Need to Know More about Iviewit Technologies and Who has the authority to do What?

Internal Iviewit Document ... Proskauer Rose LLP, Christopher Wheeler - Proskauer Rose Attorney, Billing, Incorporation, Investment and Shareholder information and well, a Mega Need to Know Document... to help you to understand WHO has the authority to do what in regard to and on behalf of the Iviewit Company ... who billed what to whom and ... well, Lot's of Information.

Click Here for Document

it is Rather Large - Give it a Few ... to Load..

Posted by

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Is Stephen Lamont, Former Alleged CEO, of Iviewit Conspiring with Foley and Lardner, the USPTO and other Players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case ???

It is Simply To Hard for Me to Wrap my Brain around the Actions of Stephen Lamont.

I Could not Figure out what possible Motive Stephen Lamont could have to Attempt to Discredit My Blog Postings and to Discredit Eliot Bernstein, when the Information on the Web from those two sources would only benefit P. Stephen Lamont up until he Threatened Me.

I just could not understand why Stephen Lamont would DEMAND that I remove Posts with his name, when those Posts were information from the www.Iviewit.TV Website that he links to in his every email, seemingly. and in which he seems to promote on the Internet with his my Space page and other online outlets of promotion.

So Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threaten Me and Tell me to get My Affairs in order while I still can.. ?? and demand that I change my Blogs.. ?? when the Facts of the Story came from www.Iviewit.TV in which he promotes ?

It Simply Did not Make Sense to me.

In trying to figure out Why P. Stephen Lamont is Aggressively Demanding and Threatening me Now after 2 months of Blogging about the Iviewit Stolen Patent, and after the information has seemingly been on the Internet for over 8 years... I just had to Look Deeper...

I found myself needing to know more, and asking myself who is Stephen Lamont working with, why NOW?, what changed?

Did someone contact him and tell him to play big shot CEO and try and scare me with Demanding and Threatening Emails?

Did Stephen Lamont get orders from the USPTO - Foley and Lardner or some other Play in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case?

P. Stephen Lamont is obviously a very smart man and surely saw me covering this story for around 2 months so far. Right ?

A guy who claims he wants to take over video.. blah .. blah .. blah.. online and the world this and that.. Surely he saw my Blogs, surely he looked into who and what I am about.. and Surely Stephen Lamont did not all of the Sudden wake up to my Righteous Stance on the Behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors ... On February 4th 2010, The day he was in Such a Stir about the email that Eliot Bernstein Sent out.

So Why did Stephen Lamont launch Demands and Threats on Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger - when I was and have been for two months... out to Defend HIM, the company he was supposedly CEO of, and him getting his rightful compensation for the Iviewit Shares in which he deserves, Along with the Inventors and other Shareholders of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. ????

It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is running a Bluff at me, possibly for Someone Else. It Seems to Me that P. Stephen Lamont wants this "Hillbilly Blogger" to believe he has powers that he does not have in a Company which he is no longer a part of other then being a Shareholder as many other Shareholders....

Kind of makes you wonder who P. Stephen Lamont is Really Working for... could it be one of the Billionaire Tech Companies - Billionaire Law Firms or ?

I mean if the Tech companies can afford Millions on Top of Millions - in Anti-Trust Violation fines every year, often every Quarter and the Law Firms such as Proskauer Rose can pay 1.5 million as a minimum a month in rent in once location and they are Global..

These Companies involved in this Trillion Dollar Stolen patent.. they have some serious money.. why not use some of it to try and Run a Bluff on some Woman.. by sending in someone with a big Fancy CEO Title of the Company your Talking about to discredit the very people you have been defending for 2 months so far.. Why not Send in someone I may think is the CEO - or somehow I may think is in Charge of the Iviewit Company?

Surely this will Shut me UP.. Right?

and If that don't Work well Stephen Lamont
will just Threat to End my Affairs...

So Again Why NOW.. ???

this information on my Investigative Blogs
is Public Knowledge, it is in the Courts, in the News,
and all over the www.Iviewit.TV website.. so why now?
Why Me?

Maybe, Possibly, Just speculating here .. maybe the Super Power Elite told P. Stephen Lamont that the Iviewit Inventors would NEVER get their rights and the SHAREHOLDERS will never get paid, however maybe he could get something out of the deal.. just speculating here..

Maybe .. just maybe someone offered P. Stephen Lamont Money to work on the other side and make it look like he was working for the best interest of the Iviewit Shareholders and the REAL Iviewit Inventors.

But anyone with a brain can see that currently Eliot Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont are not quite on the same page, so why would I think that P. Stephen Lamont could speak for Eliot Bernstein or the Iviewit Technologies Company.

If P. Stephen Lamont is disputing the information I posted, and that in which contains his name then why does every email to every person he emails and his resume, and his My Space Page contain the www.Iviewit.TV website ... as if it is his site, he is proud of it and Well ... Gee.. Hmmm... I got the information from that site and linked to the source...

So What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont? Who is P. Stephen Lamont Talking to and on Whose Authority his he Demanding anything of me?

Well I can Tell you that Right After I posted this post.

http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/
2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of_05.html

A Story of Intrigue and Suspense Unfolded Before my Eyes.. and Not Just the Threats and Demands from P. Stephen Lamont, but also of Who he Told, where they were and What Connections and Fingerprints he left along the way..

Well .. My Stat Counter Told me a Story .. that I feel I must Share..

I feel from My Own Personal Experience in Analyzing my Stats over the Years, and in my Opinion that once P. Stephen Lamont Seen the Above Post... he then Contacted the USPTO, Foley and Lardner, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Duval & Stachenfeld, Steven C. Becker and
"Crystal L. Cox" Lamont
Well Click Here and Read the Story...

posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

More information on the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent
at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV
Lamont Iviewit
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal Cox

Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications to Shareholders?

YOU Bet She Does...
How Will She Explain what She has Let Happen
in a Trillion Dollar Liability ...???

It seems from Many documents at www.Iviewit.TV That Mary Shapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.

Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?

$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?

What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.

The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .

Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?

Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..

It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Shapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..

posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html

http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated

http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html


Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..

Crystal Cox Blogger

Wherever there is Patent Theft, there Seems to Be Foley and Lardner - the Donald Stone Patent Theft and More..

It Seems that Foley and Lardner LLP has a History of Patent Theft

and NOT being Held accountable for it.

Threatening and Bullying Inventors, Seizing Control over Inventions and Pushing Their Agenda onto Inventors seems to Be something that Foley and Lardner has been doing for decades and Foley and Lardner seem to not fear the Law in any way.

It is hard to understand how the US Court System, the US Patent Office and the Attorney Bar has looked away for so long. How does Foley and Lardner stay ahead of the Law, ahead of Accountability and avoid Criminal Prosecution for what they have done to Inventors?

Foley and Lardner having had a Connection in the Republican National Committee Seem to have the Power to Make Patent Theft part of their Standard Business Activity, and seemingly have come to expect that they can get away with it and the Inventors will NEVER be heard. And are just Collateral Damage to make Foley and Lardner's World Better

It is understandable to Expect that your "Counsel" would Protect your Best Interest, However Foley And Lardner did just the Opposite and was involved in the Iviewit Stolen Patent. And this was year after they had already been EXPOSED for Patent Theft involvement and the Courts Ignored the Inventors Rights, giving Foley and Lardner the Power to continue their Patent Theft, Civil Rights Violation Reign of Terror.

Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit Intellectual Property Filings.

Michael Grebe was Chairman and CEO of Foley and Lardner and was partner for 25 years. And then Michael Grebe Goes on to Counsel the RNC, Became President and CEO of the Bradley Foundation - Michael Grebe and The Bradley Foundation are some of the biggest backers of the Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld Administration.

Michael Grebe, through the Bradley Foundation funds Charles Murray to write more about how blacks are inferior to whites like in his book, The Bell Curve..

Michael Grebe seems to me to be so powerfully connected that anyone at Foley and Lardner would be Protected to Pretty Much Do anything they please and simply know that the RIGHT people would be in Right Places to Protect Their Actions, no matter how illegal or immoral those actions might be.

We Can See from the Link Below that Foley and Lardner has been Connected to Patent Theft for quite some time. The question then becomes is Patent Theft so lucrative that it is affecting the Political Process, the Administration and has a Role in or influence over Big Government?

If Michael Grebe was Head of Foley and Lardner and these things were going on, How much did he know? What did he condone or allow and How Much was he involved in this Patent Theft Business that Foley and Larder seemed to be in?

Michael Grebe had to know of the Patent Thefts and not just their involvement in the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Patent Theft but in Patent Thefts, and Inventor Harassment and Criminal Activity for Many Years Prior... Such as the David Stone Invention Stolen...

"" Oct. 15,1993 Gilbert, Mark Sapperstein, Longo, Procter and Robert WarfIeld Sr. acting in
concert with the three law firms Miles & Stockbridge, Foley & Lardner and Williams
Hammond, Shockley, Moore & Harrison seize control of DSII and threaten to have Stone
arrested on unspecified criminal charges if Stone doesn't capitulate to their extortion attempt.""

Click Here to Read Full Document and to
See Foley and Lardner's involvement
in another Major Patent Theft in the Early 90's.

Big Law Firms, Politicians, Big Money, HUGE Corporations SHOULD not be above the Laws of the United States of America and SHOULD not be above basic rights and human dignity.
political corruption

More on the Iviewit Story at

www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

More on the Donald Stone Store

www.MarylandCorruption.com

foley and lardner

and One More Note to this Post, Email your Foley and Lardner Patent Theft Story to Crystal@CrystalCox.com - there has to be more of you out there.

crystal cox

Michael Grebe was head of Foley and Lardner when they became involved acting counsel for the Iviewit intellectual property filings.

Online Connections found on Michael Grebe, Foley Lardner
and the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Case.

""If Patentgate pans out, as described at the www.iviewit.tv website, Michael Grebe would stand to lose any of his wealth accumulated at Foley and Lardner since 1998 and perhaps everything in a sucessful RICO and could become entangled in the criminal allegations currently under investigation by the FBI, the USPTO, the USPTO OED and international investigations that are ongoing.

Key intellectual properties of Iviewit handled by Foley and Lardner are under investigation as to how the wrong inventors, owners and assignees were falsified to the USPTO, violations of federal laws regarding on false oath submitted to the USPTO on IP applications. The Commissioner of Patents has suspended Iviewit IP pending investigations.


Similar allegations are under investigation in Europe through the EPI and through the European Patent Office and through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, these false and fraudulent applications could trigger an international investigation by over twenty countries were the papers were tendered.

Michael Grebe, remained the Chairman of RNC until 2001 and resigned after the potentially fraudulent election of George W. Bush and subsequent illegal appointment of a Supreme Court US President by a narrow 5-4 vote.


Michael Grebe at the time is cited as the largest force behind getting Bush appointed.

Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.


Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it.

Images at the www.iviewit.tv website The Iviewit matters have recently come before the House Judiciary Committee after being forwarded by John Dingell of the House Energy and Commerce Committee for investigation."




Patentgate is founded on the assumption that top down control of the government was siezed by the law firms involved in the thefts of the Iviewit patents, including Foley and Lardner, to prevent due process and procedure after they were caught with evidence and witnesses against their firms.


Recently the stakes went skyrocketing on the Iviewit matters with the attempted murder via a massive car bombing of inventor Eliot Bernstein in Boynton Beach Florida, a blast so powerful it blew up three cars alongside it. Images at the www.iviewit.tv website

Source of this Post.

http://www.politicalfriendster.com/
rateConnection.php?id1=697&id2=5255

Raymond Joao Opposition in STOLEN Iviewit Patent Case - Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se

Where is Raymond Joao's Counsel?

It seems that Raymond A. Joao is Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se. So who is Representing Raymond Anthony Joao on that AT&T Patent Infringement Lawsuits he has Launched?

Was Raymond A. Joao's Counsel Removed ?

Raymond Joao seems to be his own lawyer, his own patent lawyer and a patent thief

Raymond A. Joao, Esq., Pro Se ?

Where is John Walter Fried Esq. and Fried and Epstein?

Click Here for Raymond Joao Opposition in Iviewit Case

Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Patent Theft, iViewIt Technologies,

R More on the Iviewit Patent Case and On Raymond Joao at
www.RaymondJoao.com
raymond joao
and at www.DeniedPatent.com

Joao Opposition Iviewit, John Walter Fried Esq., Patent Attorney Corruption, Raymond A. Joao

Wayne Smith Warner Bros. Entertainment - When is it Time to Do the Right Thing?

Iviewit Pending Patents - Kenneth Rubenstein ...

What Does Warner Bros. have to Say about Signing a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit and Completely Ignorning its Existence?

I Guess Warner Brothers answers to NO One, they are Above the Law and well One of those Too Big To Fail Scenerios Right?

Does Warner Bros. have connections to Judges, USPTO Connections, Proskauer Rose Connections... what is REALLY Going On here?

Folks Check Out the Link Below and ask how your US Justice Systme has let these Billion Dollar Tech companies continue to be above the LAWS that the Rest of Us Have to Follow.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf

Warner Bros. - they Signed a Confidentiality Agreement and then Used the Invention Without Compensating the Inventor.

Shocking but True, we have seen from Internal Warner Brother Company emails that THEY certainly did not and years later, like 7 years.. have FAILED to do the RIGHT thing in the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent Heist.

The question of Why, begs to be answered. However, it is unlikely that we will ever get a Real Answer. Maybe John Calkins has an answer and maybe John Calkins has seen some career advancements over 7 years as the Iviewit inventors are Bombed, faced with Economic Terror, Denied Due Process, Harassed and Cheated out of their Quality of Life, their Livlihood, there Compensation for something they Really Did Event and have given almost a Decade now to fighting this corruption with Warner Bros. Gets Richer and RICHER of of the Iviewit Stolen Technology.

www.Iviewit.TV

Read this Site, it is Powerful information

on Just How Corrupt Our US Courts are and

How the FBI, the FTC, the SEC, the Department of Justice,

the USTPO and the Attorney General DOES not Care.

Corrupt Courts

Proskauer Rose Seems to Be In ALL the Big Scandals -

"Madoff, Dreier and Allen Stanford Ponzi Links to the Iviewit Affairs with proskauer all around.

At the heart of the unearthing of several of the largest financial scams in history, Bernard Madoff, Sir Allen Stanford and Marc S. Dreier, again we find the law firm Proskauer and their Iviewit referrals and co-conspirators such as Joao and other defendants in my lawsuit, central figures as indicated in the Crime Chart.

Again, perhaps these schemes are the money laundering schemes for the royalties from the stolen technologies, a place to park bribe money like Swiss bank accounts, perhaps including those recently involved in scandal with UBS whereby the names are soon to be released or just to hide the ill gained profits.

As you can imagine because my dreams and inventions have become realities for the world in transforming virtually all digital imaging and video applications, placing Multi-Media as a more important component of the digital world now than even the operating system, i.e. Microsoft’s Windows. Without the ability to play rich multi-media the operating system would have little use.

The amount of converted royalties generated from the technologies over the past decade, including invention of wholly new markets, is beyond imagination and had to be laundered somehow; recent scandals may provide the explanation.

The Sir Allen Stanford Financial Fraud and Ties to Proskauer
The Stanford Ponzi investigation may be the card that knocks down the house of cards at Proskauer. Uncovering of the $65 Billion Madoff Ponzi led the SEC & FBI to intensify investigations into Stanford; I quote the Times Online for the Committee,
‘Perhaps the most alarming is that Stanford Investment Bank has exposure to losses from the Madoff fraud scheme despite the bank's public assurance to the contrary’, said the SEC.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5759709.ece
The Wall Street Journal reported that CFO of Stanford Financial Group, James Davis, also involved in the $7 Billion Ponzi, pled Guilty to Federal charges while appearing to implicate counsel Proskauer & Partner Thomas Sjoblom orchestrating a plan to Obstruct SEC & FBI investigations into Stanford & more. Further information reveals blood oaths between regulators and Stanford to conceal the fraud from regulatory agencies and Stanford’s possible involvement with the number one MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL with Proskauer dead center and alleged in the crimes and Cover-Up crimes.

I have submitted in my Prepared Statement links to the Wall Street Journal and other articles relating to these links for the Committees further review.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/28/sjoblom-proskauer-rose-face-fallout-from-stanford-affair/

Ironically, Sjoblom worked for the SEC & now is implicated in FBI & SEC actions, advising client Stanford employees on “how” to lie to the SEC and further obstructive acts. Huffington Post on Feb 20, 09 claims, Sjoblom, a partner at law firm Proskauer Rose doing work for Stanford's company's Antigua affiliate, told authorities that he ‘disaffirmed’ everything he had told them to date...Sjoblom spent nearly 20 years at the SEC, & served as an Asst Chief Litigation Counsel in the SEC's Division of Enforcement from 1987-1999.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-h-green/mini-madoff-scandal-scale_b_168486.html
The Committee should note the close proximity of dates between the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer’s acquisition of Sjoblom.

The Bernard Madoff Financial Fraud and Ties to Proskauer
If I may read again into the record from Bloomberg on Jan 14, 09,

The week after Bernard Madoff was charged with running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, Proskauer Rose…offered a telephone briefing on the scandal for its wealthy clients. With only a day’s notice, 1,300 Madoff investors dialed in. ‘This is a financial 9/11 for our clients’, said Proskauer litigation partner Gregg Mashberg…‘People are dying for information.’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aO32KOhrPtRw&refer=us
Following the “client” call, investigations began into major “clients” involved in Madoff, Proskauer having perhaps the most Madoff “clients”, many who originally claimed to be victims may now be accomplice.

From Fox Business, I quote, SEC OIG delivered a stinging report on Madoff harshly criticizing lax regulators for overlooking the Madoff information from WHISTLEBLOWERS & others inside the SEC, for years. http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/government/report-set-criticize-sec-madoff-scheme/

Proskauer has further ties to Madoff according to TPM, in 2004 an SEC attorney, Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot, notified the SEC of the Ponzi but was forced out of her job, the SEC later settling a claim filed by Lightfoot. Upon termination, Lightfoot turned over the Madoff file to Jacqueline Wood who then presumably buried the report that could have exposed the Ponzi in 04. The SEC OIG’s 477 page report mentions Wood of Proskauer throughout the entire report as a key figure in the regulatory failures, along with possible collusion of Madoff family members who married into the SEC. http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/oig-509.pdf

TPM reports that after leaving the SEC, Wood took a Proskauer Partnership and I submit linkage for this Committee’s review in my Prepared Statement @ TPM @ http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mrs_panstreppon/2009/07/bernie-madoff-sec-investigator.php?ref=reccafe .

According to Memphis Daily News, Laura Pendergest-Holt ( Wood ), Stanford’s CIO, criminally charged in the Stanford investigation, then filed a civil suit against Proskauer & Sjoblom claiming they “hung her out to dry” before the SEC.

Meanwhile, Sjoblom solicited a multi-million dollar retainer from now arrested Stanford Chairman, Allen Stanford, the night before the events with Holt took place at the SEC. http://www.memphisdailynews.com/editorial/Article.aspx?id=41707

The Wall Street Journal reports filing of a Class Action suit against Sjoblom & Proskauer in TX after Davis’ incriminating plea agreement implicating Proskauer, the Class Action seeking damages for the entire $7 Billion under TX Law in damages for Proskauer’s role Aiding & Abetting the Stanford Ponzi, I quote the Wall Street Journal Legal Blog by Amir Efrati,
The suit, filed in federal court in Dallas, says Sjoblom and Proskauer Rose are liable for $7 billion in damages for aiding and abetting Stanford’s alleged fraud…The civil suit is largely based on a plea agreement that we mentioned in this post yesterday, which focuses in part on the alleged actions of Sjoblom, who became outside counsel for Stanford’s international bank based in Antigua in the Caribbean starting in 2005.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/28/sjoblom-proskauer-rose-face-fallout-from-stanford-affair/

The Marc S. Dreier Financial Fraud and Ties to the Proskauer Law Firm
Another defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit, convicted felon Marc S. Dreier, found orchestrating yet another bizarre Ponzi and in the Dreier scheme, we find yet again another former Proskauer Partner, Sheila M. Gowan, now acting as bankruptcy trustee in the suit as reported by the Wall Street Journal, attached to my Prepared Statement.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/01/02/former-ausa-selected-as-bankruptcy-trustee-in-dreier-case.

As already mentioned herein, Raymond Joao, the rival to Edison with patent applications dated in 1900, perhaps even claiming he invented electricity prior to Edison, then left Meltzer to Dreier, impersonating me as the inventor of my technologies.

It is fitting to note, or joke, here that Dreier was also caught in his scheme using fake and fraudulent names and representations of himself fraudulently impersonating others while trying to Launder stolen money into Canada.

It is known that during that time Raymond Joao made several deals and sales regarding inventions in his name, although details remain sketchy and under investigation.




http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Scandals
www.DeniedPatent.com
Proskauer

The Marc S. Dreier Financial Fraud and Ties to the Proskauer Law Firm - in Relations to the Iviewit Stolen Patent Lawsuit

"Another defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit, convicted felon Marc S. Dreier, found orchestrating yet another bizarre Ponzi and in the Dreier scheme, we find yet again another former Proskauer Partner, Sheila M. Gowan, now acting as bankruptcy trustee in the suit as reported by the Wall Street Journal, attached to my Prepared Statement.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/01/02/former-ausa-selected-as-bankruptcy-trustee-in-dreier-case

As already mentioned herein, Raymond Joao, the rival to Edison with patent applications dated in 1900, perhaps even claiming he invented electricity prior to Edison, then left Meltzer to Dreier, impersonating me as the inventor of my technologies.

It is fitting to note, or joke, here that Marc Dreier was also caught in his scheme using fake and fraudulent names and representations of himself fraudulently impersonating others while trying to Launder stolen money into Canada.

It is known that during that time Raymond Joao made several deals and sales regarding inventions in his name, although details remain sketchy and under investigation."
Rose
Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
marc
www.ProskauerSucks.com
For More on Proskauer Rose LLP
Rose
www.DeniedPatent.com
for More on the Trillion Dollar Stolen Iviewit Patent
Crystal L. Cox

Eliot Bernstein Says "If you were burned in Stanford sue Proskauer"

" MADOFF + STANFORD + DREIER + SATYAM + FISERV + ALBERT HU = PROSKAUER ROSE & FOLEY & LARDNER
p
Foley & Lardner partner Patricia J. (Trish) Lane represented FISERV, sue Foley, read on.
Investors who have been burned in these scams should start to seek redress from the lawyers who were involved with these scams.

I personally have been trying to notify regulators and authorities of a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR scam that is putting states like New York and Florida at huge risk, as well as, companies like Intel, Lockheed, SGI and IBM.

The states and companies involved in the fraud fail to acknowledge the risk exposing shareholders and citizens to impending liabilities. Investigators, courts and federal agents ignoring the crimes and evidence, including a car-bombing attempt on my life. I know how Harry Markopolos felt trying to expose Madoff in a world without regulation.

Did I hear Proskauer Rose is involved in Madoff (involved many clients too) and acted as Allen Stanford’s attorney. Investors who lost money in these scams should start looking at the law firm Proskauer’s assets for recovery.

First, Proskauer partner Gregg Mashberg claims Madoff is a financial 9/11 for their clients, if they directed you to Madoff sue them. Then, Proskauer partner Thomas Sjoblom former enforcement dude for SEC and Allen Stanford attorney, declares PARTY IS OVER to Stanford employees and advises them to PRAY, this two days before SEC hearings.

Then at hearings, he lies with Holt to SEC saying she only prepared with him but fails to mention Miami meeting at airport hanger. Then Sjoblom resigns after SEC begins investigation and sends note to SEC disaffirming all statements made by him and Proskauer, his butt on fire. If you were burned in Stanford sue Proskauer.
Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner are also in a TRILLION dollar FEDERAL LAWSUIT legally related to a WHISTLEBLOWER CASE also in FEDERAL COURT. Marc S. Dreier, brought in through Raymond A. Joao of Meltzer Lippe after putting 90+ patents of mine in his own name, is also a defendant in the Federal Case.
r
The Trillion Dollar suit according to Judge Shira Scheindlin is one of PATENT THEFT, MURDER & A CAR BOMBING. For graphics on the car bombing visit http://www.iviewit.tv .
The Federal Court cases
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket 08-4873-cv – Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. – TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court – Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. – WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
( ) John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York"

r
Source of Post
http://formerlyaffluent.com/2009/04/21/the-worst-of-the-worst/
r

Iviewit Patent Theft - by Eliot Bernstein

"Iviewit Technologies, Inc. Alleges Invention Patent Theft By MPEGLA And Proskauer Rose LLP, As Reported By Sachin Garg On January 18, 2006 In The Data Compression News Blog USA

In an article written by Sachin Garg dated January 18, 2006 in the by Data Compression News Blog USA - "Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit technologies alleges that MPEGLA's primary patent reviewer Kenneth Rubenstein and law firm Proskauer Rose LLP, along with others, stole inventions and patented them in their own names."

RED BLUFF, Calif. (EWORLDWIRE) April 11, 2006 - In an article written by Sachin Garg dated January 18, 2006 in the by Data Compression News Blog USA-

[GARG] "Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit technologies alleges that MPEGLA's primary patent reviewer Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer, along with some others, stole inventions and patented them in their own names. Bernstein says that he is an inventor and that his inventions were stolen by the MPEG licensor MPEGLA, and that Iviewit has gone to court for this. He says that the primary patent reviewer for MPEG, Kenneth Rubenstein, who works for law firm Proskauer Rose LLP, along with Proskauer were patent counsel for the Iviewit inventors while they were controlling MPEG and acting as its counsel, they then stole the Iviewit technologies from the inventors they represented. MPEG contains IP from lots of patents, held by many peoples/companies. MPEGLA is an organization which collaborates with all those who have pooled their IP into MPEG and lets users license all those patents from a single source."

[QUOTING BERNSTEIN]Rubenstein?s former partner Raymond Anthony Joao now has applied for ninety patents in his own name. Yes, the patent attorney has patented the inventions in his own name; it should not even be possible. Many stolen directly from the inventions he and Rubenstein were supposed to patent for Iviewit.

[GARG CONTINUES] He further blamed them and few employees from IBM to have worked together in unison to steal other inventions from Iviewit, another Florida company, Diamond Turf Equipment and other small inventors."

[QUOTING BERNSTEIN] This is truly the greatest patent story ever told and as American citizens we must, must, prevent this type of legal crime, committed by attorneys, to protect the Constitution.

[GARG CONTINUES] If all this is true, I have to admit it will be one the big patent stories around."

More information at http://www.iviewit.tv and http://patentgate.blogspot.com

r
www.DeniedPatent.com
r