Just as Home Depot is now faced with the following, well the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..
Organized Invention Theft .. hmm.. wonder who Home Depot's attorneys were... the SHOCKING part is that the Shareholders will face Massive Damages and the CEO and Big Shots at well they always seem to skate by.. .. thing is in the iviewit technologies scandal, theft and wall of corruption - the proof is never going away.. thousands of documents.. and no matter who gets their "car bombed" next by those trying to Silence the TRUTH.. the Internet will still have these documents, this proof and one day those Attorneys, Law Firms, CEO's, Major Tech Companies... well they will pay trillions of YOUR Money to the Iviewit Inventors for What They have Done... it is not a matter of if this stuff is true.. IT IS FACT.. go to www.DeniedPatent.com for more on that.. it is proven over and over.. contracts in place with Warner Bros. and Denied .. this illegal - corrupt - behavior has hurt shareholders.
Why do big shots like Michael Powell below just stomp on Inventors Rights and welcome a Lawsuit???? Well because they have the Judges and Attorneys in their pocket and usually have no fear.. looks like the tides are turning.. and the truth is rising... and Justice for Iviewit Technologies is Next and the Shareholder of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..Will Pay the Price.. the Longer all this Corruption goes on .. the Higher the Price to the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., and More..
"" Home Depot called arrogant, ordered to pay ex-Boca Raton inventor millions more
WEST PALM BEACH — When a Home Depot executive was told inventor Michael Powell might have a claim against the hardware giant for stealing an invention that keeps store employees safe, his reaction was swift and vulgar.
"(Expletive) Michael Powell," the executive said. "Let him sue us."
The crass response typifies the company's attitude toward Powell, who crafted an simple, yet ingenious, way to keep Home Depot employees from slicing off their fingers while they're cutting wood for customers, a federal judge said Monday.
"Home Depot knew exactly what it was doing," U.S. District Judge Daniel Hurley said. "They simply pushed Mr. Powell away and they did it totally and completely for their own economic benefit."
Calling the company callous and arrogant, he ordered it to pay the former Boca Raton man $3 million in punitive damages. That's on top of the $15 million a jury in March said the company should pay him for stealing his so-called "Safe Hands" gadget that is now affixed to radial saws at nearly 2,000 Home Depots nationwide.
The damages for Home Depot don't end there. Hurley also ordered the firm to pay Powell's attorneys the $2.8 million they say they are owed, and to pay Powell an estimated $1 million in interest annually on the judgment. The interest began building in 2006 and will continuing accruing until Home Depot pays up.
The roughly $25 million judgment could have been avoided had the company agreed in 2004 to pay Powell the $2,000 he offered to charge for each device. That bill would have come to $4 million.
Instead, Hurley said, the firm dispatched workers to duplicate the saw guards Powell allowed them to test in eight stores in Georgia and California.
"It's sad to say, but Home Depot literally organized a theft of the Powell invention," he said.
Powell, who now lives in North Carolina, declined to comment on the verdict on the advice of his attorneys . Home Depot attorneys also declined to comment.
A company spokesman said Home Depot disagreed with the ruling and is considering an appeal.
"We have a strong commitment to dealing with our business partners fairly and with integrity, which is how we've maintained long-standing relationships with literally tens of thousands of suppliers over the past 30-plus years," company spokesman Stephen Holmes wrote in an e-mail. "We would never condone actions that intentionally violate another company's intellectual property rights."
However, Hurley said, that's not what the evidence showed during Monday's day-long hearing or during a nearly monthlong trial.
Recognizing it was a Goliath to Powell's David, the company sought to cut him out of any profit for the invention that saved the company millions in worker's compensation claims. In the year before the devices were installed, the company paid out $1 million in claims related to injuries caused by the saw. In the year after the gadgets were installed, it paid out $7,000.
He also criticized Home Depot attorneys for their handling of the case, which he described as "nasty, mean litigation."
For instance, when Powell's attorney asked for records of injuries cause by the saws, Home Depot attorneys handed over 6,000 documents. In a spot check of 2,300 pages, Powell's attorneys found one document that dealt with a saw injury.
"This is the kind of activity that people look at that engenders outright disgust for the legal profession," Hurley told Moss. "It is shameful." """
Source of Post
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/home-depot-called-arrogant-ordered-to-pay-ex-680890.html
the Shareholders of Intel, Lockheed Martin, Sony, Warner Bros. , Time Warner Inc., it is time to wake up and hold your CEO accountable for the Damages YOU will SOON Suffer...
www.MassiveShareholderFraud.com
Posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Showing posts with label Time Warner Inc.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Time Warner Inc.. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications to Shareholders?
YOU Bet She Does...
How Will She Explain what She has Let Happen
in a Trillion Dollar Liability ...???
It seems from Many documents at www.Iviewit.TV That Mary Shapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.
Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?
$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?
What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.
The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .
Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?
Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..
It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Shapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..
posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf
http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html
http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated
http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html
Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..
Crystal Cox Blogger
How Will She Explain what She has Let Happen
in a Trillion Dollar Liability ...???
It seems from Many documents at www.Iviewit.TV That Mary Shapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.
Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?
$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?
What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.
The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .
Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?
Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..
It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Shapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..
posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf
http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html
http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated
http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html
Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..
Crystal Cox Blogger
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Blatant and Obvious Fraud on the US Court System. Patent Office Fraud, Patent Attorney Corruption, Supreme Court Corruption, Trillions of Dollars.
The Iviewit Stolen Patent Story is very interesting to Say the Least as it Exposes Corruption in US Courts, Exposes Patent Attorneys Ease in which they can Steal Inventions, Exposes Supreme Court Judges and Attorney Bar Association that Cover Up the Corruption, Side Deals and Favoritism among preferred - Elite - Wealthy Attorneys, and Really wakes you up to Big Corporations Like Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Time Warner Inc., Sony, and all the Other major Corporations participating in this Cover Up to Deny Inventors Rights, Deny Due Process and Continue Using their Technology - Simply Ignore 8 and 10 year old Contracts, Blatantly VIOLATED Confidentiality Agreements and violating Law after Law with thus far - No Accountability.
The US Patent Office Deny Rights of Inventors and Seem to be Holding up Investigations for year after year while Real Peoples Live are On Hold and In Danger.
The US Bankruptcy Court System has blatant Obvious Proven Fraud as in the Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy - the Conflicts of Interest and Illegal behavior and For Some Reason, thus far the US Bankruptcy Courts can't seem to see what has happened.
And though there are Literally thousands of Pages of documents of Proof, the US Court Sytem Seems to be Aiding And Abetting the Criminals in all this, Seemingly just because they are Major US Corporations, Meg-Law Firms, Court Judges, Supreme Court Judges, and State Attorney Bars - there is so Much Corruption Truly Where Does One Begin.
We Begin by Understanding the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story, who the Criminals Are, Who are the seemingly Protected Patent Attorneys in all this, Which Supreme Court Judges are Looking the Other way to this Blatant and Obvious Corruption, Who in the State Attorney Bar Complaint Process is Allow this. Once we understand this at least to Some Degree we can see how this happens in the US Courts and How those In Judicial Power Either Willing Let it Happen, Accept Bribes and Pay Offs, or are Threatened Somehow.
How Does a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist Get Pulled Off and For over a Decade So Far.
Well Go to the Links Below and Find Out More on How this Level of Corruption Happens in Your United States Court System.
Click Here to Read what Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J had to Say in August of 2008 about the Fraud, Deceit, and Misrepresentation in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.
Also Check Out www.DeniedPatent.com for Names and Players and How A Theft of this Magnitude Can Be Pulled Off in the United States.
Also Go to www.Iviewit.TV Scroll Down Read Through some Documents, I know it is a Lot to Take in, but boy does it Open your Eyes to How Easy Trillion Dollar Heists Really are when you Know the Right People and have the Right Money.
The US Patent Office Deny Rights of Inventors and Seem to be Holding up Investigations for year after year while Real Peoples Live are On Hold and In Danger.
The US Bankruptcy Court System has blatant Obvious Proven Fraud as in the Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy - the Conflicts of Interest and Illegal behavior and For Some Reason, thus far the US Bankruptcy Courts can't seem to see what has happened.
And though there are Literally thousands of Pages of documents of Proof, the US Court Sytem Seems to be Aiding And Abetting the Criminals in all this, Seemingly just because they are Major US Corporations, Meg-Law Firms, Court Judges, Supreme Court Judges, and State Attorney Bars - there is so Much Corruption Truly Where Does One Begin.
We Begin by Understanding the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story, who the Criminals Are, Who are the seemingly Protected Patent Attorneys in all this, Which Supreme Court Judges are Looking the Other way to this Blatant and Obvious Corruption, Who in the State Attorney Bar Complaint Process is Allow this. Once we understand this at least to Some Degree we can see how this happens in the US Courts and How those In Judicial Power Either Willing Let it Happen, Accept Bribes and Pay Offs, or are Threatened Somehow.
How Does a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist Get Pulled Off and For over a Decade So Far.
Well Go to the Links Below and Find Out More on How this Level of Corruption Happens in Your United States Court System.
Click Here to Read what Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J had to Say in August of 2008 about the Fraud, Deceit, and Misrepresentation in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.
Also Check Out www.DeniedPatent.com for Names and Players and How A Theft of this Magnitude Can Be Pulled Off in the United States.
Also Go to www.Iviewit.TV Scroll Down Read Through some Documents, I know it is a Lot to Take in, but boy does it Open your Eyes to How Easy Trillion Dollar Heists Really are when you Know the Right People and have the Right Money.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Time Warner Inc. Deemed MOST Ethical - and they Say Ethics Pays - that is a Flat Out Lie. Time Warner Inc. is NOT Ethical.
Time Warner Inc. Deemed One of the Worlds Moth Ethical Companies for 2009. This is a Flat Out Lie, Who Owns the Company putting out this Gibberish? We intend to Tell You that Coming Soon. How Does a Company that has an UnDisclosed Trillion Dollar Liability come of as the Most Ethical Company or one of, in the World? SHOCKING to Say the Least...
""2009 World’s Most Ethical Companies Selection Process:
A methodology committee of leading attorneys, professors, government officials and organization leaders, assisted Ethisphere in creating the scoring methodology for the World’s Most Ethical Companies awards. ""
Jeffrey Bewkes
Link to Source of this Gibberish
http://ethisphere.com/wme2009/
Jeffrey Bewkes
Time Warner Inc. is NOT Ethical.
Read the Iviewit Docuements, the TRUTH is THERE plain and Simple
and Time Warner Inc. Denies the Inventors their Rights after
Making Billions Upond Billions. for them and their Shareholder.
Jeffrey Bewkes, Time Warner Inc
Related Posts
http://www.trialbyblog.com/search/label/Time%20Warner%20Inc.
Jeffrey Bewkes
""2009 World’s Most Ethical Companies Selection Process:
A methodology committee of leading attorneys, professors, government officials and organization leaders, assisted Ethisphere in creating the scoring methodology for the World’s Most Ethical Companies awards. ""
Jeffrey Bewkes
Link to Source of this Gibberish
http://ethisphere.com/wme2009/
Jeffrey Bewkes
Time Warner Inc. is NOT Ethical.
Read the Iviewit Docuements, the TRUTH is THERE plain and Simple
and Time Warner Inc. Denies the Inventors their Rights after
Making Billions Upond Billions. for them and their Shareholder.
Jeffrey Bewkes, Time Warner Inc
Related Posts
http://www.trialbyblog.com/search/label/Time%20Warner%20Inc.
Jeffrey Bewkes
Who at Time Warner Inc. is ALLOW this Blatant Sharehold Fraud To Continue? And Not Honoring Iviewit Contracts?
Board of Directors Time Warner Inc.
imagine the Connections these Folks must have
imagine the Connections these Folks must have
in Order to Keep the Iviewity Scandal Quiet
Jeffrey L. Bewkes
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Time Warner Inc.
Jeffrey L. Bewkes
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Time Warner Inc.
Jessica P. Einhorn
Dean, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University
Time Warner Inc. Says This...
"Strong executive leadership ensures we stay at the forefront of the industry."
I Say, Time Warner Inc. Stays Ahead By STEALING Technology and NOT honoring Contracts with those who Invented the Technology.
$$$$
Time Warner Inc. is also - Global Media Group - Time Inc. - Warner Bros. Entertainment - Turner Broadcasting System - Home Box Office .
How Can ALL Stand By and let This Injustice Happen.. do they Simply think it is NOT True, even with all the Proof Easily Available?
$$$$$
Senior Corporate Executives - Time Warner Inc.
Jeffrey L. Bewkes
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Edward I. Adler
Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications
Paul T. Cappuccio
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Patricia Fili-Krushel
Executive Vice President, Administration
John K. Martin
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Carol A. Melton
Executive Vice President, Global Public Policy
Olaf Olafsson
Executive Vice
$$$$$$
Turner Broadcasting System
Philip I. Kent
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew T. Heller
Vice Chairman
John E. Kampfe
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Louise Sams
Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
TBS, Inc., and President, TBS International
Kelly Regal
Executive Vice President
Jim McCaffrey
Executive Vice President, Operations
and Strategy, and Chief Strategy Officer
David R. Levy
President, Sales, Distribution and Sports
Jim Walton
President, CNN Worldwide
Philip I. Kent
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew T. Heller
Vice Chairman
John E. Kampfe
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Louise Sams
Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
TBS, Inc., and President, TBS International
Kelly Regal
Executive Vice President
Jim McCaffrey
Executive Vice President, Operations and Strategy,
and Chief Strategy Officer
David R. Levy
President, Sales, Distribution and Sports
Jim Walton
President, CNN Worldwide
$$$$$$
Warner Brothers Entertainment
Barry M. Meyer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Alan F. Horn
President and Chief Operating Officer
Susan Fleishman
Executive Vice President, Worldwide Corporate Communications and Public Affairs
Richard Fox
Executive Vice President, International
Jeff Robinov
President, Warner Bros. Pictures Group
John Rogovin
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Edward A. Romano
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Bruce Rosenblum
President, Warner Bros. Television Group
Kevin Tsujihara
President, Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Group
Kiko Washington
Executive Vice President, Worldwide Human Resources
Warner Bros. Entertainment Subsidiary Heads
Darcy Antonellis
President, Warner Bros. Technical Operations
Paul Broucek
President, Music, Warner Bros. Pictures
Dan Fellman
President, Domestic Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures
Thomas Gewecke
President, Warner Bros. Digital Distribution
Jon Gilbert
President, Warner Bros. Studio Facilities
Brad Globe
President, Warner Bros. Consumer Products
Sue Kroll
President, Worldwide Marketing, Warner Bros. Pictures
Veronika Kwan-Rubinek
President, Distribution, Warner Bros. Pictures International
John Maatta
Chief Operating Officer, The CW Television Network
Gregg Maday
Executive Vice President, Warner Bros. Theatre Ventures
Kevin McCormick
President, Production, Warner Bros. Pictures
Hilary Estey McLoughlin
President, Telepictures Productions
Diane Nelson
President, DC Entertainment
Millard Ochs
President, Warner Bros. International Cinemas
Steve Papazian
President, Worldwide Physical Production, Warner Bros. Pictures
Peter Roth
President, Warner Bros. Television
Ronald Sanders
President, Warner Home Video
Jeffrey Schlesinger
President, Warner Bros. International Television Distribution
Steven Spira
President, Worldwide Business Affairs, Warner Bros. Pictures
Martin Tremblay
President, Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment
Ken Werner
President, Warner Bros. Domestic Television Distribution
$$$$$$
Global Media Group
Mark D’Arcy
President and Chief Creative Officer, Time Warner Global Media Group and Senior Vice President, Time Warner
Kristen O’Hara
Senior Vice President and Managing Director
$$$$$$
Time Inc.
Ann S. Moore
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
John Huey
Editor-In-Chief
Sylvia Auton
Executive Vice President
Howard Averill
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kerry Bessey
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Maurice Edelson
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Stephanie George
Executive Vice President
John Squires
Executive Vice President
Brian Wolfe
Executive Vice President, Consumer Marketing
Wayne Powers
President, Time Inc. Media Group
Leslie Picard
President, Time Inc. Corporate Sales and Marketing
Dawn Bridges
Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications
$$$$$$
HBO
Bill Nelson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Eric Kessler
Co-President
Richard Plepler
Co-President
Len Amato
President, HBO Films
Kary Antholis
President, HBO Miniseries
David Baldwin
Executive Vice President, Program Planning
Steve Davidson
Executive Vice President, Affiliate Sales
Michael Gabriel
Executive Vice President, Information Technology and CIO
Ross Greenburg
President, HBO Sports
Bruce Grivetti
Executive Vice President, Business Affairs and Production
Michael Lombardo
President, Programming Group and West Coast Operations
Scott McElhone
Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
Henry McGee
President, HBO Home Entertainment
Courteney Monroe
Executive Vice President, Consumer Marketing
Sue Naegle
President, HBO Entertainment
Sheila Nevins
President, HBO Documentary Films
Robert Roth
Executive Vice President and CFO
Quentin Schaffer
Executive Vice President, Corporate Communications
Charles Schreger
President, Programming Sales
Olivia Smashum
Executive Vice President, Affiliate Marketing
Simon Sutton
President, Programming Distribution and International
Tom Woodbury
General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Network Business Affairs
Robert Zitter
Executive Vice President, Technology and CTO
Care about this HUGE Time Warner Liability?
Jeffrey Bewkes
Related Posts
Jeffrey Bewkes
Time Warner - WBOL - Fraud Against Shareholders, Lies about Liability and NOT honoring Contracts, Why?
Why Did the SEC allow Warner Brothers to Split off Aol after they wre warned of a Trillion Dollar Liability that they would certainly be responsible for Some if not all the Damages?
So We have Bills that Show every Charge for the Entire Process of setting up and Supposedly Executing these Contracts such as the one Below.
2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted.
yet AOL was allowed to Split from WBOL, and Warner Bros. Is NOT being MADE to honor these Contracts, Why?
This is FRAUD against the Shareholders as AOL - Time Warner Inc. knew that this Major Liability was NOT accounted for on their Books. So why is Time Warner AOL still ignoring the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors, are they trying to hide assets... no matter how you look at it Time Warner - Time Warner, Warner Bros., WBOL,AOLTW, AOL, Time Warner Inc., Whatever name you have for them... they KNEW and did not share with shareholders a HUGE Debit on their Books.
There is Confidentiality Agreements, and So Much Evidence, All these Names and Players, Contracts, Bills and Still Warner Brothers acts like this Just Does NOT exist... hmmm...
There are BINDING term sheets from 2001 and Still WBOL ignores the rights of those they entered into contract with, WHY?
Warner Bros. Online Videos has NOT been honoring this Contract but using the Technology for around 8 Years now, and after Iviewit Sent them Disclosure of the Issue pending, they Split of AOL, and the SEC has no Issue with this?
Do Warner Brothers Shareholders have ANY issue with any of this ? I Guess they had better Start Considering it's Validity... any Time Now...
Click Here for Contracts and Information from 2001
that Seem to Have Slipped Warner Brothers Mind.
What Does Doug Shapiro, Michael Kopelman at Time Warner Inc. of Time Warner Investor Relations, Have to Say about all of this, I mean Come On are they Denying it Exists?
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1950229,00.html
"NEW YORK – Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) will report its 2009 fourth-quarter and full-year results on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, before the market opens. "
Boy Time Warner Inc. TWX - sure is Proud of what they have done...
More Links to Research This Topic
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm
www.Iviewit.TV
www.DeniedPatent.com
AOL, Time Warner Inc, Iviewit, SEC Fraud, Andrew Y. Choung, IRELL and Manella LLP,WBOL, Warner Bros. Online, Stock Tips
So We have Bills that Show every Charge for the Entire Process of setting up and Supposedly Executing these Contracts such as the one Below.
2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted.
yet AOL was allowed to Split from WBOL, and Warner Bros. Is NOT being MADE to honor these Contracts, Why?
This is FRAUD against the Shareholders as AOL - Time Warner Inc. knew that this Major Liability was NOT accounted for on their Books. So why is Time Warner AOL still ignoring the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors, are they trying to hide assets... no matter how you look at it Time Warner - Time Warner, Warner Bros., WBOL,AOLTW, AOL, Time Warner Inc., Whatever name you have for them... they KNEW and did not share with shareholders a HUGE Debit on their Books.
There is Confidentiality Agreements, and So Much Evidence, All these Names and Players, Contracts, Bills and Still Warner Brothers acts like this Just Does NOT exist... hmmm...
There are BINDING term sheets from 2001 and Still WBOL ignores the rights of those they entered into contract with, WHY?
Warner Bros. Online Videos has NOT been honoring this Contract but using the Technology for around 8 Years now, and after Iviewit Sent them Disclosure of the Issue pending, they Split of AOL, and the SEC has no Issue with this?
Do Warner Brothers Shareholders have ANY issue with any of this ? I Guess they had better Start Considering it's Validity... any Time Now...
Click Here for Contracts and Information from 2001
that Seem to Have Slipped Warner Brothers Mind.
What Does Doug Shapiro, Michael Kopelman at Time Warner Inc. of Time Warner Investor Relations, Have to Say about all of this, I mean Come On are they Denying it Exists?
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1950229,00.html
"NEW YORK – Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) will report its 2009 fourth-quarter and full-year results on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, before the market opens. "
Boy Time Warner Inc. TWX - sure is Proud of what they have done...
More Links to Research This Topic
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm
www.Iviewit.TV
www.DeniedPatent.com
AOL, Time Warner Inc, Iviewit, SEC Fraud, Andrew Y. Choung, IRELL and Manella LLP,WBOL, Warner Bros. Online, Stock Tips
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit - Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.
The Florida Justice System is About as Corrupt as It Gets and the US Department of Justice, the USPTO, the SEC, the FBI, The Florida State Bar, the Florida Supreme Court and all the Corruption out of the New York Supreme Court that is protecting Proskauer Rose in all this.. well it all adds up to THERE is no Justice, and it DOES not matter how much evidence you have, the Corruption is so Thick and there is so many attorneys and judges covering up for those breaking the law and violating your rights that you don't stand a chance.
the Following is From www.Iviewit.TV and well it is some pretty sick stuff, it leaves me hopeless as to the United States Justice System doing anything but making the Rich RICHER and covering for the Criminals...
"The Cover-Up Crimes
The Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to the Whistleblower Anderson Lawsuit, exposes the original violations of federal, state, and international law committed to steal the technologies and additionally exposes a series of ongoing and continuous Cover-Up Crimes.
Cover-up Crimes designed to block due process through violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law, through Conflicts of Interest that act to Obstruct Justice, similar to that claimed by Anderson and committed by the many of the same Public Officials of the New York Supreme Court that Anderson fingers.
Wherever Iviewit and I filed complaints at the State Bars or disciplinary agencies under State Supreme Court aegis’ in New York, Florida and Virginia, each was later found to have MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THROUGH VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW, CREATING THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
Mind blowing conflicts, so outrageous as to find Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York Bar Association, Official at the First Department DDC and one, if not thee, leading ethics lawyer in New York and Nationally, found representing complaints against his Proskauer Partners and Himself in First Department complaints, while having an Official Role at the First Department DDC where the complaints were being investigated. How unethical but true and we will return to this matter further in a moment.
Fraudulent Patent applications and Patents fraudulently issued into the names of others are crimes directly against the United States and Foreign Agencies as there are sworn oaths on the US Patent Office applications by the inventors, so filing fraudulent patents in others names is a Fraud Directly Upon the United States Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities.
Crimes committed by the attorneys directly against government agencies and in violation of Federal Patent Bar Rules, State Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
The crimes also involve not only the creation of fraudulent shell patent filings but fraudulent shell companies for the fraudulent patents to walk out the back door in, all formed by Proskauer and others not properly authorized to create such similarly named entities by the Board of Directors, Investors or management.
All these corporate crimes were violations of hosts of state and federal securities regulations and state incorporation laws, more crimes of fraud against government agencies, again committed in violation of Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
Further, the scheme involved a false and fraudulent Billing fraud using a Florida Civil Court ( ruled by recently elected Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga and a Defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit ), which was filed by Proskauer Rose to the tune of $500,000 plus in Wrongful Fraudulent bills, bills designed to create false debt to the fraudulent companies they created, which contained the fraudulent patent filings.
Using this complex legal scheme which is a Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, the fraudulent companies were then to be bankrupted, after being sued for the fraudulent bills whereby the law firm and lawyers would become the largest creditors in the bankruptcy and seize the fraudulent patents hidden inside the fraudulent companies.
A plan that went extremely wrong when Arthur Andersen and others discovered that there were possible crimes being committed and fraudulent companies created and that this false information was being distributed to investors including, Wayne Huizenga, Ellen DeGeneres, Alanis Morissette, Crossbow Ventures and the Small Business Administration.
The SBA through Crossbow’s SBA loans which were two thirds of the money Crossbow invested makes the US Government one of the most aggrieved investors in Iviewit.
The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Scheme popped up on the horizon at or around the same time the Iviewit companies were in process to close the $25 Million Private Placement financing deal with Wachovia Securities.
No one other than the conspirators of the RICO crimes knew about these illegal legal actions.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy was another legal scheme involving this time, Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, orchestrated by Proskauer Rose referred management Brian Utley and Michael Reale both formerly with IBM and Real 3D Inc. ( Intel, SGI and Lockheed ) on a fraudulent company with fraudulent inventions inside it.
On or about this time, Intel, a minority 20% owner of Real 3D, suddenly bought Real 3D from Lockheed the 70% owner and SGI, a 10% owner, in a publicly undisclosed transaction, taking with it the Iviewit inventions which now are alleged to be on almost EVERY chip manufactured since 1998.
Through the bankruptcy the underlying IP for the inventions would have become owned by the largest creditors to the fraudulent companies, Proskauer Rose and Real 3D.
Again, neither of these illegal legal actions constituting frauds on the courts, the Fraud on the Florida State Court in The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit or the Fraud on the Federal Bankruptcy Court via the illegal Involuntary Bankruptcy were disclosed to Wachovia, Investors, Auditors, Investment Bankers, Shareholders or Management by Proskauer or Foley.
At first, upon learning of the billing lawsuit and Involuntary Bankruptcy, it was unclear why these ILLEGAL legal actions existed and what the motive was, still much of the conspiracy remains unknown but at that time very little was known.
Only later, while investigating the falsified patent applications with the US Patent Office was it discovered that there were fraudulent patents inside the fraudulent similarly named companies involved in the IB, a company that Proskauer created, then sued and then with their referred co-conspirators filed the Involuntary Bankruptcy against.
Companies created without authorization of Shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Investors, and, where the real owners of the fraudulent companies are still unknown and subject of ongoing investigations and calls for Acts of Congress from the US Patent Office to get information regarding the inventions that were involved in the illegal legal schemes and frauds on the courts.
Upon learning of the corporate crimes from Arthur Andersen and much of the information regarding the fraudulent legal schemes by AOLTW / Warner Bros. who were doing due diligence for the Wachovia PPM when they discovered the undisclosed actions, including information that patents filed at the USPTO were not those being given to prospective investors and more.
Immediately, Iviewit retained counsel to investigate if the Billing Lawsuit, the Involuntary Bankruptcy and the thefts of the IP were realities.
Counsel retained by Iviewit found that indeed there were these illegal legal actions and frauds and that the Board of Directors, Management, Investors, Investment Bankers had no knowledge and in fact were distributing the Wachovia PPM which neither mentions the Lawsuit, the Utley IP and other fraudulent IP or the Involuntary Bankruptcy.
Iviewit threw out counsel that was representing the matters without authorization or retainers from the Iviewit companies and that time it was still unknown these companies were fraudulent, as they were similarly and identically named to the legitimate companies and Iviewit counsel began representing the matters instantly.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy found that Brian Utley, Reale and Real 3d all had no employment contract or ANY binding agreement with the Iviewit company they filed against and that matter instantly went away, as soon as, it was discovered.
On the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit, well Proskauer Rose was not so lucky, counsel retained filed a Counter Complaint exposing the basics of the fraud known at the time, I submit this Counter Complaint to this Committee for review, as it too is subject to ongoing federal investigations11.
Again, in this fraud, Proskauer Rose was found suing companies they had no retainers with and the bills were not even in the companies sued names but the judge, Jorge Labarga, refused to even acknowledge the Counter Complaint, filed by Competent Counsel, alleging that the lawyers in the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit perhaps were involved in crimes against the United States and Foreign Nations.
Jorge Labarga refusing the Counter Complaint and then illegally throwing the Lawsuit out but ruling a default judgment against Iviewit for the entire amount of the fraudulent bill, for failure to retain replacement counsel. It should be noted that Labarga on the eve of trial, cancelled the trial with no notice to Iviewit who showed up with two law firms representing their interests.
At the rescheduling hearing, Jorge Labarga dismissed both of Iviewit’s counsel and forced Iviewit to get new counsel for this most complex case in just a few days.
In fact, I submit to this Committee evidence that Jorge Labarga was aware of Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler, William Dick and Brian Utley’s perjurious statements made to his court, under deposition and in response to Bar Complaints, whereby perjured statements were proven prior to his throwing the case.
In one instance, Iviewit Patent Counsel Kenneth Rubenstein makes representation that he is being harassed to come to deposition in the matter as he knows nothing about Iviewit or the Iviewit inventions and inventors and refused to be deposed.
Jorge Labarga had no legal basis to block the deposition so he ordered Rubenstein to deposition, where it became apparent that Kenneth Rubenstein had LIED and PERJURED HIMSELF to the Court and knew far more about Iviewit than his sworn statements12.
Despite this damning and irrefutable evidence of Perjury to his court, Jorge Labarga ruled against Iviewit and buried the case for an undisclosed amount.
Again, information relevant to the case fraud has been submitted to Federal and State authorities.
Who owns all these fraudulent companies remains under investigation and all relevant information pertaining to these crimes have also been submitted to Federal and State Authorities and evidence, witness statements, copies of the fraudulent IP and much more are available in the Evidence Section of the Iviewit Homepage with over 1000 exhibits and hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein for this Committee.
Crimes that if prosecuted would have taken down these powerful law firms overnight and put many of the perpetrators behind bars for more years than Madoff, as these crimes involved crimes directly against Federal, State and International Government Agencies, not merely Iviewit.
As soon as order is restored to the courts handling these matters in conflict and the corruption plaguing the New York Court system as further supported by Anderson regarding these matters is exterminated, these criminals cloaked as law firms and lawyers will be behind bars for eternity with loss of the entire partnerships assets in a successful RICO prosecution.
Knowing that it was all or nothing for the powerful law firms, they had to block due process at every venue at the highest levels, as if any of the complaints, court proceedings or investigations elevated the Billions of Dollars of revenue these firms generate would be gone and legal robes exchanged for prison garb.
Herein lies the motive for the Cover-Up Crimes and Mass of Conflicts of Interest and Violations of virtually all Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Violations and Law that have infected these matters at present.
So thick are the Conflicts that not one person out of all of the courts, disciplinary agencies, law enforcement agencies, even this Committee have signed the requested Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms provided prior to taking action in the matters.
I have provided a Conflict form for the Committee submitted with my Prepared Statement for the June 08, 2009 hearing that did not happen and again have submitted one accompanying this Prepared Statement for my testimony today, again I respectfully demand signing of this COI before the Committee takes action in anyway that may have any impact good or bad on my case.
New York Ethics Complaints Filed in 2003 and Dismissed Without Investigation; The Commissioner of Patents for the US Patent Office and Harry I. Moatz, Director of OED of the US Patent Office lead Federal Investigation of Same Attorneys State Bars and Disciplinary Agencies Dismissed without Investigation; West Palm Beach FBI Joins Patent Fraud Investigation Regarding Fraud Directly Upon the USPTO.
I filed complaints of professional misconduct instantly against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Meltzer, Raymond Joao, Foley and William Dick and continuously since 2003 alleged a host of professional misconduct, adding new Defendants in my lawsuit who became involved in the Cover-Up Crimes such as Krane, Cahill, the First Department and more.
Copies of the complaints can be found on the homepage or in the written Prepared Statement submitted herein to the Committee and in the Exhibit Section at the end of the document and for inclusion into this Committees permanent record, as promised by members of this Committee in accepting this statement.
I also note for this Committee that I fully reported the Iviewit Frauds on the courts committed by those adjudicating the matters in conflicts in both the courts and state disciplinary agencies, to the West Palm Beach FBI office.
Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of that office was already investigating the Iviewit companies’ allegations of Frauds, Fraud on the USPTO, Intellectual Property Theft, Death Threats and the Attempted Murder by Car Bombing of my Family Mini-Van in Boynton Beach, Florida.
According to the FBI, later, Lucchesi and the Iviewit files went, and remain missing at this time, although upon last speaking to Lucchesi, he was on his way to the US Patent Office to begin investigating the Fraud on the US Patent Office with investigators at the US Patent Office.
Moatz confirmed that Lucchesi was in fact working with the US Patent Office regarding the Frauds on the USPTO.
The reporting of these public office crimes to the FBI and the missing investigator, led the FBI West Palm Beach Office to direct me to speak only with the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility ( OPR ) the department responsible for handling misconduct complaints against DOJ & US attorneys. When OPR refused to speak with me, claiming they could not speak with private citizens, Inspector General of the DOJ, Glenn Fine’s Office interceded and the matters where then directed to Alberto Gonzales, then to Michael Mukasey both of them who failed to respond to formal written complaints prior to them fleeing or being forced out of office.
The matters have now been forwarded on to US Attorney General, Eric Holder, Jr. and while we await response from Holder at this time, we have not had a response yet.
Perhaps he is busy investigating the crimes of lawyers for war crimes or the crimes of lawyers in politicizing the DOJ, or the torture memo lawyers who violated international torture treatises and more or perhaps he is busy investigating the lawyers behind the financial market meltdown who have destroyed our economy for the benefit of a few, mostly criminals disguised as lawyers.
A Copy of the Letter to President Barack Obama and Holder can found on the Iviewit Homepage or @
http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080411%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20FBI%20OPR%20letter%20signed%20sent%20and%20printed%20copy.pdf
Ultimately, Iviewit filed a Complaint of Professional Misconduct against NYS First Dept Disciplinary Committee Chief Counsel Cahill, when it was learned that Cahill had allowed Steven C. Krane of Proskauer, an active Official of the First Department to handle complaints against Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein and ultimately himself, Iviewit filed further complaints for Violations of Public Office, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes and Violations of Law against all of them.
Yes, Steven C Krane represented the complaints filed against his firm, partners and himself, all the while concealing multiple conflicts of interest and violations of public offices at the First Department which excluded from such twisted representation.
In Florida at the State Bar we find similarly
Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs
While Krane was handling the complaints he was a member of the First Department and kept this Conflict undisclosed while he levied responses on behalf of his clients Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that were attempts to smear the Iviewit companies and myself, claiming Iviewit was a failed dot com and that Kenneth Rubenstein never heard of Iviewit and that Proskauer knew nothing about the patents, all while failing to disclose his First Department Roles and CONFLICT.
Krane, also in his role at the time as immediate past PRESIDENT of the NYSBA had public office rules barring his handling of disciplinary complaints for a period of one year after his service.
His representations of his firm and Proskauer Rose falling within that blackout and Krane again fails to disclose this Public Office Rule and Regulation that prevented his representation.
It is interesting to note that without knowing of the concealed conflicts and violations of public offices at the time, how the complaints within the First Department, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the State Bar and Disciplinary Committees and despite the fact that the Federal Patent Bar, USPTO, USPTO OED and FBI were investigating them, how the state complaints had been “Stalled” Indefinitely. It was not until discovering the conflicts that it became overwhelming apparent.
Iviewit has found Proskauer or Foley in every instance where there was dismissal with no investigation by a State Bar or Disciplinary, much later into the investigations, the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices that acted as the glue that bound the Cover-Up causing the delays and dismissals without investigation, even as the First Department Court Unanimously Ordered Krane and the others for formal and procedural “INVESTIGATIONS” based on the Krane and Cahill conflict information.
It was only recently exposed in July 2007 that the underlying "Patentgate" inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan's top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Cahill's "retirement" was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter and other unfolding scandal as Anderson began surfacing with Whistleblower allegations, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
Then the Whistleblower Anderson came along to confirm ones worst nightmares about the Disciplinary Committees and Courts of New York. It should be noted that Cahill was later deposed in Anderson. From an article in Expose Corrupt Courts, I quote,
July 16 2007 DOJ Widens Patentgate Inquiry:
In a letter dated July 16, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI investigation that involves an almost surreal story of the theft of nearly 30 U.S. Patents, and other intellectual property, worth billions of dollars.
The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
The Fox and the Hen House
It was only recently exposed in July that the underlying “Patentgate” inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan’s top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Mr. Cahill’s “retirement” was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
While no one can exactly figure out how inquiries under Mr. Cahill’s charge went so awry, one thing is certain. At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar increased their own investigation into the same matter implicating the same attorneys. (Note: Mr. Cahill’s replacement was recently decided, and an announcement is expected as early as next week by the Appellate Division, First Department Presiding Justice, Jonathan Lippman.)
Article @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson –Allegations of Coercion, Assault, Title 18 and State Obstruction of Justice via Official Supreme Court Document Destruction Inside the First Department by Public Officials, for “Favored Law Firms”
Christine Anderson provides a pivotal link in her heroic Whistleblowing revelations that shed insight into the criminal behavior running rampant at the highest levels of the First Department, including Coercion, Obstruction, Tampering with Official Investigatory Files, Threatening Federal Witnesses, Document Destruction and Physical Assaults on a Whistleblower tying Iviewit to her own complaint.
Anderson’s original lawsuit filing discussed the impact of Iviewit on her situation relating to a Complaint filed against Cahill and others13, as part of her allegations. Anderson’s Original Complaint can be found at Iviewit Homepage, Evidence Link or @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
http://iviewit.tv/press/press1.pdf
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys.
I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson.
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson.
Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson.
Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.""
Source of POST
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Iviewit
More on the Stolen Iviewit Patents at
www.DeniedPatent.com
RICO
Wachovia, Bankruptcy Corruption, Brian Utley
Senator John L. Sampson
the Following is From www.Iviewit.TV and well it is some pretty sick stuff, it leaves me hopeless as to the United States Justice System doing anything but making the Rich RICHER and covering for the Criminals...
"The Cover-Up Crimes
The Twelve Trillion Dollar, Federal RICO Lawsuit “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin to the Whistleblower Anderson Lawsuit, exposes the original violations of federal, state, and international law committed to steal the technologies and additionally exposes a series of ongoing and continuous Cover-Up Crimes.
Cover-up Crimes designed to block due process through violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law, through Conflicts of Interest that act to Obstruct Justice, similar to that claimed by Anderson and committed by the many of the same Public Officials of the New York Supreme Court that Anderson fingers.
Wherever Iviewit and I filed complaints at the State Bars or disciplinary agencies under State Supreme Court aegis’ in New York, Florida and Virginia, each was later found to have MAJOR CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THROUGH VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW, CREATING THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
Mind blowing conflicts, so outrageous as to find Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York Bar Association, Official at the First Department DDC and one, if not thee, leading ethics lawyer in New York and Nationally, found representing complaints against his Proskauer Partners and Himself in First Department complaints, while having an Official Role at the First Department DDC where the complaints were being investigated. How unethical but true and we will return to this matter further in a moment.
Fraudulent Patent applications and Patents fraudulently issued into the names of others are crimes directly against the United States and Foreign Agencies as there are sworn oaths on the US Patent Office applications by the inventors, so filing fraudulent patents in others names is a Fraud Directly Upon the United States Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities.
Crimes committed by the attorneys directly against government agencies and in violation of Federal Patent Bar Rules, State Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
The crimes also involve not only the creation of fraudulent shell patent filings but fraudulent shell companies for the fraudulent patents to walk out the back door in, all formed by Proskauer and others not properly authorized to create such similarly named entities by the Board of Directors, Investors or management.
All these corporate crimes were violations of hosts of state and federal securities regulations and state incorporation laws, more crimes of fraud against government agencies, again committed in violation of Attorney Conduct Codes and Law.
Further, the scheme involved a false and fraudulent Billing fraud using a Florida Civil Court ( ruled by recently elected Florida Supreme Court Judge Jorge Labarga and a Defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit ), which was filed by Proskauer Rose to the tune of $500,000 plus in Wrongful Fraudulent bills, bills designed to create false debt to the fraudulent companies they created, which contained the fraudulent patent filings.
Using this complex legal scheme which is a Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, the fraudulent companies were then to be bankrupted, after being sued for the fraudulent bills whereby the law firm and lawyers would become the largest creditors in the bankruptcy and seize the fraudulent patents hidden inside the fraudulent companies.
A plan that went extremely wrong when Arthur Andersen and others discovered that there were possible crimes being committed and fraudulent companies created and that this false information was being distributed to investors including, Wayne Huizenga, Ellen DeGeneres, Alanis Morissette, Crossbow Ventures and the Small Business Administration.
The SBA through Crossbow’s SBA loans which were two thirds of the money Crossbow invested makes the US Government one of the most aggrieved investors in Iviewit.
The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Scheme popped up on the horizon at or around the same time the Iviewit companies were in process to close the $25 Million Private Placement financing deal with Wachovia Securities.
No one other than the conspirators of the RICO crimes knew about these illegal legal actions.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy was another legal scheme involving this time, Fraud on a Federal Bankruptcy Court, orchestrated by Proskauer Rose referred management Brian Utley and Michael Reale both formerly with IBM and Real 3D Inc. ( Intel, SGI and Lockheed ) on a fraudulent company with fraudulent inventions inside it.
On or about this time, Intel, a minority 20% owner of Real 3D, suddenly bought Real 3D from Lockheed the 70% owner and SGI, a 10% owner, in a publicly undisclosed transaction, taking with it the Iviewit inventions which now are alleged to be on almost EVERY chip manufactured since 1998.
Through the bankruptcy the underlying IP for the inventions would have become owned by the largest creditors to the fraudulent companies, Proskauer Rose and Real 3D.
Again, neither of these illegal legal actions constituting frauds on the courts, the Fraud on the Florida State Court in The Proskauer Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit or the Fraud on the Federal Bankruptcy Court via the illegal Involuntary Bankruptcy were disclosed to Wachovia, Investors, Auditors, Investment Bankers, Shareholders or Management by Proskauer or Foley.
At first, upon learning of the billing lawsuit and Involuntary Bankruptcy, it was unclear why these ILLEGAL legal actions existed and what the motive was, still much of the conspiracy remains unknown but at that time very little was known.
Only later, while investigating the falsified patent applications with the US Patent Office was it discovered that there were fraudulent patents inside the fraudulent similarly named companies involved in the IB, a company that Proskauer created, then sued and then with their referred co-conspirators filed the Involuntary Bankruptcy against.
Companies created without authorization of Shareholders, the Board of Directors or the Investors, and, where the real owners of the fraudulent companies are still unknown and subject of ongoing investigations and calls for Acts of Congress from the US Patent Office to get information regarding the inventions that were involved in the illegal legal schemes and frauds on the courts.
Upon learning of the corporate crimes from Arthur Andersen and much of the information regarding the fraudulent legal schemes by AOLTW / Warner Bros. who were doing due diligence for the Wachovia PPM when they discovered the undisclosed actions, including information that patents filed at the USPTO were not those being given to prospective investors and more.
Immediately, Iviewit retained counsel to investigate if the Billing Lawsuit, the Involuntary Bankruptcy and the thefts of the IP were realities.
Counsel retained by Iviewit found that indeed there were these illegal legal actions and frauds and that the Board of Directors, Management, Investors, Investment Bankers had no knowledge and in fact were distributing the Wachovia PPM which neither mentions the Lawsuit, the Utley IP and other fraudulent IP or the Involuntary Bankruptcy.
Iviewit threw out counsel that was representing the matters without authorization or retainers from the Iviewit companies and that time it was still unknown these companies were fraudulent, as they were similarly and identically named to the legitimate companies and Iviewit counsel began representing the matters instantly.
The Involuntary Bankruptcy found that Brian Utley, Reale and Real 3d all had no employment contract or ANY binding agreement with the Iviewit company they filed against and that matter instantly went away, as soon as, it was discovered.
On the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit, well Proskauer Rose was not so lucky, counsel retained filed a Counter Complaint exposing the basics of the fraud known at the time, I submit this Counter Complaint to this Committee for review, as it too is subject to ongoing federal investigations11.
Again, in this fraud, Proskauer Rose was found suing companies they had no retainers with and the bills were not even in the companies sued names but the judge, Jorge Labarga, refused to even acknowledge the Counter Complaint, filed by Competent Counsel, alleging that the lawyers in the Fraudulent Billing Lawsuit perhaps were involved in crimes against the United States and Foreign Nations.
Jorge Labarga refusing the Counter Complaint and then illegally throwing the Lawsuit out but ruling a default judgment against Iviewit for the entire amount of the fraudulent bill, for failure to retain replacement counsel. It should be noted that Labarga on the eve of trial, cancelled the trial with no notice to Iviewit who showed up with two law firms representing their interests.
At the rescheduling hearing, Jorge Labarga dismissed both of Iviewit’s counsel and forced Iviewit to get new counsel for this most complex case in just a few days.
In fact, I submit to this Committee evidence that Jorge Labarga was aware of Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler, William Dick and Brian Utley’s perjurious statements made to his court, under deposition and in response to Bar Complaints, whereby perjured statements were proven prior to his throwing the case.
In one instance, Iviewit Patent Counsel Kenneth Rubenstein makes representation that he is being harassed to come to deposition in the matter as he knows nothing about Iviewit or the Iviewit inventions and inventors and refused to be deposed.
Jorge Labarga had no legal basis to block the deposition so he ordered Rubenstein to deposition, where it became apparent that Kenneth Rubenstein had LIED and PERJURED HIMSELF to the Court and knew far more about Iviewit than his sworn statements12.
Despite this damning and irrefutable evidence of Perjury to his court, Jorge Labarga ruled against Iviewit and buried the case for an undisclosed amount.
Again, information relevant to the case fraud has been submitted to Federal and State authorities.
Who owns all these fraudulent companies remains under investigation and all relevant information pertaining to these crimes have also been submitted to Federal and State Authorities and evidence, witness statements, copies of the fraudulent IP and much more are available in the Evidence Section of the Iviewit Homepage with over 1000 exhibits and hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein for this Committee.
Crimes that if prosecuted would have taken down these powerful law firms overnight and put many of the perpetrators behind bars for more years than Madoff, as these crimes involved crimes directly against Federal, State and International Government Agencies, not merely Iviewit.
As soon as order is restored to the courts handling these matters in conflict and the corruption plaguing the New York Court system as further supported by Anderson regarding these matters is exterminated, these criminals cloaked as law firms and lawyers will be behind bars for eternity with loss of the entire partnerships assets in a successful RICO prosecution.
Knowing that it was all or nothing for the powerful law firms, they had to block due process at every venue at the highest levels, as if any of the complaints, court proceedings or investigations elevated the Billions of Dollars of revenue these firms generate would be gone and legal robes exchanged for prison garb.
Herein lies the motive for the Cover-Up Crimes and Mass of Conflicts of Interest and Violations of virtually all Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Violations and Law that have infected these matters at present.
So thick are the Conflicts that not one person out of all of the courts, disciplinary agencies, law enforcement agencies, even this Committee have signed the requested Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms provided prior to taking action in the matters.
I have provided a Conflict form for the Committee submitted with my Prepared Statement for the June 08, 2009 hearing that did not happen and again have submitted one accompanying this Prepared Statement for my testimony today, again I respectfully demand signing of this COI before the Committee takes action in anyway that may have any impact good or bad on my case.
New York Ethics Complaints Filed in 2003 and Dismissed Without Investigation; The Commissioner of Patents for the US Patent Office and Harry I. Moatz, Director of OED of the US Patent Office lead Federal Investigation of Same Attorneys State Bars and Disciplinary Agencies Dismissed without Investigation; West Palm Beach FBI Joins Patent Fraud Investigation Regarding Fraud Directly Upon the USPTO.
I filed complaints of professional misconduct instantly against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Meltzer, Raymond Joao, Foley and William Dick and continuously since 2003 alleged a host of professional misconduct, adding new Defendants in my lawsuit who became involved in the Cover-Up Crimes such as Krane, Cahill, the First Department and more.
Copies of the complaints can be found on the homepage or in the written Prepared Statement submitted herein to the Committee and in the Exhibit Section at the end of the document and for inclusion into this Committees permanent record, as promised by members of this Committee in accepting this statement.
I also note for this Committee that I fully reported the Iviewit Frauds on the courts committed by those adjudicating the matters in conflicts in both the courts and state disciplinary agencies, to the West Palm Beach FBI office.
Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of that office was already investigating the Iviewit companies’ allegations of Frauds, Fraud on the USPTO, Intellectual Property Theft, Death Threats and the Attempted Murder by Car Bombing of my Family Mini-Van in Boynton Beach, Florida.
According to the FBI, later, Lucchesi and the Iviewit files went, and remain missing at this time, although upon last speaking to Lucchesi, he was on his way to the US Patent Office to begin investigating the Fraud on the US Patent Office with investigators at the US Patent Office.
Moatz confirmed that Lucchesi was in fact working with the US Patent Office regarding the Frauds on the USPTO.
The reporting of these public office crimes to the FBI and the missing investigator, led the FBI West Palm Beach Office to direct me to speak only with the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility ( OPR ) the department responsible for handling misconduct complaints against DOJ & US attorneys. When OPR refused to speak with me, claiming they could not speak with private citizens, Inspector General of the DOJ, Glenn Fine’s Office interceded and the matters where then directed to Alberto Gonzales, then to Michael Mukasey both of them who failed to respond to formal written complaints prior to them fleeing or being forced out of office.
The matters have now been forwarded on to US Attorney General, Eric Holder, Jr. and while we await response from Holder at this time, we have not had a response yet.
Perhaps he is busy investigating the crimes of lawyers for war crimes or the crimes of lawyers in politicizing the DOJ, or the torture memo lawyers who violated international torture treatises and more or perhaps he is busy investigating the lawyers behind the financial market meltdown who have destroyed our economy for the benefit of a few, mostly criminals disguised as lawyers.
A Copy of the Letter to President Barack Obama and Holder can found on the Iviewit Homepage or @
http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
and http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080411%20Iviewit%20Response%20to%20FBI%20OPR%20letter%20signed%20sent%20and%20printed%20copy.pdf
Ultimately, Iviewit filed a Complaint of Professional Misconduct against NYS First Dept Disciplinary Committee Chief Counsel Cahill, when it was learned that Cahill had allowed Steven C. Krane of Proskauer, an active Official of the First Department to handle complaints against Proskauer Rose and Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein and ultimately himself, Iviewit filed further complaints for Violations of Public Office, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes and Violations of Law against all of them.
Yes, Steven C Krane represented the complaints filed against his firm, partners and himself, all the while concealing multiple conflicts of interest and violations of public offices at the First Department which excluded from such twisted representation.
In Florida at the State Bar we find similarly
Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs
While Krane was handling the complaints he was a member of the First Department and kept this Conflict undisclosed while he levied responses on behalf of his clients Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that were attempts to smear the Iviewit companies and myself, claiming Iviewit was a failed dot com and that Kenneth Rubenstein never heard of Iviewit and that Proskauer knew nothing about the patents, all while failing to disclose his First Department Roles and CONFLICT.
Krane, also in his role at the time as immediate past PRESIDENT of the NYSBA had public office rules barring his handling of disciplinary complaints for a period of one year after his service.
His representations of his firm and Proskauer Rose falling within that blackout and Krane again fails to disclose this Public Office Rule and Regulation that prevented his representation.
It is interesting to note that without knowing of the concealed conflicts and violations of public offices at the time, how the complaints within the First Department, despite the overwhelming evidence presented to the State Bar and Disciplinary Committees and despite the fact that the Federal Patent Bar, USPTO, USPTO OED and FBI were investigating them, how the state complaints had been “Stalled” Indefinitely. It was not until discovering the conflicts that it became overwhelming apparent.
Iviewit has found Proskauer or Foley in every instance where there was dismissal with no investigation by a State Bar or Disciplinary, much later into the investigations, the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices that acted as the glue that bound the Cover-Up causing the delays and dismissals without investigation, even as the First Department Court Unanimously Ordered Krane and the others for formal and procedural “INVESTIGATIONS” based on the Krane and Cahill conflict information.
It was only recently exposed in July 2007 that the underlying "Patentgate" inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan's top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Cahill's "retirement" was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter and other unfolding scandal as Anderson began surfacing with Whistleblower allegations, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
Then the Whistleblower Anderson came along to confirm ones worst nightmares about the Disciplinary Committees and Courts of New York. It should be noted that Cahill was later deposed in Anderson. From an article in Expose Corrupt Courts, I quote,
July 16 2007 DOJ Widens Patentgate Inquiry:
In a letter dated July 16, 2007, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, announced from its Washington, D.C. headquarters that it was expanding its investigation into a bizarrely stalled FBI investigation that involves an almost surreal story of the theft of nearly 30 U.S. Patents, and other intellectual property, worth billions of dollars.
The probe reaches some of New York's most prominent politicians and judges, and has already proven to be a stunning embarrassment to the State's ethics watchdog committees.
The Fox and the Hen House
It was only recently exposed in July that the underlying “Patentgate” inquiries were effectively buried, or derailed, under the leadership of Manhattan’s top State ethics Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill, Esq. Mr. Cahill’s “retirement” was then quickly announced after his own ethical failings in the Patentgate matter, along with other ethics complaints that were made, became known.
While no one can exactly figure out how inquiries under Mr. Cahill’s charge went so awry, one thing is certain. At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar increased their own investigation into the same matter implicating the same attorneys. (Note: Mr. Cahill’s replacement was recently decided, and an announcement is expected as early as next week by the Appellate Division, First Department Presiding Justice, Jonathan Lippman.)
Article @ http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/08/justice-dept-widens-patentgate-probe.html
The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson –Allegations of Coercion, Assault, Title 18 and State Obstruction of Justice via Official Supreme Court Document Destruction Inside the First Department by Public Officials, for “Favored Law Firms”
Christine Anderson provides a pivotal link in her heroic Whistleblowing revelations that shed insight into the criminal behavior running rampant at the highest levels of the First Department, including Coercion, Obstruction, Tampering with Official Investigatory Files, Threatening Federal Witnesses, Document Destruction and Physical Assaults on a Whistleblower tying Iviewit to her own complaint.
Anderson’s original lawsuit filing discussed the impact of Iviewit on her situation relating to a Complaint filed against Cahill and others13, as part of her allegations. Anderson’s Original Complaint can be found at Iviewit Homepage, Evidence Link or @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
http://iviewit.tv/press/press1.pdf
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys.
I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson.
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson.
Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson.
Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.""
Source of POST
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Iviewit
More on the Stolen Iviewit Patents at
www.DeniedPatent.com
RICO
Wachovia, Bankruptcy Corruption, Brian Utley
Senator John L. Sampson
Monday, January 4, 2010
John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell - Kenneth Rubenstein
Warner Brothers Insider Discusses Kenneth Rubenstein a
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...
Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...
Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either.
Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.
John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell All have Known about this for Around 8 Years, and Have Done NOTHING to make it Right or to Warn Time Warner Inc. Stock Holders of this HUGE Liability. Where is Kevin Tsujihara and the Other Big Wigs at Warner in all This ? Well We intend to Tell you MORE with Each Passing Day.....
Subject: Iviewit
John,
In all the review we have done with Ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.
I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to Ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate.
At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.
Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.
We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.
In the fall of 2000 Iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.
Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing.
I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured,
If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.
As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW. I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.
Thanx,
David "
Source of Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins, Chuck Dages and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right?
My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.
Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company.
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...
Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...
Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either.
Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.
John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell All have Known about this for Around 8 Years, and Have Done NOTHING to make it Right or to Warn Time Warner Inc. Stock Holders of this HUGE Liability. Where is Kevin Tsujihara and the Other Big Wigs at Warner in all This ? Well We intend to Tell you MORE with Each Passing Day.....
$$$$$
Smoking Gun Email Sent 8 Years Ago and Warner Bros. DID not Care then and they Do NOT Care Now. Why is Warner Bros. Above the Law, is it all Money and Who You Know?
$$$$$
"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM
To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
John Calkins
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;
Chuck Dages
Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com
Alan E. Bell
$$$$$
"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM
To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
John Calkins
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;
Chuck Dages
Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com
Alan E. Bell
Subject: Iviewit
John,
In all the review we have done with Ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.
I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to Ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate.
At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.
Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.
We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.
In the fall of 2000 Iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.
Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing.
I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured,
as Jack Scanlon kept me up to date.
When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.
This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand. This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.
I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.
We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.
So to the other perspective....
We have an opportunity to establish a license with ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN.
When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.
This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand. This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.
I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.
We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.
So to the other perspective....
We have an opportunity to establish a license with ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN.
In good faith we signed the confidentiality agreement, iviewit revealed their processes and techniques, and we now use those techniques in encoding.
As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.
I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.
As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.
I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.
If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.
As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW. I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.
Thanx,
David "
Source of Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins, Chuck Dages and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right?
My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.
Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company.
They Stole this Technology plain and Simple, they knowingly stole it, even one of their own questioned them on it and Warner Bros. Entertainment did NOTHING about it. Doesn't this Put Warner Bros. Entertainment shareholders at Risk?
Isn't the Company Liable?
Or is Warner Bros. Entertainment simply NOT worried because they know they are Above the Law with their Political and Court Connections and they are in the "Who You Know" Club?
Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Do you Have Any Information on Any of These Names and Players. Seriously Email Me your Story, it is Time to STOP Mega-Corporations from STOMPING on the Rights of Inventors.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Do you Have Any Information on Any of These Names and Players. Seriously Email Me your Story, it is Time to STOP Mega-Corporations from STOMPING on the Rights of Inventors.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
the Truth
John Calkins - McKinsey and Company - Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc. - Lieberfarb and Associates - Senior Vice President SONY Pictures Entertainment
Who Made Money From Sony, AOL, Time Warner, Intel or IBM Stocks in the Last 6 Years and What Does this Have to Do with John Calkins? Ok So John Calkins was at Warner Bros. , He Covers Up a Trillion Dollar Technology Scam, Warner Bros. will some day have to pay the price on. John Calkins, while at Warner Brothers was part of a Warner Bros. Stolen Technology Scam whereby John Calkins knowingly Allowed Warner Brothers to Use Propietary Information from the Iviewit Company even after Signing a Confidentiality Agreement, Once the Technology Was EXPOSED to Warner Brothers after they Promised, in Good Faith ... Secrecy and Confidentiality.. .Well Warner Brothers Took the Technology Started Using it and Well that was in 2002...
So with John Calkins Mis-Hap, Error, Lie ... Whatever you Want To Call it, well Warner Brothers Videos were far superior in quality then ever before and took much less bandwidth to create. Time Warner Inc. made a whole lot of Money from This Stolen Technology, no Doubt about it.
Back to Connecting the Dots on John Calkins Role in All This.
Did John Calkins Get the Credit for this "discovery" HE STOLE, then did John Calkins use this on his Resume to be the Head Honcho at Lieberfarb and Associates, Started by DVD Mega-Man Warren Lieberfarb ? And did John Calkins Use this Lie to to Getting Heavy Hitters in the IT business to be Clients at Warren Lieberfarb's Lieberfarb and Associates?
At what Point did Lieberfarb and Associates start 'Consulting' Intel Corp. as Now the Sony Big Shot John Calkins Brags about in Press Releases as Part of his Delusional Resume? Which he did not Brag about in the First Year of Lieberfarb and Associates Press Releases.
How did John Calkins get Intel to NEED tech Consulting from a Guy from Warner Bros. now at Lieberfarb and Associates ? My Guess is John Calkins had something that Intel Corp. wanted. Or John Calkins knew something Intel Corp. was Doing and Threatened to Expose Intel Corporation.
Ok so Now Where Did John Calkins Work at Before his Technology Stealing Job at Warner Brothers And Before his Job of " Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony Pictures Entertainment " ?
Well John Calkins Press Release For his Super Duper Sony Job Says "Prior to joining Warner Bros, Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office." So it Seems John Calkins has his Hands in All Kinds of Trouble, moving from Billion Dollar Company to Billion Dollar Company, Secrets and Propiertary information in hand.
And certainly lacking in Morals and Ethics, it is no Wonder Sony Wanted John Calkins or he Forced them Hire Him ... hmmmm... a Guy Like John Calkins Could Come in Handin...willing to Steal Technology, Possibly involved in Inside secrets that affect Stock Prices, has Heavy Hitter IT connections (not because of what he coudl to for them .. but my guess in title only as he had something on them.. just a guess)... a Guy who had all the Big IT Companies, Connected Attorneys and Industry Big Whigs eating out of his hand os he would not expose the Iviewit Situation that would Send Stocks Plummeting...
Ok So now about John Calkins and his Connections to McKinsey and Company
So in October of 2009 there was This Headline, "SEC Charges Intel, IBM, McKinsey & Company and Galleon Management for Insiders Trading". So We Know that Galleon is the Guy who CEO Paul Otellini was "Surprised" was involved with Insider Trading.
Now Intel and IBM are Both Using the Iviewit Stolen Technology, and both above the Law. Keep in mind that the Head of the USPTO (the US Patent Office) was a BIG patent Guy at IBM - so he will, no doubt insure IBM's best interest and Protect IBM. Ok So what do all these companies involved in Insider Trader have in Common ?
Well Knowledge of, and Use of the Iviewit Invention, they knew it was a Holy Grail Invention before they Stole it and with this, Economics 101 would say that if you knew any of this... knew that companies would soon have access to this Stolen Technology that would change the Internet Forever, change videos forever, be used in Simulators and so much more... well with this knowledge how in the WORLD could you RESIST not BUYING Stocks, share Secrets to other insiders so that when this Stolen Technology hit the market, the Stocks would Soar. And you would be Richer then you every Imagined you would be...
And being above the law and having connection in the USPTO, the Supreme Court, Political Power, Huge .. well Connected Law Firms in Your Pocket and Billions Upon Billions of Dollars at your Disposal YOU know that you will never be Held accountable for the Trillion Dollar Accounting Mistake made within these companies that would literally plummet the stock prices. So to keep this from happening, you would have to PAY off a lot of people in a lot of places...
There Would Be One Little Problem... Those Pesky Iviewit Inventors. However Controlling Judges, the State Bar, the SEC, the Patent Office, the Courts, the Attorney.. well this will be helpful in that. And WELL it may get Messy you may even have to Kill the Inventor to Keep this All QUIET... maybe say with a Car Bomb... if NOT Trillions in Stocks would be Worthless and the Secrets would Financially Bury Long Established Huge, Heavy Hitting, Billion Dollar Tech Companies World Wide, and We can't Have that.
So John Calkins and his Connections with McKinsey and Company and all these Names and Players, Surely the SEC is looking into John Calkins Connection to all this, he seems like the guy that has the most information and the most power in all this. I mean a Big Wig at Warner Brothers, then head of a Major IT Consulting Firm, now a Big Wig at Sony and Use to Work at McKinsey and Company, as an Associate Principal for 4 Years - Boy I sure Hope the SEC Connects All these Dots.
Stay Tuned for How this all Connects to H. Hickman Powell of Crossbow Ventures ...
www.DeniedPatent.com for More Information on the Iviewit Stolen Technology Scandal Involving all the Heavy Hitting IT Companies, and the Silencing of Inventors Rights.
John Calkins
So with John Calkins Mis-Hap, Error, Lie ... Whatever you Want To Call it, well Warner Brothers Videos were far superior in quality then ever before and took much less bandwidth to create. Time Warner Inc. made a whole lot of Money from This Stolen Technology, no Doubt about it.
Back to Connecting the Dots on John Calkins Role in All This.
Did John Calkins Get the Credit for this "discovery" HE STOLE, then did John Calkins use this on his Resume to be the Head Honcho at Lieberfarb and Associates, Started by DVD Mega-Man Warren Lieberfarb ? And did John Calkins Use this Lie to to Getting Heavy Hitters in the IT business to be Clients at Warren Lieberfarb's Lieberfarb and Associates?
At what Point did Lieberfarb and Associates start 'Consulting' Intel Corp. as Now the Sony Big Shot John Calkins Brags about in Press Releases as Part of his Delusional Resume? Which he did not Brag about in the First Year of Lieberfarb and Associates Press Releases.
How did John Calkins get Intel to NEED tech Consulting from a Guy from Warner Bros. now at Lieberfarb and Associates ? My Guess is John Calkins had something that Intel Corp. wanted. Or John Calkins knew something Intel Corp. was Doing and Threatened to Expose Intel Corporation.
Ok so Now Where Did John Calkins Work at Before his Technology Stealing Job at Warner Brothers And Before his Job of " Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony Pictures Entertainment " ?
Well John Calkins Press Release For his Super Duper Sony Job Says "Prior to joining Warner Bros, Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office." So it Seems John Calkins has his Hands in All Kinds of Trouble, moving from Billion Dollar Company to Billion Dollar Company, Secrets and Propiertary information in hand.
And certainly lacking in Morals and Ethics, it is no Wonder Sony Wanted John Calkins or he Forced them Hire Him ... hmmmm... a Guy Like John Calkins Could Come in Handin...willing to Steal Technology, Possibly involved in Inside secrets that affect Stock Prices, has Heavy Hitter IT connections (not because of what he coudl to for them .. but my guess in title only as he had something on them.. just a guess)... a Guy who had all the Big IT Companies, Connected Attorneys and Industry Big Whigs eating out of his hand os he would not expose the Iviewit Situation that would Send Stocks Plummeting...
Ok So now about John Calkins and his Connections to McKinsey and Company
So in October of 2009 there was This Headline, "SEC Charges Intel, IBM, McKinsey & Company and Galleon Management for Insiders Trading". So We Know that Galleon is the Guy who CEO Paul Otellini was "Surprised" was involved with Insider Trading.
Now Intel and IBM are Both Using the Iviewit Stolen Technology, and both above the Law. Keep in mind that the Head of the USPTO (the US Patent Office) was a BIG patent Guy at IBM - so he will, no doubt insure IBM's best interest and Protect IBM. Ok So what do all these companies involved in Insider Trader have in Common ?
Well Knowledge of, and Use of the Iviewit Invention, they knew it was a Holy Grail Invention before they Stole it and with this, Economics 101 would say that if you knew any of this... knew that companies would soon have access to this Stolen Technology that would change the Internet Forever, change videos forever, be used in Simulators and so much more... well with this knowledge how in the WORLD could you RESIST not BUYING Stocks, share Secrets to other insiders so that when this Stolen Technology hit the market, the Stocks would Soar. And you would be Richer then you every Imagined you would be...
And being above the law and having connection in the USPTO, the Supreme Court, Political Power, Huge .. well Connected Law Firms in Your Pocket and Billions Upon Billions of Dollars at your Disposal YOU know that you will never be Held accountable for the Trillion Dollar Accounting Mistake made within these companies that would literally plummet the stock prices. So to keep this from happening, you would have to PAY off a lot of people in a lot of places...
There Would Be One Little Problem... Those Pesky Iviewit Inventors. However Controlling Judges, the State Bar, the SEC, the Patent Office, the Courts, the Attorney.. well this will be helpful in that. And WELL it may get Messy you may even have to Kill the Inventor to Keep this All QUIET... maybe say with a Car Bomb... if NOT Trillions in Stocks would be Worthless and the Secrets would Financially Bury Long Established Huge, Heavy Hitting, Billion Dollar Tech Companies World Wide, and We can't Have that.
So John Calkins and his Connections with McKinsey and Company and all these Names and Players, Surely the SEC is looking into John Calkins Connection to all this, he seems like the guy that has the most information and the most power in all this. I mean a Big Wig at Warner Brothers, then head of a Major IT Consulting Firm, now a Big Wig at Sony and Use to Work at McKinsey and Company, as an Associate Principal for 4 Years - Boy I sure Hope the SEC Connects All these Dots.
Stay Tuned for How this all Connects to H. Hickman Powell of Crossbow Ventures ...
www.DeniedPatent.com for More Information on the Iviewit Stolen Technology Scandal Involving all the Heavy Hitting IT Companies, and the Silencing of Inventors Rights.
John Calkins
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)