" Imagine being in a situation in which you knew you had to be quiet in order to advance your own personal career, rather than speaking up and blowing the whistle on irregularities and improprieties within your firm.
This message is consistently relayed by many a whistleblower who has suffered from having tried to do the right thing. What is the result?
Firms tout their virtuous values of integrity, respect, and excellence while effectively muzzling those who would blow the whistle on crimes and illegal practices.
I believe this reality is all too present in many, if not most, industries in our society today. There is absolutely no doubt it is present on Wall Street. Why do I write this?
A recently released report from the SEC’s Office of Inspector General David Kotz highlights the fact that the ‘whistles on Wall Street’ have been largely silent for a long time.
The Project on Government Oversight highlights this report in a recent commentary,
Not Much Bounty for SEC Whistleblower Program:
For more than 20 years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has had a program in place to reward whistleblowers who provide the agency with information about insider trading.
But a new audit by the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals that the program has almost never been used, is barely recognized inside or outside the SEC, and has fundamental design flaws.
It turns out the SEC has received very few applications in the past two decades for bounties under the program — and only five people have actually received payments since the program first began:"
Source and Full article with Additional Documents
http://www.senseoncents.com/2010/04/wall-streets-code-of-silence/#comments
Some Comments from On SEC Whistleblowers Above Link
"Does America truly think that a career regulator with longstanding ties within the financial industry can break Wall Street’s “code of silence”? "
" .... make sure America knows that there really is no pretense of investor protection so they can move forward accordingly. "
"Better not to even have the whistleblower program, though, than to pretend it exists. Lastly, the heads of all the banks should be called on the carpet and mandated to outline whistleblower protection programs within their organizations."
"Well, I I guess I thought it has been proven painfully obvious that we had no investor protection from FINRA and that obviously holds true for the SEC as well, but I guess you are right.. the public needs to hear about it again and again until they get it and insist that their representatives take meaningful action to fix things. "
Other Links on Peter Sivere SEC, JP Morgan Whistleblower
SEC IG Report: George Demos Pimped Peter Sivere; (January 28, 2010)
Posted here By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEC. Show all posts
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Whistleblower Peter Sivere Provides Affidavit to OSHA and DOL
DOL OSHA asked that Peter Sivere provide an affidavit to them after they "heard" that the SEC said Peter Sivere requested payment for documents and information.
Click Here for Peter Siver Affidavit
""... On September 30th 2004, the Wall Street Journal.. published an article entitled Trading Class Action Suit Widens. The WSJ articl state, in part, that: Mr. Stern (of Canary Capital) asked a J.P. Morgan Banker who had been working with Mr. Stern's family for a loan to finance his hedge funds trading in the PBHG funds.
The Suit contends that Mr. Stern explained his trading systme "in detail" to the executive.
According to the lawsuit, J.P. Morgan Securities made loans to business entities tied to Canary totalling as much as $105 Million. These Loans were made to finance trades that would make Canary money when the price of PBHG funds declined.
This Subject of the WSJ article appears to be consistent with the information in the Kelleher Email.
... After the September 30th, 2004 WSJ article was published, I continued to do strategic surveillance together with my interim monitoring duties.
.. On or about October 5, 2004, I located an October 4, 2004 email in which a JPM executive referring to the September 30, 2004 WSJ article, inquires about JMP's relationship with Canary.
The Email indicates that Mr. Palmer and Davis Polk and Wardell had previously indicated that JPM had no knowledge of improper trading practices. In a response to the E-mail Mr. Palmer acknowledged that JPM assisted Canary by providing a line of credit to finance Canary's mutual fund trading.
On October 6, 2004, I located an E-mail in which JPM's President and Chief Operating Officer asked JPM's Co-General Counsel about JPM's Relationship with Canary.
On October 7, 2004, I was Terminated for Alleged inappropriate use of the firms E-mail and for not cooperating with an internal fraud investigation. The Emails referred to above were on my desk at JPM at the time I was terminated. I was not permitted to return to my desk after I was terminated... ""
Read this Full Document Click HERE
Click Here for Peter Siver Affidavit
""... On September 30th 2004, the Wall Street Journal.. published an article entitled Trading Class Action Suit Widens. The WSJ articl state, in part, that: Mr. Stern (of Canary Capital) asked a J.P. Morgan Banker who had been working with Mr. Stern's family for a loan to finance his hedge funds trading in the PBHG funds.
The Suit contends that Mr. Stern explained his trading systme "in detail" to the executive.
According to the lawsuit, J.P. Morgan Securities made loans to business entities tied to Canary totalling as much as $105 Million. These Loans were made to finance trades that would make Canary money when the price of PBHG funds declined.
This Subject of the WSJ article appears to be consistent with the information in the Kelleher Email.
... After the September 30th, 2004 WSJ article was published, I continued to do strategic surveillance together with my interim monitoring duties.
.. On or about October 5, 2004, I located an October 4, 2004 email in which a JPM executive referring to the September 30, 2004 WSJ article, inquires about JMP's relationship with Canary.
The Email indicates that Mr. Palmer and Davis Polk and Wardell had previously indicated that JPM had no knowledge of improper trading practices. In a response to the E-mail Mr. Palmer acknowledged that JPM assisted Canary by providing a line of credit to finance Canary's mutual fund trading.
On October 6, 2004, I located an E-mail in which JPM's President and Chief Operating Officer asked JPM's Co-General Counsel about JPM's Relationship with Canary.
On October 7, 2004, I was Terminated for Alleged inappropriate use of the firms E-mail and for not cooperating with an internal fraud investigation. The Emails referred to above were on my desk at JPM at the time I was terminated. I was not permitted to return to my desk after I was terminated... ""
Read this Full Document Click HERE
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Iviewit Founder and Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files SEC Complaint on Trillion Dollar Patent Liability.
Proskauer Rose Named in SEC Complaint
" April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies. Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf "
Click here for SEC Complaint Naming Proskaur Rose LLP
" This FORMAL OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is filed with the Official SEC Complaint Intake Email Address: enforcement@sec.gov & CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and also filed with all investigators or committees the letter is addressed to, please make this Formal Complaint a part of all ongoing investigations or committees’ records regarding Iviewit companies and Eliot I, Bernstein, Inventor.
Re: Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen, and more.
Complaint filed against, including but not limited to;
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Barry M. Meyer; President and COO: Alan F. Horn; EVP and CFO: Edward A. Romano; Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne M. Smith
AOL, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Tim Armstrong; General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development: Ira Parker; Assistant General Counsel - Patent Litigation, Prosecution, and Licensing: Christopher Day; Executive Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: Jeffrey L. Bewkes; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.: Paul T. Cappuccio "
Source of Post and Full SEC Complaint Click HERE
Where is Mary Schapiro ?
Posted Here by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
" April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies. Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf "
Click here for SEC Complaint Naming Proskaur Rose LLP
" This FORMAL OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is filed with the Official SEC Complaint Intake Email Address: enforcement@sec.gov & CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and also filed with all investigators or committees the letter is addressed to, please make this Formal Complaint a part of all ongoing investigations or committees’ records regarding Iviewit companies and Eliot I, Bernstein, Inventor.
Re: Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen, and more.
Complaint filed against, including but not limited to;
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Barry M. Meyer; President and COO: Alan F. Horn; EVP and CFO: Edward A. Romano; Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne M. Smith
AOL, Inc. Chairman and CEO: Tim Armstrong; General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development: Ira Parker; Assistant General Counsel - Patent Litigation, Prosecution, and Licensing: Christopher Day; Executive Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley
Time Warner, Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: Jeffrey L. Bewkes; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.: Paul T. Cappuccio "
Source of Post and Full SEC Complaint Click HERE
Where is Mary Schapiro ?
Posted Here by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Was Mary Shapiro - SEC Chairman a KNOWN Risk to Investors and Shareholders - What in Mary Shapiro's past SHOULD have been a Red Flag?
Securities and Exchange Commission - News Archives
"" [The Financial Meltdown]
President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Mary Schapiro as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission may go down as his worst appointment.
Schapiro, in her capacity as President of NASD Regulation and later CEO of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), was directly responsible for ensuring that Bernie Madoff's firm, BLM Securities, obeyed federal securities laws.
Schapiro in her capacity as Commissioner and acting-Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and later as President of NASD Regulation, has covered up more violations of federal securities law than Madoff has violated.
And yes, Bernie Madoff pulled off his scam when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation and Chairperson of FINRA, which regulates NASD!
Schapiro never investigated Madoff, probably because Madoff was a powerful individual, a former Chairman of NASD.
I’m privy to this information because I was a trader on Wall Street many years ago. Beginning in 1991 I had written to Steven Lister, Senior Vice President of Compliance at the American Stock Exchange (AMEX).
I requested that, as a former member of the American Stock Exchange, I be granted access to my records.
The American Stock Exchange never replied.
Whenever I saw Lister, I asked him when he would grant me access to my records, Lister would simply state: "No."
Little background. Members of the board of AMEX had told other members that I had been evicted from AMEX for refusing to pass through a metal detector; in reality I had exposed the fact that another member of the Board had been apprehended with an unregistered pistol after he went through metal detectors at AMEX. I wanted to see whether the false information about me was in my AMEX files.
On July 26, 1993, I wrote to Mary Schapiro and requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission order the American Stock Exchange to permit me access to my files after Lister again refused to grant me access to my records. Of course this is a violation of federal securities laws, but that did not matter to Schapiro.
And SEC attorney, GayLa D. Sessoms, in a letter dated August 23, 1993 claimed "the Commission does not have the authority to compel the AMEX to produce records to you."
Schapiro knew that AMEX was a hotbed of illegal activity by the Italian Mafia-but Schapiro always looked to greener pastures.
I did not expect this lack of support from Schapiro. After all, I executed orders for Frost & Sullivan, a trading firm, on the floor of the AMEX.
When the inside trading scandal in Motel 6 was exposed –a foreign company was planning to bid on Motel 6, which was a nationwide chain of budget motels, but the information leaked and Frost & Sullivan traded illegally on it— I was investigated by the SEC.
I was the only individual who was connected to the three firms involved in this insider trading scandal that did not trade on Motel 6 insider information and thereby profit illegally. I was also the only individual who possessed knowledge of the extent of the insider trading in Motel 6 who was not subpoenaed by the SEC.
Why? Because according to Joseph Greenwald, a trader with another firm, who pleaded guilty to insider trading in Motel 6, James Breeden, at the time Chairman of the SEC, and Mary Schapiro, who was then an SEC Commissioner, had ordered the SEC to limit the scope of the investigation. The intent was to protect senior members of the AMEX and Bear Stearns who had knowledge of the Motel 6 insider information.
On September 13, 1993 I met with Assistant United States Attorney Frances Fragos (who later, as Frances Fragos-Townsend was to become George W. Bush’s Homeland Security adviser) at 1 Saint Andrew Plaza, in Manhattan, to discuss the Italian Mafia's penetration of the AMEX; the insider trading scandal in Motel 6; payoffs to AMEX Compliance Attorneys by the Italian Mafia; payoffs by the Italian Mafia to members of the Board of the American Stock Exchange; the theft of $500,000 by a vice president of the AMEX; the stock fraud at a company named PNF; involvement of members of the Board of the AMEX in the stock fraud at PNF; and, a host of other crimes.
I had first approached the FBI to expose these crimes and the agency then arranged for me to meet with Frances Fragos.
(When I showed Fragos the letter from Sessoms, she told me that Sessoms had lied and that in fact the SEC had the authority to order the AMEX to grant me access to my records.
I was convinced that the SEC and AMEX knew that once I obtained my records, I could have forced investigations that would have exposed other major crimes; yet I needed my records as a launching point).
Of course the SEC had powers over the AMEX.
For example, in 1977 the AMEX gave mild disciplinary sanctions against about 20 members for posting fictitious options trades.
The SEC overruled the AMEX disciplinary actions and suspended the 20 or so members of the AMEX involved in this fraud, including future members of the Board of the AMEX, such as William Silver, Louis Miceli, and Robert VanCaneghan..
In 1995 when Schapiro was a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a huge illegal trading scandal erupted at the AMEX.
Pat Schettino, a rogue trader and managing director of Spear Leeds and Kellogg, falsified trades; marked options positions; produced fictitious trading records; stole money from AMEX members; violated the net capital rule (the type of offense for which Ivan Boesky later went to prison); and, even entered trades at fictitious prices.
When I wrote numerous letters to the SEC and members of the Board of the AMEX about Schettino's illegal trading, he hired Eric Levine, an attorney at Proskauer Rose and sued me for defamation. The SEC did nothing; even after I had written to the SEC, including Schapiro, about Schettino's massive illegal trading.
By taking no action, the SEC countenanced Schettino's actions against me. The AMEX delayed investigating Schettino for years. Two attorneys for the AMEX, Steven Lister and Phil Axelrod, who were supposed to be investigating Schettino even taunted me about Schettino's defamation lawsuit and told me that they hoped that I would lose.
In 1998 NASD purchased the American Stock Exchange. At the time Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, which was technically overseeing AMEX regulation.
Then in 1999 when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, major violations of federal securities laws at the AMEX were exposed in a seminal article, "Scandal On Wall Street," on the front page of Business Week and it was noted that Schettino had not been disciplined four years after he had violated federal securities laws. Schettino subsequently dropped his lawsuit against me.
Schapiro did nothing, but covered up these crimes. And what has all this have to do with Bernard Madoff, the Ponzi King? Madoff, like Schettino, had also produced fictitious trading records; falsified trades; and. stolen money.
Where was Schapiro, the nominal overseer of Madoff?
Now she is to become Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission?
(Schapiro did not return a phone message seeking comment; her aide said she was meeting with President Elect Obama in Chicago). ""
Source of Post
http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=5221
Question: Mary Shapiro KNOWS of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. and is very aware according to what I have read.. about the implications to Shareholders that will be Billions upon Billions per Company in my Opinion. So when the SEC and Mary Shapiro Says she did not have prior Knowledge on the iViewit Scandal and all the Major Law Firms and Tech Companies involved.. ...
You Savvy Internet Investigators
will KNOW that she most Certainly DID...
How Come our Great Country is paying no attention to what seems in the above article to be decades of indescretions leading to Billions upon Billions and the Shareholders, Investors Seem to be the Ones to Take the Heat.. and Not Only is Mary Shapiro NEVER held Accountable, She is Constantly put back into some authoritative position that allows for the Same Over Looking of Tips - Not Looking into Facts and Creating or Shall I say ALLOWING huges Liabilities to Innocent Investors and Shareholders... ???
posted By
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
.... Got a Tip .. Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Investigative Blogger
"" [The Financial Meltdown]
President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Mary Schapiro as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission may go down as his worst appointment.
Schapiro, in her capacity as President of NASD Regulation and later CEO of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), was directly responsible for ensuring that Bernie Madoff's firm, BLM Securities, obeyed federal securities laws.
Schapiro in her capacity as Commissioner and acting-Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and later as President of NASD Regulation, has covered up more violations of federal securities law than Madoff has violated.
And yes, Bernie Madoff pulled off his scam when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation and Chairperson of FINRA, which regulates NASD!
Schapiro never investigated Madoff, probably because Madoff was a powerful individual, a former Chairman of NASD.
I’m privy to this information because I was a trader on Wall Street many years ago. Beginning in 1991 I had written to Steven Lister, Senior Vice President of Compliance at the American Stock Exchange (AMEX).
I requested that, as a former member of the American Stock Exchange, I be granted access to my records.
The American Stock Exchange never replied.
Whenever I saw Lister, I asked him when he would grant me access to my records, Lister would simply state: "No."
Little background. Members of the board of AMEX had told other members that I had been evicted from AMEX for refusing to pass through a metal detector; in reality I had exposed the fact that another member of the Board had been apprehended with an unregistered pistol after he went through metal detectors at AMEX. I wanted to see whether the false information about me was in my AMEX files.
On July 26, 1993, I wrote to Mary Schapiro and requested that the Securities and Exchange Commission order the American Stock Exchange to permit me access to my files after Lister again refused to grant me access to my records. Of course this is a violation of federal securities laws, but that did not matter to Schapiro.
And SEC attorney, GayLa D. Sessoms, in a letter dated August 23, 1993 claimed "the Commission does not have the authority to compel the AMEX to produce records to you."
Schapiro knew that AMEX was a hotbed of illegal activity by the Italian Mafia-but Schapiro always looked to greener pastures.
I did not expect this lack of support from Schapiro. After all, I executed orders for Frost & Sullivan, a trading firm, on the floor of the AMEX.
When the inside trading scandal in Motel 6 was exposed –a foreign company was planning to bid on Motel 6, which was a nationwide chain of budget motels, but the information leaked and Frost & Sullivan traded illegally on it— I was investigated by the SEC.
I was the only individual who was connected to the three firms involved in this insider trading scandal that did not trade on Motel 6 insider information and thereby profit illegally. I was also the only individual who possessed knowledge of the extent of the insider trading in Motel 6 who was not subpoenaed by the SEC.
Why? Because according to Joseph Greenwald, a trader with another firm, who pleaded guilty to insider trading in Motel 6, James Breeden, at the time Chairman of the SEC, and Mary Schapiro, who was then an SEC Commissioner, had ordered the SEC to limit the scope of the investigation. The intent was to protect senior members of the AMEX and Bear Stearns who had knowledge of the Motel 6 insider information.
On September 13, 1993 I met with Assistant United States Attorney Frances Fragos (who later, as Frances Fragos-Townsend was to become George W. Bush’s Homeland Security adviser) at 1 Saint Andrew Plaza, in Manhattan, to discuss the Italian Mafia's penetration of the AMEX; the insider trading scandal in Motel 6; payoffs to AMEX Compliance Attorneys by the Italian Mafia; payoffs by the Italian Mafia to members of the Board of the American Stock Exchange; the theft of $500,000 by a vice president of the AMEX; the stock fraud at a company named PNF; involvement of members of the Board of the AMEX in the stock fraud at PNF; and, a host of other crimes.
I had first approached the FBI to expose these crimes and the agency then arranged for me to meet with Frances Fragos.
(When I showed Fragos the letter from Sessoms, she told me that Sessoms had lied and that in fact the SEC had the authority to order the AMEX to grant me access to my records.
I was convinced that the SEC and AMEX knew that once I obtained my records, I could have forced investigations that would have exposed other major crimes; yet I needed my records as a launching point).
Of course the SEC had powers over the AMEX.
For example, in 1977 the AMEX gave mild disciplinary sanctions against about 20 members for posting fictitious options trades.
The SEC overruled the AMEX disciplinary actions and suspended the 20 or so members of the AMEX involved in this fraud, including future members of the Board of the AMEX, such as William Silver, Louis Miceli, and Robert VanCaneghan..
In 1995 when Schapiro was a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a huge illegal trading scandal erupted at the AMEX.
Pat Schettino, a rogue trader and managing director of Spear Leeds and Kellogg, falsified trades; marked options positions; produced fictitious trading records; stole money from AMEX members; violated the net capital rule (the type of offense for which Ivan Boesky later went to prison); and, even entered trades at fictitious prices.
When I wrote numerous letters to the SEC and members of the Board of the AMEX about Schettino's illegal trading, he hired Eric Levine, an attorney at Proskauer Rose and sued me for defamation. The SEC did nothing; even after I had written to the SEC, including Schapiro, about Schettino's massive illegal trading.
By taking no action, the SEC countenanced Schettino's actions against me. The AMEX delayed investigating Schettino for years. Two attorneys for the AMEX, Steven Lister and Phil Axelrod, who were supposed to be investigating Schettino even taunted me about Schettino's defamation lawsuit and told me that they hoped that I would lose.
In 1998 NASD purchased the American Stock Exchange. At the time Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, which was technically overseeing AMEX regulation.
Then in 1999 when Schapiro was President of NASD Regulation, major violations of federal securities laws at the AMEX were exposed in a seminal article, "Scandal On Wall Street," on the front page of Business Week and it was noted that Schettino had not been disciplined four years after he had violated federal securities laws. Schettino subsequently dropped his lawsuit against me.
Schapiro did nothing, but covered up these crimes. And what has all this have to do with Bernard Madoff, the Ponzi King? Madoff, like Schettino, had also produced fictitious trading records; falsified trades; and. stolen money.
Where was Schapiro, the nominal overseer of Madoff?
Now she is to become Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission?
(Schapiro did not return a phone message seeking comment; her aide said she was meeting with President Elect Obama in Chicago). ""
Source of Post
http://blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=5221
Question: Mary Shapiro KNOWS of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. and is very aware according to what I have read.. about the implications to Shareholders that will be Billions upon Billions per Company in my Opinion. So when the SEC and Mary Shapiro Says she did not have prior Knowledge on the iViewit Scandal and all the Major Law Firms and Tech Companies involved.. ...
You Savvy Internet Investigators
will KNOW that she most Certainly DID...
How Come our Great Country is paying no attention to what seems in the above article to be decades of indescretions leading to Billions upon Billions and the Shareholders, Investors Seem to be the Ones to Take the Heat.. and Not Only is Mary Shapiro NEVER held Accountable, She is Constantly put back into some authoritative position that allows for the Same Over Looking of Tips - Not Looking into Facts and Creating or Shall I say ALLOWING huges Liabilities to Innocent Investors and Shareholders... ???
posted By
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower
.... Got a Tip .. Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Investigative Blogger
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Time Warner Inc. - AOL - Withholding information from Shareholders that they have a Right to Know.
How Come AOL and Time Warner Inc. Shareholders still do not seem to know about the Trillion Dollar, at least in part - and a VERY big part is a Liability on the that is NOT reported on the AOL Time Warner Books?
Here we have Confidentiality Agreements Violated, Technology Stolen from Inventors, No Compensation to The Inventors. Time Warner Inc., AOL - they know that this Shareholder Fraud is Pending and that at some point they will have to pay for the Technology they STOLE.
Does the SEC not Care about a Liability this HUGE... look at www.DeniedPatent.com or www.Iviewit.TV and you can see thousands of Documents of Proof.
Did the SEC have any advance Notice all all of this?
Well from the Above sites you can see that the SEC did indeed know about what was going on and now the damage is mounting and still Time Warner Inc. - AOL - NYSE: TWX - Time Warner Cable Inc. -Warner Bros. they have Seemingly not disclosed this Liability to their Shareholders, in fact are they not in some sort of "Time Warner Declares Spin-Off Dividend Of AOL Shares Time Warner Inc. and AOL Inc. announced the timing and details regarding the spin-off of AOL from Time" From TimeWarner.com ? So another words they are restructuring their Company to attempt to protect themselves from this Trillion Dollar Liability without telling the Shareholders of TWX that it even exists.
Is That Legal?
"" Time Warner Inc. - AOL Separation Information On December 9, 2009, Time Warner Inc. completed the spin-off of AOL Inc. "" From the Link Below
http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&p=irol-irhome
Time Warner was Given Notice from Iviewit of this Trillion Dollar Liability and they Separated AOL after this - Folks, there is a Whole Lot More that Time Warner Inc. is NOT telling YOU.
There is No way that Time Warner Inc. Can Ever DENY that they knew the Liability from the Iviewit Stolen Patent, P. Stephen Lamont told them, Eliot Bernstein Told them, People within their own Company told them... there is Evidence on top of Evidence to PROOF that Warner Bros. Hid this Liability information from their Shareholders and denied Rights to the Iviewit Inventors. The Question is How Long with the shareholders stand for this and how long with the SEC Ignore this HUGE Liability that is NOT accounted For?
Links for You to Visit
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:FgCCwCxMZuwJ:iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%252008%252018%2520Cuomo%2520Letter%2520Final.doc+%22iviewit%22+%22Time+Warner%22&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:MviGXq-QONgJ:www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%252012%252015%2520Letter%2520to%2520Thomas%2520Cahill%2520Re%2520Krane%2520Conflict.pdf+site:www.iviewit.tv+Time+Warner&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patent%20pool%20infringers.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Miscellaneous%20Patent%20Docs/2004%2003%2026%20Moatz%20letter%20to%20take%20time%20responding%20for%20complaint.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2004%2021%20Director%20Officer%20Advisory%20Board%20and%20Professionals%20Letter%20of%20Liabilities%20email%20low.pdf
Letters of Liabilty
Here we have Confidentiality Agreements Violated, Technology Stolen from Inventors, No Compensation to The Inventors. Time Warner Inc., AOL - they know that this Shareholder Fraud is Pending and that at some point they will have to pay for the Technology they STOLE.
Does the SEC not Care about a Liability this HUGE... look at www.DeniedPatent.com or www.Iviewit.TV and you can see thousands of Documents of Proof.
Did the SEC have any advance Notice all all of this?
Well from the Above sites you can see that the SEC did indeed know about what was going on and now the damage is mounting and still Time Warner Inc. - AOL - NYSE: TWX - Time Warner Cable Inc. -Warner Bros. they have Seemingly not disclosed this Liability to their Shareholders, in fact are they not in some sort of "Time Warner Declares Spin-Off Dividend Of AOL Shares Time Warner Inc. and AOL Inc. announced the timing and details regarding the spin-off of AOL from Time" From TimeWarner.com ? So another words they are restructuring their Company to attempt to protect themselves from this Trillion Dollar Liability without telling the Shareholders of TWX that it even exists.
Is That Legal?
"" Time Warner Inc. - AOL Separation Information On December 9, 2009, Time Warner Inc. completed the spin-off of AOL Inc. "" From the Link Below
http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&p=irol-irhome
Time Warner was Given Notice from Iviewit of this Trillion Dollar Liability and they Separated AOL after this - Folks, there is a Whole Lot More that Time Warner Inc. is NOT telling YOU.
There is No way that Time Warner Inc. Can Ever DENY that they knew the Liability from the Iviewit Stolen Patent, P. Stephen Lamont told them, Eliot Bernstein Told them, People within their own Company told them... there is Evidence on top of Evidence to PROOF that Warner Bros. Hid this Liability information from their Shareholders and denied Rights to the Iviewit Inventors. The Question is How Long with the shareholders stand for this and how long with the SEC Ignore this HUGE Liability that is NOT accounted For?
Links for You to Visit
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:FgCCwCxMZuwJ:iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%252008%252018%2520Cuomo%2520Letter%2520Final.doc+%22iviewit%22+%22Time+Warner%22&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:MviGXq-QONgJ:www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%252012%252015%2520Letter%2520to%2520Thomas%2520Cahill%2520Re%2520Krane%2520Conflict.pdf+site:www.iviewit.tv+Time+Warner&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patent%20pool%20infringers.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Miscellaneous%20Patent%20Docs/2004%2003%2026%20Moatz%20letter%20to%20take%20time%20responding%20for%20complaint.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2004%2021%20Director%20Officer%20Advisory%20Board%20and%20Professionals%20Letter%20of%20Liabilities%20email%20low.pdf
Letters of Liabilty
Friday, January 1, 2010
Eliot I. Bernstein - Intel Corporation - SEC Enforcement - Mary Shapiro - SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION
More Web Archives I have Found on "Eliot I. Bernstein - Intel Corporation" "Iviewit and Intel"
"From: Eliot I. Bernstein
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro
SEC Office of Chief Accountant
SEC Office of International Affairs
SEC Office of International Enforcement Assistance
SEC Division of Enforcement
SEC Office of Internet Enforcement
SEC Division of Corporate Finance
SEC Division of Corporate Finance Chief Accountant's Office ( CF-OCA )
Federal Bureau of Investigation – White Collar Crime Unit
Complaint by Letter:
SEC Complaint Center
100 F Street NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549-0213
Complaint by Telefax: 703-813-6965
Complaint by Email: enforcement@sec.gov
Re: Complaint - Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar
Fraud on Intel Shareholders and Others
Intel Corporate Mailing Address
2200 Mission College Blvd.
Santa Clara, CA 95054-1549
Intel Phone Numbers as of March 23, 2009:
(408) 765-8080 MAIN NUMBER (800) 321-
4044 FAX: (408) 765-9904
TO: SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro;
SEC Office of Chief Accountant; Head of SEC
Office's of International Affairs,
SEC International Enforcement Assistance, SEC
Division of Enforcement, SEC Office of Internet Enforcement, SEC Division of
Corporate Finance, SEC Division of Corporate Finance Office of Chief Accountant, FBI
White Collar Crime Division and Any and All Compliance
Division Heads and Related Offices:
I, Eliot Bernstein, as the Original Owner and Inventor of key "backbone technologies" for video and imaging as further described herein, am filing this formal complaint against Intel Corporation ( Intel ) with United States headquarters located at 2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Ca, 95054-1459, and bring to your attention ongoing investigations involving multiple federal offices around the country as well as International investigations pertinent in this matter.
Intel is a primary wrongdoer as a named defendant in a presently pending Trillion
Dollar international RICO conspiracy lawsuit1 involving the theft and fraud of my
Intellectual Property rights as further set out herein. In addition to liabilities claimed in
this lawsuit, are separate direct primary liabilities and obligations from signed agreements
including Non Disclosure’s, Strategic Partner Agreements and Licensing Agreements.
Further, on information and belief Intel corporate management including at least the
President, Paul S. Otellini and corporate counsel Bruce D. Sewell, and Stephen R.
Rodgers are also involved in an ongoing and undisclosed massive international Fraud
against the Intel shareholders and investors.
Upon information and belief, the frauds include but are not limited to the failure
to disclose both the lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringements in direct violation
of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for
disclosing liabilities and more.
Merely one claim in this lawsuit involves the attempted Murder upon my family by an Iraqi style car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to mine during the early phases of the high stakes corporate theft and fraud of my Intellectual Property rights.
Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to this as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case2.
summary, dating back to 1998-1999 at the time the inventions were discovered,
I had Signed Non Disclosure Agreements, Strategic Alliance Agreements and Licensing
Arrangements, including Agreements that were at the time in legal review for R3D
relating to the USE of my proprietary rights in inventions which were hailed as the "Holy
Grail" of the internet.
The technologies were deemed the “Holy Grail” by multiple experts under signed NDA’s as it permitted full screen full frame rate video previously thought impossible and zoom and pan imaging technologies which removed pixel distortion.
The stolen technologies are now commonly found on virtually all digital imaging and video hardware and software. These signed agreements were amongst hundreds of signed agreements with many Fortune 1000 Companies.
After signing Agreements with Real 3D, Inc. ( R3D ), a company whose ownership was composed of Lockheed Martin ( 70% ), Intel ( 20% ) and Silicon Graphics Inc. ( 10% ), Intel later took over complete ownership of R3D of Orlando Florida.
In the subsequent months thereafter, a series of critical events occurred including
but not limited to the discovery of fraudulent patent applications and the discovery of
fraudulent corporations, the corporate frauds were discovered by Arthur Andersen during
an audit for the largest investor in the companies Crossbow Ventures of W. Palm Beach
Florida.
Nearly two-thirds of the Crossbow funds were secured through SBIC loans from
the Small Business Administration making the SBA the largest investor in the
technologies and companies.
On information and belief, the SBA Inspector General’s office is conducting an ongoing investigation into these and other matters please refer to the SBA Inspector General’s office to obtain relevant information.
As you will see by the letter and petition to the 44th US President, Barack Hussein
Obama II, found @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and also sent to US Attorney General Eric Holder, I was then directed by Harry I. Moatz, Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office of Enrollment and
Discipline to file charges with the Commissioner of Patents claiming Fraud Upon the
USPTO, my companies and myself.
This led to the Suspension of certain Intellectual Properties while investigations remain ongoing; please refer to Moatz and the Commissioner of Patents office to obtain relevant information. In addition, Moatz directed me to seek Congressional Legislation to obtain an Act of Congress to correct the falsified Oaths on my Intellectual Properties submitted by my former legal counsel at the law firms of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner and Proskauer Rose.
An Act of Congress is necessary to make the changes in inventors, owners and assignees
that are fraudulent, for which we have sought aid from The Honorable Senator Dianne
Feinstein who remains working through her offices regarding such.
These backbone technologies which were stolen in 1998-1999 have since been
used throughout the United States and across the globe throughout the entire value chain
of content creation and distribution of video and images for both software and hardware
in the transmission of Digital Video and Imaging across all spectrums, including, the
Internet, Television, DVD, HD DVD, Micro Processing Chips, as well as, a mass of
applications for Defense, Flight & Space Simulation, including on the Hubble Space
Telescope (providing a deeper view into time) and on virtually all Medical Imaging
Devices, and more. In fact, members of R3D and Intel were some of the earliest
champions of the value of the technologies claiming they were “Priceless” and were
valued in the hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars over the life of the Intellectual
Properties, having transformed the world of digital imaging and video that now are
considered part of daily life.
Intel was one of the earliest players in this scheme and has continued to not only
defraud myself and the other rightful owners of the technologies, including Ellen
DeGeneres and Alanis Morissette, but has simultaneously defrauded the Intel's
shareholders and investors for years by failing to report and disclose the liabilities with
full knowledge of their binding obligations regarding the technologies. These frauds and
failures by the Intel management team have continued despite multiple communications
over several years that have gone directly to the President of Intel, Mr. Paul S. Otellini
and their Corporate Counsel Mr. Bruce D. Sewell and Steven R. Rodgers and continue
despite the knowledge of the signed Agreements.
At this time, however, as noted in my Feb. 2009 letter to the Office of the US
President Barack Hussein Obama II and the US Attorney General Eric Holder, I wish to
bring to your direct attention the identities of several federal offices already involved in
this ongoing national and international Intellectual Properties theft and fraud.
Investigations that will aid and facilitate the SEC with background information for the
proper performance of complete investigations by the SEC allowing for information
sharing with these agencies, some of the key offices are as follows:
1. Glenn A. Fine, Office of Inspector General of the US Department of Justice
2. Harry Moatz, Director, OED of the USPTO
3. H. Marshall Jarrett, Office of Professional Responsibility of the FBI
4. A complete list of Federal, State & International Actions can be found @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/INVESTIGATIONS%20MASTER.htm.
Please note that I provide the SEC and the various Office and Division heads this
background solely as a starting point for full and proper investigations of Intel and related
parties in this matter and that I remain personally available to provide further information
as necessary. It should be noted that a wealth of the history of these matters is available
at my website www.iviewit.tv including links to the current federal complaint filed in the US
Court of Appeals 2nd Circ., the complaint filed with the US District Court – Southern
District of New York, links to the hundreds of signed NDAs, Strategic Alliance
Agreements, License Agreements and more.
It should be further noted that Intel failed to even Disclose the liabilities, even as a
Footnote, in their Annual Reports signed by Ernst & Young for both calendar years 1999
thru 2007 despite the fact that they had engaged in specific communications and / or
received specific communications from 1999-2009 regarding the outstanding obligations
and liabilities associated with Intel's improper use and infringement of my Intellectual
Property rights. See attached emails of 2006-2009 and Intel Annual Statements of 2006-
2007.
Not only did Intel later acquire in whole the R3D company which was intimately
involved in the early phases of this matter and under signed agreements with my
company, but specific members of Intel/ R3D staff were present during key meetings in
the early phases and otherwise involved in these matters including but not limited to,
Lawrence Palley (Director of Business Development @ Intel), Gerald W. Stanley
(Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer @ R3D), David Bolton
(Corporate Counsel @ R3D & Lockheed Martin), Steven A. Behrens (Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer @ R3D), Rosalie Bibona (Program Manager @ R3D), Timothy
P. Connolly (Director, Engineering @ R3D), Richard Gentner (Director of Scalable
Graphics Systems @ R3D), Connie Martin (Director, Software Development @ R3D),
Diane H. Sabol (Director and Corporate Controller Finance & Administration @ R3D),
Rob Kyanko (Intel), Michael Silver (@ ?), Ryan Huisman (@ R3D), Matt Johannsen (@
R3D), Hassan Miah (@ Intel), Dennis Goo (Manager, Digital Home Content for the
Americas @ Intel), Rajeev Kapur (Chief of Staff, Enterprise Product Group @ Intel) and
Kostas Katsohirakis (Business Development Manager @ Intel).
Moreover, as expressly indicated to Intel, the suit presently in litigation in the US
Second Circuit Court of Appeals is but one of many forums where these matters may be
pursued such as other federal courts within the United States and a variety of forums
abroad as well.
As the Intellectual Property crimes are investigated and the IP removed from its current Suspension status3 by the USPTO of course, those claims will be further pursued as Intel is well aware of.
Thus, it is submitted that part of this review and investigation by the SEC should likely involve prior transactions such as the purchase and sale of R3D and related transactions.
Several of the following links will also provide additional background
information:
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf
Copies of this Was also Sent to
Ernst & Young – Accountancy for Intel
The Honorable John Conyers Jr. ~ Chairman, House Judiciary Committee
The Honorable Glenn Fine ~
Inspector General, United States Department of
Justice
John J. Doll ~ Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office - Deputy Under
Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the
United States Patent and Trademark Office
The Honorable Harry I. Moatz ~ Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline,
United States Patent & Trademark Office
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. ~ Attorney General, United States
The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein
Andrew Cuomo ~ Attorney General of New York State, State of New York
Office of the Attorney General
Charlie Crist, Governor, State of Florida
CNN; MSNBC; FOX; NY TIMES; Washington Post; LA Times; Miami Herald;
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION
Source of This Post and Full Document
http://iviewit.tv/press/press4.pdf
SEC
So the SEC Knew, Does the Shareholder Know.. even Today do the Intel Shareholder know this Stuff or does Intel CEO Paul S. Otellini plan to keep it a secret until Intel can sock away more of the money?
SEC
"From: Eliot I. Bernstein
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro
SEC Office of Chief Accountant
SEC Office of International Affairs
SEC Office of International Enforcement Assistance
SEC Division of Enforcement
SEC Office of Internet Enforcement
SEC Division of Corporate Finance
SEC Division of Corporate Finance Chief Accountant's Office ( CF-OCA )
Federal Bureau of Investigation – White Collar Crime Unit
Complaint by Letter:
SEC Complaint Center
100 F Street NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549-0213
Complaint by Telefax: 703-813-6965
Complaint by Email: enforcement@sec.gov
Re: Complaint - Regarding Intel Corporation and Possible Trillion Dollar
Fraud on Intel Shareholders and Others
Intel Corporate Mailing Address
2200 Mission College Blvd.
Santa Clara, CA 95054-1549
Intel Phone Numbers as of March 23, 2009:
(408) 765-8080 MAIN NUMBER (800) 321-
4044 FAX: (408) 765-9904
TO: SEC Chairperson Mary Shapiro;
SEC Office of Chief Accountant; Head of SEC
Office's of International Affairs,
SEC International Enforcement Assistance, SEC
Division of Enforcement, SEC Office of Internet Enforcement, SEC Division of
Corporate Finance, SEC Division of Corporate Finance Office of Chief Accountant, FBI
White Collar Crime Division and Any and All Compliance
Division Heads and Related Offices:
I, Eliot Bernstein, as the Original Owner and Inventor of key "backbone technologies" for video and imaging as further described herein, am filing this formal complaint against Intel Corporation ( Intel ) with United States headquarters located at 2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, Ca, 95054-1459, and bring to your attention ongoing investigations involving multiple federal offices around the country as well as International investigations pertinent in this matter.
Intel is a primary wrongdoer as a named defendant in a presently pending Trillion
Dollar international RICO conspiracy lawsuit1 involving the theft and fraud of my
Intellectual Property rights as further set out herein. In addition to liabilities claimed in
this lawsuit, are separate direct primary liabilities and obligations from signed agreements
including Non Disclosure’s, Strategic Partner Agreements and Licensing Agreements.
Further, on information and belief Intel corporate management including at least the
President, Paul S. Otellini and corporate counsel Bruce D. Sewell, and Stephen R.
Rodgers are also involved in an ongoing and undisclosed massive international Fraud
against the Intel shareholders and investors.
Upon information and belief, the frauds include but are not limited to the failure
to disclose both the lawsuit and the Intellectual Property infringements in direct violation
of various SEC laws and rules including but not limited to FASB No. 5 requirements for
disclosing liabilities and more.
Merely one claim in this lawsuit involves the attempted Murder upon my family by an Iraqi style car bombing that blew up three vehicles in addition to mine during the early phases of the high stakes corporate theft and fraud of my Intellectual Property rights.
Notably, federal Judge Shira Scheindlin referred to this as a case involving Murder that has also been marked as legally “related” by Scheindlin to an ongoing Federal Whistleblower case2.
summary, dating back to 1998-1999 at the time the inventions were discovered,
I had Signed Non Disclosure Agreements, Strategic Alliance Agreements and Licensing
Arrangements, including Agreements that were at the time in legal review for R3D
relating to the USE of my proprietary rights in inventions which were hailed as the "Holy
Grail" of the internet.
The technologies were deemed the “Holy Grail” by multiple experts under signed NDA’s as it permitted full screen full frame rate video previously thought impossible and zoom and pan imaging technologies which removed pixel distortion.
The stolen technologies are now commonly found on virtually all digital imaging and video hardware and software. These signed agreements were amongst hundreds of signed agreements with many Fortune 1000 Companies.
After signing Agreements with Real 3D, Inc. ( R3D ), a company whose ownership was composed of Lockheed Martin ( 70% ), Intel ( 20% ) and Silicon Graphics Inc. ( 10% ), Intel later took over complete ownership of R3D of Orlando Florida.
In the subsequent months thereafter, a series of critical events occurred including
but not limited to the discovery of fraudulent patent applications and the discovery of
fraudulent corporations, the corporate frauds were discovered by Arthur Andersen during
an audit for the largest investor in the companies Crossbow Ventures of W. Palm Beach
Florida.
Nearly two-thirds of the Crossbow funds were secured through SBIC loans from
the Small Business Administration making the SBA the largest investor in the
technologies and companies.
On information and belief, the SBA Inspector General’s office is conducting an ongoing investigation into these and other matters please refer to the SBA Inspector General’s office to obtain relevant information.
As you will see by the letter and petition to the 44th US President, Barack Hussein
Obama II, found @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and also sent to US Attorney General Eric Holder, I was then directed by Harry I. Moatz, Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office, Office of Enrollment and
Discipline to file charges with the Commissioner of Patents claiming Fraud Upon the
USPTO, my companies and myself.
This led to the Suspension of certain Intellectual Properties while investigations remain ongoing; please refer to Moatz and the Commissioner of Patents office to obtain relevant information. In addition, Moatz directed me to seek Congressional Legislation to obtain an Act of Congress to correct the falsified Oaths on my Intellectual Properties submitted by my former legal counsel at the law firms of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner and Proskauer Rose.
An Act of Congress is necessary to make the changes in inventors, owners and assignees
that are fraudulent, for which we have sought aid from The Honorable Senator Dianne
Feinstein who remains working through her offices regarding such.
These backbone technologies which were stolen in 1998-1999 have since been
used throughout the United States and across the globe throughout the entire value chain
of content creation and distribution of video and images for both software and hardware
in the transmission of Digital Video and Imaging across all spectrums, including, the
Internet, Television, DVD, HD DVD, Micro Processing Chips, as well as, a mass of
applications for Defense, Flight & Space Simulation, including on the Hubble Space
Telescope (providing a deeper view into time) and on virtually all Medical Imaging
Devices, and more. In fact, members of R3D and Intel were some of the earliest
champions of the value of the technologies claiming they were “Priceless” and were
valued in the hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars over the life of the Intellectual
Properties, having transformed the world of digital imaging and video that now are
considered part of daily life.
Intel was one of the earliest players in this scheme and has continued to not only
defraud myself and the other rightful owners of the technologies, including Ellen
DeGeneres and Alanis Morissette, but has simultaneously defrauded the Intel's
shareholders and investors for years by failing to report and disclose the liabilities with
full knowledge of their binding obligations regarding the technologies. These frauds and
failures by the Intel management team have continued despite multiple communications
over several years that have gone directly to the President of Intel, Mr. Paul S. Otellini
and their Corporate Counsel Mr. Bruce D. Sewell and Steven R. Rodgers and continue
despite the knowledge of the signed Agreements.
At this time, however, as noted in my Feb. 2009 letter to the Office of the US
President Barack Hussein Obama II and the US Attorney General Eric Holder, I wish to
bring to your direct attention the identities of several federal offices already involved in
this ongoing national and international Intellectual Properties theft and fraud.
Investigations that will aid and facilitate the SEC with background information for the
proper performance of complete investigations by the SEC allowing for information
sharing with these agencies, some of the key offices are as follows:
1. Glenn A. Fine, Office of Inspector General of the US Department of Justice
2. Harry Moatz, Director, OED of the USPTO
3. H. Marshall Jarrett, Office of Professional Responsibility of the FBI
4. A complete list of Federal, State & International Actions can be found @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/INVESTIGATIONS%20MASTER.htm.
Please note that I provide the SEC and the various Office and Division heads this
background solely as a starting point for full and proper investigations of Intel and related
parties in this matter and that I remain personally available to provide further information
as necessary. It should be noted that a wealth of the history of these matters is available
at my website www.iviewit.tv including links to the current federal complaint filed in the US
Court of Appeals 2nd Circ., the complaint filed with the US District Court – Southern
District of New York, links to the hundreds of signed NDAs, Strategic Alliance
Agreements, License Agreements and more.
It should be further noted that Intel failed to even Disclose the liabilities, even as a
Footnote, in their Annual Reports signed by Ernst & Young for both calendar years 1999
thru 2007 despite the fact that they had engaged in specific communications and / or
received specific communications from 1999-2009 regarding the outstanding obligations
and liabilities associated with Intel's improper use and infringement of my Intellectual
Property rights. See attached emails of 2006-2009 and Intel Annual Statements of 2006-
2007.
Not only did Intel later acquire in whole the R3D company which was intimately
involved in the early phases of this matter and under signed agreements with my
company, but specific members of Intel/ R3D staff were present during key meetings in
the early phases and otherwise involved in these matters including but not limited to,
Lawrence Palley (Director of Business Development @ Intel), Gerald W. Stanley
(Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer @ R3D), David Bolton
(Corporate Counsel @ R3D & Lockheed Martin), Steven A. Behrens (Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer @ R3D), Rosalie Bibona (Program Manager @ R3D), Timothy
P. Connolly (Director, Engineering @ R3D), Richard Gentner (Director of Scalable
Graphics Systems @ R3D), Connie Martin (Director, Software Development @ R3D),
Diane H. Sabol (Director and Corporate Controller Finance & Administration @ R3D),
Rob Kyanko (Intel), Michael Silver (@ ?), Ryan Huisman (@ R3D), Matt Johannsen (@
R3D), Hassan Miah (@ Intel), Dennis Goo (Manager, Digital Home Content for the
Americas @ Intel), Rajeev Kapur (Chief of Staff, Enterprise Product Group @ Intel) and
Kostas Katsohirakis (Business Development Manager @ Intel).
Moreover, as expressly indicated to Intel, the suit presently in litigation in the US
Second Circuit Court of Appeals is but one of many forums where these matters may be
pursued such as other federal courts within the United States and a variety of forums
abroad as well.
As the Intellectual Property crimes are investigated and the IP removed from its current Suspension status3 by the USPTO of course, those claims will be further pursued as Intel is well aware of.
Thus, it is submitted that part of this review and investigation by the SEC should likely involve prior transactions such as the purchase and sale of R3D and related transactions.
Several of the following links will also provide additional background
information:
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf
Copies of this Was also Sent to
Ernst & Young – Accountancy for Intel
The Honorable John Conyers Jr. ~ Chairman, House Judiciary Committee
The Honorable Glenn Fine ~
Inspector General, United States Department of
Justice
John J. Doll ~ Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office - Deputy Under
Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the
United States Patent and Trademark Office
The Honorable Harry I. Moatz ~ Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline,
United States Patent & Trademark Office
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. ~ Attorney General, United States
The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein
Andrew Cuomo ~ Attorney General of New York State, State of New York
Office of the Attorney General
Charlie Crist, Governor, State of Florida
CNN; MSNBC; FOX; NY TIMES; Washington Post; LA Times; Miami Herald;
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION
Source of This Post and Full Document
http://iviewit.tv/press/press4.pdf
SEC
So the SEC Knew, Does the Shareholder Know.. even Today do the Intel Shareholder know this Stuff or does Intel CEO Paul S. Otellini plan to keep it a secret until Intel can sock away more of the money?
SEC
Broadcom, Apple, Nokia - Heads Up Intel Shareholders
" By MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) --
Among the shares expected to see active trade in Wednesday's session are those of Broadcom Corp., Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Broadcom has agreed to settle a pending class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its current and former officers and directors.
The lawsuit, which is related to the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, was brought on behalf of investors who bought Broadcom's common shares between July 2005 and July 2006.
Under the proposed agreement, the claims against Broadcom and its officers will be dismissed in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by the company. Broadcom will record the settlement amount as a one-time charge in the fourth quarter.
Nokia filed a complaint against Apple with the U.S. International Trade Commission over patent infringements in "virtually all" of its mobile devices, portable music players, and computers.
Nokia claims that Apple is using seven of its patents for key features in its products, including user interface and camera, antenna and power management technologies. "While our litigation in Delaware is about Apple's attempt to free-ride on the back of Nokia investment in wireless standards, the ITC case filed today is about Apple's practice of building its business on Nokia's proprietary innovation," said Paul Melin, general manager of patent licensing at Nokia. Read more about Nokia's complaint against Apple "
Source:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-in-focus-for-wednesday-2009-12-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Market Watch... Well Folks If you have STOCK in ANY companies on this BLOG - then don't Say you were NOT Given a Heads Up on the Lies your Company or your Stock Management Team is Feeding YOU... those in charge of your Portfolios, those in the Management and Corporate offices of these Companies - THEY know about a Trillion Dollar Liability and My Guess is NONE of them HAVE it on the BOOKS.
Bruce Sewill
Apple, Broadcom,
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) --
Among the shares expected to see active trade in Wednesday's session are those of Broadcom Corp., Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Broadcom has agreed to settle a pending class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its current and former officers and directors.
The lawsuit, which is related to the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, was brought on behalf of investors who bought Broadcom's common shares between July 2005 and July 2006.
Under the proposed agreement, the claims against Broadcom and its officers will be dismissed in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by the company. Broadcom will record the settlement amount as a one-time charge in the fourth quarter.
Nokia filed a complaint against Apple with the U.S. International Trade Commission over patent infringements in "virtually all" of its mobile devices, portable music players, and computers.
Nokia claims that Apple is using seven of its patents for key features in its products, including user interface and camera, antenna and power management technologies. "While our litigation in Delaware is about Apple's attempt to free-ride on the back of Nokia investment in wireless standards, the ITC case filed today is about Apple's practice of building its business on Nokia's proprietary innovation," said Paul Melin, general manager of patent licensing at Nokia. Read more about Nokia's complaint against Apple "
Source:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-in-focus-for-wednesday-2009-12-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Market Watch... Well Folks If you have STOCK in ANY companies on this BLOG - then don't Say you were NOT Given a Heads Up on the Lies your Company or your Stock Management Team is Feeding YOU... those in charge of your Portfolios, those in the Management and Corporate offices of these Companies - THEY know about a Trillion Dollar Liability and My Guess is NONE of them HAVE it on the BOOKS.
Bruce Sewill
Apple, Broadcom,
Monday, December 7, 2009
Former Stanford CFO: Firm Had Blood Oaths, Bribes, Fake Profits
"HOUSTON (AP) -- The former finance chief for jailed Texas financier R. Allen Stanford said his boss created a business empire where blood oaths were taken to secure loyalty, bribes were paid from a secret Swiss bank account and investor profits were more fiction than financial genius.
New details about how Stanford allegedly bilked investors out of $7 billion were made public Thursday after James M. Davis, Stanford's former chief financial officer, became the first person to plead guilty in the case.
Davis pleaded guilty in Houston federal court to three counts: conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud; mail fraud; and conspiracy to obstruct a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. The plea is part of a deal Davis, who has been helping prosecutors, made with the Justice Department in exchange for a possible reduced sentence.
His plea came hours after Stanford was taken from the privately run prison where he is being held outside Houston to a local hospital with an irregular heartbeat and high pulse. Stanford had been set to appear in the same courtroom for a hearing on whether he can get a new attorney. U.S. Marshals spokesman Alfredo Perez said Stanford was undergoing tests at the hospital but declined to give more details.
Davis, 60, only made a brief statement after his hearing.
"I did wrong. I'm sorry. I apologize. I take responsibility for my actions," he told reporters outside the courthouse.
But Davis' 23-page plea agreement provided new details of how Stanford's business began; how he, Stanford and others manufactured profits; and how panic set in as they tried to hold off federal investigators who were closing in on their scheme.
Stanford, Davis and other executives of the now defunct Houston-based Stanford Financial Group are accused of orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme by advising clients to invest more than $7 billion in certificates of deposit from the Stanford International Bank in the Caribbean island of Antigua.
Investors were promised their investments were safe and were scrutinized by Antigua's bank regulator and an independent auditor.
Stanford claimed higher rates of return on his CDS than those offered by commercial banks in the U.S. and consistent double-digit returns on his bank's investment portfolio.
But Davis said in the court documents that the bank's balance sheets were made up and the work of "reverse engineering."
"Stanford was insistent that (the bank) appear to show a profit each year. Stanford and Davis would collaborate to select a false revenue number ... Stanford, Davis (and other conspirators) would then use the 'budgeted' numbers to develop falsely inflated revenue numbers which would be claimed as the 'actual' revenue numbers to generate the desired Return on Investment," according to the plea agreement.
Asked why Davis defrauded investors for years, David Finn, his attorney, said it was greed.
To protect his scheme, Stanford paid more than $200,000 in bribes, as well as $8,000 for two tickets to the Super Bowl in Houston in 2004, to Leroy King, the former chief executive officer of Antigua's Financial Services Regulatory Commission or FSRC.
King has also been indicted with Stanford and is awaiting extradition to the United States.
Davis said Stanford secured King's loyalty in a most unusual way.
"Sometime in 2003, Stanford performed a 'blood oath' brotherhood ceremony with King and another employee of the FSRC ... This brotherhood oath was undertaken in order to extract an agreement from both King and the other FSRC employee that they, in exchange for regular cash bribe payments, would ensure that the Antiguan bank regulators would not 'kill the business' of" the bank," according to the plea agreement.
Stanford had Davis get the bribe money from a secret Swiss bank account that was funded by investors' money. The account was also used to make bribes to the bank's outside auditor.
When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating Stanford's bank and contacted King by letter in 2005 and 2006 about its probe, Stanford and others in his company helped King write false and misleading response letters.
"King appeared very stressed. King related that he had again been contacted by the SEC. King asked Davis if 'we were going to make it?' which meant whether the fraud they had been engaged in was going to be exposed. Davis informed King that he thought they were going to be OK," according to the plea agreement.
By mid-2008, Stanford, Davis and other conspirators were "desperately seeking a fraudulent mechanism whereby they could artificially inflate (the bank's) assets" and hide that Stanford had used $2 billion of investor money to make loans to himself, said the plea agreement.
They came up with a bogus real estate deal that falsely inflated a $65 million real estate sale in Antigua into a $3.2 billion bank asset.
By January 2009, the SEC had served subpoenas to Davis, Stanford and other executives about the bank's CD investments.
In February, Davis, Stanford, company lawyers and other executives met in Miami to discuss testimony that Chief Investment Officer Laura Pendergest-Holt and another executive would give to the SEC. At that meeting, Davis revealed that 80 percent of the bank's investment portfolio was made up of grossly overvalued real estate and of $1.6 billion in loans to Stanford, meaning the bank was insolvent.
Stanford at first said the bank had more assets and liabilities but later in private "acknowledged that (the bank's) assets and financial health had been misrepresented to investors and were overstated in (the bank's) financials," according to the plea agreement.
Davis faces up to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced. While a sentencing date of Nov. 20 was set, Finn said he believes that will be delayed.
As part of his plea agreement, Davis was also ordered to forfeit $1 billion in proceeds he made from his illegal actions, although there's little hope Davis can ever retrieve the funds.
Finn said authorities have seized all his client's assets and Davis, who had made between $5 million and $6 million in the last decade, is broke and now doing manual labor on a relative's farm in Michigan, making $10 an hour.
Hittner postponed a hearing scheduled for Thursday in which he would hear arguments about Stanford's legal representation. DeGuerin has asked for permission to quit the case because he doesn't have assurances he will be paid.
Stanford was considered one of the richest men in the U.S. with an estimated net worth of more than $2 billion. But he claims he is now penniless.
Stanford, along with three former company executives, have pleaded not guilty to various charges, including wire and mail fraud, in a 21-count indictment issued June 18. Stanford has been jailed without bond since then, considered a flight risk by Hittner.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/former-stanford-cfo-firm_n_270789.html?show_comment_id=29939237#comment_29939237
*****
New details about how Stanford allegedly bilked investors out of $7 billion were made public Thursday after James M. Davis, Stanford's former chief financial officer, became the first person to plead guilty in the case.
Davis pleaded guilty in Houston federal court to three counts: conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud; mail fraud; and conspiracy to obstruct a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. The plea is part of a deal Davis, who has been helping prosecutors, made with the Justice Department in exchange for a possible reduced sentence.
His plea came hours after Stanford was taken from the privately run prison where he is being held outside Houston to a local hospital with an irregular heartbeat and high pulse. Stanford had been set to appear in the same courtroom for a hearing on whether he can get a new attorney. U.S. Marshals spokesman Alfredo Perez said Stanford was undergoing tests at the hospital but declined to give more details.
Davis, 60, only made a brief statement after his hearing.
"I did wrong. I'm sorry. I apologize. I take responsibility for my actions," he told reporters outside the courthouse.
But Davis' 23-page plea agreement provided new details of how Stanford's business began; how he, Stanford and others manufactured profits; and how panic set in as they tried to hold off federal investigators who were closing in on their scheme.
Stanford, Davis and other executives of the now defunct Houston-based Stanford Financial Group are accused of orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme by advising clients to invest more than $7 billion in certificates of deposit from the Stanford International Bank in the Caribbean island of Antigua.
Investors were promised their investments were safe and were scrutinized by Antigua's bank regulator and an independent auditor.
Stanford claimed higher rates of return on his CDS than those offered by commercial banks in the U.S. and consistent double-digit returns on his bank's investment portfolio.
But Davis said in the court documents that the bank's balance sheets were made up and the work of "reverse engineering."
"Stanford was insistent that (the bank) appear to show a profit each year. Stanford and Davis would collaborate to select a false revenue number ... Stanford, Davis (and other conspirators) would then use the 'budgeted' numbers to develop falsely inflated revenue numbers which would be claimed as the 'actual' revenue numbers to generate the desired Return on Investment," according to the plea agreement.
Asked why Davis defrauded investors for years, David Finn, his attorney, said it was greed.
To protect his scheme, Stanford paid more than $200,000 in bribes, as well as $8,000 for two tickets to the Super Bowl in Houston in 2004, to Leroy King, the former chief executive officer of Antigua's Financial Services Regulatory Commission or FSRC.
King has also been indicted with Stanford and is awaiting extradition to the United States.
Davis said Stanford secured King's loyalty in a most unusual way.
"Sometime in 2003, Stanford performed a 'blood oath' brotherhood ceremony with King and another employee of the FSRC ... This brotherhood oath was undertaken in order to extract an agreement from both King and the other FSRC employee that they, in exchange for regular cash bribe payments, would ensure that the Antiguan bank regulators would not 'kill the business' of" the bank," according to the plea agreement.
Stanford had Davis get the bribe money from a secret Swiss bank account that was funded by investors' money. The account was also used to make bribes to the bank's outside auditor.
When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating Stanford's bank and contacted King by letter in 2005 and 2006 about its probe, Stanford and others in his company helped King write false and misleading response letters.
"King appeared very stressed. King related that he had again been contacted by the SEC. King asked Davis if 'we were going to make it?' which meant whether the fraud they had been engaged in was going to be exposed. Davis informed King that he thought they were going to be OK," according to the plea agreement.
By mid-2008, Stanford, Davis and other conspirators were "desperately seeking a fraudulent mechanism whereby they could artificially inflate (the bank's) assets" and hide that Stanford had used $2 billion of investor money to make loans to himself, said the plea agreement.
They came up with a bogus real estate deal that falsely inflated a $65 million real estate sale in Antigua into a $3.2 billion bank asset.
By January 2009, the SEC had served subpoenas to Davis, Stanford and other executives about the bank's CD investments.
In February, Davis, Stanford, company lawyers and other executives met in Miami to discuss testimony that Chief Investment Officer Laura Pendergest-Holt and another executive would give to the SEC. At that meeting, Davis revealed that 80 percent of the bank's investment portfolio was made up of grossly overvalued real estate and of $1.6 billion in loans to Stanford, meaning the bank was insolvent.
Stanford at first said the bank had more assets and liabilities but later in private "acknowledged that (the bank's) assets and financial health had been misrepresented to investors and were overstated in (the bank's) financials," according to the plea agreement.
Davis faces up to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced. While a sentencing date of Nov. 20 was set, Finn said he believes that will be delayed.
As part of his plea agreement, Davis was also ordered to forfeit $1 billion in proceeds he made from his illegal actions, although there's little hope Davis can ever retrieve the funds.
Finn said authorities have seized all his client's assets and Davis, who had made between $5 million and $6 million in the last decade, is broke and now doing manual labor on a relative's farm in Michigan, making $10 an hour.
Hittner postponed a hearing scheduled for Thursday in which he would hear arguments about Stanford's legal representation. DeGuerin has asked for permission to quit the case because he doesn't have assurances he will be paid.
Stanford was considered one of the richest men in the U.S. with an estimated net worth of more than $2 billion. But he claims he is now penniless.
Stanford, along with three former company executives, have pleaded not guilty to various charges, including wire and mail fraud, in a 21-count indictment issued June 18. Stanford has been jailed without bond since then, considered a flight risk by Hittner.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/27/former-stanford-cfo-firm_n_270789.html?show_comment_id=29939237#comment_29939237
*****
It is All Coming to the Light ...
Knowledge is Power
r
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)