Foley and Lardner Disclosed Confidential Information?
Foley Lardner LLP
"" Suit Claims Foley & Lardner Disclosed Confidential Patent Information
A patent holding company has sued Foley and Lardner, claiming that the law firm disclosed confidential patent information learned during settlement talks.
The suit claims Foley and Lardner used the information to file a lawsuit on behalf of its client, Japanese electronics manufacturer Kyocera, according to The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times and the Am Law Litigation Daily. The Kyocera suit sought a declaratory judgment that it did not infringe the patents of the holding company, SPH America.
SPH America had earlier sued Kyocera for infringement of a different patent used in cell phone technology. The new suit says SPH disclosed in confidence during settlement negotiations that it also held patent rights for 3G wireless technology, but it did not plan to sue Kyocera over those patents. Kyocera’s discovery judgment action concerned the 3G technology, but was not filed under seal, according to the BLT summary of the SPH suit.
The SPH suit was filed Friday in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. SPH America was formed in 2008 by a former associate at Fish & Richardson.""
Source of Post:
http://www.abajournal.com/news/
article/suit_claims_foley_lardner_disclosed_confidential_patent_information/
Foley and Lardner Seem to have their Own Special Foley and Lardner Brand of STOMPING on Inventors and rightfully Patent Holders.
Foley & Lardner, Foley Lardner, Foley and Lardner LLP...
Showing posts with label Foley and Lardner Llp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foley and Lardner Llp. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
Rico Complaint - Pattern and History - How Many Inventors has Foley and Lardner Committed Crimes Against?
If you are an Inventor that has EVER been Taken Advantage of, Threatened, Bullied, had your Car Bombed or been set up in any way by Foley and Lardner Please Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am a Blogger, an Investigative Journalist and I am Investigating Stolen Patent Cases to Write about on my Stolen Patent Blog Network and my Industry Whistleblower Network.
My intention is simply to Get the Inventor's Story Told and Expose Corrupt Patent Attorneys in the hopes that inventors rights will be defender by the Courts of the United States of America.
If your Patent was Flat OUT Stolen by your Patent Attorney or connected Patent Attorneys they recommended, email me your Story - Crystal@CrystalCox.com - a link to your blogs or videos on your story and Let's Get you Heard.
If Foley and Larder or Connected parties have been in any way involved in you NOT getting Legal Rights or Compensation to your Patent - Email me your Story.
Foley and Larder is NOT above the Law, Not Above a RICO Lawsuit and NOT above the Truth. You are NOT alone. Foley and Lardner Patent Attorneys have done this to Others, Step Up - Tell your Foley and Lardner Story and Get Heard.
Foley and Lardner have no Moral, Ethical or Legal Right to Do this to YOU. Email your Story, your Blog, your Documents, or post yourself at www.DeniedPatent.ning.com and get your Foley and Lardner Patent Theft Story Told.
If you have experienced Patent Infringement, Stolen Patents, Stolen Technology, Corrupt Patent Attorneys, Patent Fraud or a Disclosure of Confidential Patent Information by Foley and Lardner and anyone associated with Foley and Lardner EMAIL me and Get your Story Told.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
Truth Seeker
Blogger
Investigative Journalist
Crystal Cox
My intention is simply to Get the Inventor's Story Told and Expose Corrupt Patent Attorneys in the hopes that inventors rights will be defender by the Courts of the United States of America.
If your Patent was Flat OUT Stolen by your Patent Attorney or connected Patent Attorneys they recommended, email me your Story - Crystal@CrystalCox.com - a link to your blogs or videos on your story and Let's Get you Heard.
If Foley and Larder or Connected parties have been in any way involved in you NOT getting Legal Rights or Compensation to your Patent - Email me your Story.
Foley and Larder is NOT above the Law, Not Above a RICO Lawsuit and NOT above the Truth. You are NOT alone. Foley and Lardner Patent Attorneys have done this to Others, Step Up - Tell your Foley and Lardner Story and Get Heard.
Foley and Lardner have no Moral, Ethical or Legal Right to Do this to YOU. Email your Story, your Blog, your Documents, or post yourself at www.DeniedPatent.ning.com and get your Foley and Lardner Patent Theft Story Told.
If you have experienced Patent Infringement, Stolen Patents, Stolen Technology, Corrupt Patent Attorneys, Patent Fraud or a Disclosure of Confidential Patent Information by Foley and Lardner and anyone associated with Foley and Lardner EMAIL me and Get your Story Told.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
Truth Seeker
Blogger
Investigative Journalist
Crystal Cox
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Foley and Lardner a Motto of High Integrity. Have Foley and Lardner LLP Employees and Attorneys Read the Iviewit Story, the thousands of Documents..
"Foley & Lardner LLP is one of the nation's largest and most reputable law firms. " of Course this by Foley and Lardner themselves. Yet a Thinking person can see that from www.Iviewit.tv and the Thousands of Documents on that Stolen Patent Site, Foley and Lardner are Far from "Reputable" when it comes to Helping or Representing inventors on their patents.
Now I cannot speak for Foley and Lardner LLP on other Legal Issues, however it is pretty clear from the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and from the Donald Stone Stolen Technology case at www.MarylandCorruption.com that Foley and Lardner are certainly not a "Reputable Law Firm" when it comes to assisting inventors in their Patent Rights.
We have also heard that Foley and Lardner have stolen other smaller inventions, and by smaller I mean from inventors not necessarily with million backing them, it is Reported that Foley and Lardner LLP have Stolen inventions over and over again.
Please Email your Foley and Lardner Stolen Patent Story to me Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am an Investigative Journalist and my Intention is to Tell YOUR Story.
Email me your court case, documents,evidence, proof of your Stolen Technology and share your Stolen Patent Case with the World.
Now I cannot speak for Foley and Lardner LLP on other Legal Issues, however it is pretty clear from the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and from the Donald Stone Stolen Technology case at www.MarylandCorruption.com that Foley and Lardner are certainly not a "Reputable Law Firm" when it comes to assisting inventors in their Patent Rights.
We have also heard that Foley and Lardner have stolen other smaller inventions, and by smaller I mean from inventors not necessarily with million backing them, it is Reported that Foley and Lardner LLP have Stolen inventions over and over again.
Please Email your Foley and Lardner Stolen Patent Story to me Crystal@CrystalCox.com - I am an Investigative Journalist and my Intention is to Tell YOUR Story.
Email me your court case, documents,evidence, proof of your Stolen Technology and share your Stolen Patent Case with the World.
Foley and Lardner and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower
Investigative Journalist..
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit intellectual property filings.
Online Connections found on Michael Grebe, Foley Lardner
and the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Case.
""If Patentgate pans out, as described at the www.iviewit.tv website, Michael Grebe would stand to lose any of his wealth accumulated at Foley and Lardner since 1998 and perhaps everything in a sucessful RICO and could become entangled in the criminal allegations currently under investigation by the FBI, the USPTO, the USPTO OED and international investigations that are ongoing.
Key intellectual properties of Iviewit handled by Foley and Lardner are under investigation as to how the wrong inventors, owners and assignees were falsified to the USPTO, violations of federal laws regarding on false oath submitted to the USPTO on IP applications. The Commissioner of Patents has suspended Iviewit IP pending investigations.
Similar allegations are under investigation in Europe through the EPI and through the European Patent Office and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, these false and fraudulent applications could trigger an international investigation by over twenty countries were the papers were tendered.
Michael Grebe, remained the Chairman of RNC until 2001 and resigned after the potentially fraudulent election of George W. Bush and subsequent illegal appointment of a Supreme Court US President by a narrow 5-4 vote.
Michael Grebe at the time is cited as the largest force behind getting Bush appointed.
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it.
Images at the www.iviewit.tv website The Iviewit matters have recently come before the House Judiciary Committee after being forwarded by John Dingell of the House Energy and Commerce Committee for investigation."
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it. Images at the www.iviewit.tv website
and the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Case.
""If Patentgate pans out, as described at the www.iviewit.tv website, Michael Grebe would stand to lose any of his wealth accumulated at Foley and Lardner since 1998 and perhaps everything in a sucessful RICO and could become entangled in the criminal allegations currently under investigation by the FBI, the USPTO, the USPTO OED and international investigations that are ongoing.
Key intellectual properties of Iviewit handled by Foley and Lardner are under investigation as to how the wrong inventors, owners and assignees were falsified to the USPTO, violations of federal laws regarding on false oath submitted to the USPTO on IP applications. The Commissioner of Patents has suspended Iviewit IP pending investigations.
Similar allegations are under investigation in Europe through the EPI and through the European Patent Office and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, these false and fraudulent applications could trigger an international investigation by over twenty countries were the papers were tendered.
Michael Grebe, remained the Chairman of RNC until 2001 and resigned after the potentially fraudulent election of George W. Bush and subsequent illegal appointment of a Supreme Court US President by a narrow 5-4 vote.
Michael Grebe at the time is cited as the largest force behind getting Bush appointed.
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it.
Images at the www.iviewit.tv website The Iviewit matters have recently come before the House Judiciary Committee after being forwarded by John Dingell of the House Energy and Commerce Committee for investigation."
Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.
Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it. Images at the www.iviewit.tv website
Source of this Post.
http://www.politicalfriendster.com/
rateConnection.php?id1=697&id2=5255
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Enter William Dick of Foley to Replace Raymond Joao - Misrepresentation, Fraud, Lies, Deceit, IBM Connections and More..
"Once Raymond Joao was under “investigation” by Proskauer Rose he was then terminated from service by them, Proskauer instantly found an old friend of Christopher Wheeler’s, a one William Dick of Foley and Christopher Wheeler vouched for his friend William Dick to the Board of Directors.
William Dick, according to Christopher C. Wheeler was IBM’s Patent Counsel for IBM’s far eastern patent pool.
William Dick was also friends and former coworker at IBM and then again with Friedkin with another of Christopher Wheeler’s referrals to the Iviewit companies, Brian G. Utley, who was appointed President of the Iviewit companies whereby Christopher Wheeler had presented a falsified resume for Brian Utley to the Board, Shareholders and Investors, a falsified resume in several key ways.
First, the resume presented to the Board by Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer Rose claimed Brian Utley was a college graduate, in deposition Brian Utley utterly denies ever graduating.
The most important fraud on the resume though was on the point of his past employment whereby it stated that due to Brian Utley’s innovations for the company, Diamond Turf Equipment, owned by Monte Friedkin had grown to be one of the best and largest companies of its kind due to Brian Utley’s running that company.
Per Monte Friedkin, it was more like ruining the company, as when Monte Friedkin found Brian Utley, William Dick and Christopher Wheeler stealing Inventions from him, he fired Utley and closed the shop entirely down taking a several million dollar loss.
Major misrepresentation of Brian Utley by Proskauer’s Christopher C. Wheeler but even more astonishing is that the same crew of Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler and William Dick were involved in the Monte Friedkin frauds.
Many perjured statements regarding these events were submitted to official investigatory bodies and courts and evidence of these perjurious statements have been included in the Exhibit and Linkage Section under the individuals names.
Prior to learning of their seedy past, which had been misrepresented to the Board, Investors and Shareholders, as neither Williamm Dick nor Christopher Wheeler disclosed their past history together at Friedkin’s with Brian G. Utley, nor did they share the information of the failed invention theft with anyone else.
Of course, if they did disclose the attempted theft, nobody would have retained them; everyone was in the dark as they handed out falsified resumes and financials to Investment Bankers, Iviewit Investors, Iviewit Shareholders, including the SBA and more.
Foley entered the scene under similar false pretenses with Christopher Wheeler vouching for William Dick’s integrity and again failing to notify anyone of their prior failed invention theft.
Instantly, Foley identified a mass of problems with Raymond Joao’s filing but claimed they could correct everything, such as missing assignments, missing inventors, missing patent disclosure information, etc.
Again, I myself and the Iviewit Board and Shareholders trusted yet another large law firm in the IP field referred again by Proskauer Rose and this time Foley assured Investors, Investment Banks and Shareholders that they could and would fix the problems with Raymond Joao’s filing and so they were retained, again, Proskauer’s Kenneth Rubenstein as oversight.
After several months, Brian Utley came to me and asked me to sign blank patent applications for filings the inventors had not reviewed, Brian Utley claiming they needed to be filed that day, which again was false, as they were not due for several days, Brian Utley persisting that the Inventors had no time for review and that he did not have the IP filing applications to review before signing and could not get them.
Noticing several large patent binders on his desk I went to pick them up with another founder and inventor of the Iviewit technologies, James Frazier Armstrong, and what was discovered inside them was both astonishing and criminal.
Inside the binders were intellectual property filings with now Brian Utley as sole inventor of technologies including for example an application titled “Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera” and another “Zoom Image Design Applet” both inventions of which Brian Utley was not even employed at the time of invention.
Further, Brian Utley replaced original inventors on original patent filings, those filed incorrectly by Raymond Joao, Foley fraudulently replacing inventors Zakirul Shirajee and Jude Rosario with Brian Utley on filings, again Brian Utley was nowhere near the scene of invention.
Foley now found continuing the Joao fraud it appeared although at the time hard for almost anyone to believe.
Further, there were now two or more sets of patents, which almost were identical but were wholly different, as one set missed the inventions entirely and was fraught with bad math and major errors, the others with Utley’s name seemed to be the broader and more correct filings.
In fact, some of the IP found in the binders taken from Brian Utley were for Intellectual Properties already filed at US Patent Office without anyone’s knowledge, including the Inventors, Shareholders or the Board of Directors, patents that were solely ( or soullessly ) in Utley’s name, being sent to his home address, not Iviewit’s and more.
Almost identical to the Monte Friedkin theft whereby William Dick wrote Friedkin’s inventions into Brian Utley’s name and filed them into a corporation incorporated by Proskauer Rose and Christopher Wheeler, outside Friedkin’s employ and without Friedkin’s knowledge or consent.
These fraudulent applications led to immediate taped meetings regarding the fraudulent IP with Foley and Proskauer Partners, Board Members and Shareholders where it was further learned that assignments were missing, inventors were wrong and the patent applications remained filled with errors, I submit to the Committee under the Exhibits and Linkage section of the prepared statement a sample of the IP errors, contained in William Dick’s Virginia Bar Complaint Rebuttal.
Foley was to correct everything in time for the filings, the inventors then corrected the patents, and yet Foley still filed the fraudulent patents with the bad math and other fraudulent information, discarding the inventors’ changes and continuing the fraud. The cat was almost out of the bag at that time, yet it was almost impossible to believe that these were crimes and not some type of mistakes versus part of an organized criminal syndicate of lawyers and law firms attempting to steal inventions, which only later and still today are being unraveled. At the same time, other information indicating fraud began to surface.
The Arthur Andersen Audit, The Enron Broadband Attempted Technology Transfers, the Collapse of both Enron and Arthur Andersen and the Ties to the Iviewit Inventions:
Another hidden and fraudulent set of events within the Iviewit companies links to Enron Broadband discovered at the same time that Arthur Andersen began a required Audit of the Iviewit Companies performed on behalf of Crossbow Ventures and their corresponding interests of the SBA on their SBIC loans. Andersen’s Audit discovered identically and similarly named Corporate Shell companies and other misdeeds, as Iviewit also became aware of unauthorized technology transfers taking place by Utley, Dick and Wheeler that included one with Enron Broadband and Blockbuster Video.
Enron Broadband had booked Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in revenue on a future deal with Blockbuster Video to stream full screen full frame video over the Internet, that once the crimes at Iviewit were beginning to be discovered, fell apart overnight. Many of those who fully understand the Enron fraud understand that the Broadband division’s fraud was the “straw that broke the camels back.” As soon as no technology was to transfer in backdoor secret deals to stream or download the videos due to the investigations, and the scandal was unraveling quickly from the audits findings, everything Enron Broadband and Enron had done had to become extinct overnight. Problem, they already had booked the revenue having forgotten the age-old proverb, “Don't count your chickens before they are hatched”, as greed often blinds the best and brightest too.
I note as an aside that the founder of Blockbuster, Wayne Huizenga and his Son, were the seed investors in the Iviewit companies brought to Iviewit by Proskauer and now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit. Instantly, almost overnight, with discovery of the Iviewit fraud, both Andersen who was in the midst of the Iviewit audit that was revealing fraud and Enron vanished in scandal, in a trail of criminal document shredding to cover their tracks. Seeing the danger they were in from the exposure of the crimes, our trusted advisors, our retained lawyers and accountants, then began a document shredding of the Iviewit files to rid the evidence of the illegal technology transfers and other evidence revealing their criminal acts.
Similar to what Anderson now describes taking place in the First Department regarding the Cover-Up crimes alleged. According to Iviewit Employees stolen briefcases of cash of investor monies, including the SBA’s money, then used to bribe and attempt to bribe employees to steal proprietary equipment and trade secrets as indicated in one employees written statement contained in the referenced link in my Prepared Statement Submitted to this Committee @ http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/SHAREHOLDER%20STATEMENTS%20BOOKMARKED.pdf
Witness testimony on page 10 or found on the Iviewit Homepage under Evidence Link 784. "
Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Proskauer Sucks
Also Check Out www.Iviewit.TV for More on this Proskauer Rose Deceit...
Kenneth Rubenstein
The William Dick Bar Rebuttal from Eliot Bernsten is at the Link Below.
William Dick submitted documents which the patent office claimed where fraudulent which led to suspension and investigation.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2003%2012%20William%20Dick%20Virginia%20Bar%20Complaint%20Response%20BOOKM.pdf
Proskauer
William Dick, according to Christopher C. Wheeler was IBM’s Patent Counsel for IBM’s far eastern patent pool.
William Dick was also friends and former coworker at IBM and then again with Friedkin with another of Christopher Wheeler’s referrals to the Iviewit companies, Brian G. Utley, who was appointed President of the Iviewit companies whereby Christopher Wheeler had presented a falsified resume for Brian Utley to the Board, Shareholders and Investors, a falsified resume in several key ways.
First, the resume presented to the Board by Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer Rose claimed Brian Utley was a college graduate, in deposition Brian Utley utterly denies ever graduating.
The most important fraud on the resume though was on the point of his past employment whereby it stated that due to Brian Utley’s innovations for the company, Diamond Turf Equipment, owned by Monte Friedkin had grown to be one of the best and largest companies of its kind due to Brian Utley’s running that company.
Per Monte Friedkin, it was more like ruining the company, as when Monte Friedkin found Brian Utley, William Dick and Christopher Wheeler stealing Inventions from him, he fired Utley and closed the shop entirely down taking a several million dollar loss.
Major misrepresentation of Brian Utley by Proskauer’s Christopher C. Wheeler but even more astonishing is that the same crew of Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler and William Dick were involved in the Monte Friedkin frauds.
Many perjured statements regarding these events were submitted to official investigatory bodies and courts and evidence of these perjurious statements have been included in the Exhibit and Linkage Section under the individuals names.
Prior to learning of their seedy past, which had been misrepresented to the Board, Investors and Shareholders, as neither Williamm Dick nor Christopher Wheeler disclosed their past history together at Friedkin’s with Brian G. Utley, nor did they share the information of the failed invention theft with anyone else.
Of course, if they did disclose the attempted theft, nobody would have retained them; everyone was in the dark as they handed out falsified resumes and financials to Investment Bankers, Iviewit Investors, Iviewit Shareholders, including the SBA and more.
Foley entered the scene under similar false pretenses with Christopher Wheeler vouching for William Dick’s integrity and again failing to notify anyone of their prior failed invention theft.
Instantly, Foley identified a mass of problems with Raymond Joao’s filing but claimed they could correct everything, such as missing assignments, missing inventors, missing patent disclosure information, etc.
Again, I myself and the Iviewit Board and Shareholders trusted yet another large law firm in the IP field referred again by Proskauer Rose and this time Foley assured Investors, Investment Banks and Shareholders that they could and would fix the problems with Raymond Joao’s filing and so they were retained, again, Proskauer’s Kenneth Rubenstein as oversight.
After several months, Brian Utley came to me and asked me to sign blank patent applications for filings the inventors had not reviewed, Brian Utley claiming they needed to be filed that day, which again was false, as they were not due for several days, Brian Utley persisting that the Inventors had no time for review and that he did not have the IP filing applications to review before signing and could not get them.
Noticing several large patent binders on his desk I went to pick them up with another founder and inventor of the Iviewit technologies, James Frazier Armstrong, and what was discovered inside them was both astonishing and criminal.
Inside the binders were intellectual property filings with now Brian Utley as sole inventor of technologies including for example an application titled “Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera” and another “Zoom Image Design Applet” both inventions of which Brian Utley was not even employed at the time of invention.
Further, Brian Utley replaced original inventors on original patent filings, those filed incorrectly by Raymond Joao, Foley fraudulently replacing inventors Zakirul Shirajee and Jude Rosario with Brian Utley on filings, again Brian Utley was nowhere near the scene of invention.
Foley now found continuing the Joao fraud it appeared although at the time hard for almost anyone to believe.
Further, there were now two or more sets of patents, which almost were identical but were wholly different, as one set missed the inventions entirely and was fraught with bad math and major errors, the others with Utley’s name seemed to be the broader and more correct filings.
In fact, some of the IP found in the binders taken from Brian Utley were for Intellectual Properties already filed at US Patent Office without anyone’s knowledge, including the Inventors, Shareholders or the Board of Directors, patents that were solely ( or soullessly ) in Utley’s name, being sent to his home address, not Iviewit’s and more.
Almost identical to the Monte Friedkin theft whereby William Dick wrote Friedkin’s inventions into Brian Utley’s name and filed them into a corporation incorporated by Proskauer Rose and Christopher Wheeler, outside Friedkin’s employ and without Friedkin’s knowledge or consent.
These fraudulent applications led to immediate taped meetings regarding the fraudulent IP with Foley and Proskauer Partners, Board Members and Shareholders where it was further learned that assignments were missing, inventors were wrong and the patent applications remained filled with errors, I submit to the Committee under the Exhibits and Linkage section of the prepared statement a sample of the IP errors, contained in William Dick’s Virginia Bar Complaint Rebuttal.
Foley was to correct everything in time for the filings, the inventors then corrected the patents, and yet Foley still filed the fraudulent patents with the bad math and other fraudulent information, discarding the inventors’ changes and continuing the fraud. The cat was almost out of the bag at that time, yet it was almost impossible to believe that these were crimes and not some type of mistakes versus part of an organized criminal syndicate of lawyers and law firms attempting to steal inventions, which only later and still today are being unraveled. At the same time, other information indicating fraud began to surface.
The Arthur Andersen Audit, The Enron Broadband Attempted Technology Transfers, the Collapse of both Enron and Arthur Andersen and the Ties to the Iviewit Inventions:
Another hidden and fraudulent set of events within the Iviewit companies links to Enron Broadband discovered at the same time that Arthur Andersen began a required Audit of the Iviewit Companies performed on behalf of Crossbow Ventures and their corresponding interests of the SBA on their SBIC loans. Andersen’s Audit discovered identically and similarly named Corporate Shell companies and other misdeeds, as Iviewit also became aware of unauthorized technology transfers taking place by Utley, Dick and Wheeler that included one with Enron Broadband and Blockbuster Video.
Enron Broadband had booked Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in revenue on a future deal with Blockbuster Video to stream full screen full frame video over the Internet, that once the crimes at Iviewit were beginning to be discovered, fell apart overnight. Many of those who fully understand the Enron fraud understand that the Broadband division’s fraud was the “straw that broke the camels back.” As soon as no technology was to transfer in backdoor secret deals to stream or download the videos due to the investigations, and the scandal was unraveling quickly from the audits findings, everything Enron Broadband and Enron had done had to become extinct overnight. Problem, they already had booked the revenue having forgotten the age-old proverb, “Don't count your chickens before they are hatched”, as greed often blinds the best and brightest too.
I note as an aside that the founder of Blockbuster, Wayne Huizenga and his Son, were the seed investors in the Iviewit companies brought to Iviewit by Proskauer and now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit. Instantly, almost overnight, with discovery of the Iviewit fraud, both Andersen who was in the midst of the Iviewit audit that was revealing fraud and Enron vanished in scandal, in a trail of criminal document shredding to cover their tracks. Seeing the danger they were in from the exposure of the crimes, our trusted advisors, our retained lawyers and accountants, then began a document shredding of the Iviewit files to rid the evidence of the illegal technology transfers and other evidence revealing their criminal acts.
Similar to what Anderson now describes taking place in the First Department regarding the Cover-Up crimes alleged. According to Iviewit Employees stolen briefcases of cash of investor monies, including the SBA’s money, then used to bribe and attempt to bribe employees to steal proprietary equipment and trade secrets as indicated in one employees written statement contained in the referenced link in my Prepared Statement Submitted to this Committee @ http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/SHAREHOLDER%20STATEMENTS%20BOOKMARKED.pdf
Witness testimony on page 10 or found on the Iviewit Homepage under Evidence Link 784. "
Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Proskauer Sucks
Also Check Out www.Iviewit.TV for More on this Proskauer Rose Deceit...
Kenneth Rubenstein
The William Dick Bar Rebuttal from Eliot Bernsten is at the Link Below.
William Dick submitted documents which the patent office claimed where fraudulent which led to suspension and investigation.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2003%2012%20William%20Dick%20Virginia%20Bar%20Complaint%20Response%20BOOKM.pdf
Proskauer
Monday, December 21, 2009
Roy L. Reardon, Response to Roy Reardon - New York Supreme Court Appellate Division - Chairman
DRAFT Response to Roy Reardon, New York Supreme Court
How Long Can This Guy handle Complaints against Himself, be involved Coverups, Conspiracies, and the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent by way of ignoring complaints and DOING Nothing?
r
Here is the Responce to Roy L. Reardon NY Supreme Court
from Eliot Bernstein.
r
Monday, December 14, 2009
I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
TO: Roy L. Reardon
Chairman
New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First
Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
(212) 401-0800
also Partner @
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017-3954
Regarding: Your Continued Insanity in handling complaints against YOURSELF, Alan W. Friedberg and Other Defendents in a Twelve Count - Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Legally Related to a Whistleblower Causing Mass Liablity, you are Concealing from the State of New York and the People of New York.
roy reardon
Dear Mr. Reardon,
I. Response to Your Letter Dated December 07, 2009.
Your audacity bemuses me and allow me to retort to your and Mr. Friedberg’s
insanity and again put forth some basic realities regarding your misconduct and criminal
acts.
First, my seventy-eight page complaint against Mr. Friedberg and YOU, if you
have read it, is also a RE-FILED complaint against you, this letter shall serve as a third
and a bit more severe complaint.
Your letter is in response to the earlier complaints against Mr. Friedberg and yourself that you buried since February 2009, until sequestered by the NEW YORK STATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, which requested that you provide information regarding the CONCEALED complaints to them, not me.
Nevertheless, in delusion, you responded to me regarding your complaints and tried to
dismiss complaints against yourself and your partner in crime, Mr. Friedberg, while your
department is in a lawsuit with me. In that lawsuit, your department has representative
ILLEGALLY retained counsel, the New York Attorney General and yet you continue to
pester me with your continued handling of your own and Mr. Friedberg’s complaints, as well as, attempting ILLEGALLY to dismiss complaints against other defendants in the
lawsuit.
Let me dissect your letters errors one by one before I begin my further FORMAL
COMPLAINT against you in addition to the one you have buried for months and now try
to dismiss:
1. First, you state, “Your 78 page fax dated December 3, 2009 labeled as a
complaint against Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg has been referred to me.”
The problem in this statement is that you fail to see that the 78 Page Fax
Complaint, is a re-filing of the complaint you have admitted to concealing
since February 2009 against both YOU and Mr. Friedberg.
The FORMAL COMPLAINT is actually against you and Mr. Friedberg, so had you really
read the Complaint, you would see it would be impossible for it to be referred to you, as you are a Main Character in the Complaint. I resubmitted that complaint due ONLY to your prior CONCEALMENT of OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.
I have attached herein, that same complaint but have individually broke it out for you with your very own cover page. By the by, your inappropriate letter that defies ethics again has NO FORMAL DOCKETING number for the Friedberg case, so I wonder how to appeal it or
if it has been CONCEALED again.
2. Next, you claim laughably, “Among other things, the document contains
copies of letters from you to State Senator John L. Sampson of the New York
Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the DDC has engaged in conflicts of
interest, corruption and other wrongful acts. We find no merit in those
accusations.”
The silliness of your statement here, although criminal in
nature, is very telling of your cognizance of the allegations contained in the
FORMAL COMPLAINT that was CONCEALED and further stands as
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CONTINUED CRIMINAL
CONDUCT in trying to dismiss complaints you and your whole department
are conflicted in, Mr. Friedberg and yourself especially, since you have
FORMAL COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST BOTH OF YOU.
Now it becomes a bit dicey for you, as your RULES AND REGULATIONS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT CLAIM § 605.6 Investigations and Informal Proceedings
(g) Preliminary Screening of Complaints. Any complaint
received by the Office of Chief Counsel against a member
of the Committee or Staff counsel involving alleged
misconduct shall be transmitted forthwith to the Committee
Chairperson, who shall assign it either to the Office of
Chief Counsel or to special counsel who shall conduct or
direct the appropriate investigation, and give a written
recommendation as to the disposition of the Complaint to
the Committee Chairperson, who shall determine the
appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
Any such Complaint which relates to the Committee Chairperson shall, in the first instance, be transmitted to a Hearing Panel Chairperson, who shall conduct the appropriate investigation and determine the appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
My complaint Mr. Roy Reardon is a twofold problem for you as the FORMAL COMPLAINTS YOU HAVE CONCEALED SINCE FEBRUARY 2009, are against YOU, acting as the Chair of the DDC and your partner in crime, Mr. Alan Friedberg, acting as Chief Counsel.
It is clever how in your SELF DISMISSING LETTER which defies ethics, you try and CONCEAL that Friedberg’s complaint has been transferred to you, which according to your own rules would be a violation, as the COMPLAINT is also against YOU.
Thus, you are AGAIN violating your OWN rules by trying to hide that you
also are knowingly COMPLAINED of FORMALLY, by way of the Sampson
Letters you have received several times now and the ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT I re-filed. Nice try, though, “desperate men…”
3. Amazingly, your letter continues “In any event, your new "complaint" against
Mr. Friedberg provides no basis on which the Committee should pursue
action.” First, there is NO NEW COMPLAINT, this is merely a re-filing of
the ORIGINAL COMPLAINT you have ILLEGALLY CONCEALED in
violation of LAW against both you and Mr. Alan W. Friedberg and now your trying to
make it as a new complaint is both ridiculous and further criminal and will so
be reported to ALL appropriate oversight authorities and criminal
investigators of your continued violations and further attempt at CRIMINAL
CONCEALMENT.
Second, since you should not be handling complaints against yourself or your partner in crime Mr. Friedberg, it defies logic and law how you claim there is no basis in a complaint against yourself and where you should have already turned the matter over, per your rules you would have to turn the matter over to a Hearing Panel Chair, which obviously you fail to do in regard to the FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND MR.
FRIEDBERG.
Again serving as prima facie evidence of your CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT, this statement will also be forwarded to all
appropriate oversight of your continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
4. The next statement truly shows your detachment from both reality and the
rules and regulations that define ETHICS. I quote your insanity, “Indeed, you
appear to be arguing that anyone associated with the Committee is precluded
from considering the merits of your complaint.” Yes indeed Mr. Reardon I do
make the claim that NOBODY in your department can handle these
complaints and for several factual reasons.
First, your department is a DEFENDANT in a 12-COUNT, 12-TRILLION dollar LAWSUIT, which I am certain you are not concealing from state auditors, well, perhaps you could clarify that for me in writing, as I am sure you are reporting the liability on
your and the states books, liabilities directly related to your CRIMINAL
CONDUCT and CONTINUED CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
As DEFENDANT’S in the ONGOING LEGAL ACTION the whole First
Department is precluded from involvement due to CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY this creates.
Next, the CONFLICTS and APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY also act
together to create CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS. This CRIMINAL ACT, also will be reported to your
oversight and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
As the First Department DDC is a DEFENDANT in the LAWSUIT, the DDC
also has representative ILLEGAL counsel, the New York Attorney General
and Monica Connell of their offices.
Upon filing the complaints against other DEFENDANTS in the same LAWSUIT, Ms. Connell advised me as YOUR COUNSEL to file the complaints with your offices against the Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner attorneys (as the attorneys complained of are licensed
there) but that they would be moved instantly to a NON CONFLICTED
THIRD PARTY.
Moved to avoid the OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY your handling of the complaints creates.
Yet, somehow, you sneaky dog, you and your partner in
crime, Mr. Friedberg, interceded and attempted to DISMISS COMPLAINTS
AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THE LAWSUIT YOUR
DEPARTMENT IS A NAMED DEFENDANT IN.
Again, these CONFLICTS act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and will duly be noted to all
oversight of the DDC and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
Therefore, your question asks if I think anyone in your department can handle
these complaints and the answer is NO THEY CANNOT and I advise YOU,
Mr. Friedberg and any other department official that each act on these
complaints will result in further FORMAL COMPLAINTS to your oversight
and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
5. Your letter continues insanely “On October 7, 2009 I wrote to you advising that your previous complaints against Mr. Friedberg and other attorneys have been closed.” Now here your sneakiness is better than a proverbial “snake in the grass” as you attempt to state that my previous complaints filed against you and Mr. Friedberg for dismissing complaints against other DEFENDANTS are closed. Mixing apples and oranges while hiding the beef.
First, my previous complaints against other attorneys, resulted in you and Mr.
Friedberg handling them, leading to separate complaints against both you and
Mr. Friedberg.
Love how you refer to “other attorneys” in a third person voice, versus
identifying that YOU Mr. Reardon, are one of the “other” attorneys you
reference. Do you often refer to yourself in the third person; this is a very
symbolic sign of pathological behavior indicating delusion. Perhaps you
could have written more accurately, something like – your complaints against
Mr. Friedberg, MYSELF and other attorneys.
Again, you CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS, which creates further CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
Finally, I am not sure how the FORMAL COMPLAINTS can be closed when they have not been opened formally with Complaint Numbers for me to even respond too, as demanded in my complaint and as part of the RULES and REGULATIONS of your department that you psychotically continue to ignore, ah, “desperate men…”
6. Finally, this my favorite act of your insanity, I quote, “You may wish to
consider consulting with counsel regarding the matters raised in your
submissions.” To be clear, I have consulted counsel, YOUR COUNSEL the
New York Attorney General and it was determined that you are conflicted and
cannot handle complaints against other Defendants nor yourself and Mr.
Friedberg, per your own departmental Rules and Regulation, Part 600, per the
Attorney Code of Conduct and Law. The result, was to have the complaints moved to a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.
I advise you therefore to consider consulting with YOUR COUNSEL regarding the matters raised against you CRIMINALLY and then CIVIL charges against you and your
department in the civil complaint.
I advise you to consult your counsel as to further pestering me directly, where
as you know, I represent myself Pro Se, so it is highly unethical and against
the Attorney Conduct Code for you, an attorney, to be contacting me directly
when you have representative counsel.
I find teaching your ethics at this point to be an utter waste of my time, as you seem not be able to discern realistically what your own ethical obligations are, nor what the Rules
you are charged with oversighting state and finally the Law.
I therefore highly recommend that you discontinue with contacting me directly and have
your attorney handle these matters going forward.
Of course, your attorney, the New York Attorney General, is also a DEFENDANT in my LAWSUIT and his representation is therefore suspect as aiding and abetting illegally your department through CONFLICTED representation that VIOLATES the NYAG Rules Public Office Rule 17 for one and that ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION also compounds to cause
Obstruction of Justice as the Conflict precludes the NYAG from doing his public duty of investigating dirty rotten Public Officials, like yourself and Mr. Friedberg.
As my LAWSUIT has been marked legally “RELATED” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to that of the First Department DDC Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, we see that Anderson similarly is complaining that the NYAG illegal representation of State Defendants from your offices, is a Violation of the NYAG Rules and Regulations and Law, whereby you can get a gander for her position at the following URL, incorporated by reference in entirety herein @ ____________
The allegations in the FORMAL COMPLAINTS against Mr. Friedberg and yourself are replete with concrete evidence of crimes you are committing by violating the very ethics laws you and Mr. Friedberg are in charge of upholding. Conflicts like your department and several of the First Department Judges are direct defendants in a TWELVE COUNT, TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL LAWSUIT that of course, I know you are not too delusional to have reported this liability and your involvement to any state auditors, state agencies and others who have liability resulting from your continued criminal conduct.
The very fact that you attempt to ignore the conflicts and continue to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE in violation of FEDERAL and STATE CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION LAWS, ATTORNEY ETHICS CODES and more will be formally reported to your oversight and criminal authorities.
Yet, while your letter attempts to claim no conflict, almost, you failed to sign and
return the CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM attached to the
COMPLAINT. This failure serves as further evidence of your CRIMINAL
OBSTRUCTION through CONFLICT OF INTEREST, which now will be formulated
along with this letter, to several of your oversight authorities, as a FORMAL AFFIRMED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU.
Under the laws of NEW YORK and the UNITED STATES, in the interim until authorities can arrest you for your felonious acts, I place you under CITIZENS ARREST and I advise you not only to seek independent counsel but also to turn yourself in to the proper authorities for processing for FELONY charges both state and federal.
I remind you that I have sent the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK
and FEDERAL AUTHORITIES information regarding your involvement in RICO
related crimes, along with many in your department.
Quite contrary to your claim, I do not think anyone in your CORRUPT COMMITTEE or DEPARTMENT can handle these complaints without conflict and if you are so confident in your meritorious good work on behalf of the Good People of New York, you should welcome a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY review, as certainly you have nothing to hide.
Nothing to hide but everything, including the complaint against yourself that you keep concealing, even in your recent reply trying to dismiss the FORMAL COMPLAINT
against Mr. Friedberg while failing to state that you are also complained of since February of 2009, making your handling of any complaints, including your own, not only conflicted but criminal. Your attached letter, mentions other attorneys complained of but
fails to mention that YOU sir are one of those complained of and therefore are certainly
conflicted.
II. Actions to be Taken
• Please see 78 Page Complaint Against You filed for a Second Time since
February 2009 after you concealed those complaints
• This complaint is a refilling of that complaint and submission to the
Judiciary Committee for Oversight of Your Office and pursuing criminal investigations
within their scope of power over your Department, as part of the ONGOING
INVESTIGATION BY THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ABOUT YOUR and YOUR DEPARTMENTS FAILURE IN TOTO.
• Note that we are attaching copy of a SWORN AFFIRMED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT to all of the following, including but not limited to,
o Blah
o Blah
III. Conclusion
According to Whistleblower Christine Anderson under sworn oath in a Federal
Court and many others who have come forth to expose the ongoing Whitewashing of
Complaints, your offices are alleged to be involved in criminal obstruction of official
proceedings and threatening federal witnesses.
Nice reputation for an ETHICS department but we will get to that in a moment.
Not only are your offices accused of obstructing proceedings against “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” but further criminal Whitewashing of Complaints was also alleged in regard to Whitewashing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney by the “Cleaner”.
The “Cleaner” aka Naomi Goldstein of your offices, so named by your former Staff Attorney, Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson your offices should be under not only internal investigation but external.
Again, solid reasons for you and your entire department’s recusal from further involvement, other than turning yourself in and getting non-conflicted counsel to represent you.
Further, and most importantly, your failure to regulate the misconducts of the lawyers in your department according to well established rules and regulations of your department, you have failed this great nation and the People of the Great State of New York in your obfuscations of regulation.
For example, had you done your job investigating Proskauer Rose for example when I first complained, your department could have saved many peoples losses in the Sir Allan Stanford affairs, where Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom ( a former SEC Enforcement Employee ) were involved in teaching employees how to lie to Federal Authorities and have been sued for the entire amount of the Ponzi losses in a Global Class Action lawsuit.
My recommendation will be for any unrecoverable losses that those VICTIMS sue you and
your department for failure to regulate and possible conspiratorial roles in the cover up of
the crimes.
Had you investigated Proskauer Rose when I first informed you of their misconducts
and crimes, you also could have prevented many people over the 7 seven years from
losing their lives savings in the Bernard Madoff affair and saved the hundreds of charities
destroyed by Madoff and lives ruined.
Yes, you are the oversight that could have prevented these calamities and are responsible for your failures to the victims. In fact, since Proskauer appears to have senior partners basically running the First Department and the Ethics Department from Steven C. Krane, a Proskauer partner caught handling his own and his firms complaints while an officer of the First Department DDC, to recently deceased DDC officer Stephen Rakowe Kaye, a Proskauer partner and married to former Chief Judge Judith Kaye who had ultimate control over the department with her husband and Krane her former clerk, no wonder complaints bounced off them into your trash can.
Yet and personally more tragic, is the fact that had you done your job regulating
the attorneys, your “favored law firms and lawyers” most likely a BOMB would not have
been placed in my family minivan ( images at www.iviewit.tv ) allowing someone to
ATTEMPT to MURDER us.
It is strange to note how the timing of that event coincided with discovery that STEVEN C. KRANE of Proskauer and Thomas Cahill ( former Chief Counsel of the DDC ) where found violating First Department DDC Rules and Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law leading to the First Department Court, in inanimous consent, transferring complaints against Krane of PROSKAUER and also a FIRST DEPARTMENT OFFICER, Krane’s Proskauer partners he was representing ILLEGALLY in complaints while a DDC OFFICER and even Krane representing himself while an officer ( sounds familiar ).
Thomas Cahill also was transferred for Special Inquiry at that time and your recent handling of that complaint, with Mr. Stephen Lamont and attempting to dismiss that complaint, again while really clever, will also be further evidence of your CRIMINAL ACTS filed with CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES.
Lest us not forget to remind those judging your actions of the fact that your
department is supposed to regulate Wall Street lawyers and we can all see what your lax
regulations have produced.
I also remind you that your department appears to be the regulator for several fine attorneys in the Justice Department and Office of Legal Counsel who are being accused of war crimes for their violations of ethics and law that have allowed the torture and murder of innocent untried people, quite similar to Nazi Extermination Camps where habeas rights similarly were removed by dirty rotten lawyers, who were actually criminals with legal degrees who made concentration camps and murder legal for undesirables.
I remind you of the Judges Trial so that today while you feel elevated above the law, enough so to first conceal and then attempt to dismiss complaints against yourself, in drunken and high delusions of grandeur, that one day you will be tried for these crimes as Justice is restored and even the Nazi lawyers and judges had their day in the infamous Judges Trial at the Nuremberg Trials. I await hearing your defenses from behind the glass.
Truly, and I mean this FIGURATIVELY not LITERALLY, I hope this letter feels
like a bomb in your car and you may live with your family in similar trepidation that one
day your world will end, when your scam ends and you are tried in a fair and impartial
court, free of conflict ( you know the thing your supposed to be protecting ) where
hopefully you will serve the remainder of your life contemplating the magnanimity of the
damage you have done to my family, my shareholders, those you have embroiled in your
crimes like Ms. Anderson, those victims of your crimes that appear lining up with each
new Judiciary Committee, all those who lost homes or 401k’s from lawyers schemes in
an unregulated capacity free to commit financial crimes, as the REGULATOR, YOU was
naught more than a criminal in on the crimes.
Most DisRespectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
cc/ec:
Roy L. Reardon
Chairman Monday, December 14, 2009
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Re: YOUR CONTINUED INSANITY IN HANDLING COMPLAINTS AGAINST YOURSELF,
ALAN W. FRIEDBERG AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN A TWELVE COUNT TWELVE
TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT LEGALLY RELATED TO A WHISTLEBLOWER
CAUSING MASS LIABILITY YOU ARE CONCEALING FROM THE STATE AND
PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM YOUR CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT
roy reardon
Iviewit Holdings , Inc.
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Source:
www.iviewit.tv
r
Much More on Roy L. Reardon Coming Soon.
r Iviewit Holdings, Eliot Bernstein,
How Long Can This Guy handle Complaints against Himself, be involved Coverups, Conspiracies, and the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent by way of ignoring complaints and DOING Nothing?
r
Here is the Responce to Roy L. Reardon NY Supreme Court
from Eliot Bernstein.
r
Monday, December 14, 2009
I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
TO: Roy L. Reardon
Chairman
New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First
Judicial Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway
New York, NY 10006
(212) 401-0800
also Partner @
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017-3954
Regarding: Your Continued Insanity in handling complaints against YOURSELF, Alan W. Friedberg and Other Defendents in a Twelve Count - Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Legally Related to a Whistleblower Causing Mass Liablity, you are Concealing from the State of New York and the People of New York.
roy reardon
Dear Mr. Reardon,
I. Response to Your Letter Dated December 07, 2009.
Your audacity bemuses me and allow me to retort to your and Mr. Friedberg’s
insanity and again put forth some basic realities regarding your misconduct and criminal
acts.
First, my seventy-eight page complaint against Mr. Friedberg and YOU, if you
have read it, is also a RE-FILED complaint against you, this letter shall serve as a third
and a bit more severe complaint.
Your letter is in response to the earlier complaints against Mr. Friedberg and yourself that you buried since February 2009, until sequestered by the NEW YORK STATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, which requested that you provide information regarding the CONCEALED complaints to them, not me.
Nevertheless, in delusion, you responded to me regarding your complaints and tried to
dismiss complaints against yourself and your partner in crime, Mr. Friedberg, while your
department is in a lawsuit with me. In that lawsuit, your department has representative
ILLEGALLY retained counsel, the New York Attorney General and yet you continue to
pester me with your continued handling of your own and Mr. Friedberg’s complaints, as well as, attempting ILLEGALLY to dismiss complaints against other defendants in the
lawsuit.
Let me dissect your letters errors one by one before I begin my further FORMAL
COMPLAINT against you in addition to the one you have buried for months and now try
to dismiss:
1. First, you state, “Your 78 page fax dated December 3, 2009 labeled as a
complaint against Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg has been referred to me.”
The problem in this statement is that you fail to see that the 78 Page Fax
Complaint, is a re-filing of the complaint you have admitted to concealing
since February 2009 against both YOU and Mr. Friedberg.
The FORMAL COMPLAINT is actually against you and Mr. Friedberg, so had you really
read the Complaint, you would see it would be impossible for it to be referred to you, as you are a Main Character in the Complaint. I resubmitted that complaint due ONLY to your prior CONCEALMENT of OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS.
I have attached herein, that same complaint but have individually broke it out for you with your very own cover page. By the by, your inappropriate letter that defies ethics again has NO FORMAL DOCKETING number for the Friedberg case, so I wonder how to appeal it or
if it has been CONCEALED again.
2. Next, you claim laughably, “Among other things, the document contains
copies of letters from you to State Senator John L. Sampson of the New York
Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that the DDC has engaged in conflicts of
interest, corruption and other wrongful acts. We find no merit in those
accusations.”
The silliness of your statement here, although criminal in
nature, is very telling of your cognizance of the allegations contained in the
FORMAL COMPLAINT that was CONCEALED and further stands as
ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE OF YOUR CONTINUED CRIMINAL
CONDUCT in trying to dismiss complaints you and your whole department
are conflicted in, Mr. Friedberg and yourself especially, since you have
FORMAL COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST BOTH OF YOU.
Now it becomes a bit dicey for you, as your RULES AND REGULATIONS OF YOUR DEPARTMENT CLAIM § 605.6 Investigations and Informal Proceedings
(g) Preliminary Screening of Complaints. Any complaint
received by the Office of Chief Counsel against a member
of the Committee or Staff counsel involving alleged
misconduct shall be transmitted forthwith to the Committee
Chairperson, who shall assign it either to the Office of
Chief Counsel or to special counsel who shall conduct or
direct the appropriate investigation, and give a written
recommendation as to the disposition of the Complaint to
the Committee Chairperson, who shall determine the
appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
Any such Complaint which relates to the Committee Chairperson shall, in the first instance, be transmitted to a Hearing Panel Chairperson, who shall conduct the appropriate investigation and determine the appropriate disposition of the Complaint.
My complaint Mr. Roy Reardon is a twofold problem for you as the FORMAL COMPLAINTS YOU HAVE CONCEALED SINCE FEBRUARY 2009, are against YOU, acting as the Chair of the DDC and your partner in crime, Mr. Alan Friedberg, acting as Chief Counsel.
It is clever how in your SELF DISMISSING LETTER which defies ethics, you try and CONCEAL that Friedberg’s complaint has been transferred to you, which according to your own rules would be a violation, as the COMPLAINT is also against YOU.
Thus, you are AGAIN violating your OWN rules by trying to hide that you
also are knowingly COMPLAINED of FORMALLY, by way of the Sampson
Letters you have received several times now and the ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT I re-filed. Nice try, though, “desperate men…”
3. Amazingly, your letter continues “In any event, your new "complaint" against
Mr. Friedberg provides no basis on which the Committee should pursue
action.” First, there is NO NEW COMPLAINT, this is merely a re-filing of
the ORIGINAL COMPLAINT you have ILLEGALLY CONCEALED in
violation of LAW against both you and Mr. Alan W. Friedberg and now your trying to
make it as a new complaint is both ridiculous and further criminal and will so
be reported to ALL appropriate oversight authorities and criminal
investigators of your continued violations and further attempt at CRIMINAL
CONCEALMENT.
Second, since you should not be handling complaints against yourself or your partner in crime Mr. Friedberg, it defies logic and law how you claim there is no basis in a complaint against yourself and where you should have already turned the matter over, per your rules you would have to turn the matter over to a Hearing Panel Chair, which obviously you fail to do in regard to the FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU AND MR.
FRIEDBERG.
Again serving as prima facie evidence of your CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT, this statement will also be forwarded to all
appropriate oversight of your continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
4. The next statement truly shows your detachment from both reality and the
rules and regulations that define ETHICS. I quote your insanity, “Indeed, you
appear to be arguing that anyone associated with the Committee is precluded
from considering the merits of your complaint.” Yes indeed Mr. Reardon I do
make the claim that NOBODY in your department can handle these
complaints and for several factual reasons.
First, your department is a DEFENDANT in a 12-COUNT, 12-TRILLION dollar LAWSUIT, which I am certain you are not concealing from state auditors, well, perhaps you could clarify that for me in writing, as I am sure you are reporting the liability on
your and the states books, liabilities directly related to your CRIMINAL
CONDUCT and CONTINUED CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
As DEFENDANT’S in the ONGOING LEGAL ACTION the whole First
Department is precluded from involvement due to CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY this creates.
Next, the CONFLICTS and APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY also act
together to create CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS. This CRIMINAL ACT, also will be reported to your
oversight and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
As the First Department DDC is a DEFENDANT in the LAWSUIT, the DDC
also has representative ILLEGAL counsel, the New York Attorney General
and Monica Connell of their offices.
Upon filing the complaints against other DEFENDANTS in the same LAWSUIT, Ms. Connell advised me as YOUR COUNSEL to file the complaints with your offices against the Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner attorneys (as the attorneys complained of are licensed
there) but that they would be moved instantly to a NON CONFLICTED
THIRD PARTY.
Moved to avoid the OBVIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF IMPROPRIETY your handling of the complaints creates.
Yet, somehow, you sneaky dog, you and your partner in
crime, Mr. Friedberg, interceded and attempted to DISMISS COMPLAINTS
AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS IN THE LAWSUIT YOUR
DEPARTMENT IS A NAMED DEFENDANT IN.
Again, these CONFLICTS act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and will duly be noted to all
oversight of the DDC and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
Therefore, your question asks if I think anyone in your department can handle
these complaints and the answer is NO THEY CANNOT and I advise YOU,
Mr. Friedberg and any other department official that each act on these
complaints will result in further FORMAL COMPLAINTS to your oversight
and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS.
5. Your letter continues insanely “On October 7, 2009 I wrote to you advising that your previous complaints against Mr. Friedberg and other attorneys have been closed.” Now here your sneakiness is better than a proverbial “snake in the grass” as you attempt to state that my previous complaints filed against you and Mr. Friedberg for dismissing complaints against other DEFENDANTS are closed. Mixing apples and oranges while hiding the beef.
First, my previous complaints against other attorneys, resulted in you and Mr.
Friedberg handling them, leading to separate complaints against both you and
Mr. Friedberg.
Love how you refer to “other attorneys” in a third person voice, versus
identifying that YOU Mr. Reardon, are one of the “other” attorneys you
reference. Do you often refer to yourself in the third person; this is a very
symbolic sign of pathological behavior indicating delusion. Perhaps you
could have written more accurately, something like – your complaints against
Mr. Friedberg, MYSELF and other attorneys.
Again, you CONCEAL MATERIAL FACTS, which creates further CRIMINAL CONDUCT.
Finally, I am not sure how the FORMAL COMPLAINTS can be closed when they have not been opened formally with Complaint Numbers for me to even respond too, as demanded in my complaint and as part of the RULES and REGULATIONS of your department that you psychotically continue to ignore, ah, “desperate men…”
6. Finally, this my favorite act of your insanity, I quote, “You may wish to
consider consulting with counsel regarding the matters raised in your
submissions.” To be clear, I have consulted counsel, YOUR COUNSEL the
New York Attorney General and it was determined that you are conflicted and
cannot handle complaints against other Defendants nor yourself and Mr.
Friedberg, per your own departmental Rules and Regulation, Part 600, per the
Attorney Code of Conduct and Law. The result, was to have the complaints moved to a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.
I advise you therefore to consider consulting with YOUR COUNSEL regarding the matters raised against you CRIMINALLY and then CIVIL charges against you and your
department in the civil complaint.
I advise you to consult your counsel as to further pestering me directly, where
as you know, I represent myself Pro Se, so it is highly unethical and against
the Attorney Conduct Code for you, an attorney, to be contacting me directly
when you have representative counsel.
I find teaching your ethics at this point to be an utter waste of my time, as you seem not be able to discern realistically what your own ethical obligations are, nor what the Rules
you are charged with oversighting state and finally the Law.
I therefore highly recommend that you discontinue with contacting me directly and have
your attorney handle these matters going forward.
Of course, your attorney, the New York Attorney General, is also a DEFENDANT in my LAWSUIT and his representation is therefore suspect as aiding and abetting illegally your department through CONFLICTED representation that VIOLATES the NYAG Rules Public Office Rule 17 for one and that ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION also compounds to cause
Obstruction of Justice as the Conflict precludes the NYAG from doing his public duty of investigating dirty rotten Public Officials, like yourself and Mr. Friedberg.
As my LAWSUIT has been marked legally “RELATED” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to that of the First Department DDC Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, we see that Anderson similarly is complaining that the NYAG illegal representation of State Defendants from your offices, is a Violation of the NYAG Rules and Regulations and Law, whereby you can get a gander for her position at the following URL, incorporated by reference in entirety herein @ ____________
The allegations in the FORMAL COMPLAINTS against Mr. Friedberg and yourself are replete with concrete evidence of crimes you are committing by violating the very ethics laws you and Mr. Friedberg are in charge of upholding. Conflicts like your department and several of the First Department Judges are direct defendants in a TWELVE COUNT, TWELVE TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL LAWSUIT that of course, I know you are not too delusional to have reported this liability and your involvement to any state auditors, state agencies and others who have liability resulting from your continued criminal conduct.
The very fact that you attempt to ignore the conflicts and continue to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE in violation of FEDERAL and STATE CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION LAWS, ATTORNEY ETHICS CODES and more will be formally reported to your oversight and criminal authorities.
Yet, while your letter attempts to claim no conflict, almost, you failed to sign and
return the CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM attached to the
COMPLAINT. This failure serves as further evidence of your CRIMINAL
OBSTRUCTION through CONFLICT OF INTEREST, which now will be formulated
along with this letter, to several of your oversight authorities, as a FORMAL AFFIRMED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU.
Under the laws of NEW YORK and the UNITED STATES, in the interim until authorities can arrest you for your felonious acts, I place you under CITIZENS ARREST and I advise you not only to seek independent counsel but also to turn yourself in to the proper authorities for processing for FELONY charges both state and federal.
I remind you that I have sent the JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF NEW YORK
and FEDERAL AUTHORITIES information regarding your involvement in RICO
related crimes, along with many in your department.
Quite contrary to your claim, I do not think anyone in your CORRUPT COMMITTEE or DEPARTMENT can handle these complaints without conflict and if you are so confident in your meritorious good work on behalf of the Good People of New York, you should welcome a NON CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY review, as certainly you have nothing to hide.
Nothing to hide but everything, including the complaint against yourself that you keep concealing, even in your recent reply trying to dismiss the FORMAL COMPLAINT
against Mr. Friedberg while failing to state that you are also complained of since February of 2009, making your handling of any complaints, including your own, not only conflicted but criminal. Your attached letter, mentions other attorneys complained of but
fails to mention that YOU sir are one of those complained of and therefore are certainly
conflicted.
II. Actions to be Taken
• Please see 78 Page Complaint Against You filed for a Second Time since
February 2009 after you concealed those complaints
• This complaint is a refilling of that complaint and submission to the
Judiciary Committee for Oversight of Your Office and pursuing criminal investigations
within their scope of power over your Department, as part of the ONGOING
INVESTIGATION BY THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
ABOUT YOUR and YOUR DEPARTMENTS FAILURE IN TOTO.
• Note that we are attaching copy of a SWORN AFFIRMED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT to all of the following, including but not limited to,
o Blah
o Blah
III. Conclusion
According to Whistleblower Christine Anderson under sworn oath in a Federal
Court and many others who have come forth to expose the ongoing Whitewashing of
Complaints, your offices are alleged to be involved in criminal obstruction of official
proceedings and threatening federal witnesses.
Nice reputation for an ETHICS department but we will get to that in a moment.
Not only are your offices accused of obstructing proceedings against “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” but further criminal Whitewashing of Complaints was also alleged in regard to Whitewashing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney by the “Cleaner”.
The “Cleaner” aka Naomi Goldstein of your offices, so named by your former Staff Attorney, Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson your offices should be under not only internal investigation but external.
Again, solid reasons for you and your entire department’s recusal from further involvement, other than turning yourself in and getting non-conflicted counsel to represent you.
Further, and most importantly, your failure to regulate the misconducts of the lawyers in your department according to well established rules and regulations of your department, you have failed this great nation and the People of the Great State of New York in your obfuscations of regulation.
For example, had you done your job investigating Proskauer Rose for example when I first complained, your department could have saved many peoples losses in the Sir Allan Stanford affairs, where Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom ( a former SEC Enforcement Employee ) were involved in teaching employees how to lie to Federal Authorities and have been sued for the entire amount of the Ponzi losses in a Global Class Action lawsuit.
My recommendation will be for any unrecoverable losses that those VICTIMS sue you and
your department for failure to regulate and possible conspiratorial roles in the cover up of
the crimes.
Had you investigated Proskauer Rose when I first informed you of their misconducts
and crimes, you also could have prevented many people over the 7 seven years from
losing their lives savings in the Bernard Madoff affair and saved the hundreds of charities
destroyed by Madoff and lives ruined.
Yes, you are the oversight that could have prevented these calamities and are responsible for your failures to the victims. In fact, since Proskauer appears to have senior partners basically running the First Department and the Ethics Department from Steven C. Krane, a Proskauer partner caught handling his own and his firms complaints while an officer of the First Department DDC, to recently deceased DDC officer Stephen Rakowe Kaye, a Proskauer partner and married to former Chief Judge Judith Kaye who had ultimate control over the department with her husband and Krane her former clerk, no wonder complaints bounced off them into your trash can.
Yet and personally more tragic, is the fact that had you done your job regulating
the attorneys, your “favored law firms and lawyers” most likely a BOMB would not have
been placed in my family minivan ( images at www.iviewit.tv ) allowing someone to
ATTEMPT to MURDER us.
It is strange to note how the timing of that event coincided with discovery that STEVEN C. KRANE of Proskauer and Thomas Cahill ( former Chief Counsel of the DDC ) where found violating First Department DDC Rules and Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law leading to the First Department Court, in inanimous consent, transferring complaints against Krane of PROSKAUER and also a FIRST DEPARTMENT OFFICER, Krane’s Proskauer partners he was representing ILLEGALLY in complaints while a DDC OFFICER and even Krane representing himself while an officer ( sounds familiar ).
Thomas Cahill also was transferred for Special Inquiry at that time and your recent handling of that complaint, with Mr. Stephen Lamont and attempting to dismiss that complaint, again while really clever, will also be further evidence of your CRIMINAL ACTS filed with CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES.
Lest us not forget to remind those judging your actions of the fact that your
department is supposed to regulate Wall Street lawyers and we can all see what your lax
regulations have produced.
I also remind you that your department appears to be the regulator for several fine attorneys in the Justice Department and Office of Legal Counsel who are being accused of war crimes for their violations of ethics and law that have allowed the torture and murder of innocent untried people, quite similar to Nazi Extermination Camps where habeas rights similarly were removed by dirty rotten lawyers, who were actually criminals with legal degrees who made concentration camps and murder legal for undesirables.
I remind you of the Judges Trial so that today while you feel elevated above the law, enough so to first conceal and then attempt to dismiss complaints against yourself, in drunken and high delusions of grandeur, that one day you will be tried for these crimes as Justice is restored and even the Nazi lawyers and judges had their day in the infamous Judges Trial at the Nuremberg Trials. I await hearing your defenses from behind the glass.
Truly, and I mean this FIGURATIVELY not LITERALLY, I hope this letter feels
like a bomb in your car and you may live with your family in similar trepidation that one
day your world will end, when your scam ends and you are tried in a fair and impartial
court, free of conflict ( you know the thing your supposed to be protecting ) where
hopefully you will serve the remainder of your life contemplating the magnanimity of the
damage you have done to my family, my shareholders, those you have embroiled in your
crimes like Ms. Anderson, those victims of your crimes that appear lining up with each
new Judiciary Committee, all those who lost homes or 401k’s from lawyers schemes in
an unregulated capacity free to commit financial crimes, as the REGULATOR, YOU was
naught more than a criminal in on the crimes.
Most DisRespectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
cc/ec:
Roy L. Reardon
Chairman Monday, December 14, 2009
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Re: YOUR CONTINUED INSANITY IN HANDLING COMPLAINTS AGAINST YOURSELF,
ALAN W. FRIEDBERG AND OTHER DEFENDANTS IN A TWELVE COUNT TWELVE
TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT LEGALLY RELATED TO A WHISTLEBLOWER
CAUSING MASS LIABILITY YOU ARE CONCEALING FROM THE STATE AND
PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM YOUR CONTINUED
CRIMINAL CONDUCT
roy reardon
Iviewit Holdings , Inc.
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Source:
www.iviewit.tv
r
Much More on Roy L. Reardon Coming Soon.
r Iviewit Holdings, Eliot Bernstein,
Monday, December 14, 2009
Steven Charles Becker - Foley and Lardner LLP
Milwaukee, WI - Steven Charles Becker - Intellectual Property
Is Steven C. Becker an Intellectual Property Attorney?
What Role Does Steven Becker have in the Iviewit Stolen Patent,
Trillion Dollar Technology Heist?
The Foley and Lardner LLP Website says this About Steve Becker
"Steven C. Becker is a partner in the Milwaukee office of Foley & Lardner LLP. A member of the Electronics Practice, Energy Industry Team and the Medical Device Initiative, Mr. Becker helps clients protect and enforce their intellectual property, with a focus on patents.
His practice includes patent prosecution, strategic planning and portfolio management, design arounds, brainstorming sessions, pre-litigation enforcement and defense, licensing matters, and non-infringement/invalidity studies.
He also represents clients in patent
and trade secret litigation matters.
Mr. Becker has provided intellectual property counsel in a variety of electrical and computer technologies, including software, business methods, mobile devices, automation, power supplies, semiconductor fabrication, medical imaging, telematics and telecommunications.
Mr. Becker is a graduate of Marquette University (B.S., cum laude, electrical and computer engineering, 1994) and Syracuse University (J.D., summa cum laude, 1997).
As an undergraduate, he was a General Motors Scholar and a member of Alpha Sigma Nu, a Jesuit Honor Society.
As a co-op student, he worked at Delco Electronics on design projects for new and existing automotive electronics technologies.
Mr. Becker is admitted to practice in Wisconsin and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the Licensing Executives Society, and the American Intellectual Property Law Association. In 2005, he received the firm's IP Founders award, recognizing his service to his clients, his colleagues and the firm. "
Seems like this kind of Position, Experience and Connections would Put Steven Becker in an incredibly tempting position to jump on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass and Make Big Bucks Stealing Patents and Ruining Lives.
Steven C. Becker is said to "provide intellectual property counsel" - well what if he is part of stealing the intellectual property from the REAL inventors? Would anyone Care about this? Could anyone Really Do anything about it?
Would the Clients of Foley and Lardner LLP care about the using of inside knowledge to participate in a Trillion Dollar "Holy Grail" Technology Heist? Do the Partners at Foley and Lardner LLP care about Steven Becker's involvement in the Iviewit Stolen Paten Case?
Does the American Intellectual Property Law Association even know what Steven Charles Becker is REALLY up to or do they just not really care about Intellectual Property Law in the real world and just suck up to Big Money, Patent Attorneys, and Large Law Firms?
Quick Question, How would a Trillion Dollar Patent Play into Getting an "IN" with the Energy Industry?
The Link below seems to Indicate that Foley and Lardner LLP knows the Laws when it comes to Anti-Trust, Intellectual Property Law, Bankruptcy Law, Trademark Law and Well this is a HUGE list of Knowledge, Connections, and Players... no wonder they needed to be a Part of Stealing a Trillion Dollar Technology.
http://www.foley.com/services/services.aspx
p
Steven Charles Becker,
Foley & Lardner LLP,
777 E Wisconsin Ave,
Milwaukee, WI 53202,
414-297-5571.
MUCH - Much more on Steven C. Becker Coming Soon...
Is Steven C. Becker an Intellectual Property Attorney?
What Role Does Steven Becker have in the Iviewit Stolen Patent,
Trillion Dollar Technology Heist?
The Foley and Lardner LLP Website says this About Steve Becker
"Steven C. Becker is a partner in the Milwaukee office of Foley & Lardner LLP. A member of the Electronics Practice, Energy Industry Team and the Medical Device Initiative, Mr. Becker helps clients protect and enforce their intellectual property, with a focus on patents.
His practice includes patent prosecution, strategic planning and portfolio management, design arounds, brainstorming sessions, pre-litigation enforcement and defense, licensing matters, and non-infringement/invalidity studies.
He also represents clients in patent
and trade secret litigation matters.
Mr. Becker has provided intellectual property counsel in a variety of electrical and computer technologies, including software, business methods, mobile devices, automation, power supplies, semiconductor fabrication, medical imaging, telematics and telecommunications.
Mr. Becker is a graduate of Marquette University (B.S., cum laude, electrical and computer engineering, 1994) and Syracuse University (J.D., summa cum laude, 1997).
As an undergraduate, he was a General Motors Scholar and a member of Alpha Sigma Nu, a Jesuit Honor Society.
As a co-op student, he worked at Delco Electronics on design projects for new and existing automotive electronics technologies.
Mr. Becker is admitted to practice in Wisconsin and before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the Society of Automotive Engineers, the Licensing Executives Society, and the American Intellectual Property Law Association. In 2005, he received the firm's IP Founders award, recognizing his service to his clients, his colleagues and the firm. "
Seems like this kind of Position, Experience and Connections would Put Steven Becker in an incredibly tempting position to jump on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass and Make Big Bucks Stealing Patents and Ruining Lives.
Steven C. Becker is said to "provide intellectual property counsel" - well what if he is part of stealing the intellectual property from the REAL inventors? Would anyone Care about this? Could anyone Really Do anything about it?
Would the Clients of Foley and Lardner LLP care about the using of inside knowledge to participate in a Trillion Dollar "Holy Grail" Technology Heist? Do the Partners at Foley and Lardner LLP care about Steven Becker's involvement in the Iviewit Stolen Paten Case?
Does the American Intellectual Property Law Association even know what Steven Charles Becker is REALLY up to or do they just not really care about Intellectual Property Law in the real world and just suck up to Big Money, Patent Attorneys, and Large Law Firms?
Quick Question, How would a Trillion Dollar Patent Play into Getting an "IN" with the Energy Industry?
The Link below seems to Indicate that Foley and Lardner LLP knows the Laws when it comes to Anti-Trust, Intellectual Property Law, Bankruptcy Law, Trademark Law and Well this is a HUGE list of Knowledge, Connections, and Players... no wonder they needed to be a Part of Stealing a Trillion Dollar Technology.
http://www.foley.com/services/services.aspx
p
Steven Charles Becker,
Foley & Lardner LLP,
777 E Wisconsin Ave,
Milwaukee, WI 53202,
414-297-5571.
MUCH - Much more on Steven C. Becker Coming Soon...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)