Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Intel CEO Paul Otellini Still not Disclosing Trillion Dollar Liability in Iviewit Stolen Technology. Intel Stockholders Be AWARE.
This Shareholder Derivative Action was in the Fall of 2009.
Intel is Corrupt and Is Constantly Pulling the "Wool" over Shareholder. Intel CEO Paul Otellini Knows of Major Liabilities to the Intel Stockholders in the Iviewit Stolen Technologies and has still NOT disclosed this information Intel Stockholders.
It seems like with AMD, and the Other Anti-Trust Lawsuits and Issues that Intel is in Constantly in some sort of Illegal Scandaling.. stomping on the rights of others.. and Wellthe Stockholders pay the price for the Illegal and DirtyDeals by the Big Wigs at Intel.
Attention Intel Stockholders:
YOU Need to Know about the Iviewit Stolen Technology - this is a Massive Shareholder Fraud Upon YOU and YOU will paythe price for Their Lies, Deciet and Dirty Deeds. More on the Iviewit Trillion Dollar Liability NOW affecting Intel Stockholders .. at www.DeniedPatent.com - over a thousand documents of Proof.. and Intel is Hiding this CRIME from Intel Stockholders.
Below is the Shareholder Derivative Action
"" TO: ALL RECORD AND BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF INTEL CORPORATION ("INTEL" OR THE "COMPANY") AS OF MAY 25, 2010.
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS AND ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FROM PURSUING THE SETTLED CLAIMS (DEFINED HEREIN).
IF YOU HOLD INTEL COMMON STOCK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER,
1. PURPOSE OF NOTICE
Pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the "Court") dated June 2, 2010, and further pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Notice is to inform you of (a) the above-captioned action (the “Delaware Action”) pending in the Court, (b) the proposed settlement of the Delaware Action (the "Settlement") as provided for in a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") dated May 25, 2010, and (c) your right to participate in a hearing to be held on July 20, 2010 at 10 a.m., before the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan at the United States Courthouse, 844 N. King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (the "Settlement Hearing") to (i) determine whether the Court should approve the Settlement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 as fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of Intel and its shareholders,
(ii) determine whether an Order and Final Judgment should be entered dismissing the Delaware Action with prejudice, and releasing and barring prosecution of any and all Settled Claims, as defined below, (iii) consider and determine whether to enter an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses to counsel for the plaintiffs in the Delaware Action and in the Related Actions, as defined below, and (iv) consider such other matters as the Court deems appropriate.
This Notice describes the rights you may have with respect to the Delaware Action and pursuant to the Stipulation and what steps you may take, but are not required to take, in relation to the Settlement.
2. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES.
On November 13, 2009, Charles A. Gilman, an Intel Stockholder, commenced a shareholder derivative action in the Court (the “Gilman Action”) on behalf of Intel against defendants Craig R. Barrett, Carol Bartz, Charlene Barshefsky, Susan L. Decker, John J. Donahoe, D. James Guzy, Sr., Paul S. Otellini, David S. Pottruck, James D. Plummer, Jane E. Shaw, David B. Yoffie, and Frank D. Yeary (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) and nominal defendant Intel (together with the Individual Defendants, the “Defendants”).
On December 23, 2009, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System (“MPERS”) commenced a shareholder derivative action in the Court on behalf of Intel against the Individual Defendants and nominal defendant Intel (the “MPERS Action”).
On January 15, 2010, the Court entered an order consolidating the Gilman Action and the MPERS Action into this action, appointing Mr. Gilman and MPERS as lead plaintiffs in the Delaware Action (the “Delaware Plaintiffs”), and appointing Paskowitz & Associates and Berman DeValerio to be Co-Lead Counsel (together, the “Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel”).
On February 12, 2010, the Delaware Plaintiffs filed a Shareholders’ Demand-Made Consolidated Derivative Complaint (the "Delaware Complaint"), alleging, inter alia, that Intel has, for a number of years, engaged in conduct which violates U.S. and foreign competition laws, resulting in civil suits and regulatory investigations and proceedings against Intel (together the “Antitrust Proceedings”) including, without limitation:
(1) A suit commenced by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and AMD International Sales & Services, Ltd. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, entitled Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 05-441 (JJF) (the “AMD Action”);
(2) A series of puntative class action suits brought under state competition laws, consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware under the caption In re Intel Corporation Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 05-1717 (JJF);
(3) A proceeding by the Japan Fair Trade Commission against Intel Kabushiki Kaisha, Intel’s Japanese subsidiary, which resulted in a consent decree ordering Intel Kabushiki Kaisha to cease and desist certain actions;
(4) An investigation and proceeding brought by the European Commission, in which the European Commission issued a decision and imposed a fine against Intel in May 2009;
(5) A proceeding brought by the Korea Fair Trade Commission, in which the Korea Fair Trade Commission entered a ruling against Intel in June 2008;
(6) An action commenced by the New York Attorney General in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, entitled State of New York v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 09-827 (JJF); and (7) An administrative proceeding commenced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission against Intel on or about December 16, 2009, Docket No. 9341.
The Delaware Complaint incorporates the allegations made in certain of the Antitrust Proceedings, and further asserts that Intel’s alleged anticompetitive conduct has resulted in damage to Intel, and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Intel by failing to, among other things, rein in, ameliorate, or countermand such conduct, and failing to institute certain remedial measures.
The Delaware Complaint seeks recovery for and on behalf of Intel of the damages it allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the Individual Defendants.
Intel and certain of its current or former officers, directors, and employees are parties to other litigation relating to, arising out of, or making allegations similar to, the allegations contained in the Delaware Complaint, including the following (the “Related Actions”):
(1) A shareholder derivative suit pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, Santa Clara County, entitled Paris v. Otellini, et al., Case No. 110CV166850; and
(2) An action pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law § 220 pending in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware, entitled Rosenfeld Family Foundation, et ano. v. Intel Corporation, Civil Action No. 5070-VCS. The Rosenfeld Family Foundation action was filed following the dismissal by this Court of a demand futility shareholder derivative suit, entitled In re Intel Corp. Derivative Litigation, Civ. A. No. 08-93-JJF (D. Del.). The two actions are collectively referred to as the “Rosenfeld Action.”
Counsel for the Defendants and Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel have engaged in extensive negotiations concerning a possible settlement of the Delaware Action. In connection therewith, Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel have conducted a thorough investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in the Delaware Action, including:
(i) review of publicly-available documents concerning Intel and the Antitrust Proceedings, (ii) review of over 17,000 pages of documents produced by Intel, including transcripts of the depositions of twenty Intel officers, directors, or employees that were taken in the AMD Action,
(iii) the deposition of Evangelina Almirantearena, Senior Counsel, Competition Compliance for Intel, and (iv) consultation with experts in the areas of corporate governance, antitrust law, and compliance. As a result of the extensive negotiations, the Delaware Plaintiffs and the Defendants have agreed to the proposed Settlement described below, as provided for in the Stipulation, and have moved the Court for final approval of the Settlement.
Plaintiffs and counsel to the plaintiffs in the Rosenfeld Action ("Rosenfeld’s Counsel") have engaged in extensive negotiations concerning the terms of a possible settlement of the Rosenfeld Action.
In connection therewith, Rosenfeld’s Counsel have conducted a thorough investigation of the allegations asserted in the Rosenfeld Action, including a review of publicly-available documents concerning Intel and the Antitrust Proceedings, review of documents produced by Intel, the transcript, and accompanying exhibits, to the deposition of Evangelina Almirantearena, Senior Counsel, Competition Compliance for Intel, and consultation with experts in the areas of corporate governance, antitrust law, and compliance.
As a result of the extensive negotiations, Plaintiffs and counsel to the plaintiffs in the Related Actions (the "Related Plaintiffs" and "Related Plaintiffs’ Counsel," respectively) also have agreed to the proposed Settlement described below and have executed the Stipulation. ...""
Source and Full Document Click Here
Intel Stockholders, You Pay the Price for their Crimes. They Get Richer from their Crimes Everyday. Time for Intel to Disclose the Liability of the Iviewit Stolen Technology.
Craig R. Barrett, Carol Bartz, Charlene Barshefsky, Susan L. Decker, John J. Donahoe, D. James Guzy, Sr., Paul S. Otellini, David S. Pottruck, James D. Plummer, Jane E. Shaw, David B. Yoffie, and Frank D. Yeary ARE accountable to YOU: The Sooner you Stand up to them the Less Money you will Lose as the Iviewit Technologies Trillion Dollar Liability to Intel Stockholders Will Never Go Away... it will Only Get Bigger and Bigger.
Intel is Corrupt and Is Constantly Pulling the "Wool" over Shareholder. Intel CEO Paul Otellini Knows of Major Liabilities to the Intel Stockholders in the Iviewit Stolen Technologies and has still NOT disclosed this information Intel Stockholders.
It seems like with AMD, and the Other Anti-Trust Lawsuits and Issues that Intel is in Constantly in some sort of Illegal Scandaling.. stomping on the rights of others.. and Wellthe Stockholders pay the price for the Illegal and DirtyDeals by the Big Wigs at Intel.
Attention Intel Stockholders:
YOU Need to Know about the Iviewit Stolen Technology - this is a Massive Shareholder Fraud Upon YOU and YOU will paythe price for Their Lies, Deciet and Dirty Deeds. More on the Iviewit Trillion Dollar Liability NOW affecting Intel Stockholders .. at www.DeniedPatent.com - over a thousand documents of Proof.. and Intel is Hiding this CRIME from Intel Stockholders.
Below is the Shareholder Derivative Action
"" TO: ALL RECORD AND BENEFICIAL HOLDERS OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF INTEL CORPORATION ("INTEL" OR THE "COMPANY") AS OF MAY 25, 2010.
PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS AND ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FROM PURSUING THE SETTLED CLAIMS (DEFINED HEREIN).
IF YOU HOLD INTEL COMMON STOCK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER,
1. PURPOSE OF NOTICE
Pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the "Court") dated June 2, 2010, and further pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Notice is to inform you of (a) the above-captioned action (the “Delaware Action”) pending in the Court, (b) the proposed settlement of the Delaware Action (the "Settlement") as provided for in a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") dated May 25, 2010, and (c) your right to participate in a hearing to be held on July 20, 2010 at 10 a.m., before the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan at the United States Courthouse, 844 N. King Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 (the "Settlement Hearing") to (i) determine whether the Court should approve the Settlement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 as fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of Intel and its shareholders,
(ii) determine whether an Order and Final Judgment should be entered dismissing the Delaware Action with prejudice, and releasing and barring prosecution of any and all Settled Claims, as defined below, (iii) consider and determine whether to enter an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses to counsel for the plaintiffs in the Delaware Action and in the Related Actions, as defined below, and (iv) consider such other matters as the Court deems appropriate.
This Notice describes the rights you may have with respect to the Delaware Action and pursuant to the Stipulation and what steps you may take, but are not required to take, in relation to the Settlement.
2. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES.
On November 13, 2009, Charles A. Gilman, an Intel Stockholder, commenced a shareholder derivative action in the Court (the “Gilman Action”) on behalf of Intel against defendants Craig R. Barrett, Carol Bartz, Charlene Barshefsky, Susan L. Decker, John J. Donahoe, D. James Guzy, Sr., Paul S. Otellini, David S. Pottruck, James D. Plummer, Jane E. Shaw, David B. Yoffie, and Frank D. Yeary (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) and nominal defendant Intel (together with the Individual Defendants, the “Defendants”).
On December 23, 2009, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System (“MPERS”) commenced a shareholder derivative action in the Court on behalf of Intel against the Individual Defendants and nominal defendant Intel (the “MPERS Action”).
On January 15, 2010, the Court entered an order consolidating the Gilman Action and the MPERS Action into this action, appointing Mr. Gilman and MPERS as lead plaintiffs in the Delaware Action (the “Delaware Plaintiffs”), and appointing Paskowitz & Associates and Berman DeValerio to be Co-Lead Counsel (together, the “Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel”).
On February 12, 2010, the Delaware Plaintiffs filed a Shareholders’ Demand-Made Consolidated Derivative Complaint (the "Delaware Complaint"), alleging, inter alia, that Intel has, for a number of years, engaged in conduct which violates U.S. and foreign competition laws, resulting in civil suits and regulatory investigations and proceedings against Intel (together the “Antitrust Proceedings”) including, without limitation:
(1) A suit commenced by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and AMD International Sales & Services, Ltd. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, entitled Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 05-441 (JJF) (the “AMD Action”);
(2) A series of puntative class action suits brought under state competition laws, consolidated in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware under the caption In re Intel Corporation Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 05-1717 (JJF);
(3) A proceeding by the Japan Fair Trade Commission against Intel Kabushiki Kaisha, Intel’s Japanese subsidiary, which resulted in a consent decree ordering Intel Kabushiki Kaisha to cease and desist certain actions;
(4) An investigation and proceeding brought by the European Commission, in which the European Commission issued a decision and imposed a fine against Intel in May 2009;
(5) A proceeding brought by the Korea Fair Trade Commission, in which the Korea Fair Trade Commission entered a ruling against Intel in June 2008;
(6) An action commenced by the New York Attorney General in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, entitled State of New York v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 09-827 (JJF); and (7) An administrative proceeding commenced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission against Intel on or about December 16, 2009, Docket No. 9341.
The Delaware Complaint incorporates the allegations made in certain of the Antitrust Proceedings, and further asserts that Intel’s alleged anticompetitive conduct has resulted in damage to Intel, and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Intel by failing to, among other things, rein in, ameliorate, or countermand such conduct, and failing to institute certain remedial measures.
The Delaware Complaint seeks recovery for and on behalf of Intel of the damages it allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the Individual Defendants.
Intel and certain of its current or former officers, directors, and employees are parties to other litigation relating to, arising out of, or making allegations similar to, the allegations contained in the Delaware Complaint, including the following (the “Related Actions”):
(1) A shareholder derivative suit pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, Santa Clara County, entitled Paris v. Otellini, et al., Case No. 110CV166850; and
(2) An action pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law § 220 pending in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware, entitled Rosenfeld Family Foundation, et ano. v. Intel Corporation, Civil Action No. 5070-VCS. The Rosenfeld Family Foundation action was filed following the dismissal by this Court of a demand futility shareholder derivative suit, entitled In re Intel Corp. Derivative Litigation, Civ. A. No. 08-93-JJF (D. Del.). The two actions are collectively referred to as the “Rosenfeld Action.”
Counsel for the Defendants and Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel have engaged in extensive negotiations concerning a possible settlement of the Delaware Action. In connection therewith, Delaware Plaintiffs’ Counsel have conducted a thorough investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in the Delaware Action, including:
(i) review of publicly-available documents concerning Intel and the Antitrust Proceedings, (ii) review of over 17,000 pages of documents produced by Intel, including transcripts of the depositions of twenty Intel officers, directors, or employees that were taken in the AMD Action,
(iii) the deposition of Evangelina Almirantearena, Senior Counsel, Competition Compliance for Intel, and (iv) consultation with experts in the areas of corporate governance, antitrust law, and compliance. As a result of the extensive negotiations, the Delaware Plaintiffs and the Defendants have agreed to the proposed Settlement described below, as provided for in the Stipulation, and have moved the Court for final approval of the Settlement.
Plaintiffs and counsel to the plaintiffs in the Rosenfeld Action ("Rosenfeld’s Counsel") have engaged in extensive negotiations concerning the terms of a possible settlement of the Rosenfeld Action.
In connection therewith, Rosenfeld’s Counsel have conducted a thorough investigation of the allegations asserted in the Rosenfeld Action, including a review of publicly-available documents concerning Intel and the Antitrust Proceedings, review of documents produced by Intel, the transcript, and accompanying exhibits, to the deposition of Evangelina Almirantearena, Senior Counsel, Competition Compliance for Intel, and consultation with experts in the areas of corporate governance, antitrust law, and compliance.
As a result of the extensive negotiations, Plaintiffs and counsel to the plaintiffs in the Related Actions (the "Related Plaintiffs" and "Related Plaintiffs’ Counsel," respectively) also have agreed to the proposed Settlement described below and have executed the Stipulation. ...""
Source and Full Document Click Here
Intel Stockholders, You Pay the Price for their Crimes. They Get Richer from their Crimes Everyday. Time for Intel to Disclose the Liability of the Iviewit Stolen Technology.
Craig R. Barrett, Carol Bartz, Charlene Barshefsky, Susan L. Decker, John J. Donahoe, D. James Guzy, Sr., Paul S. Otellini, David S. Pottruck, James D. Plummer, Jane E. Shaw, David B. Yoffie, and Frank D. Yeary ARE accountable to YOU: The Sooner you Stand up to them the Less Money you will Lose as the Iviewit Technologies Trillion Dollar Liability to Intel Stockholders Will Never Go Away... it will Only Get Bigger and Bigger.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Sony Guilty of Embezzlement of Stolen Propietary Information? Sony and the Michael Jackson "alleged" Murder.
" July 6, 2010 – Sony Patent Denied on Stolen Technology
While Weitzman is raiding the estates of pop and rock stars with California Judge’s blessings and Branca is having people re-write the history the years 2005 – 2009, Sony is embarking on their own form of embezzlement in the form of stolen proprietary information.
I heard about it first on the Industry Whistleblower, contributed by a friend. I did some searches and found the story here on massive Shareholder Fraud.com which had a link to the original SEC complaint here.
On the google docs link you can read the complaint along with links to patent information.
Copy of the agreement here.
This is a potentially explosive situation that involves the shareholders of several multi-national corporations.
It goes on to say,
“It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement.
Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al."
“Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective.
Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.”
At the cruxt of this complaint, “May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.”
Mr. Chey was the former CEO of Sony Pictures.
“ The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony. The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. "
These are the kind of people that surrounded Michael Jackson.
Sony, Warner et. al. think nothing of defrauding their shareholders out of billions of dollars. The billions Michael was worth? No problem!
Fans of Michael Jackson!
You condone this behavior every time you purchase a Sony produced Michael Jackson CD, licensed merchandise or book, DVD or action figure (Do they still have Michael action figures?)
Money talks . . . you-know-what walks!
Stop feeding the machine!
Interesting and familiar - “Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.”
Yes, Michael has been all over this road! Mottola, Branca, Malnik, Konitzer, Wisner, the unnamed attorneys and fired business managers that conspired to drive him into bankruptcy . . . This is the way Sony practices business!
Interesting to note that the upper echelon (officers) of both Sony Corp and Warner bros. have been listed as being attendees at Bilderberger Meetings AND are members of the Trilateral Commission.
I am not mentioning this as part of a global conspiracy theory, but to draw attention to the reason things like this get so little press attention.
Most of your big 8 media outlets are corporate owned by a couple of individuals, of which also belong to these groups or attend these meetings.
Time-Warner is one of them, New York Times is another, New York Daily News, all the way down to the Children’s Television Workshop and Seseme street. Wallstreet Journal, National Public Radio, ABC, CBS, CNN, New Yorker Magazine, Newsday Corp, Newsweek, Time Magazine, NBC, PBS etc . . . all members and invitees to meetings.
They’re buddies.
If one of their corporate buddies want something suppressed in the news, it gets suppressed.
Michael Jackson?
No problem. Besides . . . the damage has already been done, hasn’t it?
A multi-trillion dollar swindle is about to take place.
Let’s see how fast the SEC acts on it.
Chances are, it won’t.
Because the SEC is a government agency.
They will find another “Murray Fall Guy” make a big deal and the trillions will still be lost and stockholders will never see their money.
I am begging for your help.
Do not fund Sony.
Do not fund Branca or Weitzman.
Keep an eye on this one, people.
And watch what the press feeds you.
“ Paper-twisted, ruthless lies…In a mirage of doubt….”
Bonnie Cox © Feathers on the Wind
Source of Post
http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/sony-patent-denied-on-stolen-technology.html
Got a Tip on any of this?
Email Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
While Weitzman is raiding the estates of pop and rock stars with California Judge’s blessings and Branca is having people re-write the history the years 2005 – 2009, Sony is embarking on their own form of embezzlement in the form of stolen proprietary information.
I heard about it first on the Industry Whistleblower, contributed by a friend. I did some searches and found the story here on massive Shareholder Fraud.com which had a link to the original SEC complaint here.
On the google docs link you can read the complaint along with links to patent information.
Copy of the agreement here.
This is a potentially explosive situation that involves the shareholders of several multi-national corporations.
It goes on to say,
“It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more.
Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement.
Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees.
Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[6]. At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al."
“Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective.
Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.”
At the cruxt of this complaint, “May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.”
Mr. Chey was the former CEO of Sony Pictures.
“ The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors.
I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony. The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY. "
These are the kind of people that surrounded Michael Jackson.
Sony, Warner et. al. think nothing of defrauding their shareholders out of billions of dollars. The billions Michael was worth? No problem!
Fans of Michael Jackson!
You condone this behavior every time you purchase a Sony produced Michael Jackson CD, licensed merchandise or book, DVD or action figure (Do they still have Michael action figures?)
Money talks . . . you-know-what walks!
Stop feeding the machine!
Interesting and familiar - “Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.”
Yes, Michael has been all over this road! Mottola, Branca, Malnik, Konitzer, Wisner, the unnamed attorneys and fired business managers that conspired to drive him into bankruptcy . . . This is the way Sony practices business!
Interesting to note that the upper echelon (officers) of both Sony Corp and Warner bros. have been listed as being attendees at Bilderberger Meetings AND are members of the Trilateral Commission.
I am not mentioning this as part of a global conspiracy theory, but to draw attention to the reason things like this get so little press attention.
Most of your big 8 media outlets are corporate owned by a couple of individuals, of which also belong to these groups or attend these meetings.
Time-Warner is one of them, New York Times is another, New York Daily News, all the way down to the Children’s Television Workshop and Seseme street. Wallstreet Journal, National Public Radio, ABC, CBS, CNN, New Yorker Magazine, Newsday Corp, Newsweek, Time Magazine, NBC, PBS etc . . . all members and invitees to meetings.
They’re buddies.
If one of their corporate buddies want something suppressed in the news, it gets suppressed.
Michael Jackson?
No problem. Besides . . . the damage has already been done, hasn’t it?
A multi-trillion dollar swindle is about to take place.
Let’s see how fast the SEC acts on it.
Chances are, it won’t.
Because the SEC is a government agency.
They will find another “Murray Fall Guy” make a big deal and the trillions will still be lost and stockholders will never see their money.
I am begging for your help.
Do not fund Sony.
Do not fund Branca or Weitzman.
Keep an eye on this one, people.
And watch what the press feeds you.
“ Paper-twisted, ruthless lies…In a mirage of doubt….”
Bonnie Cox © Feathers on the Wind
Source of Post
http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/sony-patent-denied-on-stolen-technology.html
Got a Tip on any of this?
Email Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Friday, June 25, 2010
Intel Corporation - Santa Clara, Intel Corporation Ireland, Intel Corporation Chandler Arizona, Portland OR, Hillsbro OR,
Santa Clara, California,
Intel Corporation
Chandler, Arizona
Intel Corporation
Ireland Intel Corporation
Hillsboro, Oregon,
Intel Corporation
Intel Corporation
Portland Oregon
ALL Very Interest this month .. more so then usual on my Posts on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case... Why? Is CEO Paul Otellini ready to come clean to Intel Corp. Shareholders on the Massive Shareholder Fraud that Intel Corp. and Paul Otellini have known about for quite some time?
And the Link Below REALLY lit up Intel Corp.
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/06/intel-corp-ceo-paul-otellini-conspiring.html
Intel Corporation
Chandler, Arizona
Intel Corporation
Ireland Intel Corporation
Hillsboro, Oregon,
Intel Corporation
Intel Corporation
Portland Oregon
ALL Very Interest this month .. more so then usual on my Posts on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case... Why? Is CEO Paul Otellini ready to come clean to Intel Corp. Shareholders on the Massive Shareholder Fraud that Intel Corp. and Paul Otellini have known about for quite some time?
And the Link Below REALLY lit up Intel Corp.
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/06/intel-corp-ceo-paul-otellini-conspiring.html
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Prokauer Rose Conspires to STEALS Intellectual Property from United States Technology Company
Proskauer Rose LLP defrauding the Florida Bar.
Proskauer Rose LLP Conspired to Steal Technology
from the Iviewit Technology Company.
Click Below for Eliot Bernstein Interview with Disbar the Florida Bar.
http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96
Proskauer Rose LLP Conspired to Steal Technology
from the Iviewit Technology Company.
Click Below for Eliot Bernstein Interview with Disbar the Florida Bar.
http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC Knows of a Massive Shareholder Fraud that Will Cost YOU Millions.
Information Below on Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC, and the knowledge of AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. Executive of Massive Shareholder Fraud that has been FAILED to be Disclosed for nearly a Decade.
The Source of the Words in BLUE is
http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/directwomen/materials/class/jacobs.pdf
My Comments, are in Black.
As Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC, Julie Jacobs oversees all of the transactional and corporate legal work for the company.
It is My Understanding that Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has been made aware of a Massive Shareholder Fraud involving a Technology that was Stolen about a decade ago, this Technology is now used in pretty much all TV, Computer, and Digital Media. Warner Bros.
In my Understanding Time Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL had some very iron clad agreements with the Iviewit Technology company, they had licensing agreements and agreements to not disclose the Iviewit Invention and then Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL simply used the technology and made billions and never did honor their agreement with the Iviewit Technology Company or the Iviewit Inventors.
From the Links Below it appears that there is No Speculation, no Room for Investigation at all.. there is only signed agreements, facts and well a Whole Lot of Liabilty for a Decade now to the Shareholder of Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL .
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100108%20Letter%20to%20Tim%20Armstrong%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20091231%20Jerry%20McKinley%20AOL%20Inc%20letter%20Re%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20response.pdf
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/2010/02/ira-parker-general-counsel-and.html
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Iviewit SEC Complaint Naming Ira Parker - AOL
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
www.DeniedPatent.com
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://www.matthewtriggs.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-agreements-with.html
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/p/warner-bros-aol-major-shareholder.html
more from Document Sourced in this Post..
In this role, she is at the forefront of the cutting edge business and legal issues faced by one of the leading companies in the dynamic and fast-growing new media industry.
What a Crock !!! Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC knows of a Fraud so HUGE that Shareholders may never recover and she seems to be hiding this information and yet we are suppose to believe that she is on the cutting edge, she is at the forefront and some sort of big wig in new media??? What?
Ms. Jacobs leads deals across AOL’s global operations including in the areas of advertising, marketing, distribution, content licensing, technology licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, dispositions, investments and restructurings.
Leads Deals? Hmmm.. I Believe AOL Split from Time Warner because they were trying to outfun the Iviewit Technologies Scandal, and well there will be recessionary rights now.. in my understand of all this.. and it seems the greatest deal that Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has done and continues to cover up... is the deal where AOL shareholders made big money from the Iviewit Technologies and still due .. while NEVER honoring agreements for this Stolen Technology... I guess that is a Good Deal.. just Not Legal or in any way on the Right Side of the Moral Compass.
She is also responsible for advising on securities law compliance and corporate governance issues including Sarbanes-Oxley.
Hmmm.. In My opinion... Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has no knowledge or clue what so ever in Securities Law Compliance ... I mean come on.. doesn't Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC know that she will lose everything and face Criminal Charges when the AOL shareholders wake up to the Truth of the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent.
The Source of the Words in BLUE is
http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/directwomen/materials/class/jacobs.pdf
My Comments, are in Black.
As Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC, Julie Jacobs oversees all of the transactional and corporate legal work for the company.
It is My Understanding that Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has been made aware of a Massive Shareholder Fraud involving a Technology that was Stolen about a decade ago, this Technology is now used in pretty much all TV, Computer, and Digital Media. Warner Bros.
In my Understanding Time Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL had some very iron clad agreements with the Iviewit Technology company, they had licensing agreements and agreements to not disclose the Iviewit Invention and then Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL simply used the technology and made billions and never did honor their agreement with the Iviewit Technology Company or the Iviewit Inventors.
From the Links Below it appears that there is No Speculation, no Room for Investigation at all.. there is only signed agreements, facts and well a Whole Lot of Liabilty for a Decade now to the Shareholder of Warner Inc. , Warner Bros. and AOL .
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100108%20Letter%20to%20Tim%20Armstrong%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20091231%20Jerry%20McKinley%20AOL%20Inc%20letter%20Re%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20response.pdf
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/2010/02/ira-parker-general-counsel-and.html
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Iviewit SEC Complaint Naming Ira Parker - AOL
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
www.DeniedPatent.com
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://www.matthewtriggs.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-agreements-with.html
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/p/warner-bros-aol-major-shareholder.html
more from Document Sourced in this Post..
In this role, she is at the forefront of the cutting edge business and legal issues faced by one of the leading companies in the dynamic and fast-growing new media industry.
What a Crock !!! Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC knows of a Fraud so HUGE that Shareholders may never recover and she seems to be hiding this information and yet we are suppose to believe that she is on the cutting edge, she is at the forefront and some sort of big wig in new media??? What?
Ms. Jacobs leads deals across AOL’s global operations including in the areas of advertising, marketing, distribution, content licensing, technology licensing, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, dispositions, investments and restructurings.
Leads Deals? Hmmm.. I Believe AOL Split from Time Warner because they were trying to outfun the Iviewit Technologies Scandal, and well there will be recessionary rights now.. in my understand of all this.. and it seems the greatest deal that Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has done and continues to cover up... is the deal where AOL shareholders made big money from the Iviewit Technologies and still due .. while NEVER honoring agreements for this Stolen Technology... I guess that is a Good Deal.. just Not Legal or in any way on the Right Side of the Moral Compass.
She is also responsible for advising on securities law compliance and corporate governance issues including Sarbanes-Oxley.
Hmmm.. In My opinion... Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC has no knowledge or clue what so ever in Securities Law Compliance ... I mean come on.. doesn't Julie Jacobs - Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of AOL LLC know that she will lose everything and face Criminal Charges when the AOL shareholders wake up to the Truth of the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent.
Maybe Julie Jacobs is So Good at Securities Law Compliance that she is able to keep this Massive Shareholder Fraud a Secret and has so many connections in the SEC and Courts that She actually believes she will be able to continue this decade old SECRET that will cost shareholders billions of dollars.
Ms. Jacobs has played a critical role in the implementation of AOL’s strategic shift from a subscription based internet service provider to an advertising supported web services business. She has led a series of key, high-profile acquisitions in the highly competitive space of online advertising which were instrumental to AOL’s efforts to build a world-class online ad network.
Each of these acquisitions – which together represent an investment of well over $1 billion – is an integral component of AOL's recently announced Platform-A, the world's largest digital display advertising platform.
Again.. thing that make you say Hmmm... Worlds Largest Digital Display Advertising Program, are you Kidding Me..???
so this is HUGE for Online Ad Dollars Globally and there is no Doubt in my mind, in my opinion from what I know of the Iviewit Technology ... that this Program is Using this Stolen Technology.. in which the Iviewit Inventors have received no compensation and in fact have had their car bombed, and have been harassed and been subject to corruption from district courts to Supreme Courts and All to hide the True Inventors of the technology that AOL is using to make Billions.. Thing is the gig is up.. we Know the Truth and it is Time for the Iviewit Inventors to be Compensated for a Decade worth of use of THEIR Invention...
They Made Billions and then they made multi-billion dollar deals that would lead to even more money and all this after they signed agreements with the Iviewit Technologies Company - Founder - Inventors.. and somehow this is a good thing ??? I mean Julie Jacobs - AOL General Counsel seems to tout herself as some sort of big shot.. well it does not take a whole lot of smarts to steal a technology and then market it.. especially if it is the Holy Grail Technology that has NOW been used in all our lives for near a decade...
Now there are actual contracts signed by Warner Bros. Before the AOL Split and YET still a split and then Billions of Dollars of deals internationally using this technology they had no right to use or to DISCLOSE?
In addition, Ms. Jacobs oversaw the sales of the access businesses in France, Germany and the United Kingdom for a total of nearly $2 billion.
What? International Billions upon Billions every year.. and in my opinion all based on the Iviewit Technology and those Contracts that were never honored by the Corrupt Executives at AOL, Warner Bros. and Time Warner inc. as well as the Corrupt Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose - along with Corrupt MPEG LA who Illegally Pooled the Iviewit Technologies into Patent Pools to hide this Massive Fraud.
Ms. Jacobs also negotiated AOL’s expansion of its strategic alliance with Google, including Google’s $1 billion equity investment in AOL and key business arrangements in the areas of web search, interactive marketing, display advertising, video search and instant messaging.
Ms. Jacobs currently manages a team of over 90 attorneys, contract specialists and administrative personnel.
So is Google Helping to STOMP on Inventors Rights? It is my understanding that Google is innocent in the Iviewit Technologies Heist, however Now Google is Liable Right? I mean if Google has this kind of Equity in AOL then Google will Loose Billions on top of Billions when the Iviewit Inventors and the Iviewit Investors Finally do Get their Justice and Financial Compensation and they will.. .. as this Story Will Never End.. it is the Greatest Stolen Technology - Denied Patent Story EVER and these Companies cannot HIDE... the Truth is online for all to SEE and it is Time to Wake UP..
Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Jacobs managed the international legal work for AOL’s operations worldwide. AOL had operations, directly or through joint ventures, in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain and United Kingdom.
Before coming to AOL, Ms. Jacobs was with the law firm of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, where her practice focused on a wide variety of international development and telecommunications projects with an emphasis on financing in the commercial bank, governmental/multilateral institutional and capital markets.
Ms. Jacobs was selected by the Association of Media and Entertainment Counsel as one of three finalists in the category of Dealmaker of the Year in 2007.
In addition, she was selected to attend the Breakthrough Leadership Program, a leadership development program for women executives selected across Time Warner and its divisions designed to enhance leadership skills and share strategies for business success of women leaders.
More on the Iviewit Technology Heist
at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV
Soon Every Shareholder of AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. Will get certified Letters that include the SEC Complaint so far ignored, includes proof that the CEO and General Counsel as well as other executives AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. KNEW of the Contracts with Iviewit Technologies and have known for around a Decade.. the Shareholders of AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. will get information on who knew and who they need to sue and press criminal charges against for this Massive Shareholder Fraud... including those at the Patent Office - Supreme Court - Proskauer Rose - Foley and Lardner and many more who knew of this Massive Shareholder for fraud for around a decade now...
AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. Executives KNOW full well that the Longer they Fail to Disclose this Massive Shareholder Fraud - the More damage it will do to the Shareholders ... however you see what seems to be the pattern is they cover it up as they can - pay off judges, patent officers, attorneys and whoever they need to at the SEC and all levels of this Massive Corruption .. and they only seem to do this until they can get out of that company .. move on.. then these executives seem to think it will be the problem of the AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. Shareholders and THE fat cat Executives will Get to Keep their Billions they hide in Protected Retirement Funds...
So all they need to do is escape the TRUTH.. lie - cheat and coverup long enough to hide their retirement.. AND heck with the retirement - blood, sweat and tears of the shareholders of AOL, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc. - So Wake UP Shareholders YOUR Losing EVERYTHING..
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Greenberg Traurig - Ponzi Investor Suit Targets Greenberg Traurig, Quarles & Brady
- Greenberg Traurig
"" The American Lawyer
By Susan Beck
May 12, 2010
This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily.
When the U.S. Supreme Court last year rejected the concept of aider and abettor liability in its Stoneridge decision, it was a huge win for law firms that might otherwise be sued by angry investors. But that doesn't mean that firms are completely insulated from lawsuits like these.
On Tuesday, for example, Greenberg Traurig and Quarles & Brady were named as defendants in an investor class action filed in federal district court in Arizona for allegedly aiding and abetting a Ponzi scheme run by a real estate loan company called Mortgages, Ltd. and a financing company called Radical Bunny. In an attempt to bypass Stoneridge, the defendants are accused of violating Arizona state securities laws. A copy of the complaint is here.
The case was brought on behalf of 2,000 investors who claim to have lost more than $900 million. The plaintiffs are represented by Richard Himelrick of Phoenix's Tiffany & Bosco and Andrew Friedman of Phoenix's Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint.
Mortgages Ltd. was an Arizona company that made loans to real-estate developers and then sold most of the loans to investors. Radical Bunny helped raise money for Mortgages Ltd. by illegally operating as an unlicensed securities dealer, the complaint alleges.
According to the complaint, Mortgages Ltd. adopted a Ponzi approach in which new investor money was used to cover operating expenses, investor interest, investor redemptions, and the lavish lifestyle of company CEO Scott Coles.
The company filed for bankruptcy in 2008, and investigations followed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Arizona regulators. Earlier this year the Arizona Corporation Commission issued a cease and desist order against Radical Bunny, and the SEC found that a Mortgages Ltd. affiliate had willfully violated securities law.
The law firms, according to the complaint, "played an integral role in facilitating the fraudulent scheme." The firms are accused of violating Arizona securities laws, negligent misrepresentation and nondisclosure, and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty.
The plaintiffs have also sued auditors CBIZ Inc. and Mayer Hoffman McCann, and several former executives at Mortgages Ltd. and Radical Bunny.
Mortgages Ltd. hired Greenberg Traurig in April 2006, the complaint states, and over the next two years the firm, led by partner Robert Kant, prepared 11 private-offering memorandums for investors.
The complaint alleges that from at least December 2006, "Kant was fully aware that Mortgages Ltd. was being funded with proceeds collected from Radical Bunny’s illegal securities sales.
The illegality of this fundraising was so apparent to Kant that he told Coles and [Radical Bunny executive Tom] Hirsch (during a meeting with lawyers from the Quarles & Brady firm) that 'people go to jail' for such misconduct....
Kant’s concerns about the illegal securities sales were so great that he admonished the Radical Bunny managers in late 2006 to obtain securities counsel, so that their pictures would not wind up 'on the front page of the Arizona Republic.'"
The complaint further alleges that a Quarles partner "even questioned in a file note whether Mortgages Ltd.’s relationship with Radical Bunny had 'a Ponzi scheme feel' to it."
The Quarles lawyers later stated in SEC testimony that they told Radical Bunny’s managers to stop selling the securities and to contact the SEC and Arizona securities regulators to admit they had violated securities laws, according to the complaint.
But the client said he didn't want to talk to regulators and disclose past securities violations, the complaint alleges. The firm did not disassociate itself with the client, the complaint alleges, and continued to assist in new securities sales.
Quarles & Brady gave us this statement from Jon Pettibone, the managing partner of its Phoenix office: "During a portion of 2007, Quarles & Brady represented Radical Bunny, but we have not represented it since.
At no time have we represented Mortgages Ltd. Both federal and state enforcement authorities have thoroughly investigated the dealings between Mortgages Ltd. and Radical Bunny and brought enforcement actions against Radical Bunny and its principals. Quarles cooperated fully with both investigations.
No enforcement action has been brought against our firm or any of its lawyers and we do not expect any such action will be filed. Our conduct was at all times lawful and ethical....We will defend ourselves against any claim that we acted improperly in any way." The firm is represented by Robert Gooding Jr. from Howrey.
Greenberg Traurig likewise maintained it acted properly.
"These claims are without merit," the firm said in an email. "We believe our representation was appropriate in all respects. The firm is prepared to vigorously defend against these unfounded claims." The firm said that it expects it will be represented by Williams & Connolly. ""
Source of Post
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202458107106&Ponzi_Investor_Suit_Targets_Greenberg_Traurig_Quarles__Brady&hbxlogin=1
Speaking of Investor Class Action - Intel Corp. , Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc., Sony, Lockheed Martin, AOL, IBM and more involved in the Stolen Iviewit Technologies Patent - you will be next - when investors find out how long these companies have KNOWN and failed to disclose a TRILLION dollar liability WELL I don't think these Smart, Savvy Investors will be to Happy.. and those Millions hand over fist the CEO's of the Company made - well they will lose it. .. as there are over a thousand documents of proof online of their guilt, and their Knowledge of the Iviewit Stolen Patent and they continue to this day to violate licensing agreements, and to make billions off of the Iviewit Technology..
Guys life Bruce Sewell, Jeffrey Bewkes, Paul Otellini, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler and tons more... will soon face and Investor Class Action Lawsuit of their Own.. as the PROOF is Plentiful to anyone who Can READ !!!
Oh and don't forget to note that in the RICO complaint and lots of documentation... the CBIZ connection... see CBIZ bought Goldstein Lewin Company RIGHT? and they were directly involved in the Iviewit Stolen Patent. I thought it ridiculously risky for CBIZ to make this purchase, they were all over my blogs before and after the purchase...
Now I believe, from what I am seeing.. IN MY OPINION.. that CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. and Steven L. Gerard knew exactly what they were getting and they bought Goldstein Lewin to protect them and to hide corruption and illegal activity.. they are all in Bed Together just as the RICO Complaint by Iviewit Technologies Owner - and One of the Iviewit Inventors Eliot Bernstein has documented so well in his RICO Complaint.
Just my thoughts.. as all this is adding up to
a VERY solid and Well Laid Wall Of Corruption.
http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/goldstein-lewin-company-mayer-hoffman.html
http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/
http://www.whistleblowerreport.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm
Iviewit Stolen Patent Crime Chart.
More on the Iviewit Techonologies Stolen Patent and Greenberg Traurig 's role in it go to www.DeniedPatent.com and www.iViewit.TV
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc. and the Web Stats. Curtis Lu Time Warner
What is Curtis Lu Time Warner up to ?
Why is big names and players interested today.. ?? searching "curtis lu time warner" -
We ALL know by now that a couple of weeks ago Curtis Lu of Time Warner Inc. initiated Contact with iViewit Owner and one of the iViewit inventors Eliot Bernstein - Curtis Lu Time Warner wanted Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Owner to take him by the hand and explain to Curtis Lu Time Warner what his risk was.. meaning OMG what am I up against here.. and well do I really have to tell the Warner Bros. - AOL - Time Warner Inc. Shareholders or can I just get by with ignoring it and maybe get a job at another Big Company BEFORE anyone is any wiser.. to the Trillion Dollar Secret and Liability Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Deliberately keeping from the Time Warner Inc. Shareholders...
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
The World Bank Group TODAY searching "curtis lu time warner"
7 Minutes Later Alexandria Virginia searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. and is on ONE of my sites for 4 Hours.. so what happened.. ???
is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. connected to someone at THE "World Bank Group" -Washington DC - is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. trying to get a job at the "World Bank Group" - is that why they are googling Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc.?
Or is the "World Bank Group" helping Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. to Assess the Trillion Dollar Loss and Risk to the Time Warner, AOL and Warner Bros. Shareholders ?
Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is in Alexandria Right? Is today the first time he Googled "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. " ? I mean come on searches Curtis Lu of Time Warner Inc. - the Shareholders have Rights - searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Denying Shareholders their rights to information that will cost them collectively TRILLIONS.. and he knows of the Liability so..searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. cannot EVER say he just did not know. .. searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. knows BIGTIME..
Next......
Ok so 3 Hours Earlier who was searches "Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc. " ?
Well it was Friedman Billings Ramsey Group - New York.
.. Investor Relations - FBR Capital Markets focuses its banking, advisory, trading and research efforts in ... FBR Capital Markets Announces Promotions within Its Research Group ...
So How many More NOW know of this Massive Shareholder Fraud that will annihilate the Shareholders of AOL - Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros.?
Who Else is interested in Curtis Lu today?
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Vitro Corporation
So what is the deal??
Did Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc. Panic after talking to iViewit Technologies Owner Eliot Bernstein and decide he could not work at Time Warner Inc.?
Is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. trying to avoid the HUGE scandal that Time Warner Inc. is about to face and that Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Fully Aware Of?
Or is the Hot topic of the day "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc." because these companies are trying to help Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. to assess the Trillion Dollar Risk of the Fraud - Corruption - Contractual Laws Violated and much more that Time Warner and Curtis Lu will Soon have to face??????
Well I am not sure why the Google Frenzy for "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc." but I do know that Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is in HUGE financial trouble and is up against some Major Legal Issues.. with thousands of documents of proof online..
Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc.,
TIME WARNER- SVP, Deputy General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer Curtis Lu;
Links to More information on Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc.
and the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/eliot-bernstein-again-notifies-aol-and.html
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/eliot-bernstein-again-notifies-aol-and.html
http://www.deniedpatent.com/search/label/Warner%20Bros.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Colter%20to%20Case%20re%20Thought%20Journal.pdf
SEC Complaint involving Time Warner Inc.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Posted here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Why is big names and players interested today.. ?? searching "curtis lu time warner" -
We ALL know by now that a couple of weeks ago Curtis Lu of Time Warner Inc. initiated Contact with iViewit Owner and one of the iViewit inventors Eliot Bernstein - Curtis Lu Time Warner wanted Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Owner to take him by the hand and explain to Curtis Lu Time Warner what his risk was.. meaning OMG what am I up against here.. and well do I really have to tell the Warner Bros. - AOL - Time Warner Inc. Shareholders or can I just get by with ignoring it and maybe get a job at another Big Company BEFORE anyone is any wiser.. to the Trillion Dollar Secret and Liability Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Deliberately keeping from the Time Warner Inc. Shareholders...
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States
The World Bank Group TODAY searching "curtis lu time warner"
7 Minutes Later Alexandria Virginia searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. and is on ONE of my sites for 4 Hours.. so what happened.. ???
is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. connected to someone at THE "World Bank Group" -Washington DC - is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. trying to get a job at the "World Bank Group" - is that why they are googling Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc.?
Or is the "World Bank Group" helping Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. to Assess the Trillion Dollar Loss and Risk to the Time Warner, AOL and Warner Bros. Shareholders ?
Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is in Alexandria Right? Is today the first time he Googled "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. " ? I mean come on searches Curtis Lu of Time Warner Inc. - the Shareholders have Rights - searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Denying Shareholders their rights to information that will cost them collectively TRILLIONS.. and he knows of the Liability so..searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. cannot EVER say he just did not know. .. searches Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. knows BIGTIME..
Next......
Ok so 3 Hours Earlier who was searches "Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc. " ?
Well it was Friedman Billings Ramsey Group - New York.
.. Investor Relations - FBR Capital Markets focuses its banking, advisory, trading and research efforts in ... FBR Capital Markets Announces Promotions within Its Research Group ...
So How many More NOW know of this Massive Shareholder Fraud that will annihilate the Shareholders of AOL - Time Warner Inc. and Warner Bros.?
Who Else is interested in Curtis Lu today?
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Vitro Corporation
So what is the deal??
Did Curtis Lu - Time Warner Inc. Panic after talking to iViewit Technologies Owner Eliot Bernstein and decide he could not work at Time Warner Inc.?
Is Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. trying to avoid the HUGE scandal that Time Warner Inc. is about to face and that Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is Fully Aware Of?
Or is the Hot topic of the day "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc." because these companies are trying to help Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. to assess the Trillion Dollar Risk of the Fraud - Corruption - Contractual Laws Violated and much more that Time Warner and Curtis Lu will Soon have to face??????
Well I am not sure why the Google Frenzy for "Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc." but I do know that Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc. is in HUGE financial trouble and is up against some Major Legal Issues.. with thousands of documents of proof online..
Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc.,
TIME WARNER- SVP, Deputy General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer Curtis Lu;
Links to More information on Curtis Lu Time Warner Inc.
and the Iviewit Stolen Patent.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/eliot-bernstein-again-notifies-aol-and.html
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/eliot-bernstein-again-notifies-aol-and.html
http://www.deniedpatent.com/search/label/Warner%20Bros.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION.pdf
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Colter%20to%20Case%20re%20Thought%20Journal.pdf
SEC Complaint involving Time Warner Inc.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Posted here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
P. Stephen Lamont Warning - Iviewit SC Filing: Shareholder Kevin McKeown "Opts-In" - Iviewit Technologies
It seems that P. Stephen Lamont is still scheming to derail the iViewit Technologies Inventors and Shareholders. Remember I wrote about P. Stephen Lamont, I posted information sent in to me, Stephen Lamont told Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox to get My affairs in order - which to me is a death threat. Them P. Stephen Lamont joined a hate group to launch an online attack on me and more threats of physical violence.
I posted P. Stephen Lamonts emails to me and the proof of who he was talking to in Foley and Lardner and other related parties, I fully believe through who Stephen Lamont sent those posts to that someone in Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose and other insiders involved in stealing the Iviewit patent, I believe Stephen Lamont is in bad with the bad guys on this one..
so Every month or so, Stephen Lamont - who has no rights in the iviewit company, well Stephen Lamont keeps surfacing with some bogus claim, attack, or document to try and stall the inevitable to protect the attorneys that I believe he is in the pocket of.. just my own belief from my statcounter, his emails to me and all that has transpired.. no other reason makes sense...
I personally believe that Stephen Lamont is paid to keep the Iviewit shareholders confused and shook up so that the iviewit justice will be put further off... this smoke screen seems to be confincing some iViewit shareholders even though Stephen Lamont does not have the Right to Act on behalf of Iviewit Technologies in any way.
I was writing, blogging on the iViewit Technologies in a way that would tell the truth of what really happened, this Truth would then expose that the iviewit shareholders really got screwed... so why in the world would one of these shareholders attack me and tell me to get my affairs in order... unless their was dirty dealings - double talk and corruption.. behind the scenes..
Now Stephen Lamont is trying to Scheme to put more blocks in True Justice... for the Iviewit Shareholders...
"P. Stephen Lamont, Barry Becker, Brett Howard, and Kevin McKeown v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al."
Iviewit SC Filing: Shareholder Kevin McKeown "Opts-In"
Iviewit Shareholders: Look Deep into what you are being spoon fed by Stephen Lamont - I believe he is in bed with the very enemy that stole the Iviewit Patent and keeps you from your money and justice in the first place... trust your instincts folks.. and get proof - facts.. I am NOT asking you to Believe me.. I am Saying that Knowledge is Power and you need to make sure you see proof of Stephen Lamonts rants, requests, suggestions.. talk of his power or rights.. because you may play the fool and instead of getting your money and justice .. you may just be up for criminal charges along with P. Stephen Lamont.. GET your FACTS folks..
Plaintiffs in Lamont’s scheme, if you go along with him.. seek lots of legal advice first.. and make sure that you are informed of the liabilities of putting YOUR names as direct plaintiffs in a lawsuit. You may be SHOCKED at the risk your taking by believing the lies that Stephen Lamont is feeding you.. find your facts independently..
One question I have in all this is .. who issued Kevin McKeown shares in Iviewit since no shares have been legally issued since the board disbanded without notifying shareholders etc. or electing lamont with executive authorities?
Read Folks, Study all the documents at www.Iviewit.Tv and make sure that you know what you are doing before you jump on Stephen Lamont's Bandwagon.. against True iViewit Justice.
It is my understanding that Eliot Bernstein, Owner and One of the Iviewit Inventors .. has warned all that join Lamont’s scheme and put yourself on as a Plaintiff will cause you to be center stage against 4000 defendants or more and the liabilities to you and your family would be incredibly risky..
Why does Lamont need anyone to make his argument??? The Iviewit shareholders surely can see the truth to all of this right?
Please consult a lawyer and Request that Stephen Lamont have a lawyer tell you of ALL the liabilities and risk that may result to you and your families.
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies has reported P. Stephen Lamont for criminal activities and is awaiting the investigatory reports.
Enter into binding legal agreements with P. Stephen Lamont at your risk.
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and
www.DeniedPatent.com
I posted P. Stephen Lamonts emails to me and the proof of who he was talking to in Foley and Lardner and other related parties, I fully believe through who Stephen Lamont sent those posts to that someone in Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose and other insiders involved in stealing the Iviewit patent, I believe Stephen Lamont is in bad with the bad guys on this one..
so Every month or so, Stephen Lamont - who has no rights in the iviewit company, well Stephen Lamont keeps surfacing with some bogus claim, attack, or document to try and stall the inevitable to protect the attorneys that I believe he is in the pocket of.. just my own belief from my statcounter, his emails to me and all that has transpired.. no other reason makes sense...
I personally believe that Stephen Lamont is paid to keep the Iviewit shareholders confused and shook up so that the iviewit justice will be put further off... this smoke screen seems to be confincing some iViewit shareholders even though Stephen Lamont does not have the Right to Act on behalf of Iviewit Technologies in any way.
I was writing, blogging on the iViewit Technologies in a way that would tell the truth of what really happened, this Truth would then expose that the iviewit shareholders really got screwed... so why in the world would one of these shareholders attack me and tell me to get my affairs in order... unless their was dirty dealings - double talk and corruption.. behind the scenes..
Now Stephen Lamont is trying to Scheme to put more blocks in True Justice... for the Iviewit Shareholders...
"P. Stephen Lamont, Barry Becker, Brett Howard, and Kevin McKeown v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al."
Iviewit SC Filing: Shareholder Kevin McKeown "Opts-In"
Iviewit Shareholders: Look Deep into what you are being spoon fed by Stephen Lamont - I believe he is in bed with the very enemy that stole the Iviewit Patent and keeps you from your money and justice in the first place... trust your instincts folks.. and get proof - facts.. I am NOT asking you to Believe me.. I am Saying that Knowledge is Power and you need to make sure you see proof of Stephen Lamonts rants, requests, suggestions.. talk of his power or rights.. because you may play the fool and instead of getting your money and justice .. you may just be up for criminal charges along with P. Stephen Lamont.. GET your FACTS folks..
Plaintiffs in Lamont’s scheme, if you go along with him.. seek lots of legal advice first.. and make sure that you are informed of the liabilities of putting YOUR names as direct plaintiffs in a lawsuit. You may be SHOCKED at the risk your taking by believing the lies that Stephen Lamont is feeding you.. find your facts independently..
One question I have in all this is .. who issued Kevin McKeown shares in Iviewit since no shares have been legally issued since the board disbanded without notifying shareholders etc. or electing lamont with executive authorities?
Read Folks, Study all the documents at www.Iviewit.Tv and make sure that you know what you are doing before you jump on Stephen Lamont's Bandwagon.. against True iViewit Justice.
It is my understanding that Eliot Bernstein, Owner and One of the Iviewit Inventors .. has warned all that join Lamont’s scheme and put yourself on as a Plaintiff will cause you to be center stage against 4000 defendants or more and the liabilities to you and your family would be incredibly risky..
Why does Lamont need anyone to make his argument??? The Iviewit shareholders surely can see the truth to all of this right?
Please consult a lawyer and Request that Stephen Lamont have a lawyer tell you of ALL the liabilities and risk that may result to you and your families.
Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies has reported P. Stephen Lamont for criminal activities and is awaiting the investigatory reports.
Enter into binding legal agreements with P. Stephen Lamont at your risk.
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and
www.DeniedPatent.com
Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros., Time Warner and ALL involved in Using and Stealing the Iviewit Patent .. Pay Attention.. Home Depot ..
Just as Home Depot is now faced with the following, well the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..
Organized Invention Theft .. hmm.. wonder who Home Depot's attorneys were... the SHOCKING part is that the Shareholders will face Massive Damages and the CEO and Big Shots at well they always seem to skate by.. .. thing is in the iviewit technologies scandal, theft and wall of corruption - the proof is never going away.. thousands of documents.. and no matter who gets their "car bombed" next by those trying to Silence the TRUTH.. the Internet will still have these documents, this proof and one day those Attorneys, Law Firms, CEO's, Major Tech Companies... well they will pay trillions of YOUR Money to the Iviewit Inventors for What They have Done... it is not a matter of if this stuff is true.. IT IS FACT.. go to www.DeniedPatent.com for more on that.. it is proven over and over.. contracts in place with Warner Bros. and Denied .. this illegal - corrupt - behavior has hurt shareholders.
Why do big shots like Michael Powell below just stomp on Inventors Rights and welcome a Lawsuit???? Well because they have the Judges and Attorneys in their pocket and usually have no fear.. looks like the tides are turning.. and the truth is rising... and Justice for Iviewit Technologies is Next and the Shareholder of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..Will Pay the Price.. the Longer all this Corruption goes on .. the Higher the Price to the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..
"" Home Depot called arrogant, ordered to pay ex-Boca Raton inventor millions more
WEST PALM BEACH — When a Home Depot executive was told inventor Michael Powell might have a claim against the hardware giant for stealing an invention that keeps store employees safe, his reaction was swift and vulgar.
"(Expletive) Michael Powell," the executive said. "Let him sue us."
The crass response typifies the company's attitude toward Powell, who crafted an simple, yet ingenious, way to keep Home Depot employees from slicing off their fingers while they're cutting wood for customers, a federal judge said Monday.
"Home Depot knew exactly what it was doing," U.S. District Judge Daniel Hurley said. "They simply pushed Mr. Powell away and they did it totally and completely for their own economic benefit."
Calling the company callous and arrogant, he ordered it to pay the former Boca Raton man $3 million in punitive damages. That's on top of the $15 million a jury in March said the company should pay him for stealing his so-called "Safe Hands" gadget that is now affixed to radial saws at nearly 2,000 Home Depots nationwide.
The damages for Home Depot don't end there. Hurley also ordered the firm to pay Powell's attorneys the $2.8 million they say they are owed, and to pay Powell an estimated $1 million in interest annually on the judgment. The interest began building in 2006 and will continuing accruing until Home Depot pays up.
The roughly $25 million judgment could have been avoided had the company agreed in 2004 to pay Powell the $2,000 he offered to charge for each device. That bill would have come to $4 million.
Instead, Hurley said, the firm dispatched workers to duplicate the saw guards Powell allowed them to test in eight stores in Georgia and California.
"It's sad to say, but Home Depot literally organized a theft of the Powell invention," he said.
Powell, who now lives in North Carolina, declined to comment on the verdict on the advice of his attorneys . Home Depot attorneys also declined to comment.
A company spokesman said Home Depot disagreed with the ruling and is considering an appeal.
"We have a strong commitment to dealing with our business partners fairly and with integrity, which is how we've maintained long-standing relationships with literally tens of thousands of suppliers over the past 30-plus years," company spokesman Stephen Holmes wrote in an e-mail. "We would never condone actions that intentionally violate another company's intellectual property rights."
However, Hurley said, that's not what the evidence showed during Monday's day-long hearing or during a nearly monthlong trial.
Recognizing it was a Goliath to Powell's David, the company sought to cut him out of any profit for the invention that saved the company millions in worker's compensation claims. In the year before the devices were installed, the company paid out $1 million in claims related to injuries caused by the saw. In the year after the gadgets were installed, it paid out $7,000.
He also criticized Home Depot attorneys for their handling of the case, which he described as "nasty, mean litigation."
For instance, when Powell's attorney asked for records of injuries cause by the saws, Home Depot attorneys handed over 6,000 documents. In a spot check of 2,300 pages, Powell's attorneys found one document that dealt with a saw injury.
"This is the kind of activity that people look at that engenders outright disgust for the legal profession," Hurley told Moss. "It is shameful." """
Source of Post
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/home-depot-called-arrogant-ordered-to-pay-ex-680890.html
the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., it is time to wake up and hold your CEO accountable for the Damages YOU will SOON Suffer...
www.MassiveShareholderFraud.com
Posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Organized Invention Theft .. hmm.. wonder who Home Depot's attorneys were... the SHOCKING part is that the Shareholders will face Massive Damages and the CEO and Big Shots at well they always seem to skate by.. .. thing is in the iviewit technologies scandal, theft and wall of corruption - the proof is never going away.. thousands of documents.. and no matter who gets their "car bombed" next by those trying to Silence the TRUTH.. the Internet will still have these documents, this proof and one day those Attorneys, Law Firms, CEO's, Major Tech Companies... well they will pay trillions of YOUR Money to the Iviewit Inventors for What They have Done... it is not a matter of if this stuff is true.. IT IS FACT.. go to www.DeniedPatent.com for more on that.. it is proven over and over.. contracts in place with Warner Bros. and Denied .. this illegal - corrupt - behavior has hurt shareholders.
Why do big shots like Michael Powell below just stomp on Inventors Rights and welcome a Lawsuit???? Well because they have the Judges and Attorneys in their pocket and usually have no fear.. looks like the tides are turning.. and the truth is rising... and Justice for Iviewit Technologies is Next and the Shareholder of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..Will Pay the Price.. the Longer all this Corruption goes on .. the Higher the Price to the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..
"" Home Depot called arrogant, ordered to pay ex-Boca Raton inventor millions more
WEST PALM BEACH — When a Home Depot executive was told inventor Michael Powell might have a claim against the hardware giant for stealing an invention that keeps store employees safe, his reaction was swift and vulgar.
"(Expletive) Michael Powell," the executive said. "Let him sue us."
The crass response typifies the company's attitude toward Powell, who crafted an simple, yet ingenious, way to keep Home Depot employees from slicing off their fingers while they're cutting wood for customers, a federal judge said Monday.
"Home Depot knew exactly what it was doing," U.S. District Judge Daniel Hurley said. "They simply pushed Mr. Powell away and they did it totally and completely for their own economic benefit."
Calling the company callous and arrogant, he ordered it to pay the former Boca Raton man $3 million in punitive damages. That's on top of the $15 million a jury in March said the company should pay him for stealing his so-called "Safe Hands" gadget that is now affixed to radial saws at nearly 2,000 Home Depots nationwide.
The damages for Home Depot don't end there. Hurley also ordered the firm to pay Powell's attorneys the $2.8 million they say they are owed, and to pay Powell an estimated $1 million in interest annually on the judgment. The interest began building in 2006 and will continuing accruing until Home Depot pays up.
The roughly $25 million judgment could have been avoided had the company agreed in 2004 to pay Powell the $2,000 he offered to charge for each device. That bill would have come to $4 million.
Instead, Hurley said, the firm dispatched workers to duplicate the saw guards Powell allowed them to test in eight stores in Georgia and California.
"It's sad to say, but Home Depot literally organized a theft of the Powell invention," he said.
Powell, who now lives in North Carolina, declined to comment on the verdict on the advice of his attorneys . Home Depot attorneys also declined to comment.
A company spokesman said Home Depot disagreed with the ruling and is considering an appeal.
"We have a strong commitment to dealing with our business partners fairly and with integrity, which is how we've maintained long-standing relationships with literally tens of thousands of suppliers over the past 30-plus years," company spokesman Stephen Holmes wrote in an e-mail. "We would never condone actions that intentionally violate another company's intellectual property rights."
However, Hurley said, that's not what the evidence showed during Monday's day-long hearing or during a nearly monthlong trial.
Recognizing it was a Goliath to Powell's David, the company sought to cut him out of any profit for the invention that saved the company millions in worker's compensation claims. In the year before the devices were installed, the company paid out $1 million in claims related to injuries caused by the saw. In the year after the gadgets were installed, it paid out $7,000.
He also criticized Home Depot attorneys for their handling of the case, which he described as "nasty, mean litigation."
For instance, when Powell's attorney asked for records of injuries cause by the saws, Home Depot attorneys handed over 6,000 documents. In a spot check of 2,300 pages, Powell's attorneys found one document that dealt with a saw injury.
"This is the kind of activity that people look at that engenders outright disgust for the legal profession," Hurley told Moss. "It is shameful." """
Source of Post
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/home-depot-called-arrogant-ordered-to-pay-ex-680890.html
the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., it is time to wake up and hold your CEO accountable for the Damages YOU will SOON Suffer...
www.MassiveShareholderFraud.com
Posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
FBI Coverups, Boca Police Scandals, Major Law Firms Covering Corruption, Enron Collapsing, Attempted Murder, Invention Stolen, Denial of Due Process.
In America only Certain People have rights to Protection from the Law - Most All are just Collateral Damage to Protect Corrupt Attorneys, Judges, DOJ Officials, Corrupt FBI agents, Billionaire Tech Companies, Major Media Companies and Mega Law Firms.
Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...
"" KernelOfTruth says:
There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).
The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.
The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.
If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.
If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf
The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involving public corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.
He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.
The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his name and place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.
According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.
This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also by Stephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.
Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.
For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.
Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s court and the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.
Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).
RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured by Proskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.
With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.
Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:
(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill
(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in a bankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and
(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.
It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.
Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.
The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.
Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.
All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who had perpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.
For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.
The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],
..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departments when the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],
...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and Lardner Law Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].
The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special Agent Joseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.
Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],
.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,
... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]
The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.
We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.
Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.
I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.
A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.
In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.
Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota of protection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.
Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""
Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.
Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees .. so Nevermind...
Judical Coverups, Attorneys and Judges Protecting Each Other, Illegal Behavior among judges, attorneys and clerks .. well this is American Justice.. not based in TRUTH or Law but Based in who you know and what your willing to pay them to cover your Dirty Deeds...
"" KernelOfTruth says:
There is a case in which any one of you might be interested. It involves the theft of patents worth at least one trillion dollars, and has already paid out billions in royalties that have never been received by the inventor or the company (with no report of where that much looted money has disappeared).
The reason you may be interested is that it is a Florida case with ties to places in New York, and the inventor seems to have run into problems similar to those discussed by individuals who have posted on the subject of public corruption in the Scott Rothstein case.
The shenanigans are unbelievable, including, but certainly not limited to, a Keystone Cop like investigation by the Boca Raton Police Department and an ostensible Office of the FBI [in West Palm Beach]. How much do you think it cost the taxpayers to set up that [rented FBI] Office, which acted as though an investigation was being run when nothing was done to examine the complicity of lawyers, public officials, and investigating agencies and a car bombing.
If you are interested, you can go to http://www.iviewit.tv and listen to certain testimony relating to the crimes that were allowed to occur through the Courts, both a Civil Division State Court and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, in West Palm Beach, Florida.
If you prefer, you can read certain documents at
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%2004%2020%20Iviewit%20Request%20for%20FBI%20IA%20and%20OIG%20investigation%20of%20FBI%20case%20downlow.pdf
The inventor and main person being abused, Eliot L. Bernstein, discusses the matter in the State Hearings held in New York, involving public corruption. One case brought up concerns a Monty Friedkin case, which he says is cloaked as lawyers and law firms acting as a criminal enterprise stealing inventions from inventors.
He identifies William J. Dick of the Foley and Lardner law firm and Brian Utley as working with Christopher Clarke Wheeler to steal inventions from Monte Friedkin, of Diamond Turf Equipment, a Florida corporation.
The criminal enterprise against Mr. Friedkin was explained as Utley (operating as the President of the company) contracting former IBM patent attorney William Dick to write Friedkin’s patents in his name and place them into a company incorporated by Christopher C.Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.
According to [page 15 of] the Complaint found at that web site, a lawyer that had subsequently been convicted in Florida of Felony Driving Under the Influence with Injury is identified as the instigator or ringleader. Then, this ringleader, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, is identified as a lawyer with the law firm of Proskauer Rose.
This scam is identified by Eliot Bernstein (in testimony and also by Stephen Lamont in the Complaint) as being perpetrated in a same fashion [as that run against Diamond Turf] when involving his Iviewit Company, wherein certain individuals performed in the enterprise, to walk the patents and intellectual properties [Utley] worked on, out of the business and into a company that these co-adventurers owned, in which the true owner [in this case, one can replace Friedkin with Bernstein] had no interest or idea of it’s existence.
Scroll down to pages 16 - 18 of the 43 page Complaint, and you can read about how both intrinsic and extrinsic fraud were further perpetrated before a Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, in the State of Florida, with what would appear a Circuit Court Judge’s willingness to grant an allowance for continual acts of perjury, intentional fraud, and criminal acts of conversion.
For instance, the Judge [Jorge Labarga] is said to have stated that the prior counsel that the parties did not know or hire had been representing them so that the right to file almost anything in the case had been waived by the counsel that had no authority to file the case or act in the case.
Further on, at page 21 [after explaining the reasons for starting File number 402-2-59-1799-339, on May 13th, 2002, with the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, at the behest of the Long Beach, California FBI], is the explanation “Bernstein, upon discovering further that the companies were involved in a federal bankruptcy in Florida (Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF Inv Chap 11 in the Southern District of Florida) and the law suit in civil court in Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit discussed above, both previously unbeknownst to exist by shareholders or management of the legitimate companies, built his case from California and then moved to Florida to the lions den or Labarga’s court and the Bankruptcy Court, believing that justice would be had.
Both actions filed in Florida were instigated by Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Rose referred management Utley, Michael Reale and an entity RYJO, Inc. (“RYJO”).
RYJO a subcontractor under a strategic alliance structured by Proskauer Rose, between Iviewit and Real 3D, Inc. (“R3D”) a client of theirs, R3D owned 70% by Lockheed Martin, 20% by Silicon Graphics Inc., and 10% by Intel, later wholly acquired by Intel and a third party necessary with management to file an involuntary.
With new counsel relieving dirty counsel, those acting without authority, now replaced by counsel retained by the legitimate companies, Bernstein went back to Florida to pursue his rights. It is presumed that once Proskauer Rose to instantly get rid of the evidence of the fraudulent companies but first had a plan to get the stolen intellectual properties out.
Thus, when combined, the billing case that they thought nobody would ever discover was in court and bankruptcy, the companies could do the following:
(i) Proskauer Rose would sue fraudulent companies ABC which harbored the stolen patents with a large unpaid bill
(ii) this would make them the largest creditor and thus entitled in a bankruptcy to majority of the company and the stolen patents and
(iii) with Utley, RYJO and Reale instigating the bankruptcy they would be the remaining benefactors, it would all look clean to the Courts, almost invisible and they would walk off with the stolen assets. They never figured that Bernstein would be tipped off to this in the midst of the process”.
It was related that one of the counsel [Kenneth Rubenstein] “was so brazen that the Court was in his pocket, that he wrote [Judge] Jorge Labarga a sworn statement claiming he never heard of Eliot Bernstein, the Iviewit companies and was being harassed”.
Also related to the case was a declaration of a showing to Warner Brothers of entries with investor H. Wayne Huizenga, in regards to the Iviewit inventions and multiple billings.
The kicker in the last paragraph [on page 18] is the obvious dereliction of duty in regards to what passes for FBI Agents in the network [of the ol’ south Good Ole Boys] and compromised Office of the US Attorney with the Southern District of Florida, when it is written “one asks, why later those same crimes exposed in mass against the government to the West Palm Beach Office of the FBI, were not prosecuted when taken by the FBI to the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, along with all the other crimes they were apprised of and given evidence in support of and which they then led Iviewit to believe they were investigating until April 17, 2007”.
Page 20 holds a critical piece of information, which is “Another part of the immediate problem was that evidence surfaced of a deal between the fraudulent Iviewit companies and Enron’s Broadband Division, in the now infamous Enron/Blockbuster Deal which due to Enron’s booking of hundreds of millions of dollars ahead of earning it, on a new technology for broadband internet distribution of movies, based on technologies almost stolen from Iviewit which are the true cause of the collapse of Enron.
All evidence of this had to be destroyed by the law firms who had perpetrated the crimes and this may have been the cause of the massive shredding party”.
For a story about the “Specific Involvement by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- West Palm Beach Office: January 2003 to March 2007”, scroll down to page 23.
The tale involves accusations regarding lawyers submitting false statements and falsified documents (including to a Court of Law), money made or laundered under the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements, conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety that involved Public Office corruption cases before the Florida Supreme Court, denial of due process and procedure in the Civil Courts as the criminal lawyers legal and political power have been able to position [without disclosure] through conflict to avoid prosecution by infiltrating Public Offices where Complaints have been filed, the infiltration of the attorney discipline process [both in New York and Florida],
..the possibility that the [Democrat-controlled] Proskauer Rose law firm is controlling certain of the Florida Courts and Disciplinary Departments when the New York law firm has one small Office in Boca Raton, cases at the Boca Raton Police Department that were derailed [with the Officer disappearing without Notice],
...the possibility that the [Republican-controlled] Foley and Lardner Law Firm is controlling a certain tier of the Florida Courts and the Governor’s Office when the Wisconsin law firm had virtually no presence in Florida, a subterfuge of a deferral of a Department of Business and Professional Regulation Complaint that falls under another conflict due to the fact that Governor Charlie Crist had appointed [Iviewit’s former patent counsel] Foley and Lardner, special Office positions favorably given to lawyers like George Lemieux [a managing shareholder where the ringleader (Christopher Wheeler) worked in the Fort Lauderdale Office of the Gunster, Yoakley, & Stewart law firm].
The behavior of the President of The Florida Bar [Kelly Overstreet Johnson] who worked for the brother [James Wheeler] of the ringleader lawyer, the infiltration of federal investigations, an FBI Agent [Stephen Lucchesi] who acted as though the problem was one that was civil in nature without need for FBI involvement, Special Agent Joseph Sconzo’s denial that there was any file concerning Iviewit in the FBI’s [rented] West Palm Beach Office.
Special Agent in Charge John McVie’s denial of any history of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein with any FBI investigation after years of investigation, a non-existent Securities and Exchange Commission investigation jointly run with the Boca Raton Police Department, denial of any oversight responsibilities pertaining to action taken by the FBI by the Inspector General of the Department of Justice [Glenn Fine],
.... the dismissal of a need for an audit when the Small Business Administration is the largest investor and shareholder through SBIC loans, the lack of oversight by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the lack of investigation by the Department of Justice into the Iraqi-style car bombing of the family vehicle belonging to Mr. Bernstein his wife and three children, possible terminations of US Attorneys for political reasons and retirements of Special Agents for political reasons,
... an admittance of no power or authority held by either the House Judiciary Committee or the Senate Judiciary Committee, harm to international relations through violations of international treatises, the failure of former Commissioner of Patents [John Doll] and his successor Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property [Jon W. Dudas] to follow the law, and possible influence wielded by Michael Grebe [the former Chairman of the Foley and Lardner law firm and former Chairman of the Republican National Committee who is currently under investigation for other violations]
The gist of the Complaint can be boiled down to the request contained on page 22, which is “With the revenues from the technologies converted to their pools and already generating profits in billions of dollars since invention, it would take either a continuous corruption of any legal or prosecutorial agency the complaints went or easier that with a Presidential top down denial of due process and procedure, through various Presidential appointments in key positions to block it top down.
We are asking the DOJ OIG to investigate for any possible connection to election fraud or payola to politicians capable of planting individuals to block Iviewit at each of these agencies”.
Moreover, on page 7 of a succeeding formal request to the Office of Internal Affairs for the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the inventor and President & Founder of Iviewit Technologies, Inc./Iviewit [Iviewit Holdings, Inc.], Eliot Bernstein, further concluded his ordeal and exasperation and concern for others, in his summation: “Please contact me immediately regarding these matters, as I fear for not only the life of my family but those who had volunteered to act as witnesses and others, that presumed they were doing so with the FBI investigating the matters.
I am in grave concern that the FBI has taken no actions to protect a citizen whose life has been threatened repeatedly, whose car has been blown up and confirmed as committed with intent by fire investigators.
A group of citizens who have followed all the rules of making complaints to all the proper authorities, to find that no one is protecting their rights to life, as well as, the rights guaranteed through the Constitution under Article I, Sec 8, Clause 8 pertaining to protection of inventors with the full weight of the Constitution, in the event of just such attempts to steal such inventions and murder inventors.
In fact, in a RICO case the FBI typically offers protection to witnesses against corruption from small or large mobsters when witnesses’ lives may be in danger.
Where a group of citizens have brought allegations of corruption that may yield a Patentgate, with attempted murders already occurring in the US and threats already effectuated against ones life, it is stunning that FBI officers who have been fully apprised of the matters and tendered evidence and witnesses against the accused, have not granted an iota of protection to those who are in danger, all indicating a top down control of the government and its regulatory agencies.
Control by those at the top to aid and abet those alleged to have committed such atrocities, through violation of public offices of these federal and state investigatory agencies. Most disturbing though is that it now appears that no one is protecting the United States and foreign nations from a group of criminals cloaked as lawyers, politicians and judicial members!”. ""
Posted Here
By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
What Really Collapsed Enron? Well it was a Proskauer Rose Law Firm Scandal, a Foiled Patent Theft. Proskauer Rose Law Attorney Corruption has ruined countless lives, portfolios and has left an amazing path of Destruction.
Can Enron Victims Sue Proskauer Rose Law Firm for their Loss, Suffering and Hardship.. well if they had the TRUTH .. maybe? But wait.. Proskauer Rose controls US Courts, Judges, Attorney Ethics Committees .. so Nevermind...
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Andrew Cuomo Appoints Retired Court of Appeals Chief Justice Judith Kaye to run the Gov. Paterson Probes.
WoW, this should be Impartial, Fair, Just... Come on talk about the Queen of the Attorney Fraternity in New York State that Reaches Everywhere Proskauer Rose Law Firm Is..
Judith L. Kaye would definitely qualify in my book as IN NO way a good pick for this "probe" .. oh unless you want to cover up Zillions in Alleged Crimes - Fraud - or Really Anything.. as with Proskauer Rose connections, Favors Owed, Steven Krane and all the Favors and Influence that Brings ... there seems to be No One that Can Hold Criminals Accountable for Crimes on their Watch...
Here is the Article..
"" ALBANY - Attorney General Andrew Cuomo handed off the politically red-hot probes of Gov. Paterson on Thursday - clearly hoping not to get burned any more.
Just days after a Marist College poll revealed a sizable drop in his approval ratings, particularly among blacks, Cuomo "removed" himself from the potentially explosive inquests.
He appointed retired Court of Appeals Chief Justice Judith Kaye to run the probes.
"This is a legal determination as to what is the best way to conduct an investigation," said Cuomo, who is all but certain to run for governor.
Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed.
"I understand the ferocity of politics of New York and I understand that it is incredibly important to all of us that the public have a 100% confidence that this investigation is being handled properly," Cuomo said.
Cuomo's office is investigating whether Paterson and the state police interfered in a domestic violence complaint mom of two Sherr-una Booker brought against top Paterson aide David Johnson.
His office has also launched a probe into whether the governor got free World Series tickets from the Yankees - and then lied about it to the state's Public Integrity Commission.
Tuesday's Marist poll found the public was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with Cuomo's role in the investigation. His once sky-high approval rating had dropped 13 points in just a week, including a 22-point drop among nonwhite voters, to 45%, the Marist poll showed.
"Politicians are supposed to follow public opinion, he did and the result was a wise decision," said Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf."
Kaye's appointment means the case is likely to drag on for several more weeks - and hang over Paterson as he tries to negotiate a budget with lawmakers.
Kaye will oversee Cuomo's staff of lawyers and investigators, who've interviewed dozens of witnesses and pored over pages of documents in both cases.
Nearly all of the crucial witnesses have been deposed in the probe of whether Paterson, his aides or the state police broke any laws by intervening in the domestic abuse case.
The Daily News reported yesterday that Cuomo's investigators have found little evidence to support a witness tampering case against Paterson.
Cuomo did not deny the story, but said: "Discussing any outcome would be premature."
This week, a handful of witnesses are being called back for a second interview. Johnson, another top Paterson aide, Clemmie Harris, and the governor are to be interviewed as soon as next week.
Kaye will essentially play the role Cuomo would have played, overseeing any presentation to a grand jury, signing off on subpoenas and, in the end, making the call as to whether to prosecute.
Cuomo will be barred from participating in any of these matters.
Kaye, who has no experience as a prosecutor, vowed the "public will have a full, fair and independent accounting of the facts."
Paterson's lawyer Theodore Wells Jr. promised to cooperate with Kaye.""
Source of Post...
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/03/11/2010-03-11_down_in_polls_andy_bails_on_probe_gives_hotpotato_gov_mess_over_to_former_chief_.html#ixzz0hwGdgE2T
So Cuomo wants to Be Gov. - Cuomo's Dad Appointed Kaye to her Judge Job... and now Judith Kaye is Investigating the Current NY Governor.. Hmmm.. nobody sees this as a Conflict.. and Andrew Cuomo has the nerve to say.. "Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed." What is Going on in New York?
Who is Theodore Wells Jr. - what Connections does he have to Proskauer, or History with any of the Attorney Fraternity we talk about on this site... ???
More on Proskauer Rose Affiliations, Conflicts of Interest and Alleged Crimes..
and How Proskauer Rose is Involved in a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft that now has plenty to do with the Corruption in the New York Court System and the Cover Up Power of Judith S. Kaye..
www.ProskauerSucks.com - www.DeniedPatent.com - www.Iviewit.TV
Got a Inside Tip on any of this.. Email Me At
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Judith L. Kaye would definitely qualify in my book as IN NO way a good pick for this "probe" .. oh unless you want to cover up Zillions in Alleged Crimes - Fraud - or Really Anything.. as with Proskauer Rose connections, Favors Owed, Steven Krane and all the Favors and Influence that Brings ... there seems to be No One that Can Hold Criminals Accountable for Crimes on their Watch...
Here is the Article..
"" ALBANY - Attorney General Andrew Cuomo handed off the politically red-hot probes of Gov. Paterson on Thursday - clearly hoping not to get burned any more.
Just days after a Marist College poll revealed a sizable drop in his approval ratings, particularly among blacks, Cuomo "removed" himself from the potentially explosive inquests.
He appointed retired Court of Appeals Chief Justice Judith Kaye to run the probes.
"This is a legal determination as to what is the best way to conduct an investigation," said Cuomo, who is all but certain to run for governor.
Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed.
"I understand the ferocity of politics of New York and I understand that it is incredibly important to all of us that the public have a 100% confidence that this investigation is being handled properly," Cuomo said.
Cuomo's office is investigating whether Paterson and the state police interfered in a domestic violence complaint mom of two Sherr-una Booker brought against top Paterson aide David Johnson.
His office has also launched a probe into whether the governor got free World Series tickets from the Yankees - and then lied about it to the state's Public Integrity Commission.
Tuesday's Marist poll found the public was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with Cuomo's role in the investigation. His once sky-high approval rating had dropped 13 points in just a week, including a 22-point drop among nonwhite voters, to 45%, the Marist poll showed.
"Politicians are supposed to follow public opinion, he did and the result was a wise decision," said Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf."
Kaye's appointment means the case is likely to drag on for several more weeks - and hang over Paterson as he tries to negotiate a budget with lawmakers.
Kaye will oversee Cuomo's staff of lawyers and investigators, who've interviewed dozens of witnesses and pored over pages of documents in both cases.
Nearly all of the crucial witnesses have been deposed in the probe of whether Paterson, his aides or the state police broke any laws by intervening in the domestic abuse case.
The Daily News reported yesterday that Cuomo's investigators have found little evidence to support a witness tampering case against Paterson.
Cuomo did not deny the story, but said: "Discussing any outcome would be premature."
This week, a handful of witnesses are being called back for a second interview. Johnson, another top Paterson aide, Clemmie Harris, and the governor are to be interviewed as soon as next week.
Kaye will essentially play the role Cuomo would have played, overseeing any presentation to a grand jury, signing off on subpoenas and, in the end, making the call as to whether to prosecute.
Cuomo will be barred from participating in any of these matters.
Kaye, who has no experience as a prosecutor, vowed the "public will have a full, fair and independent accounting of the facts."
Paterson's lawyer Theodore Wells Jr. promised to cooperate with Kaye.""
Source of Post...
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/03/11/2010-03-11_down_in_polls_andy_bails_on_probe_gives_hotpotato_gov_mess_over_to_former_chief_.html#ixzz0hwGdgE2T
So Cuomo wants to Be Gov. - Cuomo's Dad Appointed Kaye to her Judge Job... and now Judith Kaye is Investigating the Current NY Governor.. Hmmm.. nobody sees this as a Conflict.. and Andrew Cuomo has the nerve to say.. "Cuomo said he made the decision to appoint Kaye out of "an abundance of caution" to avoid any possible conflicts, though he acknowledged the political prism through which the case is likely to be viewed." What is Going on in New York?
Who is Theodore Wells Jr. - what Connections does he have to Proskauer, or History with any of the Attorney Fraternity we talk about on this site... ???
More on Proskauer Rose Affiliations, Conflicts of Interest and Alleged Crimes..
and How Proskauer Rose is Involved in a Trillion Dollar Patent Theft that now has plenty to do with the Corruption in the New York Court System and the Cover Up Power of Judith S. Kaye..
www.ProskauerSucks.com - www.DeniedPatent.com - www.Iviewit.TV
Got a Inside Tip on any of this.. Email Me At
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)