEN THEM. We do NOT solicit people so if you have not written to us, you would not be getting an e-mail from us.

**** DON'T MISS WHAT THE NEWSPAPERS AND NEWS MEDIA REFUSE TO TELL YOU. COMING UP ON THE " WHY" PAGE IS ONE OF THE LARGEST OFFICIAL COVER-UPS IN U.S. HISTORY.

IT HAS BEEN HUSHED UP FOR 7 YEARS...UNITL NOW. ****

PLEASE PASS THIS WEB ADDRESS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW
http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com/

We will be discussing, a variety of issues on this site, but first, let me tell you what the newspapers and news media don't think you should know and why this site was born.

The myth of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press in this Country is marred by Political Strongholds.

When someone first enlightened me years ago to this fact, I didn't believe them. It couldn't be true...this was America, land of the free with justice for all.

I couldn't have been more wrong.

The Supreme Court of the United States in Washington DC, the highest Court in the Nation has in their possession, clear cut, black and white evidence vindicating me of the charges against me, and implicating my former employer who is a Major NYC Realtor/Attorney, and Top NY and Government Officials in ONE OF THE LARGEST OFFICIAL COVER-UPS IN U.S.

HISTORY.
Terrorist information that was hand delivered to the FBI disappeared because it also named the Perjuring Employer, and Officials who are guilty of DENIAL OF RIGHTS,EVIDENCE TAMPERING, HINDERING A STATE INVESTIGATION, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and more.

The Supreme Court who took an oath to uphold the Constitution, as other Officials did, would rather have an innocent person convicted by their cowardly silencethan to convict their political colleagues and have an over abundance of job openings in the NY Dept. of Labor, NY Dept. of State, The Courts, The Government, and the FBI.

This is the second time John Roberts closed his eyes to Political Corruption. While in the Justice Department, he refused to investigate the corruption in Schoharie County and Albany NY, and those of us who spoke out, lost everything we owned: our homes, our good credit, those that had businesses lost them too.

Now he's Chief Justice of the Highest Court in the Nation and he closed his eyes again to outright blatant corruption. NOT TWICE JOHN ROBERTS ! THIS WEBSITE WILL HOLD A TRIAL WITHOUT THE SUPREME COURT.

EVERYONE WILL KNOW THE CRIMES
YOU ARE HIDING
FOR YOUR POLITICAL BUDDIES
TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Our Declaration of Independence states in part: All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED. THAT WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR TO ABOLISH IT, AND TO INSTITUTE NEW GOVERNMENT.

The new election enabled Former Governor Pataki and corrupt members of his administration to walk away without being held accountable for their blatant crimes plus they will eventually receive pensions paid by the taxpayers.

Take a moment and think about how many Officials are involved and how many hundreds of thousands/millions of dollars we, as taxpayers, are contributing to giving them a wonderful quality of life for the rest of their lives.

Think about how hard you work for your money and how little you actually receive because you are funding the illegalities of the very people you are paying to protect you and who are supposed to have YOUR best interest first.

With the amount of money that is going to Former Gov. Pataki, Dept. of Labor Commissioner Linda Angello, Inspector General Jill K. Levine, Secretary of State Randy Daniels, the Judges, and other Officials, think about how that money would benefit the Law Abiding Citizens with health benefits, child care, senor care, the arts, etc.

WE WILL NEVER

BE RID OF THE CORRUPTION

UNTIL WE,

THE TAXPAYERS

STOP FUNDING IT!

New Gov. Eliot Spitzer and new Attorney General Andrew Cuomo claim they want to clean up Albany. The fact is, Eliot Spitzer closed his eyes to the corruption when he was Attorney General, he's doing the same as Gov. and Andrew Cuomo is following in his footsteps. UPDATE: We have a new Gov. since Spitzer was finally caught for just a portion of the slimball that he is.

The problem is, with Gov. Patterson, he still employs some of the same Spitzer staff that covered this corruption up in the first place. His new addition of Charles O'Byrne turned out to be no better. He not only evaded taxes, but a jail term for his illegality that the general public would have received had they done the same.

The new guy Cunningham that's replacing him, is ignoring this situation also. Jeff Manns from Patterson's Office was nice until he found out who was involved. Then he became belligerent and refused to look at any of my evidence because it would have proven some of his colleagues obvious guilt. Wonder what he'll be promoted to for his silence.....Spitzer described Judge Judith Kaye as an "esteemed great friend." That would explain why she let him get away with his blatant illegalities. In reality, she and Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts are a disgrace to humanity.

They failed to protect the Constitution they took an oath to uphold. They refused to hear the case and in doing so, intentionally and maliciously convicted an innocent person. They had all the evidence in their possession that clearly vindicated me, and without a doubt, proved the guilt, 8 counts of perjury, evidence tampering, libel, slander, lying in writing to hinder a State Investigation, denial of rights, and the use of my former employer Nancy Packes, along with State and Gov. Officials professional credentials, to obstruct justice.

If the officials think convicting an innocent person when all the witnesses testimony disappeared proving the person's innocence is legal, they shouldn't have their jobs. It's not only illegal, it's unconstitutional! Can you believe the nerve of John Roberts to want a raise? We should all be so lucky to not do the jobs we are hired to do and get more money for it. Yes...the Officials have some racket going, and you and I are paying for it.

UPDATE: Judge Judith Kaye retired at the end of 2008 with a nice taxpayer pension after she covered up ONE OF THE LARGEST CASES OF OFFICIAL CORRUPTION IN U.S. HISTORY.

Famed NY District Attorney Robert Morgenthau will retire soon after also covering this up and another major illegal, but silenced, scandal.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo continues to cover up the crimes of his predecessor and other Albany and NYC Good O'L Boys, which will most likely secure him another nice promotion for his silence.

http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com/WHY.html

accountability

OPEN LETTER NO. 2 TO JUSTICE JUDITH KAYE & GOVERNOR ELIOT SPITZER

This Article is Kind of Funny, almost Seems Like Someone is Complaining to Judge Judith Kay about IBM as if they don't know who has IBM Connections and I Believe IBM Work Experience. Anyway, Here is this Article wiht a Link to the Source Below... As we Explore the Connecting of Dots, the Affiliations and Players in the Iviewit Trillion Dollar Stolen Technology Holy Grail Heist. ... Who was Involved ?

Who was married to Who, What politics played in all this and for the Purpose of this Serious of Posts... how is Ex-Supreme Court Judge Judith Kay connected to this whole mes besides the obvious of Being married to a Proskauer Rose Partner.

This is Good Stuff.. But What did Ex-Judge Super Judith
Do to Help .. hmmm.. I Bet NOTHING !!!

The Following is From an Awesome Website
I Just Discovered Today...
Time To Bring Light to the Dark...

$$$$$$

"OPEN LETTER NO. 2 TO JUSTICE JUDITH KAYE & GOVERNOR ELIOT SPITZER

Chief Court Attorney James Garfein sent me an embarrassing response on your behalf. But his feeble effort proved my point better than anything else -- the New York State court system has been so manipulated by IBM that Mr. Garfein could not even identify the correct case. The IBM cancer and birth defect cases have been sealed, and then the Order sealing the sealing Order has been sealed. You've heard of double dealing and double dipping. Now you have double sealing !!!

The case involving the plagiarism of IBM's attorneys, Jones Day, and "opposing" attorneys Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, is the appeal of Bailey v. Union Carbide Index # 17951/2002 Westchester County (Second Department Appellate Division Docket # 2005-03440.)

Look at page 16 of the Jones Day Respondent brief. Compare Jones Day's submission with the "opposition" Respondent brief of Levy Phillips & Konigsberg LLP on page 23. Do you get a match ? Work forward and backwards from there. A side by side analysis of the two briefs will reveal numerous similarities in structure, organization, strategy, argument, and syllable for syllable overlaps. Even some footnotes bear resemblance and evidence of the copy and paste techniques of these "independently" prepared briefs. How do you define collusion ???

Well, there is just one little problem...

IBM, Union Carbide, and more than a dozen other global corporations were understandably "sensitive" about the public, government, media, or the investment community scrutinizing the sordid behind the scenes cover-up in hundreds of settlements in IBM's cancer and birth defect cases. So what did they do ? With the witting or unwitting assistance of the Supreme Court of Westchester County New York (White Plains), IBM and the other Defendants conveniently sealed everything they could get away with.

IBM was so adept that even Chief Attorney Garfein could not find the file ! If that continues to be the case, I can send you a copy of the two briefs.

C' est la vie.

Someone needs to investigate and examine the process used in handling all of the IBM cancer and birth defect cases. IBM should not be able to silence the plaintiffs as it has. IBM should not be able to manipulate the court system as it has.

What say ye, Justice Kaye and Governor Spitzer ???

Carolyn Bailey
www.GrayHatsBeGone.com

cc: Select Media
Select Concerned Individuals


OPEN LETTER TO JUSTICE JUDITH KAYE & GOVERNOR ELIOT SPITZER

IBM has made a mockery of the New York State court system !

IBM's lawyers Jones Day and Levy Phillips & Konigsberg submitted plagiarized briefs and relied upon court seals to cover their collusion. (See details in the expose reprinted below.) And if that were not bad enough, Levy Phillips yielded to the lure of easy contingency $$$$$$$ and functioned as IBM's hatchetmen. As a result, 100's of New York State plaintiffs have been denied informed and fairly negotiated and aboveboard settlements in the IBM cancer and birth defect cases. And all that was done with Westchester County Supreme Court conSEALment and stamp of approval !!! So far IBM has pulled this off because the plaintiffs were unethically pressured by Levy Phillips to sign chump-change releases that included an unconscionable clause requiring them to repay 25% of their few coins unless they remained silent.

Governor Spitzer, will your clean sweep include a broom for IBM and others who manipulate the current court rules to deprive ordinary people of their just deserves ???

" ... and who knows whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this ?" Esther 4:14

* * * * * * * * * *

PART OF EXPOSE SERIES

IBM WROTE THE BOOK ON PLAGIARIZED BRIEFS

Look at page 16 of the Jones Day (IBM's legal representative) Respondent brief in Bailey v. Union Carbide et al (Docket # 2005-03440 Second Appellate Division New York State). Compare Jones Day's submission with the "opposition" Respondent brief of Levy Phillips & Konigsberg LLP on page 23.

Do you get a match ? Work forward and backwards from there. A side by side analysis of the two briefs will reveal numerous similarities in structure, organization, strategy, argument, and syllable for syllable overlaps. Even some footnotes bear resemblance and evidence of the copy and paste techniques of these "independently" prepared briefs. How do you define collusion ???

Well, there is just one little problem...

IBM, Union Carbide, and more than a dozen other global corporations were understandably "sensitive" about the public, government, media, or the investment community scrutinizing the sordid behind the scenes cover-up in hundreds of settlements in IBM's cancer and birth defect cases.

So what did they do ? With the witting or unwitting assistance of the Supreme Court of Westchester County New York (White Plains), IBM and the other Defendants conveniently sealed everything they could get away with. So, if you want to read the plagiarized brief filed by IBM, you will have to wait until the hundreds of cases are unsealed.


BELOW IS A LIST OF THE CASE NAMES AND FILE NUMBERS THAT I HAVE ACCUMULATED TO DATE. THESE ARE ALL HOUSED AT THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE IN WHITE PLAINS, NY.

SOME PLAINTIFFS ARE GROUPED UNDER ONE FILE NAME, FOR EXAMPLE "RUFFING".
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASJcaptcha

IT IS SOMEWHAT TEDIOUS, BUT A SEARCH OF "UNION CARBIDE" UNDER THE DEFENDANT LINK FOR WESTCHESTER COUNTY ON THE ABOVE WEB SITE, WILL BRING UP ALL THE CASES, CURRENT AND CLOSED.

NOTE: THE INITIAL COMPLAINT IS USUALLY UNSEALED.

THE SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS ARE GENERALLY THE RECORDS THAT IBM AND THE CHEMICAL SUPPLIER DEFENDANTS HAVE HAD SEALED BY THE COURT, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT JUSTIFICATION.
(UC=UNION CARBIDE)

1 KELLEY DALEY V UC INDEX 014308-1997; INDEX 018755-1997
KELLY DALEY V. UC (DALEY II) INDEX 014206-1997

2. ROBERT KELLEHER V UC INDEX 004048-1997

ROBERT KELLEHER V SHIPLEY COMPANY (KELLEHER II) INDEX 015665-1997
3. RITA BASS V. UC INDEX 018275-97; INDEX 002550-1999

***4. ZACHARY DAVID RUFFING V HOECHST (RUFFING II) INDEX 015664-1997
THIS CASE INCLUDES CLOSE TO 100+ PLAINTIFFS.

5. CAROLYN BAILEY V UC INDEX 002465/1998
6. ALYCE BAILEY V. UC INDEX 017951/2002

THIS CASE IS GROUPED WITH A FEW OTHER PLAINTIFFS.
***7. RYAN BURGER V. UC INDEX 015612-2000

THIS CASE INCLUDES ABOUT 20 PLAINTIFFS.

8. ZACHARY DAVID RUFFING V. UC INDEX 4049-1997
THIS CASE INCLUDES A NUMBER OF OTHER PLAINTIFFS.

9. MARGARET ABIDI V UC INDEX 014712-2001

10. DONALD MELE V. UC INDEX 004047-1997
11. CYNTHIA MOKRITSKI V. UC INDEX 012838-1997

12. JOHN CATALDO V. UC INDEX 013561-1998
13. JOHN WILLIAM EVANS V. UC INDEX 002549-1999
14. MARY ALICE CASTALLANO V. UC INDEX 003045-2001

15. NATHAN SMITH V. UC INDEX 005643-2002
16. AMBER ANN KARDAS V. UC INDEX 009011-2000

THIS CASE INCLUDES 12 OR MORE PLAINTIFFS.

17. HEATHER KELLY V. UC INDEX 012300-1999

18. BONNIE BENNETT V. UC INDEX 018426-2001
19. CHRISTINA CORDARO V. UC INDEX 002548-1999

20. JAMES ABBATICCHIO V. UC INDEX 02550-1999
21. DIANE PAOLICELLA V. CANDACE CURTIS INDEX 7884-2004

I AM NOT SURE WHAT THIS CASE IS ABOUT.

BUT CANDACE CURTIS IS THE CASE IBM SETTLED FOR "AN UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT" ON MARCH 3, 2004, JUST AS THE JURY SELECTION WAS ABOUT TO BEGIN.

22. KELLY DALEY V. EKC TECHNOLOGY INDEX 000146-1998
23. ALYSSA PFLEGING V. IBM INDEX 019667-2001
24. DAVID FREER V. UC INDEX 004171-2003

THE ABOVE INFORMATION WILL CERTAINLY GET YOU STARTED. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

INTERVIEWS OF THE VARIOUS NAMED NYS PLAINTIFFS OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES WILL VERIFY MY ACCOUNT OF THE DECEIT AND UNETHICAL PRESSURE EXERTED ON SICK PERSONS AND THIER FAMILIES TO BRING ABOUT THE SETTLEMENTS.

IS THERE A GIDEON TO TAKE ON IBM ???

Part of a series of exposes on IBM's cancer and birth defect cases.

Gideon feared death.

Does the main stream media fear the loss of current or potential advertising revenue, diminishing personal investment portfolios, or facing the wrath of Zeus ?

It takes big bucks to intervene in a lawsuit involving IBM. And it takes a whole lot of heart. Only a few organizations have the financial and legal resources to wage war with IBM. Are there any that have the courage and resolve ???

IBM ducked a heart rending trial on the East Coast USA by settling the Curtis v Union Carbide/IBM suit for an "undisclosed sum". Plaintiff and widow Carolyn Bailey maintains that IBM sought to avoid hundreds of similar trials by:

1. Extensive and unnecessary sealing of court records, and

2. Nudging the "opposing" attorneys into doing IBM's dirty work.

The Westchester County Supreme court's application of New York's current law regarding the sealing of court records has made it easy for IBM, Union Carbide, and the court to conSEAL "messy" cases from public scrutiny. Take a look at California's enlightened version --

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT 243.1(d) SEALED RECORDS

(d) [Express factual findings required to seal records] The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly finds facts that establish:

(1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record;

(2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record;

(3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed;

(4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and

(5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest.

News organizations did a masterful job of promoting the public's interest in the recent Brooke Astor case. Judge Stackhouse's August 29, 2006 ruling in Matter of Astor 2006 NY Slip Op 51677(U) has shown that public interest in court proceedings overrides the preference of private parties. That includes such big wigs as IBM and the chemical suppliers who prefer to do business on the hush-hush !!!

It is far past time to pull the rug from under the secret shenanigans of IBM, Union Carbide and more than a dozen other international corporations who have hid their dirty laundry under court seals. "

Full Article and Source of Post Below
http://www.grayhatsbegone.com/spitzerletters.html

DOJ Trial Attorney Mark Kenney Corruption - Affiliations, Corruption, Felonies and Important Information "Under Seal" - You Lose !!

"Everyone asks the question – How could Bernie Madoff get away with it for so long?
The simple answer is - he was not arrested from his bad faith conduct.

It is hard enough – as Mr. Markopolous can tell you – to get the SEC and Feds to even look at the complaints of fraud.

What does a citizen do when you report the fraud and good faith DOJ personnel attempt to address it – only to have other persons within the Dept of Justice become duplicitous?

Here is a real time example, directly on-point with Madoff/Markopolous that goes beyond being mindboggling and shocking ones conscience.

Laser Steven Haas Oath of verity
I, Steven Haas (better known as a/k/a Laser Haas) does state and affirm this the 12th day of July 2009 – Under Penalty of Perjury – that the following is True and Correct;

BACKGROUND
The perpetrators – being “Caught” red-handed – simply confessed to their minor criminal acts and then the Dept of Justice personnel circled the wagons and gave the perpetrators of Perjury & Fraud -

Illegal immunity given to Paul Traub’s firm
Unlawful, implied, blanket immunity and the implied promise of future willful blindness by the Dept of Justice US Trustee’s office.

See pages 8 & 9 of the PDF file drafted and hand signed by Mark Kenney http://petters-fraud.com/US_Trustee_Motion_Feb24_2005_2giveTBF_immunity.pdf

Attorney emails threat to Laser Haas to “Back off” or else!
In the fall of 2004 the Court approved company as Liquidation Consultant for eToys – Collateral Logistics Inc (CLI) received an email from its attorney Henry Heiman.

The email contained Threats from Susan Balaschak of the law firm Traub Bonacquist & Fox (TBF) stipulating that if Haas (the 100% sole owner of CLI) did not “Back Off” from investigating the issues of Barry Gold (President/CEO of eToys) and Paul Traub;

Not only would Haas and CLI not get paid, Laser Haas’s career would suffer and they might even come after Haas for payments previously received.

The email of this threat is a crime by extortion, threats/intimidation of Victim/Witness and most certainly Obstruction.

DOJ Trial Attorney Mark Kenney’s lapse linquae
When Laser informs the DOJ US Trustee’s office (Mark Kenney) of the emailed threat – Mark Kenney responded in anger with the following lapse linquae’s and faux pas;

Mark Kenney stipulated;
“All we had to do was make Traub a special counsel and all of this would have been avoided“as Mark Kenney continued and said ”the matters of Traub and Gold were addressed in Bonus Sales case"

The smoking gun!
The DOJ Trial Attorney in DE – Mark Kenney – did not know at the time that Laser Haas had become weary of parties doing deliberate harm as Haas had begun to study the DOJ website and bankruptcy Code/Rules and specifically the Professional rules, the US Trustee responsibility and the bankruptcy Fraud statutes;

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/41mcrm.htm
Apparently – inadvertently – Mark Kenney named a case that Laser had heard of before; prior to his reviews of the Dept of Justice US Trustee’s website

http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/sig_guidance/index.htm
The newly acquired knowledge of the bankruptcy Code/Rules, along with the realization that the DE DOJ are the police of the Bankruptcy Courts and the fact that Haas had now learned how to search case pleadings sophisticatedly on PACER – led to the discovery of a pleading in the case of In re Bonus Sales03-12284 (DE Bankr 2003) where a vanity letter-head upon an Affidavit by Barry Gold stipulated that Barry Gold was a co-principal of Asset Disposition Advisors (“ADA”) and that Paul Traub was also a co-principal owner.

This was the smoking gun that brought the entire house of cards apart in the eToys fraud case. For Paul Traub’s firm had put in over 17 Affidavits over a period of years stipulating Under Penalty of Perjury (Bankr Rule(s) 2014/2016) that there was NO Conflict of Interest.

Conflict of Interest documentation by US Trustee
Being that Barry Gold was the President/CEO of eToys and placed there by Paul Traub’s firm (the Creditors attorney) – it was THE conflict of interest revelation!

Asst US Trustee Frank Perch
Motions to Disgorge TBF for $1.6 million.

The Director of the Executive Office of US Trustee’s (Lawrence Friedman) had emailed Laser Haas personally giving a promise to handle the situation. His promises appeared valid with the replacing of the Region 3 Trustee ( Roberta DeAngelis )

http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/stapleton_release2_12-04.htm
and the

Asst US Trustee Motion to Disgorge TBF
http://petters-fraud.com/DisgorgeMotion_TBF_1_6_Million.pdf
The Disgorge Motion states that the acts by TBF were Deliberate, rather than inadvertent.
While addressing only 3 bad faith acts the Disgorge Motion also concluded that Fraud on the Court had transpired.

Disgorge Motion states parties were Forewarned
The most heinous issue about the crimes and the efforts of Obstruction by Mark Kenney is the fact that the Disgorge Motion stipulates in parts 19 & 35 that the US Trustee’s office forewarned the parties – quoting part 19;

“More significantly, TBF was specifically aware in this matter, from discussions with the Office of the United States Trustee, of the UST’s concern about replacing corporate officers with individuals related to any of the retained professionals in the case. TBF Objection, ¶ 10″

By TBF and the law firm for the Debtor (MNAT) collaborating to plant Barry Gold within – without disclosing the connections to the Court – this was a deliberate perpetration of fraud on the court – vis-a-vis Perjury and made extensively egregious by the warning and the fact that Traub and MNAT were officers of the court.

Mark Kenney’s Obstruction of Justice
Less than ten (10) days after the Asst US Trustee put in the Disgorge Motion – Mark Kenney proffered the Stipulation to Settle which provided Traub’s firm with the illegitimate blanket immunity all summed up with this one specific clause;’
“WHEREAS the United States Trustee shall not seek to compel TBF to make additional disclosures –“

Paul Traub immediately commits another $100 million Fraud
We were extremely alarmed by the outrageous actions of the DE Dept of Justice Trial Attorney.

Apparently there were more serious issues that needed to be addressed and the clause of “shall not seek to compel” was obviously an effort to assure futures discoveries of fraud and perjury were of no benefit to Laser or the eToys shareholders who were investigating.
Haas then discovered that MNAT was representing Bain and that Barry Gold and Paul Traub had worked for Bain related issues prior to eToys – especially in Stage Stores bankruptcy in S Texas (00-35078).

The significance of the issues are MNAT, Traub and their plant – Barry Gold – negotiated the sale of eToys assets to Bain/KB Toys for discounts in the tens of millions of dollars.

This is Collusion to Defraud an Estate.
Digging deeper Laser also discovered that Michael Glazer, the CEO of KB Toys – was also a director and stockholder with other Bain parties at Stage Stores.

Haas discovered this Supplemental Affidavit in Stage Stores by Paul Traub – who apparently was trying to explain in that case – in the year 2000 – that he was not violate with his connections to Barry Gold.

http://petters-fraud.com/StageStores_TBF_Supplemental_Affidavit_BarryGold.pdf

Haas company – CLI – was hired because they were going to sell eToys to Bain/KB for $5.4 million.

The auction was halted, CLI was court approved and Laser helped get back over $45 million into the eToys bank accounts. This was also to include a $10 million dollar bid by Bain/KB for eToys.com; that was negotiated down by Traub and MNAT to only $3 million.

Mark Kenney Obstructs Justice in another case
Laser also discovered that Michael Glazer had paid himself and Bain $100 million prior to Kay Bee Toys filing for its own bankruptcy protection in Delaware (DE Bankr 04-10120).

MNAT had failed to disclose to that Court its conflict of interest issues of being an adversary to Bain as eToys Debtor’s counsel. At the same time Traub and Barry Gold worked the Kay Bee Toys bankruptcy – they failed also to inform the Court of their Conflict of Interest issues.
Paul Traub even had the unmitigated gall to petition the KB Toys bankruptcy court for the right to be the one to prosecute the Michael Glazer and Bain $100 million dollar payment.
Sort of like Capone asking to be prosecuted by Frank Nitti.

When we reported these fraud and perjury issues to that court – Mark Kenney once again aided and abeded the perpetrators of fraud and had the Court strike and expunge the proof of perjury.

http://petters-fraud.com/KenneyKB_Obstruction_2228.pdf

Akin to Madoff – Mark Kenney asks SEC to Back Off
We were in communication with Director Friedman of the Exec Office of US Trustee’s (EOUST) as well as the FBI, Delaware Dept of Justice and the SEC Bankruptcy Fraud Division in Atlanta – just to name a few.

Mark Kenney instructed Gordon Robinson of the SEC to refrain from sending in an Official Intergovernmental Letter recommending an Official Investigation!

Mark Kenney Obstructs Justice at Federal 3rd Circuit

The eToys shareholders and Laser Haas appealed the rulings that were permitting the Frauds to continue and the DE Bankruptcy Court’s blessing of the illicit immunity Stipulation of Mark Kenney.

Inexplicably – Mark Kenney and the Removed Region 3 Trustee (Roberta DeAngelis) (who was speciously promoted to Acting General Counsel) of the EOUST – where both parties Obstructed Justice and lied to the 3rd Circuit Court stating that Laser Haas did not have standing to appeal and that the eToys shareholder was not ill.

http://petters-fraud.com/US_Trustee_Obstruction_3rdCir_07_2360.pdf

DE DOJ refuses to investigate MNAT law firm
The footnote within that pleading gives an insight into places that even Mark Kenney and Roberta DeAngelis fear to tread – for it states in the very first footnote therein;

“11 The bankruptcy court order which was the subject of Mr. Alber’s district court appeal also ordered partial disgorgement of compensation by debtors’ counsel, Appellee Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell (“MNAT”) in connection with Mr . Alber’s January 25, 2005 motion alleging conflicts of interest by MNAT, and approved a settlement between the post-effective date committee of unsecured reditors and Goldman Sachs & Co .

The United States Trustee did not assert a position in the bankruptcy court or the district court appeal regarding those two matters and does not address them herei

3rd Cir certifies Fraud on the Court
Citing the 6th Circuit Court -the 3rd Cir certifies the 5 requirements to document Fraud on the Court;

“The United States Court set forth five elements of fraud upon the court which consist of conduct: “1. On the part of an officer of the court; 2. That is directed to the ‘judicial machinery’ itself; 3. That is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth; 4. That is a positive averment or is concealment when one is under a duty to disclose; 5. That deceives the court.” Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 10 F.3d 338, 348 (6th Cir. 1993). “

Mark Kenney helps Traub keep Threat against Laser Haas/CLI
Traub’s firm Susan Balaschak had threatened Haas that if he did not back off – he and CLI would not get paid and his career would suffer.

The MNAT law firm submitted a document that Traub and Barry Gold told the Court was a generous waiver by Haas and CLI of $3.7 million dollars in fees and expenses that Mark Kenney and Roberta DeAngelis seek to affirm.

What is so profoundly inane is – if you are going to forge a document to the Court – one should not do so in a half art manner.

Anyone who reads items 10 & 11 of the purported WAIVER can clearly see that it states CLI is entitled to its success fees.

So the big question is – how does a bright legal professional call a document that states Request for Payment of Expenses a Waiver?

http://petters-fraud.com/Haas_Affidavit_816.pdf

Haas discovers DE US Attorney is withholding evidence
One has to wonder how high up the food chain – the protection for Paul Traub goes. Most certainly Mark Kenney cannot keep Organized Criminal acts from prosecution by himself.
Amazingly – looking into the concept led to an immediate discovery that the DE US Attorney (Colm Connolly) whose office was refusing to investigate or prosecute the perjury and fraud – had his own Conflict of Interest.

Turns out US Attorney Colm Connolly was a partner with the MNAT law firm in 2001 – the very year that the Perjury and Fraud by MNAT began.

http://www.justice.gov/archive/olp/colmconnollyresume.htm

Laser reports the Mark Kenney, Roberta DeAngelis and Colm Connolly ethics and felony violations to the US Attorney Public Corruption Unit in CA.

The only thing that transpired apparently was The CA US ATtorney shuts down the Public Corruption Unit and Threatened Career Prosecutors.

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/mar/20/local/me-shakeup20

This is how guys like Bernie Madoff get off with billions in fraud over 10 years. He has help.
Goldman Sachs manipulated eToys from the beginning and Bain benefited as well.
MNAT, Barry Gold and Paul Traub all worked for Bain and Goldman Sachs issues.
Barry Gold and Paul Traub also helped Wells Fargo pull a $100 million dollar fraud as well.

There are over 100 felony violations
Not counting the 34 items of Perjury that MNAT and Paul Traub’s firm have already confessed to.

Including. but not limited to, Collusion, MisPrision of a Felony, Obstruction, Intimidation of Victim/Witness, Extortion, Failure to Disclose an Bankruptcy Asset, False Oath/Declaration, Scheme to Fix Fees, Conspiracy and being that it is more than $100 million, several years, several states, many different parties – RACKETEERING

There is $300 million in fraud in eToys
$100 Million in Fraud in Kay Bee Toys
Possibly a Billion dollars in Fraud in Stage Stores
One of the Reasons this has continued thus far.

Director Friedman of the EOUST Resigned
http://www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/public_affairs/press/docs/friedman_resignation_4-27-05.htm

Paul Traub was a partner with Marc Dreier and Tom Petters
That is correct – after Paul Traub received his personal DOJ Get out of Jail Free Card – he became a full time partner with Petters Group Worldwide, Fingerhut and UBid as well as with the Marc Dreier firm.

Even if he is the mysterious deep throat there helping bring down the frauds; the Courts and DOJ cannot permit him to continue the crimes in eToys and other cases like Levitz and Domain RDVA.

The New York Supreme Court case 601805/2002 is the case that has been permitted to go forward for Goldman Sachs eToys IPO bad faith deeds.

When eToys went IPO in 1999 for $8 Billion (nearly $78 per share) Goldman Sachs was to get only $1.50 each share and eToys received $16.50

Where did the rest of the money go?

One of the first Motions that MNAT put forward in eToys was docket item 300 – the request for the Destruction of Books n Records – that benefited Goldman Sachs.
MNAT hand picked their fraud partner (Traub) to handle the NY Supreme Court case.
Traub knows that we caught him before by docket items he had long since forgotten.

To make sure the same thing does not happen now -
Nearly 1/2 of the NY Supreme Ct case of eToys (ebc 1 ) v Goldman Sachs
Is Under SEAL!

Source of Post
http://laserhaas.wordpress.com/doj-trial-attorney-mark-kenney-corruption/
US trustee corrupption

Roy L. Reardon, Response to Roy Reardon - New York Supreme Court Appellate Division - Chairman

DRAFT Response to Roy Reardon, New York Supreme Court
How Long Can This Guy handle Complaints against Himself, be involved Coverups, Conspiracies, and the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent by way of ignoring complaints and DOING Nothing?
r
Here is the Responce to Roy L. Reardon NY Supreme Court
from Eliot Bernstein.
r
Monday, December 14, 2009
I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
TO: Roy L. Reardon
Chairman
New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First
Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
(212) 401-0800
also Partner @
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017-3954

Regarding: Your Continued Insanity in handling complaints against YOURSELF, Alan W. Friedberg and Other Defendents in a Twelve Count - Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Legally Related to a Whistleblower Causing Mass Liablity, you are Concealing from the State of New York and the People of New York.
roy reardon
Dear Mr. Reardon,
I. Response to Your Letter Dated December 07, 2009.
Your audacity bemuses me and allow me to retort to your and Mr. Friedberg’s
insanity and again put forth some basic realities regarding your misconduct and criminal
acts.

First, my seventy-eight page complaint against Mr. Friedberg and YOU, if you
have read it, is also a RE-FILED complaint against you, this letter shall serve as a third
and a bit more severe complaint.

Your letter is in response to the earlier complaints against Mr. Friedberg and yourself that you buried since February 2009, until sequestered by the NEW YORK STATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, which requested that you provide information regarding the CONCEALED complaints to them, not me.

Nevertheless, in delusion, you responded to me regarding your complaints and tried to
dismiss complaints against yourself and your partner in crime, Mr. Friedberg, while your
department is in a lawsuit with me. In that lawsuit, your department has representative
ILLEGALLY retained counsel, the New York Attorney General and yet you continue to
pester me with your continued handling of your own and Mr. Friedberg’s complaints, as well as, attempting ILLEGALLY to dismiss complaints against other defendants in the
lawsuit.

Let me dissect your letters errors one by one before I begin my further FORMAL
COMPLAINT against you in addition to the one you have buried for months and now try
to dismiss:

1. First, you state, “Your 78 page fax dated December 3, 2009 labeled as a
complaint against Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg has been referred to me.”
The problem in this statement is that you fail to see that the 78 Page Fax
Complaint, is a re-filing of the complaint you have admitted to concealing
since February 2009 against both YOU and Mr. Friedberg.

The FORMAL COMPLAINT is actually against you and Mr. Friedberg, so had you really
read the Complaint, you would see it would be impossible for it to be referred to you, as you are a Main Character in the Complaint. I resubmitted that complaint due ONLY to your prior CONCEALMENT of OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.

I have attached herein, that same complaint but have individually broke it out for you with your very own cover page. By the by, your inappropriate letter that defies ethics again has NO FORMAL DOCKETING number for the Friedberg case, so I wonder how to appeal it or
if it has been CONCEALED again.

2. Next, you claim laughably, “Among other things, the document contains
copies of letters from you to State Senator John L. Sampson of the New York
Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the DDC has engaged in conflicts of
interest, corruption and other wrongful acts. We find no merit in those
accusations.”

The silliness of your statement here, although criminal in
nature, is very telling of your cognizance of the allegations contained in the
FORMAL COMPLAINT that was CONCEALED and further stands as
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CONTINUED CRIMINAL
CONDUCT in trying to dismiss complaints you and your whole department
are conflicted in, Mr. Friedberg and yourself especially, since you have
FORMAL COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST BOTH OF YOU.

Now it becomes a bit dicey for you, as your RULES AND REGULATIONS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT CLAIM § 605.6 Investigations and Informal Proceedings

(g) Preliminary Screening of Complaints. Any complaint
received by the Office of Chief Counsel against a member
of the Committee or Staff counsel involving alleged
misconduct shall be transmitted forthwith to the Committee
Chairperson, who shall assign it either to the Office of
Chief Counsel or to special counsel who shall conduct or
direct the appropriate investigation, and give a written
recommendation as to the disposition of the Complaint to
the Committee Chairperson, who shall determine the
appropriate disposition of the Complaint.

Any such Complaint which relates to the Committee Chairperson shall, in the first instance, be transmitted to a Hearing Panel Chairperson, who shall conduct the appropriate investigation and determine the appropriate disposition of the Complaint.

My complaint Mr. Roy Reardon is a twofold problem for you as the FORMAL COMPLAINTS YOU HAVE CONCEALED SINCE FEBRUARY 2009, are against YOU, acting as the Chair of the DDC and your partner in crime, Mr. Alan Friedberg, acting as Chief Counsel.

It is clever how in your SELF DISMISSING LETTER which defies ethics, you try and CONCEAL that Friedberg’s complaint has been transferred to you, which according to your own rules would be a violation, as the COMPLAINT is also against YOU.

Thus, you are AGAIN violating your OWN rules by trying to hide that you
also are knowingly COMPLAINED of FORMALLY, by way of the Sampson
Letters you have received several times now and the ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT I re-filed. Nice try, though, “desperate men…”

3. Amazingly, your letter continues “In any event, your new "complaint" against
Mr. Friedberg provides no basis on which the Committee should pursue
action.” First, there is NO NEW COMPLAINT, this is merely a re-filing of
the ORIGINAL COMPLAINT you have ILLEGALLY CONCEALED in
violation of LAW against both you and Mr. Alan W. Friedberg and now your trying to
make it as a new complaint is both ridiculous and further criminal and will so
be reported to ALL appropriate oversight authorities and criminal
investigators of your continued violations and further attempt at CRIMINAL
CONCEALMENT.

Second, since you should not be handling complaints against yourself or your partner in crime Mr. Friedberg, it defies logic and law how you claim there is no basis in a complaint against yourself and where you should have already turned the matter over, per your rules you would have to turn the matter over to a Hearing Panel Chair, which obviously you fail to do in regard to the FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND MR.
FRIEDBERG.

Again serving as prima facie evidence of your CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT, this statement will also be forwarded to all
appropriate oversight of your continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

4. The next statement truly shows your detachment from both reality and the
rules and regulations that define ETHICS. I quote your insanity, “Indeed, you
appear to be arguing that anyone associated with the Committee is precluded
from considering the merits of your complaint.” Yes indeed Mr. Reardon I do
make the claim that NOBODY in your department can handle these
complaints and for several factual reasons.

First, your department is a DEFENDANT in a 12-COUNT, 12-TRILLION dollar LAWSUIT, which I am certain you are not concealing from state auditors, well, perhaps you could clarify that for me in writing, as I am sure you are reporting the liability on
your and the states books, liabilities directly related to your CRIMINAL
CONDUCT and CONTINUED CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

As DEFENDANT’S in the ONGOING LEGAL ACTION the whole First
Department is precluded from involvement due to CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY this creates.
Next, the CONFLICTS and APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY also act
together to create CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS. This CRIMINAL ACT, also will be reported to your
oversight and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.

As the First Department DDC is a DEFENDANT in the LAWSUIT, the DDC
also has representative ILLEGAL counsel, the New York Attorney General
and Monica Connell of their offices.

Upon filing the complaints against other DEFENDANTS in the same LAWSUIT, Ms. Connell advised me as YOUR COUNSEL to file the complaints with your offices against the Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner attorneys (as the attorneys complained of are licensed
there) but that they would be moved instantly to a NON CONFLICTED
THIRD PARTY.

Moved to avoid the OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY your handling of the complaints creates.

Yet, somehow, you sneaky dog, you and your partner in
crime, Mr. Friedberg, interceded and attempted to DISMISS COMPLAINTS
AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THE LAWSUIT YOUR
DEPARTMENT IS A NAMED DEFENDANT IN.

Again, these CONFLICTS act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and will duly be noted to all
oversight of the DDC and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.

Therefore, your question asks if I think anyone in your department can handle
these complaints and the answer is NO THEY CANNOT and I advise YOU,
Mr. Friedberg and any other department official that each act on these
complaints will result in further FORMAL COMPLAINTS to your oversight
and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.

5. Your letter continues insanely “On October 7, 2009 I wrote to you advising that your previous complaints against Mr. Friedberg and other attorneys have been closed.” Now here your sneakiness is better than a proverbial “snake in the grass” as you attempt to state that my previous complaints filed against you and Mr. Friedberg for dismissing complaints against other DEFENDANTS are closed. Mixing apples and oranges while hiding the beef.

First, my previous complaints against other attorneys, resulted in you and Mr.
Friedberg handling them, leading to separate complaints against both you and
Mr. Friedberg.

Love how you refer to “other attorneys” in a third person voice, versus
identifying that YOU Mr. Reardon, are one of the “other” attorneys you
reference. Do you often refer to yourself in the third person; this is a very
symbolic sign of pathological behavior indicating delusion. Perhaps you
could have written more accurately, something like – your complaints against
Mr. Friedberg, MYSELF and other attorneys.

Again, you CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS, which creates further CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
Finally, I am not sure how the FORMAL COMPLAINTS can be closed when they have not been opened formally with Complaint Numbers for me to even respond too, as demanded in my complaint and as part of the RULES and REGULATIONS of your department that you psychotically continue to ignore, ah, “desperate men…”

6. Finally, this my favorite act of your insanity, I quote, “You may wish to
consider consulting with counsel regarding the matters raised in your
submissions.” To be clear, I have consulted counsel, YOUR COUNSEL the
New York Attorney General and it was determined that you are conflicted and
cannot handle complaints against other Defendants nor yourself and Mr.
Friedberg, per your own departmental Rules and Regulation, Part 600, per the
Attorney Code of Conduct and Law. The result, was to have the complaints moved to a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.

I advise you therefore to consider consulting with YOUR COUNSEL regarding the matters raised against you CRIMINALLY and then CIVIL charges against you and your
department in the civil complaint.

I advise you to consult your counsel as to further pestering me directly, where
as you know, I represent myself Pro Se, so it is highly unethical and against
the Attorney Conduct Code for you, an attorney, to be contacting me directly
when you have representative counsel.

I find teaching your ethics at this point to be an utter waste of my time, as you seem not be able to discern realistically what your own ethical obligations are, nor what the Rules
you are charged with oversighting state and finally the Law.

I therefore highly recommend that you discontinue with contacting me directly and have
your attorney handle these matters going forward.

Of course, your attorney, the New York Attorney General, is also a DEFENDANT in my LAWSUIT and his representation is therefore suspect as aiding and abetting illegally your department through CONFLICTED representation that VIOLATES the NYAG Rules Public Office Rule 17 for one and that ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION also compounds to cause
Obstruction of Justice as the Conflict precludes the NYAG from doing his public duty of investigating dirty rotten Public Officials, like yourself and Mr. Friedberg.

As my LAWSUIT has been marked legally “RELATED” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to that of the First Department DDC Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, we see that Anderson similarly is complaining that the NYAG illegal representation of State Defendants from your offices, is a Violation of the NYAG Rules and Regulations and Law, whereby you can get a gander for her position at the following URL, incorporated by reference in entirety herein @ ____________

The allegations in the FORMAL COMPLAINTS against Mr. Friedberg and yourself are replete with concrete evidence of crimes you are committing by violating the very ethics laws you and Mr. Friedberg are in charge of upholding. Conflicts like your department and several of the First Department Judges are direct defendants in a TWELVE COUNT, TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL LAWSUIT that of course, I know you are not too delusional to have reported this liability and your involvement to any state auditors, state agencies and others who have liability resulting from your continued criminal conduct.

The very fact that you attempt to ignore the conflicts and continue to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE in violation of FEDERAL and STATE CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION LAWS, ATTORNEY ETHICS CODES and more will be formally reported to your oversight and criminal authorities.

Yet, while your letter attempts to claim no conflict, almost, you failed to sign and
return the CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM attached to the
COMPLAINT. This failure serves as further evidence of your CRIMINAL
OBSTRUCTION through CONFLICT OF INTEREST, which now will be formulated
along with this letter, to several of your oversight authorities, as a FORMAL AFFIRMED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU.

Under the laws of NEW YORK and the UNITED STATES, in the interim until authorities can arrest you for your felonious acts, I place you under CITIZENS ARREST and I advise you not only to seek independent counsel but also to turn yourself in to the proper authorities for processing for FELONY charges both state and federal.

I remind you that I have sent the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK
and FEDERAL AUTHORITIES information regarding your involvement in RICO
related crimes, along with many in your department.

Quite contrary to your claim, I do not think anyone in your CORRUPT COMMITTEE or DEPARTMENT can handle these complaints without conflict and if you are so confident in your meritorious good work on behalf of the Good People of New York, you should welcome a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY review, as certainly you have nothing to hide.

Nothing to hide but everything, including the complaint against yourself that you keep concealing, even in your recent reply trying to dismiss the FORMAL COMPLAINT
against Mr. Friedberg while failing to state that you are also complained of since February of 2009, making your handling of any complaints, including your own, not only conflicted but criminal. Your attached letter, mentions other attorneys complained of but
fails to mention that YOU sir are one of those complained of and therefore are certainly
conflicted.

II. Actions to be Taken
• Please see 78 Page Complaint Against You filed for a Second Time since
February 2009 after you concealed those complaints

• This complaint is a refilling of that complaint and submission to the
Judiciary Committee for Oversight of Your Office and pursuing criminal investigations
within their scope of power over your Department, as part of the ONGOING
INVESTIGATION BY THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ABOUT YOUR and YOUR DEPARTMENTS FAILURE IN TOTO.

• Note that we are attaching copy of a SWORN AFFIRMED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT to all of the following, including but not limited to,
o Blah
o Blah

III. Conclusion
According to Whistleblower Christine Anderson under sworn oath in a Federal
Court and many others who have come forth to expose the ongoing Whitewashing of
Complaints, your offices are alleged to be involved in criminal obstruction of official
proceedings and threatening federal witnesses.

Nice reputation for an ETHICS department but we will get to that in a moment.

Not only are your offices accused of obstructing proceedings against “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” but further criminal Whitewashing of Complaints was also alleged in regard to Whitewashing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney by the “Cleaner”.

The “Cleaner” aka Naomi Goldstein of your offices, so named by your former Staff Attorney, Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson your offices should be under not only internal investigation but external.

Again, solid reasons for you and your entire department’s recusal from further involvement, other than turning yourself in and getting non-conflicted counsel to represent you.

Further, and most importantly, your failure to regulate the misconducts of the lawyers in your department according to well established rules and regulations of your department, you have failed this great nation and the People of the Great State of New York in your obfuscations of regulation.

For example, had you done your job investigating Proskauer Rose for example when I first complained, your department could have saved many peoples losses in the Sir Allan Stanford affairs, where Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom ( a former SEC Enforcement Employee ) were involved in teaching employees how to lie to Federal Authorities and have been sued for the entire amount of the Ponzi losses in a Global Class Action lawsuit.

My recommendation will be for any unrecoverable losses that those VICTIMS sue you and
your department for failure to regulate and possible conspiratorial roles in the cover up of
the crimes.

Had you investigated Proskauer Rose when I first informed you of their misconducts
and crimes, you also could have prevented many people over the 7 seven years from
losing their lives savings in the Bernard Madoff affair and saved the hundreds of charities
destroyed by Madoff and lives ruined.

Yes, you are the oversight that could have prevented these calamities and are responsible for your failures to the victims. In fact, since Proskauer appears to have senior partners basically running the First Department and the Ethics Department from Steven C. Krane, a Proskauer partner caught handling his own and his firms complaints while an officer of the First Department DDC, to recently deceased DDC officer Stephen Rakowe Kaye, a Proskauer partner and married to former Chief Judge Judith Kaye who had ultimate control over the department with her husband and Krane her former clerk, no wonder complaints bounced off them into your trash can.

Yet and personally more tragic, is the fact that had you done your job regulating
the attorneys, your “favored law firms and lawyers” most likely a BOMB would not have
been placed in my family minivan ( images at www.iviewit.tv ) allowing someone to
ATTEMPT to MURDER us.

It is strange to note how the timing of that event coincided with discovery that STEVEN C. KRANE of Proskauer and Thomas Cahill ( former Chief Counsel of the DDC ) where found violating First Department DDC Rules and Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law leading to the First Department Court, in inanimous consent, transferring complaints against Krane of PROSKAUER and also a FIRST DEPARTMENT OFFICER, Krane’s Proskauer partners he was representing ILLEGALLY in complaints while a DDC OFFICER and even Krane representing himself while an officer ( sounds familiar ).

Thomas Cahill also was transferred for Special Inquiry at that time and your recent handling of that complaint, with Mr. Stephen Lamont and attempting to dismiss that complaint, again while really clever, will also be further evidence of your CRIMINAL ACTS filed with CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES.

Lest us not forget to remind those judging your actions of the fact that your
department is supposed to regulate Wall Street lawyers and we can all see what your lax
regulations have produced.

I also remind you that your department appears to be the regulator for several fine attorneys in the Justice Department and Office of Legal Counsel who are being accused of war crimes for their violations of ethics and law that have allowed the torture and murder of innocent untried people, quite similar to Nazi Extermination Camps where habeas rights similarly were removed by dirty rotten lawyers, who were actually criminals with legal degrees who made concentration camps and murder legal for undesirables.

I remind you of the Judges Trial so that today while you feel elevated above the law, enough so to first conceal and then attempt to dismiss complaints against yourself, in drunken and high delusions of grandeur, that one day you will be tried for these crimes as Justice is restored and even the Nazi lawyers and judges had their day in the infamous Judges Trial at the Nuremberg Trials. I await hearing your defenses from behind the glass.

Truly, and I mean this FIGURATIVELY not LITERALLY, I hope this letter feels
like a bomb in your car and you may live with your family in similar trepidation that one
day your world will end, when your scam ends and you are tried in a fair and impartial
court, free of conflict ( you know the thing your supposed to be protecting ) where
hopefully you will serve the remainder of your life contemplating the magnanimity of the
damage you have done to my family, my shareholders, those you have embroiled in your
crimes like Ms. Anderson, those victims of your crimes that appear lining up with each
new Judiciary Committee, all those who lost homes or 401k’s from lawyers schemes in
an unregulated capacity free to commit financial crimes, as the REGULATOR, YOU was
naught more than a criminal in on the crimes.

Most DisRespectfully Yours,

Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
cc/ec:

Roy L. Reardon
Chairman Monday, December 14, 2009
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Re: YOUR CONTINUED INSANITY IN HANDLING COMPLAINTS AGAINST YOURSELF,
ALAN W. FRIEDBERG AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN A TWELVE COUNT TWELVE
TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT LEGALLY RELATED TO A WHISTLEBLOWER
CAUSING MASS LIABILITY YOU ARE CONCEALING FROM THE STATE AND
PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM YOUR CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT
roy reardon
Iviewit Holdings , Inc.
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.


Source:
www.iviewit.tv
r
Much More on Roy L. Reardon Coming Soon.
r Iviewit Holdings, Eliot Bernstein,

Iviewit Rebuttal to Thomas Cahill - New York State Bar - Kenneth Rubenstein Bar Complaint

"REBUTTAL OF IVIEWIT TO THE NEW YORK STATE BAR OF
RESPONSE OF KENNETH RUBENSTEIN AUTHORED BY STEVEN KRANE"


P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
July 2, 2003

Re: Rebuttal of Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Response
to Complaint of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Docket 2003.0531

Dear Mr. Cahill:
By way of introduction, I am Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Company”) with a background of which the Company
invites you to view at http://www.iviewit.com/management.htm , and I write to rebutt all
those material feints, denials, and, therefore, inconsistencies in the response of Kenneth
Rubenstein, Esq. (“Respondent”) to the Company’s New York Bar Complaint of
February 26 (“Complaint”).

Moreover, the facts of the Complaint find Respondent so uncloaked that he resorts to
disingenuously traversing from tall tales of retaliation to some irrelevant litigation, to
stories of a “failed dotcom company looking for someone to blame,” and even to the
personal attacks on the founder and principal inventor of the Company, whose passion for
his inventions confounds the mind of Respondent whose personal, financial, and other
ambitions rise above all, to the detriment of his clients.

Furthermore, Respondent continues this transparent discourse and all the while maintaining “The only thing I did for Iviewit is I referred them to another patent lawyer,”1 which the Company shall incite in the minds of First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee that such a statement by Respondent could not be farther from the truth, as evidenced by Section I to Section XII, infra.

Prior to Section I to Section XII, infra, however, the first feint we need to address, and as
Respondent has chosen to apprise you, is that the Company and Respondent’s employer,
Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), are parties to that certain litigation titled Proskauer
Rose LLP v. Iviewit.com, Inc. et. al., Case No. CA 01-04671 AB (Circuit Court of the
15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida filed May 2, 2001)
(“Litigation”) that, as Respondent is aware, yet prefaces and attributes the Complaint to
said Litigation, bears not one iota of relevance to the specific allegations contained in the
Company’s Complaint.

Second, another important feint to correct, and wherein Respondent hopes that First
Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee fails to see the forest from the trees, is that the Company is not now nor has ever been a so called “dotcom” company, but rather is a designer and developer of video scaling and imaging technologies where, in combination and among other things, said technologies have the capability of “panning and zooming” on any image or any image within a video without degradation to the quality of that image (where degradation is termed “pixelation” to those skilled in the art).

Additionally, the Company technologies are targeted to device original equipment
manufacturers (“OEMs”) who, when individually, or in combination with other third
party hardware, firmware, and/or software, shall include them in OEM products such as,
but not limited to, cable set top boxes, satellite set top boxes, analog-to-digital converter
boxes, next generation DVD players, digital cameras, personal video recorders, and
personal computers; alternatively the Company has the option of exclusively contributing
said essential technologies to the multimedia patent pools known as MPEG 2 (digital
compression according the digital television standard), MPEG 4 (another compression
standard at a lower bit rate, and wherein interactive objects may be embedded), and DVD
(“digital video disc”) player-drive-codec and the discs themselves.

Third, and most disingenuously, Respondent attempts to point to the two and one half
percent (2.5%) interest in, an interest that Proskauer paid a nominal, par value price for,
and that was supposedly in return for adoption by the MPEG 2 patent pool of the
Company’s essential inventions, the Company’s direct, 92.03% owned, subsidiary,
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., that more specifically translates into a one and ninety nine one
hundredths of a percent (1.99%) fully diluted interest in lower valued Class B Non-
Voting shares of the Company’s direct subsidiary, as a motivation for Proskauer Rose to see
the Company succeed, yet fails to apprise First Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee that in Respondent’s stewardship of the MPEG 2 patent pool,
which presently generates royalties in the nine figures, according to industry observers,
and that once digital television and the content there with assumes a penetration rate in
U.S. households akin to analog color television that said royalties from MPEG 2 shall rise
into the trillions of dollars, and much to the benefit of Respondent in his role as counsel,
by his admission2, and to the best of the Company’s knowledge, patent evaluator, and
Proskauer Rose, thereby dwarfing any potential realized gain from the nominally priced equity position in the Company’s direct subsidiary.

Clearly, by this analysis, the Company suggests that Respondent and his author, Steven C. Krane (“Author”), continue to apply their skills sets towards, physics and technology licensing, and legal ethics and dispute resolution, respectively, as their prospects of future careers as financial analysts have diminished as a result of this poorly attempted feint in the response of Respondent.

Fourth, and an equally poorly analyzed feint, is Respondent’s reference to a letter
presented in his deposition to that certain Litigation on November 20, 2002, wherein such
Litigation is wholly irrelevant to the Complaint, but is instructive for these purposes,
seemingly attempting to engage Respondent’s services future services, but by viewing an
electronic copy and right clicking the mouse of a IBM compatible personal computer and
selecting “properties” it is clear to Respondent that said letter’s date of creation was April
25, 2002, which was designed as a means for which to allow Respondent to “save his
soul” by reaffirming prior statements to potential licensees, and inapposite to
Respondent’s assumed intention (see Section IX Subsection A and Exhibit O – Statement
of CEO Lamont).

Lastly, Mr. Thomas Cahill, and as Respondent would have you believe, this is NOT the
Complaint of Eliot I. Bernstein, but of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation)
funded in total of approximately Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) by prominent investors and entertainment professionals alike, including, but not limited to: Wayne Huizenga, Wayne Huizenga Jr., Alan Epstein, Esq. and Michele Mulrooney, Esq. of Armstrong
Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer of Los Angeles. Cal., Kenneth Anderson, CPA,
Donald Kane (formerly Managing Director of Goldman Sachs), James Osterling, James
Armstrong, Ellen DeGenres, Alan Young, Allan Shapiro (Atlas Entertainment), Mitchell
Welsch (Vice President of UBS Paine Webber), and Jeffrey Friedstein (Vice President of
Goldman Sachs), Caroline P. Rogers, Esq. and many others.
p
Full Article - Full Rebuttal to Thomas Cahill. Part of the US Court Smackdown
on the Iviewit Inventors in the Trillion Dollar Patent Heist.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2009/12/rebuttal-of-iviewit-to-new-york-state.html
p