John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell - Kenneth Rubenstein

Warner Brothers Insider Discusses Kenneth Rubenstein a
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...

Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...

Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either.

Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.

John Calkins - Chuck Dages - Alan E. Bell All have Known about this for Around 8 Years, and Have Done NOTHING to make it Right or to Warn Time Warner Inc. Stock Holders of this HUGE Liability. Where is Kevin Tsujihara and the Other Big Wigs at Warner in all This ? Well We intend to Tell you MORE with Each Passing Day.....

$$$$$

Smoking Gun Email Sent 8 Years Ago and Warner Bros. DID not Care then and they Do NOT Care Now. Why is Warner Bros. Above the Law, is it all Money and Who You Know?
$$$$$

"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM

To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
John Calkins
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;
Chuck Dages
Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com
Alan E. Bell

Subject: Iviewit

John,

In all the review we have done with Ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.

I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to Ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate.

At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.

Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.

We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.

In the fall of 2000 Iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.

Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing.

I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured,

as Jack Scanlon kept me up to date.

When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.

This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand. This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.

I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.

We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.

So to the other perspective....

We have an opportunity to establish a license with ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN.

In good faith we signed the confidentiality agreement, iviewit revealed their processes and techniques, and we now use those techniques in encoding.

As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.

I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.

If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.

As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW. I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.

Thanx,

David "

Source of Post

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf


So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins, Chuck Dages and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right?

My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.

Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company.

They Stole this Technology plain and Simple, they knowingly stole it, even one of their own questioned them on it and Warner Bros. Entertainment did NOTHING about it. Doesn't this Put Warner Bros. Entertainment shareholders at Risk?

Isn't the Company Liable?

Or is Warner Bros. Entertainment simply NOT worried because they know they are Above the Law with their Political and Court Connections and they are in the "Who You Know" Club?

Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Do you Have Any Information on Any of These Names and Players. Seriously Email Me your Story, it is Time to STOP Mega-Corporations from STOMPING on the Rights of Inventors.
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

www.DeniedPatent.com

the Truth

John Calkins - McKinsey and Company - Warner Bros., Time Warner Inc. - Lieberfarb and Associates - Senior Vice President SONY Pictures Entertainment

Who Made Money From Sony, AOL, Time Warner, Intel or IBM Stocks in the Last 6 Years and What Does this Have to Do with John Calkins?

Ok So John Calkins was at Warner Bros. , He Covers Up a Trillion Dollar Technology Scam, Warner Bros. will some day have to pay the price on. John Calkins, while at Warner Brothers was part of a Warner Bros. Stolen Technology Scam whereby John Calkins knowingly Allowed Warner Brothers to Use Propietary Information from the Iviewit Company even after Signing a Confidentiality Agreement, Once the Technology Was EXPOSED to Warner Brothers after they Promised, in Good Faith ... Secrecy and Confidentiality.. .Well Warner Brothers Took the Technology Started Using it and Well that was in 2002...

So with John Calkins Mis-Hap, Error, Lie ... Whatever you Want To Call it, well Warner Brothers Videos were far superior in quality then ever before and took much less bandwidth to create. Time Warner Inc. made a whole lot of Money from This Stolen Technology, no Doubt about it.

Back to Connecting the Dots on John Calkins Role in All This.

Did John Calkins Get the Credit for this "discovery" HE STOLE, then did John Calkins use this on his Resume to be the Head Honcho at Lieberfarb and Associates, Started by DVD Mega-Man Warren Lieberfarb ? And did John Calkins Use this Lie to to Getting Heavy Hitters in the IT business to be Clients at Warren Lieberfarb's Lieberfarb and Associates?

At what Point did Lieberfarb and Associates start 'Consulting' Intel Corp. as Now the Sony Big Shot John Calkins Brags about in Press Releases as Part of his Delusional Resume? Which he did not Brag about in the First Year of Lieberfarb and Associates Press Releases.

How did John Calkins get Intel to NEED tech Consulting from a Guy from Warner Bros. now at Lieberfarb and Associates ? My Guess is John Calkins had something that Intel Corp. wanted. Or John Calkins knew something Intel Corp. was Doing and Threatened to Expose Intel Corporation.

Ok so Now Where Did John Calkins Work at Before his Technology Stealing Job at Warner Brothers And Before his Job of " Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony Pictures Entertainment " ?

Well John Calkins Press Release For his Super Duper Sony Job Says "Prior to joining Warner Bros, Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office." So it Seems John Calkins has his Hands in All Kinds of Trouble, moving from Billion Dollar Company to Billion Dollar Company, Secrets and Propiertary information in hand.

And certainly lacking in Morals and Ethics, it is no Wonder Sony Wanted John Calkins or he Forced them Hire Him ... hmmmm... a Guy Like John Calkins Could Come in Handin...willing to Steal Technology, Possibly involved in Inside secrets that affect Stock Prices, has Heavy Hitter IT connections (not because of what he coudl to for them .. but my guess in title only as he had something on them.. just a guess)... a Guy who had all the Big IT Companies, Connected Attorneys and Industry Big Whigs eating out of his hand os he would not expose the Iviewit Situation that would Send Stocks Plummeting...

Ok So now about John Calkins and his Connections to McKinsey and Company

So in October of 2009 there was This Headline, "SEC Charges Intel, IBM, McKinsey & Company and Galleon Management for Insiders Trading". So We Know that Galleon is the Guy who CEO Paul Otellini was "Surprised" was involved with Insider Trading.

Now Intel and IBM are Both Using the Iviewit Stolen Technology, and both above the Law. Keep in mind that the Head of the USPTO (the US Patent Office) was a BIG patent Guy at IBM - so he will, no doubt insure IBM's best interest and Protect IBM. Ok So what do all these companies involved in Insider Trader have in Common ?

Well Knowledge of, and Use of the Iviewit Invention, they knew it was a Holy Grail Invention before they Stole it and with this, Economics 101 would say that if you knew any of this... knew that companies would soon have access to this Stolen Technology that would change the Internet Forever, change videos forever, be used in Simulators and so much more... well with this knowledge how in the WORLD could you RESIST not BUYING Stocks, share Secrets to other insiders so that when this Stolen Technology hit the market, the Stocks would Soar. And you would be Richer then you every Imagined you would be...

And being above the law and having connection in the USPTO, the Supreme Court, Political Power, Huge .. well Connected Law Firms in Your Pocket and Billions Upon Billions of Dollars at your Disposal YOU know that you will never be Held accountable for the Trillion Dollar Accounting Mistake made within these companies that would literally plummet the stock prices. So to keep this from happening, you would have to PAY off a lot of people in a lot of places...

There Would Be One Little Problem... Those Pesky Iviewit Inventors. However Controlling Judges, the State Bar, the SEC, the Patent Office, the Courts, the Attorney.. well this will be helpful in that. And WELL it may get Messy you may even have to Kill the Inventor to Keep this All QUIET... maybe say with a Car Bomb... if NOT Trillions in Stocks would be Worthless and the Secrets would Financially Bury Long Established Huge, Heavy Hitting, Billion Dollar Tech Companies World Wide, and We can't Have that.

So John Calkins and his Connections with McKinsey and Company and all these Names and Players, Surely the SEC is looking into John Calkins Connection to all this, he seems like the guy that has the most information and the most power in all this. I mean a Big Wig at Warner Brothers, then head of a Major IT Consulting Firm, now a Big Wig at Sony and Use to Work at McKinsey and Company, as an Associate Principal for 4 Years - Boy I sure Hope the SEC Connects All these Dots.

Stay Tuned for How this all Connects to H. Hickman Powell of Crossbow Ventures ...

www.DeniedPatent.com for More Information on the Iviewit Stolen Technology Scandal Involving all the Heavy Hitting IT Companies, and the Silencing of Inventors Rights.
John Calkins

Warner Bros. Internal Emails - they Signed Confidentiality Agreements and STOLE the Technology.

Warner Brothers Insider Discusses Kenneth Rubenstein a
nd Issues Surrounding the Iviewit Stolen Patent...

Now Keep in Mind As you Read this...

Ken Rubenstein Patent Attorney for Proskauer the AOLTW/WB checked with... is who Iviewit is Accusing of Major Fraud on the USPTO - of Which the USPTO does not seem to have issue with and Proskaur Rose seems to Have No Problem with Either. Kenneth Rubenstein claimed under deposition and to a civil court that he does not know anything about the Iviewit Companies, the Iviewit Patents, or the Inventor Eliot Bernstein.

$$$$$

"From: David.Colter@warnerbros.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:51 AM

To: John.calkins@warnerbros.com
Cc: CHuck.dages@warnerbros.com;

Alan.Bell@warnerbros.com

Subject: iviewit
Page 1 of 2
3/26/2003

John,

In all the review we have done with ivieiwit it seems to boil down to the status of the patents and their inherent value. At that point it is a risk-reward evaluation -- without awarded patents it is difficult to completely assess the value.


I would suggest that we consider one other perspective... Prior to ivieiwit (approx Feb 2000) the video we (WB Online) delivered on the web was QCIF (160x120) or smaller and was below full frame rate. At the time of our first meeting we also identified On2 along with ivieiwit as two solid players who could deliver full screen full frame rate web video. All who saw it were impressed.

Greg and I visited ivieiwit in August and reported back that they had filed patents on scaling techniques that hinged upon a visual 'trick' which allowed the human eye to accept 320x240 video scaled to 640x480 at 30 fps as close to VHS quality.

We checked with Ken Rubenstein and others who provided some solid support for ivieiwit, and Chris Cookson asked Greg and I to continue to work with Ivieiwit in an R&D capacity.

In the fall of 2000 iviewit also met with a number of folks at WB Online (in September and October) and demonstrated their process and techniques to Sam Smith, Houston, Joe Annino and others.

Sam contacted ivieiwit a number of times and requested the patents, along with specifics of the ivieiwit process to evaluate what they were doing. I was not part of these meetings, but was aware they had occured, as Jack Scanlon kept me up to date.

When I sat down with Morgan and Houston in March 2001 to see what technology they were using to encode video, it was clear that they were using some of the techniques that would overlap with iviewit's filed process patents (still pending), but it is not clear that these were all learned from Iviewit -- we may wish to explore this a little.

This meeting was to determine what equipment we would get for our lab at 611 Brand.

This same information was also provided to ivieiwit by Morgan as they were establishing the company as an outsourcing facility for encoding our content.

I am aware of several meeting held between ivieiwit and WB Online to share information of techniques and process, and was invited to a few of them.

We all signed ivieiwit's confidentiality agreement.

So to the other perspective....

We have an opportunity to establish a license with Ivieiwit for a modest fee at this time, and establish a MFN. In good faith we signed the confidentiality agreement, iviewit revealed their processes and techniques, and we now use those techniques in encoding.

As we have discussed on a few occasions, these techniques now appear in the public domain to some extent in documentation for Real Producer, WMP Developer Guides, Media Cleaner Pro, etc, but they were not available in 2000.


I would not suggest we learned the techniques completely from Iviewit (I actually do not know the answer), but a modest licensing fee may be appropriate and honorable considering our good faith relationship in signing the confidentiality doc.

If we choose to pass at this time the risk is primarily from iviewit's main investor, Crossbow Ventures, gaining control of the IP and approaching WB later for a license -- I do not believe they will be as friendly considering their dealings with ivieiwit and it's employees since Feb of 2001. It is estimated that the patents will be completed in 8-12 months.

As you are all aware I have a personal relationship with Eliot Bernstein, the founder of iviewit, and as a result, I left the evaluations and decisions to Greg, and others, and only assisted iviewit to get to the correct people in WB and AOLTW.

I wanted to add this perspective as we consider if there is an option to pursue with iviewit -- they are facing continued financial pressure right now. There are many other threads to our interaction with iviewit and I would be happy to discuss.

Thanx,

David "

Source of Post

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf

So Warner Bros. Signed a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, John Calkins and the Others mentioned above knew full well that that were using the Iviewit Coding and What Have they Done in all these years to Make This Right? My guess is to Line Their Pockets with Gold. Now the Author of this Email seems to have a conscience, seems to be a good guy... why he was not listened to is a Serious Unanswered Question.

Warner Bros., Warner Brothers, Warner Home Video, WB Online - they Use this Stolen Technology after they Signed a Confidentiality agreement and were Shown this Technology by the Iviewit Company. They Stole this Technology plain and Simple, they knowingly stole it, even one of their own questioned them on it and Warner Bros. Entertainment did NOTHING about it. Doesn't this Put Warner Bros. Entertainment shareholders at Risk? Isn't the Company Liable? Or is Warner Bros. Entertainment simply NOT worried because they know they are Above the Law with their Political and Court Connections and they are in the "Who You Know" Club?

Well Stay Tuned as Our Industry Whistleblower Network Explores and Exposes ALL the Boys in this Post... Email me your Story Crystal@CrystalCox.com

www.DeniedPatent.com

the Truth

John Calkins became President of Lieberfarb and Associates in 2004

What was John Calkins Doing before he became President of Lieberfarb and Associates in 2004 ? Well we know that John Calkins Joined Warner Bros. Entertainment in 2000 - We know that in January 2002 John Calkins was made aware of the HUGE Trillion Dollar Liability that
Warner Bros. Entertainment would Face with the Iviewit Stolen Patent Issue.

We Don't Know if John Calkins was Paid Off to Keep quite on this, or if he had any Obligation to the Warner Bros. Shareholders or anyone Else in the Time Warner, AOL Company.

We Do know that Lieberfarb and Associates was Founded in 2003 by Lieberfarb. We don't know if Lieberfarb was an Old Friend of John Calkins or how he really came to hire John Calkin as the President of his firm that Conviently happens to "provides senior level counsel to media and technology companies regarding the creation, development, marketing and distribution of traditional and new forms of entertainment. The firm's clients include many leading entertainment, consumer electronics and IT heavy weights, including Microsoft, Toshiba, Best Buy, Samsung and Columbia House. The firm is also actively evaluating new ways to deliver media via emerging forms of digital technology. " per the Link Below.

So with the Secret Iviewit Information and all the money and Connections that come from being a part of Stonewalling the the REAL Inventors - John Calkin was now the expert in such matters, and seemingly with no accountability for What He Knew or the Damage his Silent Fraud did while at Warner Bros. Entertainment.


Do these IT heavy weights that Lieberfarb and Associates brag about representing, Do They know about John Calkins concealment of Information? Does Microsoft, Toshiba, Best Buy, Samsung and Columbia House know who they are dealing with? Lieberfarb and Associates also brags about "actively evaluating new ways to deliver media via emerging forms of digital technology". Gee I would be careful with that... John Calkins was fully aware of Iviewit's Stolen Patent and how it implicated Warner Bros. Entertainment and What did he Do to Help these Victimized Inventors?

From Theme Parks to High Tech, Deeply Advanced Technology? Hmmm..

this transition makes no sense to me and I would dare to say that John Calkin made Some Deals somewhere, how did he go from a Theme Park, Retail sort of a guy to a Tech Geek and though Lieberfarb and Associates just started in 2003 (2 years after John Calkin was informed of the Iviewit Patent Issue) - from 2003 to the date of the article below which is dated November 2004 Lieberfarb and Associates somehow, in that short time became "universally acknowledged to be the architect of the entertainment industry transforming DVD" -

Oh or did Warren Lieberfarb already have this "Universally Acknowledged" title and if so, then did John Calkin, after finding about the Iviewit Technology, cut a deal with Warren Lieberfarb ?

I mean it certainly would be nice to be someone so Admired and "Acknowledged" to control this kind of technology, and what connections does Warren Lieberfarb to Warner Bros. Entertainment - to Proskauer Rose and Who is Really at the Top of the Heap in Profitting from the Stolen Patent of the Iviewit Holdings Company?

Now why did Warren Lieberfarb Leave Warner Home Video, a position he relinquished in early 2003 ? And what part did Warner Home Video play in Using the Iviewit Patent without Compensating the Inventors of the Technology?

Foul Play on Top of Foul Play and Nobody Seems to be Paying any Attention to Any of it. Meanwhile Crooks and Thieves like Warren Lieberfarb and John Calkins along with Warner Bros. Entertainment can Do as They Please, are Above the Law, Own the Courts, Control the USPTO and inventors... YOU Have NOT Rights...

$$$$$$

Article and Source Below

http://www.allbusiness.com/media-telecommunications/movies-sound-recording-movie/5548437-1.html

Archived News from Nov. of 2004
"LOS ANGELES -- Warren N. Lieberfarb, Chairman and Founder of Lieberfarb & Associates, announced today the appointment of John Calkins as the firm's President, charged with day-to-day responsibility for all aspects of Lieberfarb & Associates' business operations.
Calkins joined

Warner Bros. Entertainment in 2000 and most recently served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Business Development and Strategy.

While at Warner Bros., John Calkins was intimately involved in the studio's entry into technology-driven applications such as wireless distribution, multi-player video gaming, and Video-on-Demand. He was instrumental in the creation of Movielink, the five-studio joint venture to distribute theatrically released motion pictures on the Internet.

Lieberfarb & Associates was founded by Lieberfarb in 2003 as a consulting firm that provides senior level counsel to media and technology companies regarding the creation, development, marketing and distribution of traditional and new forms of entertainment.

The firm's clients include many leading entertainment, consumer electronics and IT heavy weights, including Microsoft, Toshiba, Best Buy, Samsung and Columbia House. The firm is also actively evaluating new ways to deliver media via emerging forms of digital technology.

Commenting on the appointment of Calkins as President, Lieberfarb stated, "John's decision to join us in building Lieberfarb & Associates is a very significant step in the growth of our business. John possesses the rare combination of a deep understanding of the entertainment business and, also, of the role technology has played and will increasingly play in the future of media.

Along with Howard Osa and the other professionals in our company, John and I will be able to offer insights to our clients that few other firms can provide.

I look forward to working closely with John as we enable both technology and media companies to develop cutting-edge yet practical strategies for the delivery of digital entertainment to consumers."

Prior to joining Warner Bros., Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office. During his four years at McKinsey, Calkins developed strategic recommendations for companies in such diverse industries as theme parks, the Internet and retailing.

Calkins also held positions with Trammell Crow Company and Pepsico's Taco Bell restaurant division. Calkins received his MBA from Duke University's Fuqua School of Business in 1989.

Warren Lieberfarb is universally acknowledged to be the architect of the entertainment industry transforming DVD.

His successful ten-year effort to persuade the consumer electronics, information technology and the entertainment industries to accept his vision for DVD occurred while Lieberfarb was at the helm of Warner Home Video, a position he relinquished in early 2003. Lieberfarb & Associates operates as a unique consulting firm focused on the intersection of digital technology and entertainment. The firm has been retained on a long-term basis by many of the leading technology and entertainment companies. "

$$$$$$

Related Post
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/01/letter-from-aol-time-warner-regarding.html

John Calkins, Lieberfarb and Associates

Wayne Smith Warner Bros. Entertainment - When is it Time to Do the Right Thing?

Iviewit Pending Patents - Kenneth Rubenstein ...

What Does Warner Bros. have to Say about Signing a Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit and Completely Ignorning its Existence?

I Guess Warner Brothers answers to NO One, they are Above the Law and well One of those Too Big To Fail Scenerios Right?

Does Warner Bros. have connections to Judges, USPTO Connections, Proskauer Rose Connections... what is REALLY Going On here?

Folks Check Out the Link Below and ask how your US Justice Systme has let these Billion Dollar Tech companies continue to be above the LAWS that the Rest of Us Have to Follow.

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf

So What Did John Calkins Do at Warner Bros. Entertainment ?

He joined Warner Bros. as its Vice President of New Media Business Development in 2000.

So what Does this Mean Exactly? What it says to me is the "New Media" meaning any new invention that comes across my desk, I will squash the inventor, steal the technology and take the credit, then I Will get Big Job Offers at New "heavy hitting IT consultant Firms" where I will then get an offer from SONY to be a wig over there...

If you Look at When John Calkins Joined Warner Bros. Entertainment and let's not forget before that he was into Theme Parks and Retail... Right? Ok then at Warner Bros. in a few Short years he created enough Clout to move on to Lieberfarb and Associates and "Consult" heavy hitting IT Companies such as "Intel Corp." - ok then a couple of years later is the Senior VP of Corporate Development at Sony Pictures.

Ok so in 2000 "In strategic planning and business development, leading the newly combined department will be John Calkins and Gary Meisel, who become Senior Vice Presidents, Corporate Business Development & Strategy. " and Well From the Moment he "Overlooked" the Breach of the Iviewit Confidentiality Agreement He Started Zinging up the Corporate Latter...

My Guess is this is NOT a Well Deserved Concidence but instead a "Who You Know" and "What you Know about them" Sort of a Deal.


Links for Your Research

http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,669285,00.html

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patentforfraud.htm
John Calkins

Warner Bros. - they Signed a Confidentiality Agreement and then Used the Invention Without Compensating the Inventor.

Shocking but True, we have seen from Internal Warner Brother Company emails that THEY certainly did not and years later, like 7 years.. have FAILED to do the RIGHT thing in the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent Heist.

The question of Why, begs to be answered. However, it is unlikely that we will ever get a Real Answer. Maybe John Calkins has an answer and maybe John Calkins has seen some career advancements over 7 years as the Iviewit inventors are Bombed, faced with Economic Terror, Denied Due Process, Harassed and Cheated out of their Quality of Life, their Livlihood, there Compensation for something they Really Did Event and have given almost a Decade now to fighting this corruption with Warner Bros. Gets Richer and RICHER of of the Iviewit Stolen Technology.

www.Iviewit.TV

Read this Site, it is Powerful information

on Just How Corrupt Our US Courts are and

How the FBI, the FTC, the SEC, the Department of Justice,

the USTPO and the Attorney General DOES not Care.

Corrupt Courts