Intel Corp. CEO Paul Otellini Conspiring with Michael DELL to Monopolize Technology and Covering Up a Trillion Dollar Liability.

Dell to Settle Intel Claims - what a Crock - Does the SEC Favor Intel or What .. and WHY? Paul Otellini is Hiding a Trillion Dollar Shareholder FRAUD.

Who is Intel Corp Paying over there at the SEC... a "George Demos" type that will rat out Whistleblowers - I mean come on Intel Corp. has known of a Multi-Trillion Dollar Shareholder Fraud in the Iviewit Stolen Technology Case for Over a Decade, what Does the SEC say about this?

Oh it seems that the Iviewit Stolen Technology is a "pending investigation" - I Say BULL... this DELL thing comes up and is looked into - it is Headline News.. the MPEG LA patent infringement accusations .. that is in the news.. Why is Eliot Bernstein and iViewit not Main Stream Breaking News every single day, as it will COST shareholders Trillions..

This is Fact and Easily Proven - YET Ignored, or it seems that way to me.

and Now DELL is working with the SEC to 'resolve allegations" ???

What Does this Really mean?
Does this mean DELL and Intel Corp. (Paul Otellini) are negotiating some back alley pay off to those corrupt SEC investigators... You know the ones like George Demos was, the Ones that Favor Corrupt Law Firms like Proskauer Rose, Foley and Lardner and Greenberg Traurig ...

So is Intel a Super Power Elite Or What?
I mean Intel Corp. ( CEO Paul Otellini) knows full well of the SEC Complaint from Eliot Bernstein - Inventor and Founder of Iviewit Technologies and yet Paul Otellin FAILS to Disclose this Blatant Fraud to Intel Corp. Shareholders and to Intel Corp Liability Carriers .. oh unless the Liability Insurance Company is in on the Trillion Dollar Scandal.. I mean if Intel Corp. can give DELL a billion dollars in a year then surely they can afford to Pay Off who ever they need to at the SEC or Insurance Companies to Stay Silent about Eliot Bernstein and the Trillions of Dollars in Liabilities that the Intel Corp. Shareholders will one day pay for the Crimes and non-Disclosure of CEO Paul Otellini.. AND surely Intel Corp and Paul Otellini have Millions to Pay off Patent Attorneys, MPEG LA, Judges, and Clerks to Cover Up their Crime Right.. ???

The SEC seems to me to be doing Nothing about Flat Out Theft of an Intellectual Property that we all use and have for many, many years. The SEC seems to be doing nothing about Massive Shareholder Fraud when they Certainly have Known about the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent - there is Prove on Top of Proof of This..

What Does Mary Schapiro, Head of the SEC have to Say about all of this ? Well there is Proof She Knows.. so I guess Mary Schapiro is taking the Path of "Silent Fraud" ...

here is the Michael Dell - Paul Otellini - Intel Corp. Article.

"" Dell said on Thursday that it was in talks with the Securities and Exchange Commission to resolve allegations that it and its founder and chief executive, Michael S. Dell, engaged in financial irregularities related to the company’s dealings with Intel, The New York Times’s Miguel Helft reported.

The company said that any settlement would not bar Mr. Dell’s service as an officer and director of a public company, and would be made without admitting or denying the agency’s allegations.

The disclosure that the S.E.C. has been investigating aspects of the relationship between the two companies is new, as is its focus on Mr. Dell. A person briefed on the case, who agreed to speak on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is confidential, told The Times that the S.E.C.’s allegations related to how Dell accounted for payments and rebates that it had received from Intel. The allegations are not criminal.

Dell also said that it had set aside $100 million for a possible settlement of these allegations, as well a separate long-standing investigation by the S.E.C. into its accounting practices. That investigation, which began in 2005 and became formal in 2006, has already led to admissions of misconduct by Dell and prompted the computer maker to restate financial results from 2003 to the first quarter of 2007.

“We are hopeful that these settlement discussions will achieve a comprehensive resolution in the near future,” Sam Nunn, director of Dell’s board said in a news release and a former United States senator. As to Mr. Dell’s standing with the board’s independent directors. Mr. Nunn said, “He continues to have our complete confidence and support.”

The relationship between Dell and Intel had already come under scrutiny in an antitrust lawsuit filed in November by Andrew M. Cuomo, the New York attorney general, against Intel.

In that suit, Intel, the world’s largest chip maker, was accused of using rebates and co-marketing arrangements as bribes to persuade Dell and other manufacturers to use its products in computers and servers rather than switching to lower-cost chips from its rival, Advanced Micro Devices.

Intel has denied the allegations.

Intel declined to comment.

Dell declined to comment beyond its news release.

A spokesman for the S.E.C., John Nester, also declined to comment.

The company said that Mr. Dell’s settlement with the S.E.C. would relate to the “company’s disclosures and alleged omissions” and “would involve alleged violations of negligence-based fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, as well as other nonfraud-based provisions.”

Dell also said that it would record a $100 million liability for the settlement of its long-standing accounting problems. As a result, it will reduce its net income in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 by the same amount, or 5 cents a share.

Dell’s shares dropped about 2 percent in after-hours trading following the company’s disclosure. But analysts said the news of a possible settlement should be seen as positive by investors. Since Dell’s troubles with the S.E.C. began in 2005, the company stock has lost about two-thirds of its value.

“We didn’t know much about the S.E.C. investigation,” said Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst with the research firm Sanford C. Bernstein & Company. “I view this as good news. Uncertainty has been taken off the table, and a $100 million fine is nothing for investors.” Dell had nearly $11 billion in cash and short-term investments as of April 30.

Mr. Cuomo’s lawsuit against Intel revealed e-mail messages between Mr. Dell and Paul S. Otellini, the chief executive of Intel, in which Mr. Dell complained of losing business to rivals using A.M.D. chips.

In those conversations, Mr. Otellini reminded Mr. Dell that Intel had paid Dell more than $1 billion in the last year and said that was “more than sufficient to compensate for the competitive issues.”

According to the suit, Dell delayed buying chips from A.M.D. and Mr. Otellini later wrote an e-mail message to a colleague describing Dell as “the best friend money can buy.” ""

Source of Post
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/dell-in-talks-with-s-e-c-to-settle-intel-claims/


""condition of anonymity"" - That is SO Funny as if the SEC gives a Hoot about keeping Whistleblower Tipsters Anonymous. It is More like the SEC will do what they want .. when they want regardless of who they hurt and the SEC will ignore the Rights of Some while they Protect and Uphold the Rights of Others, My Guess .. this is is Based on Who pays who off.

"confidential investigation" - what a Crock - this Cannot be TRUE.. not even a little.. all these Attorneys, CEO's, Investigators, SEC Officials .. Judges.. DOJ investigators .. well they Know Each other and they know just what button to push or person to pay to get their way.. and the TRUTH.. the Laws of the United States Are Simply Irrelevant.. Proven Over and Over again as Each New Judge, Attorney, Investigator, Court, USPTO Officer and Official Denies and Ignores a Massive Shareholder Fraud as in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case that is Now over a Decade Old, and has Been Constantly Proven Valid.. document after Document..

If Michael DELL set aside a $100 million dollars to "settle" .. well then Michael Dell must have known that DELL was doing something ILLEGALLY right?

Guilty - GUILTY - Guilty.

And this Illegal Activity between Michael Dell and Intel Corp. - Paul Otellini WELL it must have Paid in the Billions and a little ol' hundred million dollar slap on the wrist is certainly well worth it.. and are these HUNDRED Million Dollar FINES that these Big time Company Owners - these High Tech CEO's set aside.. are they "Tax Deductible"??? Hmm.. and don't they Shareholders of Dell of Intel Corp. Actually end up paying for this Corruption, Dirty Deals, Anti-Trust Violations and Flat Out Patent Theft as in the Case of the Iviewit Stolen Technology.

Oh Well.. as Long as guys Like Michael Dell of DELL Computers and Guys like Paul Otellini - CEO of Intel Corp. are not footing the Bill or Paying the Price ... well it is Win - Win for them Right??? They do the Crime and Shareholders do the Time.. pay the Price.. Oh Well.

So Intel Paid DELL more then a Billion Dollars Last Year? Hmm. .that is a lot of Your Money Shareholders.. and yet Intel Corp. continues to hide the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Stolen Technology and the involvement of Intel Corp. in this Multi-Trillion Dollar Lawsuit. Who at the SEC is Helping Intel Corp. to Cover Up a Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability such as the One that Eliot Bernstein - Iviewit Technologies Brings to the Table?

Got a Tip?
Email Me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

more on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

FBI Coverups, Boca Police Scandals, Major Law Firms Covering Corruption, Enron Collapsing, Attempted Murder, Invention Stolen, Denial of Due Process.

In America only Certain People have rights to Protection from the Law - Most All are just Collateral Damage to Protect Corrupt Attorneys, Judges, DOJ Officials, Corrupt FBI agents, Billionaire Tech Companies, Major Media Companies and Mega Law Firms.

Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...

"" KernelOfTruth says:

There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).

The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.

The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.

If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.

If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf

The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involving public corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.

He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.

The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his name and place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.

According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.

This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also by Stephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.

Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.

For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.

Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s court and the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.

Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).

RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured by Proskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.

With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.


Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:

(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill

(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in a bankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and

(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.

It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.

Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.

The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.

Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.

All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who had perpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.

For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.

The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],

..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departments when the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],

...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and Lardner Law Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].

The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special Agent Joseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.

Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],

.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,

... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]

The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.

We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.

Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.

I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.

A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.

In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.

Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota of protection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.

Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""

Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.

Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees .. so Nevermind...

Intel Executives have KNOWN of the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liability to Shareholders - for Years

Intel Corp. Knew Long Ago of a Trillion Dollar Liability - they have Since Told No One or Admitted to anything, and the Intel Stocks falsly climb as CEO Paul Otellini continues to brag on any media outlet that will listen about HOW great ... financially that Intel. Corp is Doing...

CEO Paul Otellini knew long ago of the Pending Doom to Shareholders with the Major Liability of NOT honoring Contracts with the Iviewits Technology and being a Part of a Trillion Dollar Patent theft in the Process.

When Intel is forced to face the Truth, as in the "over a thousand" documents are www.Iviewit.TV - and the US Courts Stop Condoning the Previous Corruption that ensued with the Iviewit Stolen Patent Scandal, well the Intel Shareholders will then be faced with Massive Shareholder Loss, and How many Years did the Intel Executives Know of this liability and Not Disclose this Extremely IMPORTANT information ?

At the Time of the Iviewit Scandal, and Inventor's Rights SMACKDOWN... Durward Bruce Sewell was General Counsel at Intel Corp. Bruce Sewell is Now at APPLE as their General Counsel. There is and has been PROOF for years of Bruce Sewell 's Knowledge in What Intel Did to The Iviewit Inventors, and D. Bruce Sewell seems to have done Nothing about it.

Who Protected Intel in the Courts? What Judicial Officials allowed this to Happen? Where is the SEC, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the USPTO on this one. There is tons of documented evidence, there are Legally Related to the Case whistleblowers and tons of Evidence but no justice seems to be stepping up... why is this... ??

Well I a not sure, but I do know FOR SURE that the TRUE Iviewit Inventors will NEVER give up, and this case of Serious Injustices will NEVER go away, so your Intel Stocks may not be at Risk this Second, but they will be AS some Honest Judge, Honest Attorney, Honest Court ... Somewhere... sometime .. will Tell the TRUTH and Honor the Laws of this Great Country and Intel Corp. Will have to Come Clean on a Trillion Dollar Liability they Deliberately failed to disclose for over 8 years and counting....

More on CEO Paul Otellini Click Here

More on D. Bruce Sewell Click Here

Click Here for the SEC Complaint By Eliot BernStein
Iviewit Technologies Regarding Intel's HUGE Liability and
explaining how this all came about and Who Else was involved
in this undisclosed Massive Shareholder Fraud.

More on the Patten and History (RICO Pattern)
of Intel Shareholders NOT to Happy with Intel Executives.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141168/
Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines

posted here
by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal Cox Blogs

Marc S. Dreier SEC Investigation and Conviction - Excerpts from Eliot Bernsteins SEC Complaint.

"" The SEC Indictment and Conviction of Marc S. Dreier as it relates to Proskauer, comes from the connection to Patent Attorney Raymond A. Joao.

Joao initially introduced to Iviewit as a Proskauer partner by Wheeler, along with Rubenstein, when they were actually with Meltzer at that time.

Once investors in Iviewit learned Rubenstein and Joao were not with Proskauer as represented, Proskauer partner Christopher C. Wheeler (“Wheeler”) claimed they were transferring to Proskauer shortly.

Rubenstein then transferred almost overnight and Joao was to follow after he finished work at Meltzer but since he was actually writing the patent applications under Rubenstein’s direction for Iviewit, Iviewit had to take an additional retainer to Proskauer’s with Meltzer until Joao transferred.

However, Joao never transferred to Proskauer Rose and during his first year of work for Iviewit, it was discovered that Joao allegedly was not filing timely and correct patent applications and patenting inventions in his own name.

Joao now under ongoing investigation at the US Patent Office and FBI, ordered for by the First Dept and yet to be completed and more. Wheeler then claimed that Proskauer was beginning an investigation of Joao, ironically, and ignoring the conflicts this presented, as Joao was Proskauer, Wheeler and Rubenstein’s referral.

Christopher Wheeler then suggested his good friend William Dick (“Dick”) of Foley to replace Joao for filing the patents and reviewing Joao’s work, continuing under Rubenstein’s oversight, as described in the Wachovia Private Placement already exhibited herein.

What Christopher Wheeler failed to disclose to Iviewit is that Dick had been involved immediately prior to being retained by Iviewit, with both Wheeler and another Proskauer/Wheeler referral to Iviewit, Brian G. Utley, formerly employed by IBM and working with Dick, Utley then becoming President of Iviewit, in another allegedly failed Intellectual Property theft.

The prior attempted Intellectual Property heist was against another Florida businessperson, Philanthropist Monte Friedkin of Diamond Turf Equipment Co. and whereby all those addressed herein should take note of the Prior History of these alleged patent thieves, clearly indicating that this is an organized and repeated crime against inventors.

The SEC should note that Wheeler presented a falsified resume for his friend Utley to Iviewit that not only failed to disclose the attempted theft but also failed to disclose, and in fact materially falsified Utley’s resume concealing the facts by claiming Utley left the company Diamond Turf a success due to his innovations.

Factually, the attempted IP theft, according to Friedkin, led to the firing of Utley by Friedkin and Friedkin’s immediately closing the business and taking a multimillion-dollar loss directly due to the scheme perpetrated by Utley, Dick and Wheeler. Dick also failed to disclose this fact when joining Iviewit.

In both Utley and Wheeler’s depositions, already exhibited herein, both Utley and Wheeler contradict each other’s statements when confronted with the Friedkin information and Dick in his Virginia Bar Response to a complaint filed against him further contradicts both Wheeler and Utley regarding the Friedkin events. Supplementary evidence confirming these claims can be found on the Iviewit homepage at www.iviewit.tv .

When Dick replaced Joao, the press reported that Joao claimed he now had 90+ patents in his own name, many allegedly directly lifted from Iviewit.

Joao then joined the Marc S. Dreier law firm of Dreier & Baritz. This new information should be cause for the SEC to reanalyze the entire Dreier Ponzi Scheme in light of this new evidence, and in fact, the monies of the Dreier Ponzi allegedly directly relate to royalties from sales and licensing of Joao’s stolen Intellectual Properties.

The Dreier Ponzi is alleged to be another money-laundering scheme concocted by the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.

The SEC should also cease distribution of assets in the Dreier Ponzi, especially where the Trustee appears conflicted with Proskauer and again the court actions may be further attempts by these all too clever law firms to abscond with funds in further illegal legal actions and Fraud on the Court. ""

Where is the SEC and Mary Schapiro In All This ?

Click Here for Full SEC Complaint by Iviewit Technologies, Eliot I. Bernstein.

posted here by
investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

Iviewit Stolen Patent, Hall and Bernstein calls to Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros. executives

"" December 29, 2009 ~ Hall and Bernstein calls to Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros. executives.

o Further, I hereby complain that such recent elusive conduct involves the CEO, CFO and General Counsel at Time Warner, Inc., even hiding and dodging professional phone calls, in fact wholly ignoring them, simply to confirm messages and communications were received and seeking responsibly to address the mass of liabilities described herein.

Instead, quite shockingly, both Hall and I were intentionally passed along to extensions whereby the employees refused to give their names and several times just hung up on us.

Then, unidentified employees transferred us to Security personnel, personnel who would claim to be proper members of the company to receive and deliver messages to the Senior Executives regarding the massive potential Shareholder liabilities, yet they too would offer no confirmation of the delivery of the matters to the Executives and several refused to give their proper names or oversight.

Security for Time Warner instead then took messages with a promise only to deliver the message and since there has been absolutely no call back from Senior Management, Counsel, Outside Counsel or an Auditor since those calls, we presume that avoidance equals concealment. This stands as additional cause for the SEC to investigate and find out more information regarding the failure to return these calls and address liabilities properly by either Officers, Directors, Auditors, Outside Counsel, etc. and further determine if they have reported the liabilities their offices have been notified about to Auditors and Shareholders. ""

Full SEC Complaint Name Time Warner Click HERE
and Source of Above Post

posted on this blog by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
blogger crystal cox

Iviewit Stolen Patent Case - On What or Whose Authority is P. Stephen Lamont Acting On?

Why is Stephen Lamont Threatening to End the Affairs of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox? Why is Stephen Lamont Demanding that I Copy him on my emails to anyone regarding the Iviewit Company?

Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threat my Life, and my "Affairs", just because I posted a document and words THAT were NOT mine... ???

Does Stephen Lamont have the Legal Authority
to Speak on behalf of the Iviewit Company?

Can P. Stephen Lamont Legally File Federal Documents to QUASH Eliot Bernstein's Motion .. when Mr. Lamont was Fired, Long .. Long ago ?

Iviewit, Eliot Bernstein Says:

" Lamont was not approved by any board, as the board disbanded illegally and without noticing the shareholders and so I hired lamont and offered him stock in the company. Later we learned from Garber and other law firms that we could not act on behalf of Iviewit in official capacity until the books and corporate records were fixed, approximately 50k and that is why lamont claims he was advised by counsel to work outside the company and not as an officer, as he legally was never an officer."

More on Iviewit.. and Lamont
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of.html

Posted by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower

This is not My Story .. it is However, the Greatest Patent Story every Told, and well I find it intriguing So I post about it.. I Found the Information on www.Iviewit.TV where the story has been running for 8 Years.

I link to that site in Which Stephen Lamont also promotes.

SO why threaten me for posting information from that site and directly from the REAL owner .. and one of the Inventors of the Iviewit Patent.. Why Terrorize me for simply reading a Website and posting pieces of it on my site and linking to the site...??

Why has, P. Stephen Lamont, an Alleged Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies Inc. Threatened me for posting information that is not mine.

And it is Reported to ME that Stephen Lamont has Joined and or Created a Hate Group, and is actively recruiting others to join him in this group that is threatening to Incarcerate me, Burn Me at the Stake, Ruin Me, and Telling Lie upon Lie about me.. and my Business.. all because I Posted Excerpts from the Iviewit Website.

I just don't Understand. I have no Bad intentions.
I am simply writing about an 8 Year Old Stolen Patent Story
that is and has been already on the Web for 8 years....

Not my Story...
I am Just a Modern Day
Investigate Journalist.. which means
I Read..
I Post...
that Simple..

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at
www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.iViewit.TV

Crystal Cox Blog
a Special Note to POST
for the Concerned Reader
that May wonder Why the "Authorities" do NOTHING about threats on people's lives..

well folks they don't want to, don't know how to or your LIFE and quality of life means nothing to them.. because I can tell you that Homeland Security, DHS.gov, and the Department of Justice is Reading this Stuff...

I can See them on my Stat Counter.. DHS was on this site today .. will they do anything ??? or are they simply investigating the Messenger and NOT the Message... they seem to just Observe while bad things happen.. kind of like today's news Out of Seattle where the 3 Guards Watched the Young Black woman beaten almost to death and did nothing...

I have been getting tips, and researching stories for awhile now, and definitely under the Watch of the DHS.gov and the Dept. Of Justice Web Server, the VERY scary part is they don't do anything or take action on Obvious Threats to People's Lives or Injustice. They simply seem to put the messenger on Watch, when Really it is NOT my Story. A couple of Years of this and I can tell you once again - that these folks read this stuff.. and they make no attempt to help .. even when I email them and ask for help...

So Don't Worry.. DHS and the Dept. of Justice may be here looking to Investigate ME and not really caring about the Illegal Behavior or Death Threats Coming from the Actual Source of the Facts.. or the Truth on the Case .. the Real Crimes and Criminals...


Crystal L. Cox


Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

NY TIMES REPORTS 80M SUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS V. PROSKAUER & NY SUPREME COURT

"NY TIMES & LAW JOURNAL REPORT $80M SUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING OF IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS v. PROSKAUER, STEVEN KRANE PAST NYSBA PRES, FOLEY LARDNER & NY COURT OFFICERS, REVEALED BY ATTY INSIDE WHISTLEBLOWER

For_Immediate_Release:

United States of America (Press Release) November 23, 2007 -- In an explosive $80M federal lawsuit @ http://www.iviewit.tv/CCA-2-amended.pdf a staff attorney at the New York Supreme Court claims officials whitewashed Iviewit complaints against Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Esq. (former NYSBA Pres & clerk to Chief Judge Judith Kaye) & other high ranking NY Supreme Court officers.

The inside whistleblower also claims she was physically assaulted & then terminated to keep Iviewit claims of fraud on the US Patent Office and other government agencies buried.

The New York Law Journal
@ http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1193648632218 and The New York Times @ http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/nyregion/01suit.html?ref=nyregion reported on a federal lawsuit claiming high ranking members on the New York Supreme Court, purposely and with intent to cover-up for other high ranking court officials, caused the whitewashing of complaints against attorneys and senior court officials who committed hosts of state, federal, and international crimes against a multiplicity of governmental agencies, and in fact, threatened and coerced Plaintiff Anderson, including wrongfully terminating her and physical assault, for voicing concern that there was irrefutable evidence of wrongdoings by the attorneys and court officials to cover up the crimes committed against the United States.

In the lawsuit http://www.iviewit.tv/CCA-2-amended.pdf filed on October 27, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed as Christine C. Anderson v. The State of New York, et. al. S.D.N.Y., October 27, 2007 the Plaintiff affirmatively claims support by the Iviewit matters of patent sabotage, FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, intellectual property theft , and an attempted murder perpetrated by, among others, the once respected Proskauer Rose LLP and its members Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane, (former New York State Bar President, former clerk to Chief Judge Judith Kaye), Chief Judge Judith Kaye and her late Proskauer partner husband Stephen Kaye, Christopher C. Wheeler, Foley & Lardner LLP led by its former Chairman and former Republican National Committee, Chief Counsel, Michael C. Grebe and others.

In that lawsuit, the Plaintiff factually alleges that:

Upon information and belief, defendants also state that the timing of the, Plaintiff’s abrupt firing was connected to the newly circulated revelations concerning Cahill's status as an individually named defendant in a lawsuit entitled In the Matter of Complaints Against Attorneys and Counselors-At-Law; Kenneth Rubenstein - Docket 2003.0531; Raymond Joao-Docket 2003.0532; Steven C. Krane- Docket 2004.1883; Thomas J. Cahill- Special Inquiry #2004.1122; and the Law Firm of Proskauer Rose, LLP; filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, Pro Se and P. Stephen Lamont Both Individually and On Behalf of Shareholders of: Iviewit et. al., Petitioners. [Iviewit’s]…petition was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division: First Department.

The Iviewit Petition @ http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2007%2008%20Cahill%20Motion%20Supreme%20court%20new%20york%20FINAL%20BOOKMAR.pdf for immediate investigation was later granted by the First Department Justices in a unanimous decision to begin immediate investigation for the Appearance of Impropriety and Conflict of Interest in Unpublished Orders:

• M3198 - Steven C. Krane & Proskauer Rose @ http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2008%2011%20new%20york%20first%20department%20orders%20investigation%20Krane%20Rubenstein%20Joao.pdf

• M2820 Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose
• M3212 Raymond A. Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel and,
• Thomas J. Cahill – Special Inquiry #2004.1122 - Cahill was transferred for Special Inquiry and Investigation to Martin Gold per First Dept rules.

Original First Dept Complaints:
• Kenneth Rubenstein – Docket 2003.0531 First Department,
• Raymond Joao – Docket 2003.0532 First Department,
• Steven C. Krane – Docket 2004.1883 First Department,
• the Law Firm of Proskauer Rose, LLP and,
• the Law Firm of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel

Additionally, and similar to the NYLJ and the NYT, as reported in an article aptly titled "Justice Department Widens 'Patentgate' Probe Buried by Ethics Chief Thomas J. Cahill" @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html the Iviewit inquiries have reached the highest levels of New York & Washington political circles and into many judicial chambers as well.

The original inquiries revealed that New York ethics Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill of the First Department Disciplinary Committee whitewashed investigations, which recently led to his abrupt departure.

In a letter dated July 16, 2007, H. Marshall Jarret’s office, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI and US Attorney investigation, initiated in 2001, that involves the theft from Iviewit of nearly 30 patents, trademarks and other intellectual properties, with an estimated value of a trillion dollars.

The OPR investigation was sparked by a request from the DOJ – OIG, Inspector General Glenn Fine’s Office whom is also conducting an ongoing investigation. The patent pending applications and other IP have been suspended by the Commissioner of Patents pending the outcome of ongoing state, federal and international investigations.

The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.

As a backdrop to the technologies in question, Mr. Bernstein's inventions, the Iviewit video scaling and image overlay systems, are the backbone, enabling technologies for the transmission of video and images across almost all transmission networks and viewable on all display devices, an elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of reconfiguring video frames to unlock bandwidth, processing, and storage constraints -- the "Holy Grail" inventions of the digital imaging and video worlds that enable low bandwidth video on the Internet and mobile phones.

As previously reported, the U.S. Senate and U.S. House Judiciary Committees (Representative John Dingell, Chair of the Energy & Commerce Committee forwarded the Iviewit matters to John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee for investigation) have known about the Iviewit investigation since about September of 2006. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office is also championing the Iviewit cause.

The story is globally known in technical and intellectual property circles, with ongoing investigations at international patent offices such as the European Patent Office as well.

Full information available @ www.iviewit.tv , including full pertinent documentation and images of the car bombing attempt on inventor Bernstein’s life.

Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Iviewit Holdings, Inc.
http://www.iviewit.tv/
iviewit@iviewit.tv
...

About Iviewit Technologies, Inc. and Iviewit Holdings, Inc.,
Iviewit’s innovative patent pending imaging and video technologies deliver to millions of people around the world digital video and images every day.

Founded in 1998 by Eliot I. Bernstein, Jude Rosario and Zakirul Shirajeee, Iviewit’s core backbone technologies deliver video and images to top web properties in all major global markets enhancing the overall web experience for users. For more information, visit www.iviewit.tv .

Currently the Iviewit patent pending applications have been suspended by the USPTO pending investigations by state, federal and international authorities concerning the theft of the IP by patent attorneys charged with filing them.

....
Visit our website: http://iviewit.tv

Eliot Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont"

Source of this Post
http://iviewit.blogtownhall.com/default.aspx

posted here by Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger...
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
at www.DeniedPatent.com
Crystal Cox

Foley and Lardner LLP Seem to Be In the Business of Patent Thefts.

The Tactic is to Bully, Harass and Financially Ruin Inventors in order to Steal Their Patent. Story after Story since the 80's of Foley & Lardner Bullying Inventors to take their patens, many have given up over the years and they see the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story and the Donald Stone Stolen Technology and they reach out and tell their stories. Many of whom gave up long ago because this Mega-Law Firm beat them down, took their invention and left them with no hope.

The Foley and Lardner story seems to be the same over and over, the Same "Patented" invention stealing scheme by a Foley and Lardner LLP Patent Attorney over and over. How does a Mega Law Firm Like Foley and Lardner get away with This Kind of Mass Patent Theft? Well the Inventors that the Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney represents do not have hundreds of millions of dollars and the Inventors that Foley and Lardner represent do not have Political Connections that Go all the way to The Supreme Courts, Connection in the USPTO Office and Connections in the Republican National Committee (RNC).

So if your going to hire Foley and Lardner to "Help You" patent your Invention, your Technology well Then Do so at your own risk. I am not asking you to believe me, I am simply telling the Victims stories and asking that you do your homework before you turn your invention over to Foley and Lardner, you may be sorry - you may never have rights to your invention and your life will certainly never be the same....

Also Check Out..

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.MarylandCorruption.com



Crystal L. Cox
Truth Seeker...
Whistleblower

Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit intellectual property filings.

Online Connections found on Michael Grebe, Foley Lardner
and the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Case.

""If Patentgate pans out, as described at the www.iviewit.tv website, Michael Grebe would stand to lose any of his wealth accumulated at Foley and Lardner since 1998 and perhaps everything in a sucessful RICO and could become entangled in the criminal allegations currently under investigation by the FBI, the USPTO, the USPTO OED and international investigations that are ongoing.

Key intellectual properties of Iviewit handled by Foley and Lardner are under investigation as to how the wrong inventors, owners and assignees were falsified to the USPTO, violations of federal laws regarding on false oath submitted to the USPTO on IP applications. The Commissioner of Patents has suspended Iviewit IP pending investigations.


Similar allegations are under investigation in Europe through the EPI and through the European Patent Office and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, these false and fraudulent applications could trigger an international investigation by over twenty countries were the papers were tendered.

Michael Grebe, remained the Chairman of RNC until 2001 and resigned after the potentially fraudulent election of George W. Bush and subsequent illegal appointment of a Supreme Court US President by a narrow 5-4 vote.


Michael Grebe at the time is cited as the largest force behind getting Bush appointed.

Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.


Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it.

Images at the www.iviewit.tv website The Iviewit matters have recently come before the House Judiciary Committee after being forwarded by John Dingell of the House Energy and Commerce Committee for investigation."




Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.


Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it. Images at the www.iviewit.tv website

Source of this Post.

http://www.politicalfriendster.com/
rateConnection.php?id1=697&id2=5255

Blatant and Obvious Fraud on the US Court System. Patent Office Fraud, Patent Attorney Corruption, Supreme Court Corruption, Trillions of Dollars.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent Story is very interesting to Say the Least as it Exposes Corruption in US Courts, Exposes Patent Attorneys Ease in which they can Steal Inventions, Exposes Supreme Court Judges and Attorney Bar Association that Cover Up the Corruption, Side Deals and Favoritism among preferred - Elite - Wealthy Attorneys, and Really wakes you up to Big Corporations Like Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Time Warner Inc., Sony, and all the Other major Corporations participating in this Cover Up to Deny Inventors Rights, Deny Due Process and Continue Using their Technology - Simply Ignore 8 and 10 year old Contracts, Blatantly VIOLATED Confidentiality Agreements and violating Law after Law with thus far - No Accountability.

The US Patent Office Deny Rights of Inventors and Seem to be Holding up Investigations for year after year while Real Peoples Live are On Hold and In Danger.

The US Bankruptcy Court System has blatant Obvious Proven Fraud as in the Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy - the Conflicts of Interest and Illegal behavior and For Some Reason, thus far the US Bankruptcy Courts can't seem to see what has happened.

And though there are Literally thousands of Pages of documents of Proof, the US Court Sytem Seems to be Aiding And Abetting the Criminals in all this, Seemingly just because they are Major US Corporations, Meg-Law Firms, Court Judges, Supreme Court Judges, and State Attorney Bars - there is so Much Corruption Truly Where Does One Begin.

We Begin by Understanding the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story, who the Criminals Are, Who are the seemingly Protected Patent Attorneys in all this, Which Supreme Court Judges are Looking the Other way to this Blatant and Obvious Corruption, Who in the State Attorney Bar Complaint Process is Allow this. Once we understand this at least to Some Degree we can see how this happens in the US Courts and How those In Judicial Power Either Willing Let it Happen, Accept Bribes and Pay Offs, or are Threatened Somehow.

How Does a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist Get Pulled Off and For over a Decade So Far.

Well Go to the Links Below and Find Out More on How this Level of Corruption Happens in Your United States Court System.

Click Here to Read what Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J had to Say in August of 2008 about the Fraud, Deceit, and Misrepresentation in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.

Also Check Out www.DeniedPatent.com for Names and Players and How A Theft of this Magnitude Can Be Pulled Off in the United States.

Also Go to www.Iviewit.TV Scroll Down Read Through some Documents, I know it is a Lot to Take in, but boy does it Open your Eyes to How Easy Trillion Dollar Heists Really are when you Know the Right People and have the Right Money.

Time Warner - WBOL - Fraud Against Shareholders, Lies about Liability and NOT honoring Contracts, Why?

Why Did the SEC allow Warner Brothers to Split off Aol after they wre warned of a Trillion Dollar Liability that they would certainly be responsible for Some if not all the Damages?

So We have Bills that Show every Charge for the Entire Process of setting up and Supposedly Executing these Contracts such as the one Below.

2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted.

yet AOL was allowed to Split from WBOL, and Warner Bros. Is NOT being MADE to honor these Contracts, Why?

This is FRAUD against the Shareholders as AOL - Time Warner Inc. knew that this Major Liability was NOT accounted for on their Books. So why is Time Warner AOL still ignoring the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors, are they trying to hide assets... no matter how you look at it Time Warner - Time Warner, Warner Bros., WBOL,AOLTW, AOL, Time Warner Inc., Whatever name you have for them... they KNEW and did not share with shareholders a HUGE Debit on their Books.

There is Confidentiality Agreements, and So Much Evidence, All these Names and Players, Contracts, Bills and Still Warner Brothers acts like this Just Does NOT exist... hmmm...

There are BINDING term sheets from 2001 and Still WBOL ignores the rights of those they entered into contract with, WHY?

Warner Bros. Online Videos has NOT been honoring this Contract but using the Technology for around 8 Years now, and after Iviewit Sent them Disclosure of the Issue pending, they Split of AOL, and the SEC has no Issue with this?

Do Warner Brothers Shareholders have ANY issue with any of this ? I Guess they had better Start Considering it's Validity... any Time Now...

Click Here for Contracts and Information from 2001
that Seem to Have Slipped Warner Brothers Mind.

What Does Doug Shapiro, Michael Kopelman at Time Warner Inc. of Time Warner Investor Relations, Have to Say about all of this, I mean Come On are they Denying it Exists?
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1950229,00.html
"NEW YORK – Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) will report its 2009 fourth-quarter and full-year results on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, before the market opens. "

Boy Time Warner Inc. TWX - sure is Proud of what they have done...

More Links to Research This Topic

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

AOL, Time Warner Inc, Iviewit, SEC Fraud, Andrew Y. Choung, IRELL and Manella LLP,WBOL, Warner Bros. Online, Stock Tips

Trillion Dollar Fraud on the US Court System - Who Can STOP this Kind of Interconnected Corruption at the Highest Levels?

Conflicts of Interest, Fraud Against the US Government, Stolen Technology, Stolen Patents, United States Courts, US Patent Office, NYAG, Proskauer Rose, Judge Shira Scheindlin, Christine C. Anderson Whistleblower, Anti-Trust Violations, Iviewit Stolen Patent, Fraud on the Court, Shareholder Liability, New York State Liability, Trillion Dollar Accounting Error, New York Senate Judiciary and More... Read This...
Eliot Bernstein Patent Heiste
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf
Iviewit Stolen Patent,

Time Warner Inc. - AOL - Withholding information from Shareholders that they have a Right to Know.

How Come AOL and Time Warner Inc. Shareholders still do not seem to know about the Trillion Dollar, at least in part - and a VERY big part is a Liability on the that is NOT reported on the AOL Time Warner Books?

Here we have Confidentiality Agreements Violated, Technology Stolen from Inventors, No Compensation to The Inventors. Time Warner Inc., AOL - they know that this Shareholder Fraud is Pending and that at some point they will have to pay for the Technology they STOLE.

Does the SEC not Care about a Liability this HUGE... look at www.DeniedPatent.com or www.Iviewit.TV and you can see thousands of Documents of Proof.

Did the SEC have any advance Notice all all of this?

Well from the Above sites you can see that the SEC did indeed know about what was going on and now the damage is mounting and still Time Warner Inc. - AOL - NYSE: TWX - Time Warner Cable Inc. -Warner Bros. they have Seemingly not disclosed this Liability to their Shareholders, in fact are they not in some sort of "Time Warner Declares Spin-Off Dividend Of AOL Shares Time Warner Inc. and AOL Inc. announced the timing and details regarding the spin-off of AOL from Time" From TimeWarner.com ? So another words they are restructuring their Company to attempt to protect themselves from this Trillion Dollar Liability without telling the Shareholders of TWX that it even exists.

Is That Legal?

"" Time Warner Inc. - AOL Separation Information On December 9, 2009, Time Warner Inc. completed the spin-off of AOL Inc. "" From the Link Below
http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&p=irol-irhome
Time Warner was Given Notice from Iviewit of this Trillion Dollar Liability and they Separated AOL after this - Folks, there is a Whole Lot More that Time Warner Inc. is NOT telling YOU.

There is No way that Time Warner Inc. Can Ever DENY that they knew the Liability from the Iviewit Stolen Patent, P. Stephen Lamont told them, Eliot Bernstein Told them, People within their own Company told them... there is Evidence on top of Evidence to PROOF that Warner Bros. Hid this Liability information from their Shareholders and denied Rights to the Iviewit Inventors. The Question is How Long with the shareholders stand for this and how long with the SEC Ignore this HUGE Liability that is NOT accounted For?

Links for You to Visit
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:FgCCwCxMZuwJ:iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%252008%252018%2520Cuomo%2520Letter%2520Final.doc+%22iviewit%22+%22Time+Warner%22&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:MviGXq-QONgJ:www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%252012%252015%2520Letter%2520to%2520Thomas%2520Cahill%2520Re%2520Krane%2520Conflict.pdf+site:www.iviewit.tv+Time+Warner&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patent%20pool%20infringers.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Miscellaneous%20Patent%20Docs/2004%2003%2026%20Moatz%20letter%20to%20take%20time%20responding%20for%20complaint.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf


http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2004%2021%20Director%20Officer%20Advisory%20Board%20and%20Professionals%20Letter%20of%20Liabilities%20email%20low.pdf
Letters of Liabilty

to James B. Comey from Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit - Regarding: Lockheed Martin Use of Iviewit Intellectual Properties

James B. Comey Ignoring Phone Calls from Iviewit - Eliot Bernstein.

James B. Comey, Assitant Stephanie Doherty On April 03, 2009 - Informed Iviewit that James B. Comey of Lockheed Martin Corporation would NOT Take Eliot Bernstein's Calls on a Trillion Dollar Intellectual Properties Infringement Liability Relating to Iviewit Intellectual Property and a Lawsuit Naming Lockheed Martin Corporation as a named Defendant.

James B. Comey, Lockheeds General Counsel has Refused Phone Calls and has Not Responded to Written Requests from Eliot Bernstein on Behalf of himself, the other Iviewit Inventors and the Iviewit Technologies Shareholders.

As Pro Se Counsel, it is Shocking that James B. Comey can Legally, It Seems get away with simply ignoring Trillion Dollar Lawsuits. And refusing sound business practice to resolve the Lawsuit and Intellectual Property Infringements and to Comply with Proper Accountancy Rules and Regulations.

It Appears that Lockheed is another Player in this Trillion Dollar Heist that is, for Some Reason Protected by the US Courts, Why - We are unsure of.

So James B. Comey, General Council of Lockheed Martin Corporation was notified of Intellectual Property Infringement / Cease and Desist and Lawsuit in Writing after a Phone Conversation with James B. Comey's Assistant Stephanie Doherty and James B. Comey Can Simply Do Nothing?

Is this How the United States Justice System Works?

Here is the Document I am Discussing in This Post, Read it all and see that the Proof in the Iviewit Stolen Patent, Patent Infringement, Stolen Technology Case is Overwhelming, and these Corporations can Simply Ignore it.
James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090416%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20Demand%20Letter%20to%20Lockheed%20Comey4841clow.pdf

James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV
James B. Comey, Lockheed Martin Corporation

New York Second Circuit Courts are Blocking Due Process, Blocking the Truth. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Christine C. Anderson and Iviewit

Now in the Iviewit Case, we know that this Case is Legally Related to the Christine C. Anderson, New York Whistleblower Case Right?

We know from all the Information, Proof, and Documents on www.Iviewit.TV and on www.DeniedPatent.com that the Iviewit Inventors have had their Technology Stolen and that the Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose that is involved in this Trillion Dollar patent Heist seems to be Protected by the New York Courts and the Florida Courts as Well as the New York and the Florida Attorney Bar.

It seems that time after time the Florida and the New York Court of Appeals simply denies due process or just dismisses complaints with no real reason why. And well they are the LAW and they can do that.

The question is How Long will YOU, Will "We the People" take this abuse of power... do you have no rights at all when a Court can just push paper at you year after year with this much proof and evidence.

The New York Second Circuit is Dishing up the kind of justice that will make sured Favored Law Firm Proskauer Rose is Protected as is the Reputation of the Not So Justice Judith Kaye Ex-Supreme Court Judge. Along with this Intel, Time Warner Inc., Sony, MPEG-4, MPEGLA, Bruce Sewell, Kenneth Rubenstein, and More are Protected by the Simple Stroke of a Pen by the New York Second Circuit.

The Christine C. Anderson Whistleblower Case in New York is one that you all need to pay attention to, for decades the TRUTH has been silenced and the courage of Christine C. Anderson needs to be rewarded, and SOMETHING needs to be done. Instead folks like Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe are continuing to deny rights in Related Cases to this huge Whistle Blowing Scandal Exposing the TRUE corruption in the New York Court System.

Whistleblowers like Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe don't seem to stop business as usual at the Second Circuit - Check out the Links below and see if you can make sense of the Continuing to Deny and Keep down the Due Process Rights of the Iviewit Company, the Real Inventors of a Trillion Dollar Technology that we all use every day and have for years upon years while the inventors are kept down, harasses, and have had attempted murder. Still the New York Second Circuit Court is Above Morals, Above the Law and It is Time for You the People To Speak Up and Hold them accountable for the Injustice they are dishing up.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20100109%20US%20Court%20of%20Appeal%20Denial%20of%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20and%20Appeal.pdf

Motion is Denied - Not Based in Fact they Say
Talk about Delusional I Say. Can the Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe and her Clerk not read. This is Seriously Based in Fact, and why the big law firm Proskauer Rose is Being protected and all those covering up this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft are being Protected by the New York Courts.. well it is SHOCKING and time for YOU to start asking Questions.

In the New York - United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Your RIGHTS are "Moot" - S.D.N.Y. - N.Y.C. 07-cv-11196 Scheindlin, J.

Next Document...
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf

Thousands of Documents of Proof Literally and the New York Second Circuit Court of Appeals simply, with a sway of the Pen Denies YOUR RIGHTS, your get no due process, you do not get to present you facts, they protect the Criminal and Simply say your Complaint is Not based in Fact and is MOOT... Litterally Thousands of Pages of Proof and NOT Based in Fact Says Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe -

why is New York Second Circuit So Corrupt and Allowed to Keep on Protecting the Criminals ... this Patent Theft is Fraud Against the United States Government, it involves Pay Offs, Attempted Murders, Cover Ups, Contracts not Honored, Perjury and More and the New York Second Circuit thinks it is "Moot" - something is Very Wrong in the New York Court System and the Law is Simply Irrelevant on every level.

New York Court Corruption, New York Whistle Blower, Second Circuit New York

Christine C. Anderson, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe